Bickering and Complaining about CW's containment thread.

>>25609086
This is bad and you should feel bad

if this is a thread for complaining im going to just expand for a bit and complain about one of the rules.

>no contactfagging
can we please have an amendment to the rules of soc?

who thought of this? why is this even in place?

i met my current girlfriend on soc because we were contactfagging.

keep in mind this was 2 years ago but seriously how are you supposed to meet people otherwise? not to mention half the threads on here whether it be kik, skype, snapchat, discord, ideal mate, are all focused around contacting people.

it just doesnt make any sense and to be honest i get pretty annoyed when i see threads that say no contactfagging .

again this doesnt affect me now anyway but if we had "followed the rules" i wouldnt have met the girl im going to marry.

>>25609281
I agree to a point, asking for someones kik/snapchat is ok but obviously doing it over and over is annoying.
I honestly think this rule is more in place to keep people on the boards and chatting than anything else.
Also, is it just me or has this place been more dead lately? Im slow to the game but wtf happened...? Summer ending...? Even during the schoolyear, feels like there is more activity.

>>25609312
i mean i understand the repetitive asking is annoying. but in general people will lay off once rejected just as a typical human reaction.

the other point of it being to keep people on the board, i mean i guess but there is always going to be a need for the board regardless.

and yes this place has been dead asf recently. i think its becoming a bit obsolete or rather talking anonymously has lost its appeal.

now theres all sorts of social media where you can keep yourself anonymous but at the same
time have a profile which tracks activity.

so i think the biggest issue is there isnt ever really an influx of new people.

Well there has been a bunch of nastyness of late. Also, the CW's get busy over the summer, when there is a lot to do outside, and drift back in the wintertime when they are cooped up indoors.

>>25609223
Why? I had to kill / sage out the last /SBT/ thread, it was so cancerous, and start a new one. MOD even posted in the previous one warning people to quit bickering.

A common example:
If a girl shaves off her pubes, don't whine about it.

If a girl doesn't shave her pubes, don't whine about that either.

Just be happy you are getting to see something. The pubesfags bickering with the shavedpubes fags and making the CW feel bad, damm sure isn't helping anything. That's why I made this thread, come whine all you want over here, and if the CW's want to read about, they can come and do so. otherwise, they aren't bothered.

>>25609450
the nastiness i see is mainly guys against guys though.

theres always some people who harass the cam girls but recently theres TONS of guys calling other guys: betas, pathetic, virgins, cucks, desperate etc. this is very annoying as you know nothing about the other person and their motivations for posting.

also there seems to be a general lack of attention when people post. like people arent really reading what the other person writes. this decreases conversation value on the board itself.

oh also while i have the floor i cant stand
>>25609500

the girl in the op pic. no bickering involved. i just dont like her look.

>>25609281
That rule is in place in cw thread because there were a good number of cases where that said contactfag ended up stalking and blackmailing said cw over her nude pics.
That usually happens after some altercation over whatever contact app they used, someone gets blocked or removed and that contactfag gets bitter over it and stalks her facebook. There was a case where the guy sent a cw's nudes
to her parents either because he was mad or did it for the lel epic lolz.

If a cw wants to contact someone they usually just go into a contact thread, but thats on their own risk. And of course there was that famous case of the dude tracking down one girls address and sending necklaces.
Followed by spamming the thread she posted in with, "your necklace is in the mail"

Theres a reason that rule has been in place for nearly half a decade anon, thats nice you found your gf on here but thats a totally different topic.
Plus why are you trying to contact cw if your taken already? No one who didn't contactfag would be upset about this

>>25609696
its outdated. people understand internet security now and how to remain anonymous.

also can you read? i clearly stated that i am not trying to contactfag. please learn to read asshole. i am just arguing the point that it seems useless and outdated.

>>25609706
>people understand internet security now

LOOOOL

Are you that stupid??

>>25609706
No way man someone recently got stalked in a thread here, it happens all the time .And it'll keep happening as long as new generations of anons keep finding this board.
I feel like you need to spend more time in this shitpool before you can start complaining about the rules

>>25609716
This
I wanted to put it the way you did, but that would have been mean
Some anon understand security some don't thats the way the world works

>>25609716
>>25609725
>loyalist cucks
sorry faggots i know what it means to be a true patriot.

if they cant handle the responsibility of their own contact information they shouldnt be posting.

>>25609729
Wow lol okay mr pol insult very grown up of you

>>25609669
Does have creepy hands lol.

>>25609669

She should get banned for paywhoring. But alas the mods on this board are all SJW idiots.
They seem to be too occupied with all the dick rate threads.

>>25609498
>the nastiness i see is mainly guys against guys though.

Correct. Most of the nastiness is guys throwing insults back and forth, but what that does is generate a somewhat poisonous thread environment, and that in turn stops girls from posting, because all they see is a bunch of redpilled arseholes being unnecessarily mean to people.

>>25609469
Why? Because this whole idea of this place is to be civil to the girls and to request and get lewds.
The reason threads get ruined is because anons get self righteous and feel the need to shit on the girls.

So creating a breeding ground for dumb fucking virgins to shit on us is a terrible idea. You're a fucking idiot.

>>25610569
Its also arguably against the rules, I'm surprised the mods havent deleted it yet

>>25610569
if youre so upset about it then dont camwhore. nobody is forcing you to post.
>>25611549
also how is this against the rules? actually this thread makes about as much sense as the board itself. this is a containment thread. soc is a containment board.

as far as i remember the whole purpose of this board was containment from /b/

>>25610569
No, the idea is people need to take their arguing to another thread, and keep it out of the CW threads. The CW threads are for enjoying the girls posting, not fighting. If a CW actually wanted to be criticized, she would start a roast me thread. A lot of these girls are here to get some self confidence in how they look, especially the first time posters. They don't need to be driven off by the bickering.

what is CW

>>25611549
A mod prolly made this

>>25611651
>implying I don't "get" it
K

>>25611607
>Be Civil to CWs
>Makes a thread specifically designed to give people a place to shit on CWs
are you retarded?

>>25612291
thats not the rule sweetheart.
the closest thing is
>be respectful to each other

which nobody does on here anyway.

this thread is better than people
shitting up normal threads.

>>25611654
CW stands for Cam Whore. While I don't like that term, it is the most commonly used one.

>>25612291
The idea is keep it out of the CW picture threads. If they give a shit about the whiners, they can come to this thread and read what they have to say. Otherwise the girls don't have to be exposed to it.

>>25612414
Yeah but no ones going to come here to bitch so this is just another retarded excuse for faggots to complaint about shit

There's already a "secrets feelings vent" thread
This shit is obsolete

>>25612679
doesnt it feel good to have a place to complain? youre doing it right now. i feel good knowing theres a thread we can just shit up.

maybe the title is wrong, maybe instead of it being camwhore complaints we could have a complaints general.

just a thread where we can rant and complain and argue, just because its fun.

and you sound like a faggot

>>25612690
That's literally what /adv/ is for

I've spent years complaining about shit in 4chan, I'm over it. I just want to see people get naked for me. Take this shit elsewhere
>>>/trash/

>>25612696
unless a mod moves it, this is an appropriate home for it. so gtfo out of my thread asshole.

note im not the op but im enjoying myself so i think ill bunker down here for a while.

>>25612711
Waah waah

>>25612866
lmao funny i enjoyed this
it just goes to show how impressionable the kids are.
>>25612785
eh 3/10

>>25612866
Abdou pls

>>25612679
Hey, if it helps keep the CW threads a bit cleaner, it has done its job.

>>25612886
But it won't... why would it? No one is going to seek out an alternate thread to vent when they're active in a thread and something is pissing them off
Besides, most of the "bickering" is trolls whose sole aim is to derail a thread or get a girl to stop posting
You're a fucking numbskull if you think this would work

>>25612892
In short, the mods just need to do a better job and get rid of the faggotass janis that have obvious vendettas against posters

>>25612892
Well, if it dicourages the bickerers, then it is helping. You note I linked to the mod comment to stop the bickering. Perhaps this shall encourage mods to start kicking for derailing the thread.

>>25612899
Stop fucking using the word "bicker" we don't live in fucking medieval England

>>25612892
>>25612893
>>25612899
lmao the "bickerers" the more this word is used the funnier it gets. and maybe it doesnt help anyone but it might. its worth trying.
>>25612895
the rules are rarely enforced as it is so im not sure if this would help. keep in mind i like that they are pretty liberal with the rules.

i guess the new issue is that camwhores arent as fleeting as they were. now we have people who have been around for long periods of time.

in the past there was never anything like this, people would troll them, nobody cared because next week there would be a new girl.

things are changing i guess and it makes me sad. this used to be a fun place but everyone is so sensitive now.

>>25612918
So you're just bitter that girls hang around, so you get bored and try to scare them away? And now you're buttflustered that it isn't working? Pretty hilarious. I'll keep posting just to piss you off, homes

>>25612904
You forgot to put "Reeeeeeeeee" at the beginning of your sentence.


>>25612918
ty

>>25612929
this isnt the time to use that
>>25612931
no im not so much against the girls as i am against the guys who worship them.
there was a reason they were called camWHORES in the first place. not worshipgirls.

what are some good shg posters to balance out the cancer that is Hux???

>>25612943
Eloquent

>>25612956
>were
They're still camwhores. Calm your tits, Daniel

>>25612961
>things
and professor oak was def in charge. if he said no you didnt get on that bike.
>>25612972
it took a bit to get people but this thread is probablt funnier than like 95% of the other threads rn.

>>25612976
Every thread I'm in is hilarious.
Eh I dunno man i fucking love this shitshow of a board. We're such a cancer.

>>25612962
Canadianon has short hair, but rarely posts anymore.

There is always Caela after a haircut.............. :P

>>25612962
Alice was just posting

>>25612414
>sweetheart
am i talking to another girl? lmao, do you just want this thread around to be a petty bitch to other women?

>>25612980
me top thats all i want, my cancer board back. where i can say what i want and mean what i say.
>>25613023
lol the poor are always arguing.
>>25613027
im a guy bb i was calling you sweetheart because youre such a nice girl.

>>25613048
nah, you're a girl lmao

>>25613054
>>25613062
One way to sort of find out, do a vocaroo of you reading out your id from the thread, and post the link here.

>>25613080
Lol i wasn't the one bickering with you, I was just trying to interpose myself in the argument, since there was some people calling each other girls. From reading back, perhaps you both are?

Kind of expected it would just be guys arguing in this thread to be honest.

>>25613054
you know me too well, they may be pointless but it is entertaining.
>>25613062
if i was a girl i would def be a lesbian.
one time some girl told me i was too straight. im like wtf how r u too straight?

>>25613095
are you meh or something

>>25613023
It's amazing growing up with 4chan! I'm forever grateful for this shithole.

Am glad that some of the "bickering" is going on in this thread, instead of the ones for the Girls to post and chat in. This thread is serving its purpose.

> What else do you want?

I would like to find the woman who is right for me, and I am right for her, and to have it actually work out to spend our lives together. That is what I want in life, but doesn't seem like that was meant to be.

>>25613098
Omg it does sound like him

>>25613109
yea honestly im like 99.9999% sure its him which explains a lot

>>25613098
this actually made me laugh. please do not associate me with that guy. too funny
>>25613104
yeah me too its too much fun
>>25613105
i read >>25613098 and then >>25613105
so many lulz

>>25613123
post a pic of yourself and then i'll believe you

>>25613119
Since you feel this thread will work somehow here's my complaint: this bitch feeds every troll and responds to the stupidest most obvious bait, but when I give her actual constructive advice she's a cunt
If camwhores didn't take the bait there'd be significantly less """"bickering"""""

>>25613129
listen babe if i was meh, this thread would have been spammed with pictures already. seriously that guy is a laugh and a half specifically that he became "meh" like thats how people refer to him. so funny.
>>25613134
i laughed at the link. oh god what has this place become.

>>25613153
>babe
please stop talking to me like this meh its really fucking gross and i dont want your disease ridden ginger cock

>>25613160
its funny there was one other time i was on here and someone else also accused me of being meh.

i dont really look at his threads since he often just has his cock out but why do i sound like him?

>>25613123

well glad could cheer you up tonight Anon.

>>25613186
because you are him you retarded cuck now fuck off back to your containment thread where you only talk to yourself

>>25613190
yeah honestly i needed it ive been sick (physically) for a long time. i finally got the correct medication so im feeling better.
>>25613212
you must want him or something you sound obsessed.

>>25613244
Good that you are getting better now anon.

>>25614066
yep pretty much ruined my whole summer. all because doctors are a bunch of clowns. seriously i have no respect for them after this.

>>25609086
Great idea OP!!!

>>25609086
Bumping

What this thread has taught me : anon love all CW, but hate other anon

>>25617188
thats def not true at all
the camwhores get graded as harshly as all other anons.

>>25609706
Man I hear horror stories all the time of people finding the most minute detail in the background of a photo and finding out where you live over that.

>>25619120
yeah well they could do that with any picture then. so with that logic nobody should ever post a picture on the internet.

>>25619159
Well, if I post a harmless selfie, and they cross reference it to another harmless selfie, they have no leverage because nobody gives a shit about harmless selfies. If I post nudes, which are taboo and have serious power over women in particular, that can be used as leverage.

You shouldn't post any risky images of yourself on the internet unless you're prepared for that possibility, I agree with that.

>>25619177
i like you because you can actually follow my logic.

>>25619198
That's why camming's a risky business. I did it for a little while when I was at my lowest, but it made me super anxious because I knew if one of these guys really wanted to, they could out me to the world and ruin my life. I had fun doing it, I loved the attention because fuck it was the only attention I'd ever get on a weekly basis from men, but I quit because I was too scared. I know my pics are saved somewhere, so I'll never be out of the woods, I can be ruined at any time if they want to, but idk I guess I just decided to stop adding fuel to the fire.

>>25619221
hmm idk what it is but you are kind of hot. just your thoughts i like

>>25619249
Well thank you. I'm realistic. I may not like a lot of shit, like how it's just socially so much worse to have a boob pic out there than a dick pic, but I know that's how it is and ain't shit I can do to change it in my lifetime. Gotta play with the cards you're dealt, even if you have some shitty cards mixed in with the good ones.

>>25619120
Tfw once nearly posted a pic with mail on bed in background

>>25619177
That line of thinking was valid maybe 5-10 years ago but a lot has changed, esp because of the Fappening. Now all a person really has to do is claim that they were photos intended for a single person who later shared them without permission, and revenge porn is a crime in at least a few jurisdictions.

Also consider how common posting nudes has become elsewhere, especially Reddit. It's no longer something taboo and unacceptable, but rather something women can do to earn a few dollars on the side, which is a total reversal from say the -chan heydays on /b/ so long ago.

>>25619221
I'm not going to say your feelings are invalid, and if you felt like you were losing control over something that you felt could ruin your life then certainly I support your decision. However there's still an incredible amount of anonymity. Let's say your photos are saved somewhere. 1) Chances are they're in some obscure gallery that isn't easily accessible, nor would there be any relevant information that's unique to you (probably something like 'Hot nude teen Blonde slut naked selfies'). 2) Even if you were given a nickname on 4chan, the overwhelming majority of girls, probably 99.9998% of the named girls who posted hundreds of photos, fell into obscurity. Puddems, who also posted on Reddit before camwhoring there blew up, is the exception that proves the rule and there are maybe two or three other girls in the entire history of /soc/ who do, too. FMU is another one and surprise surprise: it's because she posted on Reddit as well. 3) You might have heard or believe that once something has been uploaded it's there forever and there's nothing you can do: the problem with that mentality is that ignores the fact that there are BILLIONS if not TRILLIONS of amateur pornographic photos on the internet and the chances of yours being remarkable enough are incredibly low.

>>25619280
lol I freaked out enough when I accidentally forgot to crop a photo before I uploaded it and you could see part of one of my paintings on the wall. I deleted the photo as fast as I could and also ripped down all the pictures of that painting I posted on my social media too for good measure. Still bothers me there's no really taking that back, even though I know it's unlikely to be found. I know the second they're uploaded on here some anon is saving them, you can never be fast enough.

>>25619262
>>25619298
i dont like alot of shit either. and i laughed because i can relate. ive sent dick pics a few times and its like so much paranoia.

i guess part of me is like, people do this shit all the time why cant i have some fun. but then i sit there and think someone is gonna find it and show everyone. i know where you are coming from.

>>25619284
The courts simply do not care that much about an individual person though, they know you'd waste more time and money taking someone to court than it's actually worth, and also the burden of proof is difficult to maintain. You can claim shit all you want, but the proof all leads back to you posting it on a public fourm such as 4chan. You'd lose that case in a second if a judge even bothered to look at it while he was taking a dump.
The fappening only got wind because it was a class action thing. If you're running a website that is advertising itself as revenge porn, yes you're gonna get the hundreds of girls lawyer's attention. If you're just one channer who willingly posted photos to a public forum and they get traced back to you, then you have zero legal case.
>t. have lawyer fags in the family.
Besides, even if you win the suit, doesn't change your fate. You still have nudes that are attached to your identity all over the internet for every employer who google's your name to find.

>No longer taboo and unacceptable.
Tell that to any employer, ever. Especially white collar jobs. You can't be a teacher if you have nudes out there, you can't be a laywer, you can't be in any high position because it's true like it or not, people look down on CW's, strippers, and people in the sex industry alike. Even in 2017. It's not as accepted as feminists would like us to believe, I wish it were believe me

>>25619284
Oh I know nobody likely remembers me. I had such a short stint and there are millions of us out there, and hell I'm not even that hot. I know I'm not special in the slightest, but still, just takes one person to take interest, then I can flush my life down the crapper.

>>25619320
dont get me started on employers. seriously its like legal slavery. i dont mean to get down on you, but this is seriously one of the biggest reasons i dont want to be alive.

i cant fucking live in a world where you have to pay this pay that, lick someones asshole so you can have a job. who the fuck thought this type of society was a good idea? the people at the top who control everything.

people like me and you we are dispensable.

>>25619320
What do you think is really happening? You can't be a teacher if you have nudes "out there"?
This is a dumb line of thinking. I don't think you've actually thought through this scenario. No white collar employee is looking at peoples nudes upon hiring. They do a cursory google search of your name and may try to lurk your Facebook page.
If you google yourself every once in a while and see what kinds of things come up, and you don't see your nudes, your potential employer won't either.

>>25619368
I don't mind working, I get it, nothing would ever function or get done if we all just sat on our asses all day. But I do agree, gotta be an equal trade for work/reward, which hasn't been the case for a while, and also my fucking private life should not be a factor at all in my work life.

If I wanna come home at the end of the day and take some nudes for channers online, I should be able to without getting fired for it. I ain't doing it at work, so why's work involved?

But at the same time, again, I know reputation is a thing and companies have to maintain it too. If people would just get off their high horse and stop abusing it it'd be better. Because holding someone's job over them is too big of leverage and we all know it. Thats why middle aged ladies who get pissy at JC Penney for being told they can't use an expired coupon always try to tell the manager to fire that employee. Because they know they can get back at that employee for telling them no by getting them fired.

And same goes with the ex boyfriend who is bitter about the breakup and has his ex's nudes, he can get her fired from her job and royally fuck her over. Or the disgruntled anon on 4chan. It is what it is.

>>25619378
Knew a girl who taught at a preschool, someone she pissed off took a pic of her smoking weed at a party on the weekend, forwarded it to her boss, she was fired the next day.

Friend of mine is a teacher who simply shares the same name as a porn star and has had to explain a couple times that they aren't the same person due to principals googling her name when interviewing her. It does happen.

And again, my argument is all it takes is one anon to connect my nudes to me, and make it so it comes up on every google search of my name to ruin my life. Once it's attached to your name it's game over.

>>25619395
Yeah, someone catching your smoking weed is completely different and incomparable. No one has ever been fired because of a nude photo they posted on /soc/ on 4chan. Knock on fcuking wood, but I think it is an extremely unlikely occurrence.

>>25619395
>>25619378
And keep in mind, I'm not saying its likely or probable, I'm just saying it's possible.

Even if the chance is extremely low, I still don't like them odds. The risk may seem small to you, but it's a much bigger deal to me. It's the same reason I triple up on birth control methods. Even though I know with my pill my odds of getting pregnant are next to nothing, but it's still possible. And sex just plain isn't that worth it to me if he doesn't want to wear a condom and pull out, sex isn't worth even that .01% chance of getting pregnant from using only the pill to me. Same as camming, camming just did not become worth the .000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% chance of it ruining my whole life. The anxiety of that extremely slim chance killed the enjoyment for me.

>>25619410
I'm sure it has happened at least once, you just may not have heard about it.

And again, that was one example, friend with the porn star name had a really rough time getting to even the interview stage when job hunting in school districts because they only THOUGHT those were her nudes/videos. And after a year out of college job hunting with no luck, and every single person she knew who graduated with her finding a job within that time, she started asking people to find out why she didn't make the cut. This is how she found out she shared a name with a porn star lol. One of her friends got hired at this school she had just gotten rejected from, so she had her friend ask the principal what gives. Low and behold, the principal told her, "I searched her on the web and found out she had inappropriate pictures online and she wasn't a good role model for our students and the parents would have had an absolute fit if they ever found out. Last thing we need is bad press"

>>25619384
wait a sec is that where you work? oh thats funny if its true i have a story for you.

>>25619424
Nah, but I worked at a similar chain. Had friends who did work at JCP, we'd relate our stories of customers telling us with "WELL X STORE/JCP WOULD HAVE DONE IT" and we're both like "Then please go shop there and never come back to our store again" lol

>>25619411
Oh so you're just batshit. I get it now. Carry on

File: 67b5a82b4f0c55b643a01701688abd00.gif (481KB, 499x315px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 499x315px

>>25619430
Whatever makes you feel better about yourself man.
If not thinking exactly the same way you do makes me batshit, then the whole world is batshit. And if you're the only one who's not, doesn't that make you the real batshit one?

>>25619428
ah i used to work there so i was gonna say i could relate 100% those places. low level retail.. they are some of the most abusive positions on the planet.

and look i get that people should work, hell i like to work, but i want to be able to do what i want. i dont want to have to work for someone. but almost anyway you slice it, you are going to work for someone whether its an employer or if its a customer or if its entertainment. thats why i cant do it.

i dont know if you understand, im not sure anyone does but i just cant do it.

>>25619446
Well I'll give if you're still in the slave wage market, I understand completely. All min wage jobs are extremely unbalanced since min wage isn't a living wage anymore. You get paid pennies for arguably some of the hardest work with zero respect from management or customers. I'd never felt more powerless in my life than when I was working slave wage gigs. Customers could spit on me, harass me, even physically assault me and I could get fired for retaliating at all, thus losing my only source of income, which as we've addressed isn't even a living wage to begin with, and therefore bankrupt me.

But once you get into the big leagues, you have a degree/skill, and can get a job that actually pays what you're worth, then it gets better. You have more power because you're not as easily replaceable

>>25619436
Using three methods of birth control is not normal. Sorry

>>25619459
oh don't listen to that shit either i feel exactly the same way about birth control. i dont any little kids running around.

so do you have a "real" job? or are you still in those low tier things? i just didnt quite follow. and if i could tell you a fraction of the shit ive dealt with.

i worked maybe a combined total of 4 years in retail its honestly a nightmare

>>25619463
Maybe not, but I really don't want a baby and in all honesty, PIV sex just don't feel that good on my side. If it were all about me, dick wouldn't ever be inside me, they'd just rub the clit all night long. Ergo, I don't have much incentive to have PIV sex on their terms, since letting them stick their dick in me is a gift I'm giving to them as far as I'm concerned. I sure as hell ain't getting anything out of it.

>>25619472
Well, not exactly since I'm not quite finished with my degree, which I know makes me sound like a hypocrite or "how would you know?"
BUT I will say since I've got a lot more "professional" experience through my classes I have qualified for more than just the slave wage jobs despite not having a full degree. I've gotten jobs that paid me more like 11-15$ an hour because of my classes that I wouldn't have qualified for if I hadn't had those experiences. I already bumped up a little bit just by having some degree of "skills" not just anyone had.
So I follow that logic to state once I have my full degree, I will be making more than just the minimum to survive because I'll have even more skills that aren't easily replaced.

Plus, I've also seen this be the case for every adult I know, and it's been the advice every successful adult I know gives me. A professional level job is much better than a slave wage job in many different ways.

>>25619320
Uh what?

Texts/photos sent to a partner definitely fall under privileged communication with an expectation of privacy. Being fired because someone found your name/nudes when there was a breach of that expectation of privacy is definitely grounds for wrongful termination.
>traced back to you
It's 4chan so I'm really not sure how that's going to happen... Unless someone just happens to have an archived or cached version of the thread where you posted something like a timestamp readily available i don't see that happening.

Like I said I get wanting to be safe and support your decision to stop for your own totally valid reasons, but it seems like you really don't have a complete image of how this amateur pornographic thing works.

>>25619493
its not that i don't believe you but i dont believe in the system. i actually just graduated and i havent even tried to find a job. and what i mean by not believing in the system is, how much more secure could you really be? i guess its more specialized but you are still replaceable if it doesnt work out.

oh and i just have to say it again your thinking is so hot. <3

>>25619519
In theory if they were indeed private images, and not camwhoring on a public thread like the scenario we're actually describing, yes. However again, the cost of going to court is much larger than the damages. If I stole $50 bucks from your wallet, yes I've committed a crime and you certainly can take me to court to get it back. But thing is you'd spend $5000 on a lawyer to get that $50 back. Its not worth it, so you'd grumble about how life is unfair and move on.

Same scenario, girls know if their ex spreads their nudes, technically they have a case, but they know it's too much effort and a lot of lawyers/judges are still set in old fashioned morality and would have a bias against you thinking "the slut deserves it for being a slut".

And also, there are many ways around wrongful termination. They would just say "you weren't a good fit for the company". Nothing illegal about firing someone over that.

It happens on 4chan the most. These channers are the ones who taught me how not anonymous I am by finding people's identities in the drop of a dime. Back in my /b/ lurking days I watched anons get pissed off about someone trolling and then dropping their IP, name, address, and social media accounts within an hour.

Again, I totally get its UNLIKELY. The chances are near impossible, but not impossible. I know I'm probably worried over nothing, but it doesn't erase the fact that there's a one in 100 trillion chance it could happen.
Ive just never been one to be lucky in my whole life. Any time something bad can happen to me, it does. Thats why I don't trust even small odds.

>>25619545
youre driving me crazy with this

>>25619545
There's a big difference between $50 and having your life ruined. Saying that there's no point in pursuing the legal route is pretty incompatible with you being so worried that your life can be ruined by just one person.
>4chan is a public forum
Yes but you've missed my point entirely. It's really rare for you to be in a position where you can't claim that they were posted by an ex.
>old fashioned morality
The law is the law, morality doesn't have any sway.
>back in my /b/ days
How long ago are we talking?
4chan strips geotags and has for years.
The old Skype exploit to find someone's IP address (which isn't a reliable way to find their location, point blank) has been patched.
Unless someone uses the same screenname across all their social media accounts you're not going to find any relevant information, period.

>>25619524
Well it depends too, of course your art major isn't gonna get a better life just from having a degree. You still have to have marketable skills that are in demand.

Yes, everyone is replaceable, but how many people can replace you is a good question. With your slave wage jobs, literally anyone above the age of 15 can replace you. You don't need to have any qualifications other than that (despite what they try to tell you and ask for on the application).
But with a skill, sure there still might be 100k people who can replace you, but its better than a million right?

>>25619569
again though, even if I won the case, it wouldn't change my future. I still will never get hired again by anyone who thinks that stuff is taboo (which is most people still). They aren't obligated to hire me, they can trash my application for any reason. Life is still over even if I get a measly thousand bucks or so in damages from a lawsuit that may or may not even make it that far.

>Lie to court
That's a very risky thing to do for starters, because not only will you get caught, you will also then be charged with a crime.
How will you get caught? Nothing is anon on the internet man. If this got legal, they'd get my internet history and find out I did indeed post this image myself. Dad works in cable industry, they pull up people's browsing histories and shit for the cops all the time.
And again, in court I can't just claim anything and it be taken for fact. I have to PROVE it. He is innocent until proven guilty, I have to prove this was a private image somehow and if I can't I have no case. This is where the law fails a lot of people, but it's necessary to protect people as well. If you do not have proof you don't have a case.
>The law is the law, morality doesn't have any sway.
In a perfect world yes, but that is not always the case. That is why you still have people asking in court what a girl was wearing when she was raped. Sure you could keep going until it hits the supreme court, but again, cost is too high for fixing literally nothing even if you win.

Idk, few years ago? I still know if the feds can do it, so can any other tech savvy anon. Nothing is anonymous.

>>25619576
id ask you for contact but i can only imagine the answer im going to get. aside from that you charmed the shit out of me.

im a little preoccupied so i cant really talk. but could you at least hang around the thread in the future?

>>25619605
Yeah I can peak in every now and then. Soc isn't really my main board anymore tho lol

>>25619605
>has a girlfriend of two years
>wants to contactfag
Alrighty then.

>>25619603
No offense but this discussion is really going nowhere, simply because it really seems like you don't really know what you're talking about... Your dad is lying because that's not how IP addresses work, especially since most cable companies use dynamic IP and most domains use Https. The NSA is really the only group that has the ability and latitude to do that kind of thing, not your local police.

You seem to have this doom and gloom image of things that's totally distanced from reality, so it's probably for the best if we both move on.

>>25619853
Whatever man, I think you don't give people enough credit. You can find someone if you really wanted and had the knowledge and it's entirely possible for someone on this board to have that knowledge.
Maybe I'm a pessimist, but as I said before I just stopped seeing the enjoyment compared to the risk. It wasn't worth it anymore, even if the risk was small.

>>25619298
Also had a hs female teacher who was found to have previously worked as exotic dancer who got canned. Though it was unclear if the problem was her past job or the students reaction and obsession over it

>>25619853
yeah and? my girl is cool with me talking to other girls. its nbd
>>25619850
so no contact then huh? lol well cant blame a guy for trying.

what a player tho right?

>>25619868
Probably both. Thats why people don't want these kinds of women teaching their kids, because once the kids find out they'll never NOT see their teacher standing up there talking about science naked.

>>25619870
Well I do agree with the other anon on something, I don't really think it's a good idea to get in close contact with someone who keeps calling me hot and sexy and also has a gf.
But if she's really ok with that then it's fine. But still, I'm not wanting to really disclose anything after pissing these other anons off lol.

>>25619878
>really think it's a good idea to get in close contact with someone who keeps calling me hot and sexy and also has a gf.

that made me laugh lol

and yeah she is cool with it in general. how about we just talk on here for now and i can put down my contact later, because desu its entertaining to watch you debate itt.

>>25619878
oh actually btw what do you have? you have a kik?

>>25619956
>>25619897
Nah I'm good. I'm flattered you find me interesting and all but I'm not really into e-friends lol. I'd in all honesty forget about you by the end of the night and drop contact, that's how all my e-friendships end

>>25619964
lmao ur funny you sure? we could be best friends

>>25619981
Yeah, I'm sure lol.

>>25619983
lol shut up here
my kik is pyromancyflame

you know i think like you i wouldnt post it fot no reason.

>>25619994
Oh my fucking god how are you still here harassing this girl? She fucking said no

>>25619997
and she doesnt have to add me. grow up.

>>25619994
>>25620000
Yeah again, hard pass. I think this is kinda why those threads say no contactfagging though. You have to take no for an answer man.

>>25620011
no no see this is supposed to be proving the opposite point. you can ask for contact, and then the girl can say no and its no big deal.

see? you just helped me prove my point. thanks babe <3

>>25620024
ooook, I just said no 3 times though. The first should have been the end of the discussion

I'm not really comfortable with the pet names knowing you have a gf man. Which is part of the reason I'm not gonna contact you, even if she's ok with it it feels sleezy to me. It would upset me if my bf was talking to other women flirty like that.

anyone else here bored of Hux now? It was fun when she would tease us now and then with lewds but it's every single day now and they thrill is gone

>>25620042
>she still thinks he has a gf
It's his pillow.

>>25620050
Eh, I'll give the benefit of the doubt.

>>25620045
Yes, she's probably going through some Britney Spears crisis needing all this attention and validation.

>>25620042
this isnt sex its talking about its contact info over the internet. you all need to lighten up around here. this place used to be full of contact trading.

and it really didnt take much effort to say no even if it was multiple times right? hell you could have even just straight up ignored me if you wanted.

my point is, there is no obligation to accept contact info if given. its just a harmless way of trying to make friends.
isnt this how things like steam and discord work? i dont see why soc cant be used as such a medium.

>>25620058
You shouldn't ask multiple times though. No's a no. It did make me a little uncomfortable yes. And if I were actually putting myself in a vulnerable position (IE posting nudes) in this thread, I would have bailed by now and stopped posting altogether because I have no idea what you'll do next. You give a bad vibe when you do stuff like that man, you feel dangerous to talk to or interact with when you press and press.
Contact fag all you want, but accept a hard no when it's given. I don't think people mind as much if it is an innocent ask and no's are accepted graciously and respected.

The only reason I'm even really still replying to you is because I know you don't have much on me. I didn't post any pics ITT, if I had, you'd be scaring me off right now. So consider that when you actually are in CW threads alright bud?

>>25619994
I thought this anon had a girlfriend? What is this hypocrisy why are you OP'in this thread?

>>25620058
meh stop harrassing random women

>>25620077
maker save us all. think about what you are saying dangerous? its someone posting their own contact info. if there is no acceptance then how would they have anything on you at all?

and you really cant speak for all women considering there are girls who post THEIR contact in slut threads and stuff.

its really not a big deal and people on here are making it a big deal is all i am trying to get at.

im sorry i had to use this as an example but again this is how i met my girlfriend, we contact fagged in a thread.

and if people are going to be jumpy then they shouldnt be posting nude pictures you said it yourself.

>>25620100
Pretty much this, what a weird fucking stalker.

File: 1503782218437.jpg (17KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x281px

>when you realize this thread is leass to do with cw complaining and more to do with one anon's opinions on himself

>>25620100
The fact there hasn't been a meh thread this week speaks echos

>>25620105
Your pushy behavior is what feels dangerous, the fact you don't respect me when I say no feels dangerous.
If women are posting their own stuff that's totally different. They're volunteering their info despite being in the compromising position.

And I'm saying I agree, asking isn't a big deal, but pushing and asking 3 times despite being told no is. I'm also saying if you want to continue to recieve nude pics you cannot create a hostile environment for the CW's, and I think thats why other anon's hate pushy contactfags, because you're taking the CW's away from them as well when you make them feel too uncomfortable to post.

>>25620125
youre still not hearing the point. how was were you being "pushed"? there was an ask you said no, then i said are you sure, and you said no. then i posted my contact.

there was no pushing it was just asking a question.

if you felt like you were being pushed i have no idea how were not even near each other, were talking anonymously on the internet.

man so pissy around here.

>>25620150
Well I guess we don't think alike after all. So see ya. Take no for an answer in the future or you're gonna scare off more chicks you supposedly are interested in.

>>25620124
its literally just meh making a thread to talk about himself without being upfront about it

>>25620165
Sorry for humoring the dude too long lol

>>25620159
oh come on youre a nice girl and i apologize for bugging you but i wanted to argue my point.

you dont see the validity in and thats fine. but dont say i dont at least have some valid points.

>>25620165
how many times do i need to say im not meh

>>25620177
its fine sorry he keeps harrassing you his narcissism knows no bounds case in point he posted his contact because he really deep down believes you want to talk to him depsite you saying no three times

>>25620187
I was tempted in the beginning but he started giving a weirder and weirder vibe. The whole gf thing and calling me hot and shit was not settling well with me. I doubt his gf (if real) is actually ok with that shit. I don't know any women who are ok with their bf flirting so openly like that.

>>25620187
hehe hey babe you can hmu if you want

also still not meh but whatever

im just a guy tryna have fun with some girls

>>25620195
I'll play devils advocate here, I'm a poly man in an open marriage, and admittedly its quite difficult for me to totally assure someone that I'm legitimate and not a shitty fuck sneaking around behind his lady's back, just about everyone I get involved with is justifiably sketched out by my admission. Although, pushing someone to the point of giving them the spooks is not acceptable, questionable actions lead to questionable intentions.

>>25620195
yea the fact that hes so insistant on having contactfagging in threads (specifically cw threads) whilst having a girlfriend is weird lmao, cant iagine what hed want to gain from talking to cws privately other than nudes

>>25620165
If its him or not, I'm not even sure if he noticed he derailed this entire thread and made it about himself. For someone who is already taken, posting in this thread almost everyday makes it seem like this was all a ruse orrrrrr he's a real narcissist

>>25620177
Nah at least you got to plug and play itt instead of finding out his mentality over kik and have to argue with him over kik. It's always better to get to know an anon on 4chan before you contact eachother

>>25620201
Hah and you know, I actually do respect the whole poly thing, though I will admit, I will only believe you if I actually hear your wife/gf say it too lol.

>>25620195
>>25620201
>>25620203
>>25620204
yes yes im so mean and terrible because i asked a girl to accept my contact.

also for the record nobody really likes camwhores. they are just whores

File: 1487990185912.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x250px

>>25620203
>>25620204
Kek and there it is. He got rejected and now he's playing the "I-I was only pretending to like you anyway" card

>>25620209
And sometime it has to come to that, its my job as the poly male to prove that I'm not bullshit, and my wife accepts that. We've even joked about me having her write notes and call them hall passes, no one ever wants to be the accomplice and I will always do my best to accommodate someones feelings and concerns.

>>25620210
Haha, then why do you want them to contact you if you don't like them? What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>25620201
being in a open relationship seems like a bit of a different scenario, im assuming if he was also in an open relationship he wouldve mentioned it by now

>>25620219
not only that but negging camwhores and calling them whores to feel justified

>>25620219
no i still like you why would i not? youre funny and smart but you just dont agree with my policies. its ok i dont hold it against you or hate you.

im just playin with you settle down

>>25620220
Hah right. I've always said that people who knowingly engage with cheaters are as bad as cheaters themselves, so of course if a guy is telling me his gf/wife is cool with it I'd want to make sure.
Well, not that I'd actually engage anyway lol. Not really my thing to share, nor is it really my thing to have casual no strings attached sex.
But I respect your lifestyle regardless.

>>25620228
Thats it as well, most people want to be aware of that sort of thing, as someone whos in an open relationship you understand the main rule is to make others aware, even if I speak to people online with no intention of actually meeting them I make it a point that they are aware, its an important courtesy to extend.

>>25620224
also i dont want them to contact me. shes not a camwhore
>>25620228
yes i have to say i do not care for camwhore in general however by referring to them as camwhores you yourself are negging them.

think about it cam WHORE

>>25620245
i am a camwhore you retarded cuck stop replying to me

>>25620248
And like, I'm a former camwhore? So I still take offense to that statement lol. If he doesnt like camwhores why would a former camwhore be any different

>>25620243
Thats actually not my thing either, meaningless sex is weird to me, I prefer to have an honest connection with those I'm sleeping with, but thats one of those things. In my experience, no polyamorous relationship is the same, the rule sets always very.

>>25620245
So if she was you wouldn't want her to?

>>25620245
>>25620248
Haha, dude, jokes on you.

>>25620248
then pleass my dear leave my thread i dont need you here

>>25620210
I don't think there would be a big problem if you didn't ask her multiple times and then later try to defend yourself adding more of this "but I met my gf that way". And...like seriously man you have to most posts itt, your mainly pushing
on what your vision on how the /soc/ rules should be. Even though you "have" been told these rules are in place for a good reason. Which you ironically proved yourself

>>25620219
Theres always a couple stages to this phase of rejection. Its only going to go down hill from here on his half>>25620245 Now your seeing the stage of aggression, he's probably going to take some pot shots at you sooner or later

>>25620254
>>25620248
>>25620204
Well anyway just wanted to say it was nice talking to yall, I got class early tomorrow so I gotta go to bed. Night!

>>25620253
because i believe people can change. you dont do it anymore so i give you credit.
>>25620254
listen dude im not here to talk to dudes so please go back to your dick rates

>>25620255
>i dont need you here
>i
did you forget this isnt a meh thread already lmao

>>25620253
hes just trying to find a roundabout way of making himself feel better about rejection by putting us beneath him

>>25620261
this is a bickering thread no? meant for arguing? why am i explaining the point of the thread. and hell i argued my point, which again is the point of the thread.

i cant help it that i dont help you guys get off by showing my boobs so my opinion isnt valid.

>>25620265
You silly cunt, why would she need to change? You're some sort of fucked up mens rights guy aren't you?

>>25620272
when will you stop reading into it more than what it is? you insist that i am upset about the rejection. i was trying to argue my point. maybe im just a little bit more with it than youre giving me credit for.

>>25620263
Alright anon have a good night and wake up on time, this thread isn't going any where lol

>>25620277
are you kidding? after this thread dont you see why mens rights are needed around here? these camwhores are treated like some sort of higher power to be praised and loved, meanwhile guys such as myself are allowed to be harassed in such a manner.

you call yourself a man? youre no more a man than the 2 girls bitching at me.

>>25620279
>maybe im just a little bit more with it
what the fuck does this even mean grandpa

>>25620288
the old mans still got

>>25620295
oh damn it that was supposed to be
the old mans still got it.

guess he doesnt have as much as he thought but hes still good lol

File: 1502407692692.gif (1MB, 277x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 277x300px

>>25620272
>did you forget this isnt a meh thread already lmao
oh shit lol shots fired

>>25620275
It was a bickering thread but then you popped a gravity well itt and made it mostly about what you think. Theres nothing I can really say to you to make you realize that. If you bitched about a specific cw or a cw thread instead of board rules then
maybe that wouldn't be a problem. But you just complained about how your not allowed to drop contacts in those threads. Does your gf know you've been posting here everyday?

>>25620287
>camwhores are treated like some sort of higher power to be praised and loved

They are the higher power you stupid shit, do you want nothing but dick rate threads? God damn I don't get what you don't get, men are supposed to be second class /soc/ialites here, or else we'll make everything fucking terrible.

Unfuck your mental retardation, enjoy pictures of pretty women, and quit crying like a shitty child.

>>25620288
/thread

>>25620301
theres no rule that says i cant run a thread so if you dont like it gtfo
>>25620305
please faggot no more, i cant listen to how much of a cuck you are.
>treat women like goddess
>they show their tits and hairy pussies

this is 4chan now would you kindly just give up so i dont have to come at you more

>>25620317
>so i dont have to come at you more
>come at you more
>come at you

Calm down there cockmerchant, you're getting a little too triggered here, coming at someone on the internet is serious talk.

>>25620305
>do you want nothing but dick rate threads?
he probably would like that

>>25620327
lol ok you made me laugh with that. while i dont like some of the stuff you are saying you did get me to laugh.

there maybe some hope for you yet

>>25620333
Its terribly apparent, mens rights, wants camwhores to redeem themselves, master of coming at people, scared of hairy pussy... Totally a closet homosexual scared of his true nature.

>>25620333
no actually if i was in charge i would abolish those immediately. i hate them, and mens assholes threads.

youre a little spitfire though

>>25609086
hux is the most disgusting creature I've ever seen and I wish she'd fucking die or at least go away from these boards

she looks like a gremlin

she looks like an uglier version of Grimace when she's naked

she has body acne

even her personality is shit, she's the kind of girl that goes to gay lame nerd gatherings not because she's interested in any of the shit that's happening there but because she wants attention from the pathetic beta males (and judging from the reaction in /shg/ she is very good at getting it from that demographic)

if I saw her on the street I know for a fact I'd have a powerful urge to punch her fucking teeth in, I bet my fist is about the same size as her stupid pinched gremlin face so if this really happened it would be spectacular

File: IMG_2020.jpg (94KB, 600x872px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 600x872px

you all worship me you beta c ucks

>>25620341
yea dont forget his fake girlfriend too kek

File: IMG_2022.jpg (60KB, 500x654px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x654px

i am the queen of shg

>>25620341
mediocre
>>25620348
>>25620352
this is mint but no physical violence promotion
>>25620354
babe i have a gf in fact most of the time i have 2 gfs

>>25620317
>theres no rule that says i cant "ruin" a thread so if you dont like it gtfo
Jesus I really hope your the original OP on a different ID, if you can't tell your part of the problem with contactfagging then hell even meh comes off as a better guy than you.
I think you need to take your 58 posts and take a breather

>>25620352
>>25620355
of shit look its a copy cat maxim

>>25620354
Self hating gay men are known for having relationships with women.

>>25620348
Waow

>>25620362
>most of the time i have 2 gfs
how much do they cost? was looking to get myself anywhere from 6-10 boyfriends

>>25620366
i dont believe anyone or anything would have a relationship with this guy

Hux scared off 90% of the other /shg/ posters by always dumping lewds.
RIP /shg/.

>>25620363
if you want you can call me sir-talks-alot
and no im not the op but ive commandeered many threads in my time so this is nothing new.
>>25620366
lol yes

>>25620378
>how much do they cost? was looking to get myself anywhere from 6-10 boyfriends
I almost shit myself, this was good.

I can understand your position, it would have to be a rather flavorless woman to put up with his buttfuckery.

>>25620378
idk what do i look like an accountant? not much well its really my gf, and the other girl is her friend and if she is dating someone then shes not. but if shes not dating anyone then shes like my other gf.

and you probably have 6-10 beta orbiters as it is buying you stuff so dont try to pull that one.

>>25620417
>beta orbiters
meh confirmed
gg wp

>>25620417
>you probably have 6-10 beta orbiters as it is buying you stuff so dont try to pull that one.
i said BOYFRIENDS not ORBITERS you braindead ginger

>>25620401
i guess if he met her on /soc/ thats already a bad sign lmao

>>25620431
Our only hope is that shes crazier than he is and kills him in his sleep.

>>25620424
how would saying beta orbiters make me meh? thats a thing they exist.
>>25620431
oh did i hit a nerve there? hehe because i was making a joke about what you said.

>>25620450
>hehe
you can tell me if you're gay its okay this is a safe space

>>25620391
Nah never mind the more you talk the more you sound like fucking meh. And the fact you admitted to hijacking threads...speaks echos anon.......echos

>>25620431
I'm seriously thinking his ***gf*** has some serious problems if she's able to deal with him on a daily basis
or is it really just some ldr deal he gets nudes out of for money

>>25620450
No, they don't, its some bitch shit only a douche canal like meh would say. As a matter of fact, its confirmed, the gospel, meh is the only person in the history of /soc/ to have said beta orbiters.

You're done son, the jig is up, why do you always pretend to be someone else. It makes you look bad you know.

>>25620458
thats a good one babe
>>25620461
>>25620463
i didnt realize meh does these things. or are we just bashing meh at this point? cause honestly he is kind of bad at running threads.

ok ok
with that im calling it a night here. this was alot of fun, the most fun ive had on here in a while.

maybe well do it again tomorrow or the day after. idk gotta see how im feeling keep in mind your host is still recovering from an illness.

>'i love the way you think'
>until you keep politely but firmly declining to contact me outside of 4chan

>'there was no pushing it was just asking a question'
>sentence immediately preceding describes how I refused to take no for an answer and have segued into haranguing you

>>25620362
>physical violence promotion

I didn't say I'd actually punch her teeth in, I said I'd have an overwhelming urge to do it. I have self control, although I do think it would be tested pretty hard if you put me in the same room as her.

>>25620197
>>25620195
You're both autistic.

This thread is such a mistake. The mods here are so disappointing.

Can we make a "why do the /soc/ mods fail at their job?" Thread? It would be a lot more relevant than his pile of shit

Bickering bump

Threads working reasonably well so far.

>>25623281
Jesus fucking Christ m8

There's only been one real cw complaint so far

>>25623851
Hux? Seems like the more she posts the more people lose interest desu

>>25623894
yeah they dont even create the short girls thread anymore because of her.

like ffs just stick to spamming one thread. or better yet just stop posting

i know theres probably some cucks out there that love her. i for one do not

>people don't even bother asking for timestamps half the time
>some lurkers are okay with pic dumps
>an alarmingly high percentage of responses are basically attempts to sext/cyber even if there's a 4chan filename
>an even more alarmingly high percentage of responses are M'lady/Reddit tier grandiose puddles of word vomit that overcompliment a girl who posted a half naked selfie without making any kind of request
>plenty of lurkers cling to girls who have been established/posted for awhile to the point where they don't even bother with new girls, and when the thread is inevitably dead there's orbiter civil wars
>krautfag is still here and still cancerous
>pubefags have two containment threads but still can't contain their 'show/grow pewbs' spaghetti there
>macros from years and years ago of girls who don't post anymore are STILL being used

W H Y

>>25625888
The fucking pube lovers are annoying af

>>25625888
>>25625888
checked

welcome to /camwhore/ 2017, where the nu-lurkers think this place is a more randumb xD r/gonewild.

Bumping for more containment!

im fucking sick of all the god damn dick threads. you look at the catalogue right now and theres like 5 fucking pictures of dicks.

who needs their dick to be seen this badly? how can there be so many posts in the threads? i dont get it why is this a thing? there's literally hundreds of dick pics on soc right now. do we really need this?

who is benefiting from this? the fags? theres a seperate board for faggotry the 15 girls on here and the straight guys dont need to be subjected to this shit. its gay and obnoxious.

thats my rant for the night, seriously i looked at the first maybe 4 pages and there were like 5 dick images. thats not even the whole board. is this really necessary?

why, why are these faggots so crazy about posting their god damn dicks. and whats even worse is the threads take off?!?

theres tons of people rating dick pics. this needs to end or at the very least be confined to one thread.

>fucking dick containment thread
please

Man, this thread is fucked
As someone who used to CW: contactfags are actually the worst and I'm glad there's the "no contactfagging" rule on most threads. It's so uncomfortable. I can almost guarantee that the majority of girls that CW here don't want anything 1-on-1. If we did, we'd do one of those dirty kik trades or whatever.

>>25627505
>MMXVII
>being homophobic
Anon pls.

It's not that there are too many homosexual males. It's that there's too many males period. The numerous dick threads aren't for gay males, they're for heterosexual males who are insecure and desperate to talk to another human being about their dick. Note that I didn't say female. Most of them are okay with traps, too.

Why do you think trap threads and male butt threads hit the image limit so often? What's the common denominator? Dudes are just more inclined and eager to get sexual gratification thru the internet. We want to talk about putting our dick into a hole. A lot. And some guys are just at that point where they don't care if there's a vagina or a rectum. They just want a hole.

>>25627538
>I can almost guarantee that the majority of girls that CW here don't want anything 1-on-1.

This is so true it hurts (as a CW)

>>25627505
>meh posting his dick
>complaining about dicks

>>25627538
>>25627569
Also gonna have to agree with this.

>'I posted my boobs once in a roll thread on /b/ years ago so I'm totally a camwhore'

Yawn. Plenty of girls camwhore because they're lonely and end up exchanging info, or had prior. Anecdotal evidence from '''''CWs''''' doesn't mean much.

>>25627505
meh all you ever do is spam your ugly ginger dick on this board

I genuinely dislike having to hide so much shit on this board. The number of good threads is dwindling.
The board is actually very slow for someone that only has heterosexual interests and doesn't go for all sorts of degenerate content.

>>25627538
>>25627569
good we dont want you here either.
you people think youre all self important just because some cucks worship you.

i dont like you

>>25627557
im not homophobic i just hate people and i hate seeing dicks more

>>25628095
ah thank you someone who is with me.

im sick of all the dicks and the god damn degenerate cam whores.

you know whats funny in the past i never paid much attention to those threads, you know the camwhore ones, but if you actually look at them, closely they are disgusting.

loads of betas calling whores by names, its even to the point where some of the betas have their own names in the thread.

ffs what happened to being anonymous.

you know what though? my anger is generally misplaced here.

its not the camwhores i have an issue with. although i dont agree at all with that contactfag rule, its the betas.

i cant stand the orbiters who worship these girls. contact wouldnt be as much of a problem if it wasnt for the beta cucks.

but at the same time you filthy sluts get off your high horse. yeah i totally disapprove of camwhores and the beta cucks.

>>25628286
>totally disapprove of camwhores
>doesn't like dicks

Why are you here? Exterminate your self immediately.

>>25628260
Lmao nah I just don't want to talk to you all one on one, guys say 'hey' and when you say 'hi' back, they immediately ask 'you horny?' Or 'send pubes/ass hole'

>>25628462
lol kind of funny you seem more reasonable than most of these people. and what you say is fair which leads back to the betas or the horny losers which seem to be a bigger problem.
>>25628461
if youre only here for dicks and tits maybe youre the one that should leave. try being a person instead of a disgusting animal.

Some anons are weird af with CWs, and want to have a personal bond with them and know about their lives. That's some gf experience shit, not free cw images shit. If you want a private cw go pay for one. There are contact threads, CWs are separate and don't want any of that shit. Anon need to stop trying to get a personal camgirl for free and just jerk off to the requests she's filling for you already.

>>25628527
this whole paragraph is sad. you are further enhancing the point that these threads are cancerous and breed horny guys who have little to no self control.

im not saying its the camwhores faults entirely but they play a role in this issue.
feeding these filthy savages who are starved for any sort of sexual contact.

you get it? its like when you feed an animal, theyre always going to come back for more and wanting more.

we need to stop these profligates
ave true to caesar

>>25628538
You must be a mod because there's no other way this retarded drivel would still be here. Seriously consider becoming an hero. No one here likes you and I will venture to say no one in your personal life like you, either.

>>25628547
lmao i wish i was a mod. seriously i mean i doubt i would get the job anyway but i would like to at least have the opportunity to apply.

and the second part made me laugh. oh i do enjoy the banter so funny

>>25628556
Why don't you get off your ass and delete this thread for example? >>25628405

This cunt has re photos posted almost every other day. She's never time stamped. It's obviously not her. And yet for some reason, this shit sticks around like it belongs here. The fucking mods are the entire problem with this board. Either do your job or kill yourself so someone else can work here.

>>25628563
lmfao im not a mod but i agree there needs to be more maintenance around here.

>>25628260
literally when did I say that lmao
I just said that contactfags make me uncomfortable because usually they just want 1-on-1 nude trades or something.

>>25628527
I agree. There were obviously anons who I really liked, but I don't understand why some of them want a personal experience when most CWs are happy to fulfil most requests ~ anonymously~

If the CW is asking for anon's contact info, I guess that'd be different since presumably they know what they're getting into.

>>25629437
ok but everyone is taking it to the next step when the initial issue isnt being addressed. they make you uncomfortable if you accept the contact. is that what im understanding?

what i am questioning is the rule itself not the secondary issues behind it.

so lets say youre taking your pants off in a thread, and someone asks you for contact. that makes you feel uncomfortable? because of an anonymous request?

which its my understanding is the point of those threads anyway.

so just say no or dont respond. you have no obligation to respond to that stuff. i guess what i am getting at is

contactfagging as a bannable offense is way too harsh imo

Bickering bump.

>>25629460
>so lets say youre taking your pants off in a thread, and someone asks you for contact. that makes you feel uncomfortable? because of an anonymous request?
Nah, asking for contact in itself isn't bad. The problem comes when people asking for contact become contactfags, where they get mad because you don't want to see their dick over kik or be their qt3.14gf or whatever. It's just kind of weird because the persona CWs adopt when they're camming isn't really who they are as a person, but some contactfags think CWs are their soulmate/lewd semen demon waifu just from impersonal interactions online.

>so just say no or dont respond. you have no obligation to respond to that stuff.
KEK wait aren't you the guy who kept harassing a girl to contact you after she said no in this very thread holy shit
That's exactly what happens. You say no and contactfags get really pissy and start harassing and shitposting.

>contactfagging as a bannable offense is way too harsh imo
I agree to a certain extent - but if it wasn't a bannable offense CW threads would be filled with dudes giving out their kiks, probably for no reason since the CWs aren't going to contact them anyway lmao.

And like I said, if the CW is interested, they can always ask a certain anon for their contact, at their own risk.

>>25629460
If a CW wants someone to contact them from the thread, they can always ask them to post in one of the other contact allowed threads in order to get the contact info.

It's like with tributes. If a CW wants someone(s) to tribute them, they can always go to /b/ and ask, or start a tribute thread. The other thread viewers do NOT want a bunch of tribute posts to have to wade through.

If you want a contact allowed thread, then start one and see if you get any replies. Do NOT try to turn the regular no contactfagging allowed threads which are popular with the cam girls into something they clearly do NOT want them to be.

>>25630483
first off in light of asking that girl, i was just trying to convey a point. asking for a contact is not a big deal. its excessive that there is a rule around it.

also nobody gives a shit if a camwhore wants someones contact thats not what this is about.
>>25630522
yawn all im getting out of this is camwhores are stuck up bitches that don't deserve the level of pampering they receive.

take a look at the hairy guys thread, nobody cares about contactfagging there.

and for the record no, im not going to start a thread without contactfagging im arguing a point. i actually hate camwhores and the cucks in the threads.

i never lurk them or anything but i get pissed as fuck when im scrolling through and i see 8 threads that say no contact sandwiched between 8 dick threads.

you people need to get your shit together.

>>25630556
I don't think you understand how many anon try to find CWs real identities. Nobody gives a fuck about hairy guys and their dicks. They don't want to share their fat cock pictures with their families and try to ruin their lives. CWs just want to take requests, stay anonymous, and be lewd af. Contactfaggots are always trying to cross that line. All that does is make CWs and new girls who would potentially post run tf away. Don't fucking contact fag if you want CWs and new content. Go to Kik threads etc. And if a cw actually wants to cross that line I'm sure she would say so. It's good that it's bannable, otherwise CWs would be flooded with contact requests and wouldn't post

>>25630592
huh oh well it didnt start out that way it kind of just evolved during the thread. i started off asking what the logic was behind it, when i was then barraged with.
>omg you cant contact them
>omg blashemy
>omg protect the whores
or
>lol he thinks he can contact us
>lol the whores make the rules
>lol i dont feel safe if someone asks me for contact!

so yeah what you are seeing literally evolved with this thread.

honestly i never really payed any attention to those threads until there was a commotion and this thread was created so i wanted to see what the fuss was about.

plus i like fighting with people over the internet about trivial things.

>>25630588
well then pal maybe they shouldnt exist at all. they sound like such a hassle to maintenance and theres so many rules.

just get rid of them and the dick threads and this board will be much cleaner with less thirst.

>>25630556
>first off in light of asking that girl, i was just trying to convey a point. asking for a contact is not a big deal. its excessive that there is a rule around it.

yeah, and then you kept badgering her after she said no, which was the point I was trying to convey re: contactfagging is shitty. as i said, people asking for contact info ≠ contactfags, it's about how they take rejection that makes them such.

>just get rid of them and the dick threads and this board will be much cleaner with less thirst.
Real question, if you remove the "cams" part of the Cams & Meetups board, what do you have left? Face rate threads, local meetup threads, dating advice threads?
What is the objective?? This is already a containment board for thirst, there's no way to remove it because that's the entirety of the content here.

>>25630630
What do you think soc should be then?

>>25630671
well i was trying to joke around with her about it but she became hostile very quickly as do most other camwhores. actually to be honest i thought we were just joking around and then she started
>i am holier than thou do not ask me multiple times for contact

its not removing the cams kid, its just getting rid of the whores who are just as bad as these guys since they play into it.

they are inadvertently ruining this board as much as these thirsty guys are.
dont you see? its a vicious cycle.

so do i hate them? i didnt before but i sure as hell do now, am i gonna go ruin their threads? no ill just ignore them with the rest of the dick threads.

thats all they are an extension of a dick thread

>>25630692
just a place to talk and meet people without the need for excessive sexual content.

i mean who knows maybe some of these girls and guys would be worth getting to know, but theyre so preoccupied posting their own genitalia to even care.

anyway thats enough for one night im gonna call it. anyway maybe tomorrow we can do more bickering.

i have to say this is quite fun. i dont get to just sit here and jerk around you guys are actually making me think.

maybe thats all i wanted all along was a thread with some thought in it as opposed to the shallow stuff posted here daily.

anyway im more than content with this thread

>>25630751
Glad you are enjoying it anon.

>>25630704
>joke around
>she became hostile quickly

Damn your mind is seriously warped. You were being a pathetic beta cuck, telling some random person on the internet that she "sounds hot- like her mind is sexy" because of two posts. And then continued to spew random compliments (to, again, someone you know nothing about). She pleasantly ignored all your creepy remarks for hours until you began begging and begging for her to contact you. At which point she had to literally spell her disinterest out to you. And then you still thought she was "playing hard to get" or "just joking." She was never hostile. She should've been. You're a fucking cancer.

>>25630556
>don't deserve the level of pampering they receive
You have a mental illness. Please exterminate yourself from the face of the planet.

>>25630522
In fact, there is often a "chubby girls contact thread" up for fat bitches to give contact info

the fact that this thread is still up just proves how cancerous the mods here are

>>25632008
This x 9999999999999999

>>25631609
>claim i have a gf early on
>talk to girl
>probably a homewrecking slut
>is willing to accept contact
>i back down saying later
>girl gets pissed she isnt a top priority
>changes mind and declines
>try to joke about it after
>get called a cuck/rapist

you my friend are cucked if you read this thread any other way than that. it just goes to show you how much power these women around here have.
>>25631610
nobody cares this isnt even a thing
>lol go kill urself xddddd
>>25631613
lol this made me laugh fat bitches
ive had a number of fatties hit on me. i always turn them down. although this one chick used to rub up against me and she was all gooey and squishy it felt kind of nice.

>>25632082
>this isn't even a thing
To what are you even referring?

>>25632008

Quite the contrary, every 'shitpost' made in this thread is a post not made in a thread where concerns as voiced in this thread don't belong.
You should in fact be happy that people spout their non-sense or valid concerns here.

>>25632131
No, it's been filled with created complaints about annoying ass faggots like this guy >>25632082
He has 81 posts here. This thread is just about his retarded opinions, has nothing to do with a single cw thread

>>25632131
this thread is nonsensical complaining about whatever this faggot >>25632082 doesn't like, nothing about this is constructive or "civil" but its clear hes either a mod or the OP is a mod and refuses to have this fucking mess taken down

>>25609086
Such as great idea for a new thread type I must say!!!

the women of color no contactfagging got me.
who wants to contact women of color anyway lol

Alright newfriends and nu-lurkers, I'm going to explain the no contactfagging rule because some of you don't think it makes sense or leaves ambiguities. It doesn't. Your confusion comes from the fact that the sticky seems ambiguous ('no contactfagging') when in reality the actual rule is spelled out in it's entirety here:

http://www.4chan.org/rules#soc

>6. Requesting contact info outside of contact and meetup threads is not allowed. Offering your contact info unsolicited is also disallowed. Responding to a request for contact info is allowed.

This can be broken down into three constituent subrules:

>a) Requesting contact info outside of contact and meetup threads is not allowed.
>b) Offering your contact info unsolicited is also disallowed.
This might be called the 'pls respond' rule.
>c) Responding to a request for contact info is allowed.

6a and 6b are pretty basic: users are neither allowed to ask for contact info nor are they allowed to post their own contact info OUTSIDE of contact and meetup threads.

But what about 6c, you ask? It seems contradictory, but it isn't. Let's use a pretty common example:

>1) Anon X asks Camwhore Y for contact info.
>2) Camwhore Y assents, and posts her info.

#1 is a clear violation of 6a, the post will be deleted and the user warned or banned.
#2 is allowable per 6c, but the janitors will understand it to be a violation of the spirit of Rule 6. The post will be deleted but the user will not be warned or banned automatically (see below).

>>25635993
explaining the contingencies does not give the rule itself anymore validity.

In short, you cannot ask for contact info in camwhore threads. You cannot leave your own info either. You will be warned or banned for doing either. You may respond to a request for info, but your post will be deleted and depending on how literal or liberal the janitor is.

>Why is this thread still up isn't it a violation of the be civil rule?
Strictly speaking, no, aside from the posts that directly attack another user (Hux). There is nothing in this thread that warrants it being deleted, aside from a lot of cringe and a little bit of autism.

While I'm here let me clear up some common misconceptions:

1. The moderation team looks at two things in OPs to determine which rules are applicable: first, whether a gender is specific and second, where it's designated a camwhoring thread. Both pieces of information are self-contained and self-explanatory, generally from the thread title or macro, there is no need to put no contactfagging or anything else to make sure 'the bases are covered.'

2. Posting photos of other people is not allowed, aside from macros and pose requests. This should be extremely obvious to you all. Bumping with a photo or 'past win' is not allowed. Encouraging others to post more of other people will lead your post being deleted, along with a ban for the original poster.

>>25636001
I'm glad you're still able to function as an adult, even with such a severe learning disability.

>>25636010
you can spout rules and regulations all you want, it doesnt mean they make sense.

they ammend laws all the time so you saying
>these are the rules
means nothing

are they going to change it? i doubt it, because they want to protect their precious whores.

you describing the rule more thoroughly does not change my opinion of it.

>>25636010
>>25635993
Thank you anon!

>>25636023
The validity of the rules are not subject to your approval or comprehension. The rules are the rules, and you will abide by them. If this is a difficult concept for you to understand I apologize, but I'm not here to coddle you.

>>25636059
im allowed to have an opinion on rules friend. you saying the rules are the rules again means nothing.

you can repeat yourself all you want at the end of the day i think its a retarded rule and i still hate camwhores.

and again i am not attempting to break the rules or encourage others to break it. im saying the rule itself is excessive.

you didnt prove anything other than the fact that you can read.

good job

>>25636075
>you saying the rules are the rules again means nothing.
Actually, you irresponsible cunt, it means those are the facts, and your opinions doesn't change them, and they will continue to be fact.

>>25636075
You're allowed to have an opinion, everyone is. But if your actions are in contravention of the rule, you will be warned or banned. It's as simple as that. You don't have to like it, and there is an appeals process, but the rules are the rules and you are subject to them.

>The rule is 'retarded' and 'excessive'
Nope, quite to the contrary. You are not allowed to ask or post contact info in camwhore threads. You are allowed to ask or post contact info in contact or meetup threads. Quite simple.

Again if you don't like it, you are free to complain about it even more than you already have in this thread, which is totally fine.

>>25636096
yawn you just keep saying the same things go back to your king

i fight for the americans

>>25636075
so you're mad that you cant contact cws even though you hate them
literally any other thread you can post contact info in, but the one type of thread that contains people who you dont like (cws) you want to be able to contactfag in?

>>25636117
Don't bring America into this buddy. We'll kick your ass.

>>25636434
Wonder why Trump hasn't attacked North Korea yet. They have certainly crossed the line in the sand.

>>25637624
???? North Korea is a baby country with a baby dictator. No one is ever going to take their claims seriously. Russia is more of a potential threat to the United States than north korea

>>25637628
Allowing a bit job run out dictator to thumb his nose at us, while making constant threats of nuclear war, only emboldened our enemies.

Completely destroying him, sends a strong message to others to not push their luck.

>>25637674
I can't tell if this is bait or satire, so congrats

a preemptive strike from NK would mean they would be totally isolated with no allies. they can't even hit the US with anything, nuclear or not, and we're supposed to be afraid of them?

>>25635512
Lol were that attractive white male that posted in there meh? Cause I called someone out on that.

>>25637775
Have you not been paying attention to the news the last few months? They have tested an icbm that get hit the West coast. Question. Is, can the warhead survive reentry from space.

>>25639083
Lmfao you're so gulllible. You must be pretty young. It's okay, when I was 18 I was scared of North Korea too. 8 years later, and they're still a pathetic country that can barely care for their own people.

As this guy said, >>25637775 of North Korea ever stepped out of line china would crush them instantly.

Ps did y'all see the guy pretending to be fox in that masturbstion thread?
She never posted Snapchat screenshots so I'm fairly convinced it's not her. Wondering if it's the asshole who drove her away from this site or if perhaps she just contacfagged

File: thonking.png (262KB, 830x467px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 830x467px

>>25612666
>Cam Woman

>>25639083
They tested an ICBM which can MAYBE hit Alaska and Hawaii with a smaller payload. NK hitting the lower 48 is an outside shot, and with a full-size warhead basically impossible with the Hwasong-14.

This isn't about flexing muscles, it's about baiting Trump into doing something stupid like abandoning SK/JP because they're not complying with his foreign policy. That's it. By making a show of their nuclear capabilities all they're doing is maintaining the status quo.

NK will never be invaded as long as they maintain their nuclear capability: Iraq then Libya complied with non-proliferation, Iraq then Libya were both invaded with their dictators removed.

NK will never undertake any kind of offensive action because they know 1) they'd have no allies and 2) they would lose everything.

So the solution is to maintain the threat of nuclear attack without ever intending to use them.

>when a new girl posts and no one replies
>when a new girl posts and no one asks for a timestamp
>when a new girl posts, gets some replies, produces a timestamp and is taking requests, but a shitpost about a camwhore from years ago gets more replies and the thread is derailed

FOR FUCKS SAKE.

what do you all want? do you want living threads with new girls coming in or do you want to keep up the cycle of fyp8ing until a girl who's been posting for years finally shows up after a few weeks? get your acts together. we're in this together and we all have to work to try and clean up the sludge of FIVE YEARS of nostalgiafagging.

or maybe that's all you want? you want some e-waifu to post for years and no one else, and when she's not there you cling to memories and opine about what they're doing, who's fucking them, and so on?

are you all really that desperate and sad? is this just how things are going to be in the era of nu-lurkers, where you care more about being eunuch orbiters with unrequited crushes than coming here to masturbate and banter?

File: Lovely.jpg (83KB, 776x834px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 776x834px

>>25612997
I loved making and posting this macro, not only did it entice Caela to actually post a little in the thread, but it annoyed the resident crop of /shg/ lurkers.

>>25612962
Dani/flo is hot

>>25641409
Not really

>>25641487
>thicc, pale and qt
bad taste desu

>>25641573
Contact fags, has obvious severe mental illness, etc

>>25641576
Not really

>>25609086
OP you are brilliant!

>>25641700
No, really. Plus her duck face is ugly as fuck

>>25609223

Found the bickering bickerer.

>>25640827
Excellent work anon.!!!

>>25643240
Naw nan. On the incredibly rare occasion that you actually get a real smile out of Caela, she lights up amazingly. Have only seen it briefly in a video before, but wow does it look great!!!

>>25640348
Actually Libya had a civil war that overthrew the government, thanks to that jackass mudslime obama throwing in support for the fanatics. Same as he did to Egypt's government, and tried hard to do to Assad.

North Korea can and has put satellites into orbit, which means they have the capability to do a high altitude explosion for emp. For that, the warhead doesn't have to be able to survive reentry.

Also, it is right easy to put a nuke on a cargo ship it fishing vessel and motor across to the United States coast. Same for putting their vehicle launched ballistic missiles into a cargo ship, move them closer within range, and fire.

>>25648865
We weren't talking about caela

>>25648904
Oops, my bad.