The time is nigh for /sci/ to write a collaborative textbook

>>7765250
>Why pop science is shit, by /sci/.
The book will practically write itself. In fact you could probably write a bot that just scans the archives and dumps them into a text file. Then all you need to do is send it off to an editor and bada-bing bada-boom we're authors.

>>7765250
I have been tempted to try to write a book on GR that could be read by a high school student with no math experience higher than precalc. Start with the fundamentals of calc and try to develop everything from a highly geometric perspective that will make GR feel natural.

Unfortunately I am both busy and lazy.

Don't forget triple integral, algebraic topology and HoTT.

>>7765250

Textbooks are best written by people who have done original research and published papers.

Not implying anything.

>>7765767
Thanks for letting us know family.

>>7765250
holy fuck

>>7765763
a meme and two research subjects?

>>7765854
Come on now, calling HoTT a meme...

>>7765763
Anonymous never forgets.

>>7765250
We could write an abstract algebra book for beginners.

Someone should train a neural network using data from /sci/ and then use that to generate the textbook

>>7765921
Sounds good. Or maybe logic, one of these simpler areas. You can also make up tons of meme references there.

>>7765921
As long as we do it Bourbaki style.

File: Bourbaki.png (61KB, 710x155px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 710x155px

>>7766654
invent our own notation and conventions in hope it takes off, because we clearly are the central elite on the subject?

File: 1448206970474.jpg (16KB, 480x236px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x236px

>>7766654
>yfw a second iteration of the Bourbaki group forms from /sci/

File: landscape-1448060835-emma-stone-rings.png (469KB, 980x490px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 980x490px

>>7766677
Let's make Mochizukis work rigorous and use it to prove Wildberger right

http://vocaroo.com/i/s0Y1vD15zP1p

>>7765262
This would actually work.
Pop-sci examples, and explain why they are wrong.

For example, faster than light threads.

Then we can make that the /sci/ sticky (like /fit/)

>>7766676
I can't imagine a more /sci/ way of doing things. Let's not act like some of those guys wouldn't fit in here (minus the actual talent for mathematics).

>>7766002
Some Australian on /pol/ made a shitpost generator.