If Earth is still the same planet of the dinosaurs, then if we

File: i-e6425acbe9d18274be6f4b676bd7084e-Heron 1.jpg (43KB, 618x385px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 618x385px

>>7838164
Dinosaurs still rule the Earth, though.

File: index.jpg (5KB, 282x179px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 282x179px

>>7838174
Rate my dinosaur

>>7838174
Wtf they really eat rabbitses?

File: BirdRabbit3Barcroft_450x300.jpg (34KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 450x300px

>>7838201
Cute/10
>>7838314
Looks like it. Herons are predators after all.

>>7838164
How high are you right now? Get your life together man.

>>7838328
Thanks. I wasn't planning on sleeping tonight anyways

>>7838201
10/10

>>7838332
Shut the fuck up, I am sober, you pleb.

>>7838164
If you run forward for long enough you will end up where you started. So to answer your question: Yes.

>>7838164
not even if the universe was cyclic.

>>7838348
>not even if the universe was cyclic.
I that case why not? We like to assume that life would be totally different than ours on other planets. But they have the same physical and chemical laws. Life if still probably going to be based on carbon since its a freely availabe element and it likes to hang around with other atoms. Is it that hard to assume that the same thing that happened here can happen elsewhere, or maybe in a new cycle of the universe? What can happen will probably happen again and again

File: never-give-up-frog.jpg (26KB, 303x430px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 303x430px

>>7838328
>Herons are predators after all.
They probably gave up frogs...

>>7838174
Some pre-KT mammals could also have eaten weak/small species of dinos and that doesn't mean they ruled the Earth.

>>7840612
>around 10,000 species of birds
>around 5,400 species of mammals
Sure thing, kiddo.
You're right, though, neither dinosaurs nor synapsids have ever ruled the Earth; insects did and do.

>>7841303
Humans rule the earth. When did you see a bug build a skyscraper or make porn?

>>7838164
No.

>>7841306
Since when is the ability to build a skyscraper a primary indicator of species success (particularly if a lot of the processes that allowed us to build skyscrapers might happen to challenge prospects for decent species survival)?

The most successful organisms (things like bacteria, beetles, plankton, etc.) tend to be relatively simple.

>>7841411
They might be successful in adapting to their environment.

But humans are at the top of the food chain.

>>7842021
>But humans are at the top of the food chain
>not bacteria and other saprophytes
Do you even biology, faggot?

>>7838164
>the same planet
Lrn2same fgt pls

>>7838164
The earth has changed, so except if the oxygen suddenly appeared out of nowhere, we're not seeing anything as big as dinos walking around on land anytime soon