Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6
Anonymous
ITT: We find out how good /sci/ is at cryptography. 2016-01-15 03:57:28 Post No. 7784431
[Report] Image search: [Google]
ITT: We find out how good /sci/ is at cryptography. 2016-01-15 03:57:28 Post No. 7784431
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: manning.jpg (27KB, 615x409px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 615x409px
ITT: We find out how good /sci/ is at cryptography.
Anonymous
2016-01-15 03:57:28
Post No. 7784431
[Report]
The rules are simple, decode the code and post a picture of the answer, along with your method.
The code is: 145519121631191914312121
>>
>>7784431
Hello to you too anon :)
>>
>>7784454
Close, but no cigar. ;)
>>
>>7784457
I didn't try. I am sorry anon :(
>>
>>7784458
What if I made it a little easier?
>>
File: 1452648189837.jpg (18KB, 300x415px) Image search:
[Google]
18KB, 300x415px
>>7784460
I don't want to try anon. I was just trying to be cute with a random guess.
>>
>>7784463
This saddens my soul.
>>
File: can I borrow a feeling.jpg (44KB, 500x375px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 500x375px
>>7784466
I'll try after my class tomorrow morning. Sorry anon :(
>>
File: facepalmstatue.jpg (106KB, 1024x683px) Image search:
[Google]
106KB, 1024x683px
>>7784472
Please stick to this promise.
>>
It always amazes me how people manage to decode shit like this with just the message.
Can you teach me how to do this OP?
>>
>>7784485
Wouldn't that be me solving my own thread?
>>
File: 1441834113352.jpg (3KB, 150x150px) Image search:
[Google]
3KB, 150x150px
>>7784483
If it will make you proud anon
>>
>>7784487
True. I'm just confused on where to start here. To me it seems like there's so many things you could have done in a specific order that I would just have to guess for eternity (reversing, switching to hex, altering with a constant).
How do I find out what steps I take to reverse it, or is it always just guesswork?
>>
File: proudparent.gif (492KB, 430x245px) Image search:
[Google]
492KB, 430x245px
>>7784492
It would make me very proud, VERY PROUD. I'm tearing up already.
>>
>>7784496
A bit of both, sometimes you're looking for signifiers.
>>
>>7784496
OP is kind of ignorant in that this is not cryptography at this point, but more so just a guess and solve puzzle.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6