Call it whatever you want, some call it "racialism" which is simply the idea you believe that race is a legitimate concept. Which it is. It doesn't mean you want to oppress anyone, it just means you see reality for what it is.
But go ahead and deny the effect that hundreds of thousands of years of evolution has had on different human populations....Do you think it's a "social construct" that most people in Asia and Africa are lactose-intolerant, but most white people are not?
Sure, there are differences in populations, but I don't trust anyone to be unbiased interpreters of the differences. There is obviously an IQ gap between Whites and blacks, and another gap between Whites and East Asians. Guess which gap the typical 'race realist' on 4chan talks about. Facts are facts, but when the same people keep pushing the same cherrypicked facts over and over, you have to wonder what motivates their agenda. It certainly isn't honest curiosity or beneficence.
>These more realistic models estimate that the most recent common ancestor of mankind lived as recently as about 3,000 years ago, and the identical ancestors point was as recent as several thousand years ago.
But yeah, racists, continue to not study Anthropology and tell us all about 'race realism'.
Compared to the 'niggers are dumb' gap it barely gets passing mention. You can point it out and then the stormfags will go 'uh yeah whatever, BUT NIGGERS ARE SO FUCKING DUMB OMG!' and then shitpost about niggers for 200 posts.
>>26379655 There's a problem with this senpai. Genetic studies show there is often more genetic difference within populations than between them. The concept of race doesn't hold up in genetic studies, it only holds up as far as using visual cues like skin color and hair type to categorise people. However, these categories don't match with genetics.
If we were to categorise races by genetics than the world would have essentially three races. Sub-Sahara Africa, The rest of the world, and Australian aborigines. Sub-sahara africa is absurdly diverse though, and you can get two tribes in the same country having more genetic differences between each other than English vs Vietnamese.
What I'm trying to say is that you can't use visual cues to categorise race. This was a concept used in the 19th century and the Nazis held onto it, but it was wrong. Leave this race realism bullshit to /pol/
>>26380080 An additional point, if we were the break up the world into 40 races, 38 of them would be in sub-sahara africa just because of the genetic diversity in there. The rest of the world is very closely related.
>>26379655 >Do you think it's a "social construct" that most people in Asia and Africa >most whites
therein lies the problem with your belief
to say "most" here, you must at the same time concede that there are different types of white people, different types of asians and africans. racialism doesn't allow for "most". it allows for all or none.
>>26380080 race is not just a scientific term, It is defined by biology as well as a shared history, culture, spirit, society, politics, a common destiny.
saying "the white race doesn't exist" is like saying "The United States doesn't exist"
because scientifically, the United States doesn't exist. It's a human creation. So when someone says "I love my country" do you tell them "COUNTRIES ARE A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT AND AREN'T SCIENTIFICALLY BASED."
>>26379855 Literally meme anthropology, common ancestors are largely a theoretical figure based on the gene differences and assuming it takes a certain amount of time for x to morph from x to xy to y and guestimating that time period. Seriously >muh whole human race has a ancestor as recent as 3000 years ago How would that even be possible when Australian aboriginals left africa 130,000 years ago and were in many areas completely uncontacted until the 1700's. I could maybe see that for middle easterns and europeans due to all the trade and constant migrations but the whole fucking world. That shits a meme friendo
>>26380080 >more diversity in races than between them To have made this assumption it requires you to A. not understand the difference between a race and an ethnicity B. not understand basics of chart reading
Heres a helpful chart for you champ, and your half right since on an individual level some europeans are closer to central asians and some east asians are closer to polynesians than other east asians so there definitely is alot of diversity in races. however despite the datapoints mixing in many areas they form visible groupings, because thats what race is similar genetic populations in a specific geographical locations that are distinct from other broadly defined races. Notice how there isn't a single east asian data point in the african grouping or a single european data point in the polynesian datagroup. I don't get why everyone suddenly got so anal about race, its been a legitimate scientific concept for hundreds of years and still is, because race is literally just genetically similarl populations from specific geographic locations, and arguing against that existing is literally retarded.
>>26380971 I once read in national geographic that it only takes 10,000 years for a species to go from the size of a sheep to the size of a whale. Alot can happen in a little time with the right circumstances.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.