[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
>Employing strictly the properties of...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

>Employing strictly the properties of the set of rational numbers listed above
What did mean by this?

How does one go about proving i - iii employing strictly the properties of the set of rational numbers listed above?
>>
>>7806656
It might help if you post the properties that you cut off from the top of the page
>>
File: asfaf.png (410 KB, 1360x768) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
410 KB, 1360x768
>>7806662
>>
>>7806673
to do 1.(i):
ab+a(-b)
=a(b+(-b)) (by (v))
= a0 (by definition of additive inverses)
=a(0+0) (since 0 is additive inverse)
=a0+a0

in particular this implies a0=0 so a(-b)=-(ab)
>>
>>7806686
how do you prove the transposition part?
>>
>>7806727
What transposition are you referring to?
>>
>>7806730
ab+a(-b)
>>
>>7806744
I'm still not sure what you mean. ab+a(-b) is a number, not a transposition.
>>
>>7806750
I mean how did you get from a(-b)=-(ab) to ab + a(-b) = 0?
>>
>>7806757
-(ab) designates the additive inverse of ab, i.e. the unique number such that ab+(-ab)=0. So I showed ab+a(-b)=0, which implies a(-b)=-(ab).
>>
>>7806760
I get it now

cheers
>>
These are arithmetic axioms.
With these you can prove that

ab = 0 => that either a or b is 0
>>
>>7806656
> Question 3

Shouldn't it be for a != 0?