In a similar way how most good-functioning men are turned on by being dominant, females are programmed to be submissive. protip: tell her she's your filthy slut while you're penis-stabbing her, and she'll come buckets
>>26381135 Because we are wired that way. Men are stronger physically and mentally, men have been the providers ever since early humans and therefore we have always depended on men for food and protection. Honestly, if you're a male and submissive or a woman a dominant you're not a well functioning human being.
>>26381135 being submissive is more powerful then you think. if you summit to the right guy you get to live a very comfortable life of being care for and being protected while the man gets to die off in coal mines of cancer or from operating toxic fumes that heavy machinery produce. also you get to die in war as well so being dominate is not that great.
Hate the "le wired that way" meme. More like socialized that way. Domming a submissive little qt is the best I've ever felt in the bedroom, literally cum buckets just from slapping him around. Maybe if more girls weren't afraid to try it and weren't put down for trying it or brainwashed with this "le natural to be submissive" garbage then there wouldn't be such a trend.
They do that for money only and/or don't want any kind of real sex, love, intimacy and relationships with submissive men. They want relationships and intimacy with a dominant Chad and maybe be dominatrix on the side.
There is generally more variability amongst men. People with highest IQ are mostly male, people with lowers IQ are mostly male. Great artists are all male, stupid reading is for faggots dudebros are also mostly male. Greatest comedians are male, super serious preachers and depressed poets are also mostly male. And so on.
Same with sex. Some men are into MILF, chubby, femdom... but women aren't into short men or sub men.
Feels pretty good. It just works if the guy knows what he's doing and wants to take the lead. Not like it can't be good a different way, but it's the least amount of effort with the biggest payoff. It's nice and fun to try different things but sometimes it's just the best acting as a hole for him.
Men are even more socialized to be dominant, tho. Dominant women at least have the "sexy dominatrix" meme. Let alone all the feminism. Submissive men on the other hand get shit on from all sides, and yet there are quite a few of them - and at least more than dominant women.
I also think it's evolution. Probably because women bear children and are pregnant for 9 months. So women that are stable and mediocre have kind of advantage.
With men on the other hand, it's different. One man could easily impregnate thousands of women. So evolution experiments, I suppose.
This is why monogamy was so important to create a stable civilization. Without monogamy you either get what the Muslims often have, a harem where the rich guy gets 4 wives, and three men don't have any wive and then become suicide bombers.
And in the West you have all women competing for the same few men, whereas more and more men become bitter, radicalized incels.
>>26382117 A mix of evolution and society. Far be it from me to side with feminists or whatever, but there are social repercussions to treating women like special snowflake princesses and never expecting dick all of them. They never grow as people, they are constantly a hivemind that defaults to one common thing: their gender. Honestly, sex bots (far out there a thing as it is) could largely change women. Once men lacked a need for women for sex, they'd stop treating them like princesses in hopes of gaining their love. Why do you think feminists HATE the idea of VR or sex bots? They know damn well it will kill the sexual market as it is now. Even Chad wouldn't bother fucking her if he can just go pump some money into a model tier sex bot with no risk of pregnancy, and no beta bux will be around if they already have their waifu.
Women and Men have completely different reproductive strategies
Think back to cave-man times:
>Men are programmed to impregnate as many women as possible. We can impregnate several women at a time. That's why we love variety in pornography, and are constantly looking around for someone NEW
> Women need to guard their womb until a GOOD man comes around, because carrying a child is a huge investment. Because of this, they test every man that pursues them. They want the biggest, strongest, most aggressive male they can get.
ALSO the most prized females are the ones you know are carrying your child. Before birth control, getting cucked was a serious concern. There was no way at all, as a man, to confirm the kid is actually yours.
SO men wanted younger, sexually inexperienced women. Women - to their credit - know this. So they put extra effort into not having casual sex with random ugly losers, because it lowers their market value
> F I N A L L Y The woman does not naturally display aggressive sexual behavior because she wants the men to CHASE her - AND she doesn't want them to think she is a loose woman who might carry another man's child as pass it off as her own
So, a woman's sexual revolves around being taken by a strong, powerful man - especially in a transgressive way -- like he wants her so bad he MUST take her sexually -- bordering on rape, -- but she's letting it happen. That is the woman's mindset and it's sexy as fuck, but also perfectly logical and natural
It is in the best interest of her DNA that she behaves this way. Same with cucking, acquiring beta orbiters, and rejecting any and all men that pursue her passively. She wants aggressive, powerful, BEST man possible for her eggs
>>26382385 >This is why monogamy was so important to create a stable civilization. Without monogamy you either get what the Muslims often have, a harem where the rich guy gets 4 wives, and three men don't have any wive and then become suicide bombers. >And in the West you have all women competing for the same few men, whereas more and more men become bitter, radicalized incels.
So are video games, porn, and junk food the only reason we don't have hordes of suicide bombers, Eliot Rodgers, and bandits running around?
>>26382785 >So are video games, porn, and junk food the only reason we don't have hordes of suicide bombers, Eliot Rodgers, and bandits running around?
Maybe. But we're also just at the beginning yet. Even our parents grew up in a society that was, by today's standards, hardcore conservative Christian. And the values of our grandfathers who fought the Nazis would be considered Nazi today.
But the young man ... young men today have less sex than young men even in the 80s.
Just wait 30 years or so and we'll probably have way more Elliot Rodgers.
>>26382117 They need to stick to the group to survive. For them, their survival is tied to men. As a result, they are much much more invested into social structure and it's maintenance than men are. That is why they will always just follow the herd. It's also why women in general are so much less accepting of differences. You'll find they're viciously cruel towards anyone who acts different, or towards outsiders. They are extremely averse to "creeps" and "weirdos" for this reason. Thats because they are hard wired on a deeper level to absolutely hate and be disgusted by anyone or anything that could be a threat to the status quo.
Developing a personality for a woman was dangerous from an evolutionary standpoint. Having strong beliefs and values could cause conflict, and get in the way of social cohesion. By just aligning their beliefs to that of the strongest group, they increased their social value, their access to resources, and thus they increased their chance of survival to pass on their genes.
They benefit from being willing to just accept and agree with whatever is popular, quick to change sides. Loyalty is useless to them, in fact it would have been dangerous. Better for them to just integrate into a stronger group that took over their old one. The woman that wasn't willing to fuck the "enemy" would just die (or get raped anyways, I guess).
Their survival is purely tied to their ability to lie, to fit in, and to attach themselves to dominant groups/individuals.
A lot of their behavior makes sense when you analyze it with this in mind.
>>26383555 Thanks man. I never even went to college, so I take this as a great compliment. >>26383719 Yeah, it's sad what I hear about the state of uni right now. Apparently SJW politics have completely hijacked campuses.
Unfortunate but true. We're all descended from the women that made nice with the Glug tribe when they invaded and caved the skulls in of the Orf tribe males, repeat for thousands of years. Ain't no woman gonna put her ass on the line for her dead assed husband, and even the few that did would be rapidly outbred by the ones that didn't.
>>26384470 >Low-test "men" who know they have no reproductive chance submitting to alphas to gain protection
Maybe this is why both the Ancient Roman / Greek as well as Christian monogamy have worked.
In the Ancient model, the alpha male might have an additional "trap" (I think it was Nero who even castrated some boy to make him look like his former wife) - and in Christian monogamy, Chad was forced to settle down with one woman, leaving the rest of the woman on the dating market. And they needed a man (not a surrogate man via "government") to survive.
>>26384875 >some shy men have good-looking girlfriends
If you have high socio-economical status, shy guys are considered to be "cute" and attractive by women. Same with "nerds" and women who say that they love "nerds" - they mean attractive, handsome scientists with money, of course.
Needing temporary affirmations of worth and security with the nice boys in between bouts of cock carouselling, insecurity driving her towards him until that same insecurity drivers her to cheat on him, sometimes just getting bald assed lucky, there's a lot of potential reasons depending on the dude and girl. Being very temporary or a beta bux situation does seem to be the common theme though.
>>26382863 >Imagine you were with some 6/10 chick and then some 8/10 came and took you away to feed you, protect you, and use you for sex. How awesome would that be? Not awesome at all because I'd be throwing away any shred of moral integrity I had into the gutter by abandoning someone who relied on me and trusted me when I had agreed to a monogamous relationship with them? If you bitch about women and then pull the same shit as them, kill yourself.
>>26385970 I don't know anon. It takes a certain level of autism. I think its more of a personality thing, some people just love them and most people it makes their eyes bleed. I pretty much immediately fell in love with ASCII games due to their insane amount of depth and variety. I remember as a child I would just read the features of MUDs and Roguelikes and they always seemed so much cooler because they had so many more races and abilities than any other game.
I can play other games too, but I find they get repetitive too fast, and I find the graphics takes away from it. After a while it feels like just watching the same repetitive animation over and over, the mechanics seem way too limited, and it actually takes away from the immersion.
Not to say the same thing doesn't happen with roguelikes, but it takes a bit longer.
The best way to get into them for most people is probably by using tileset/graphic packs.
>>26385970 Not that guy, but download Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup, play the tutorials, after that just try playing. The controls will elude you for awhile, but you'll eventually get them all and know what to do.
You'll probably die a lot as you're learning, don't worry about trying to finish the game at the start, and read shit in-game to make sure you know what you're getting into. Also, play different races and classes all the time.
Gender roles are real no matter how much feminists deny it. There's a reason femdom is the thing of doujins and ERP- it's a fantasy we escape into because real life is fucking awful. Nothing turns women off more than a man that isn't outwardly dominant.
Thread replies: 86 Thread images: 19
Thread DB ID: 499725
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.