#99 here: >>17208771
>>17220643
Sauce?
>>17220717
>>17220718
>>17220722
not hi res
>>17220724
the middle one isn't. the other two are, they're just not in super sharp focus.
>>17220707
>Sauce?
4chan /s/ a few years ago...
>>17220757
Name?
>>17220718
Who is the girl on the left, for sake of science?
>>17221165
>Name?
Sorry, no clue. I think that is the only image I have of her.
>>17220653
Can't find the set name on this one with reverse search. Hint?
>>17220729
>the other two are
>1216x811 is "high" res
retard alert.
>>17220626
What constitutes a High Res image? Filesize?
>>17224661
Me needing to scroll with a 3200x1800 resolution.
>>17224661
In my opinion its a combination of image dimensions and visible detail. My rule of thumb is if you can see hair on skin its decent. If its largely out of focus then you may as well just up scale low res.
>>17220660
More of this? who is it
>>1722539
Sasha J ... I think
>>17225398
>>17225473
>>17224661
It's really, really, really fucking big.
>>17220627
Lorena my love
>>17220729
Wrong.
>>17227909
name
>>17228050
it's printed on the picture
>>17228050
Dude, you post "name" on threads all the time. Learn how to fucking source.
>>17228050
Faggot
>>17220650
What a good looking pussy.
>>17225644
I'm going to disagree with this picture being high res. Its been rescaled.
>>17234173
It literally has fucking not.
>>17220645
Way too much photoshop...
>>17220664
Look at the size of those palm trees!
>>17241409
Coconut trees?
#101: >>17241504