People don't have respect anymore. The morals of the people have changed. Girls don't care about marriage or children anymore, it is not longer "hip" to be a woman. They are whores who open their legs and wonder why they die alone. Men are just as bad, they are now thuggish man-whores, either chasing after the whores or setting the bar for them to become whores. Both are incapable of holding onto a relationship, they lack any emotional depth. It is always entertaining to watch their relationships crumble a few weeks after they brag about how they found "the one", but a point has been crossed. The culture has changed, allowing this kind of behaviour to thrive, to flourish to the point where, if unchecked, isolates the wholesome, those who don't indulge, who have self-control, self-respect. This is how it has been for some time now. I only hope that when this culture is burned with the hellfire of the ancients that it will never rise up again, that these people will either change their behaviours or leave. God have mercy on our souls when this is praised, when people take after these kinds of people. May God grant mercy to our wretched souls.
It was never about morals, it was about necessity and public standing. You're also not nobility, so you should comparing your life to the plebeians who have always been hedonists. You got fooled by romantic literature, laugh out loud.
>something which doesn't even really exist
Um, been following the news lately? The BLM shit, liberal PC college campuses that try to make victims out of everybody who isn't white, the destruction of families, mass immigration, critical theory in action and the death of tradition.
That is cultural marxism running wild.
I'm just pissed because I simply want a partner.
I want someone who is fro my background (i.e. same heritage), thinks the same way I do, is a virgin (like me), similar interests/hobbies, a loyal and honest friend. None of these traits are found these days, if they are, it's in fellow men. When was the last time you saw a woman like this? I sure as hell can't find any of them here.
Roastie gtfo. You sound like a drugged-up whore from a hentai manga.
>As long as I feel good, I don't care about my husband and son. I belong to your cock because it makes me feel so good!
Sex is supposed to be baseless. We, as humans, have grown passed the phase of raw, animalistic sex. This is for savage animals who only need to procreate. This is still noble, because they don't have time for emotional relationships, they simply need children. The modern sex fiends don't even have children, making their actions literally meaningless and, in every sense of the word, animalistic. Sex between two people is supposed to be the final step of a healthy relationship, when they have crossed every other mental boundary with each other. What is the point if it is upfront and animalistic? It ruins the special bond between a couple if it is exchanged like a currency. In my opinion, a sexual deviant is one of the lowest forms of degeneracy.
You have a point, but the moot part is that you only feel bad about it because you suck at getting into "their" lifestyle. It's fun (while you do it) and you dislike it because you can't have it.
In a way it's sad how the relationship notion slowly dies, but substract of that sadness that which is just nostalgia.
On a related note (and trigger warning, because this will sound White Knight'ish), I feel bad for kids growing up wiht instagram. Photos of stuff like pic related are shared dayly on their facebook feed, and only one in 100 girls can resemble that.
And at least guys like to lay almost anything, girls are picky af by nature and it eats them up.
Of course, that kind of lifestyle is attractive and fun, but one should practice self-control. With each inch, it slowly devolves into a mile. I have seen my friends drink a few beers casually to post Snapchats at 2 in the morning doing bumps of cocaine half-naked in some random downtown underground club.
My only worry in life is what I would do if my children (assuming there are wholesome women left) followed the same path.
They've been influenced by people who have no fucking idea what they're talking about. Trust me, they're just as braindead, just as willing to follow empty rhetoric on emotional whims, as you are.
>still falling for the "morals and respect" meme
This is why I'm done with relationships as a whole.
My first crush from first grade to high school became a flaming whore. My first girlfriend cheated on me with a nigger who she claimed was her cousin, and ended up getting knocked up by him. During college, I had a relationship with a girl in high school, also became a flaming whore. The last chick I dated was a christian chick that lead me on so hard, and ended up putting me in her friendzone just so she can have an excuse to keep visiting "chad" without considering it cheating. She did put a hizzy-fit royale after I became so busy to give her free rides, gifts and complements all of a sudden.
I'm getting the impression that you don't actually have an answer to that question.
And being a good goy is about fitting yourself into a camp and following rules without personal analysis, so I think you're already making headway on that one.
OP please stop listening to your grandparents drunken rants about the good old days where raping your wife wasnt a crime and boys who were being molested were charged with sex acts if they were raped by another man.
Stupid acts are usually just more pronounced with the use of social media and other communication, not to mention you're on a board where 10% of the posts are people bitching about women and how miserable they are.
I believe people should stay with their own kind, a mixed child is an abomination, it has no heritage, it is in a dead man's zone. I want to continue my bloodline and cherish my culture, not spurn it by mixing two or more. But yeah, I'm just a contrarian hivemind. Okay. Personal preference is damned these days.
Liberals: when things weren't our version of good, it was all shit.
>"If I let my thoughts roam I find no one. The best, after all, is death."
Old Lou had it right. These dumb sluts don't even know the regrets of the massive cunts who set the benchmark for all this degeneracy.
How does it have any less heritage than a non-mixed? Your type usually only consider your father and his father and so on anyway, so I wouldn't expect it to make a difference who any of the other ancestors were.
What's your heritage, mate?
Good goy, don't listen to these cuh-razy conspiracy theorists. It's all a big coincidence that Jews are 0.2% of the population but control all of the big banks and media corporations. Just listen to our puppet-- er I mean this funny comedian Stephen Colbert mock the silly goyim, and you'll have your world view affirmed and feel safe in the morning.
No, that's what I've been saying I'm against.
I am Aryan, from Iran. I want a secular, normal Iranian partner, but they've all been Westernized and indulge in the sickening culture.
>inb4 not true Aryans
okay, not Kurdish tanned Arabs, central Iran.
Trump is the least bad. I don't support big business Jews, but I don't needlessly hate on them because they are successful. History has proven hating rich people doesn't end that well. The right vs left false dichotomy is getting old.
What's wrong with those three candidates, and what makes Trump better than them?
>Go to your local OWS protests and redistribute wealth
Nice strawman, anon. You can disagree with what the rich elite are doing to the world without being a bleeding heart liberal.
Well mass child molestation, some of which is legal is pretty bad to me, yeah!
Granted to say everything was bad is untrue, but to say it was better when these things wernt being addressed or sometimes wernt being seen as problems is kinda bs.
Also heritage exists regardless of who your parents are, What are you on about when you say "it has no heritage"
This might make for an interesting conservative fanfic though, keep writing op.
I've done the research and outside of /pol/ memes Trump really does not seem like a good option at all.
>Also, do you agree on wealth redistribution and the merits behind OWS?
Yes, the fact that 62 people hold the majority of the world's wealth isn't great at all. They weren't 'successful', they were just incredibly lucky to be born into the right families. I don't agree with the whole going after legitimate business owner angle that OWS had.
Failed conservative normes truly are shallow people
>I just want a wife
>I just want kids
>Cherish my culture
You would think during times of degeneracy they would strive for something higher, but not, they aim pretty low, some mass of land, some skin, some children.
Litterally failed normies
Then the strawman stands because it was valid, you are a bleeding heart liberal but you deny it.
I'm just tired of regurgitating everything over and over again, you people just come in droves and are so relentless. There needs to be a wind, some kind of cyclone to deal with you.
>agree with their sentiments
>BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL
This is why /pol/ isn't taken seriously. You either suck Trump's cock or you're a commie liberal degenerate faggot or something.
Stop posting that image unless you can actually point out a single argument in it. Otherwise, it's ironic that you think you're making a point with a strawman comic, since that's exactly the kind of cheap tactic you'd expect from SJWs when they can't avtually support their stances.
Not even that guy. Not even arguing against you. If you've done the research, if you've really dug into it, you should at the very least have some references available.
You said it yourself, friend. You agree with them, so you are like them.
I have grown tired, go read an article from some sticky somewhere and that should answer your questions. Or is that "sucking up to the man!" like the other anon.
>you agree with them, so you are like them
Any evidence for this? Have you got photos of me doing these things. Since you've clearly got a massive treasure trove of evidence for why Trump is the second messiah you must have something.
>"Sucking up to the man!"
Again, nice strawman.
actually it don't. people of high statues abuse and betlittle lower statues people to increase their own statues.
the person with the little statues is grateful for the interaction anyways
this is why social dynamics are wrapped in catshit, person with high statues won't want anything to do with person of low statues therefore its pointless trying to get on that tree
No goy really, reddit is screaming about how r9k is a huge hugbox. Seems like you betas are the laughing stock of reddit, ebaums, and something awful.
R9k confirmed for miller genuine draft of irc chatrooms
Which sticky where? At least share some of your opinion and the relevant support, prove that you have some credibility, that you're not just following trends. Cruz is a big point of discussion right now, what's your main issue with him?
You can't just say it's diluting your argument when it is identical to your argument. You claim I am a goy because I support wealthy individuals, and you shit on some because they are very successful. If you hate them and claim their success is baseless, then you'd agree with me. I could just as easily say you are using a strawman against me, claiming that I blindly support the wealthy. Your original argument was a strawman in itself.
high statues is an illusion. its hard to reach high social statues because the people who are actually high in statues are making it seem impossible by purpose. so that unreachable thing that kids always crave about is there but its a complete illusion of objectiveness
I am not going to spoonfeed you like an infant. Find out the knowledge for yourself, stop asking strangers on the Internet to do it for you. If you are too lazy, then continue with the subversion.
Because it doesn't work out at all for anyone but the people at the very top. If you spend your entire time idolizing someone, it just gives them power and leaves you as a weak little beta. This whole "worship the strong" mentality is retarded and half the reason this country is so fucked up. Perhaps if people hated them, shamed them, and even attacked them, they would have no power (or at least very little of it).
The vast majority of people never, ever get in good with people of high status, it is a fool's path to success. Make your own connections, cherish your own life, and work your hardest to bring down the people who have more than you in life. Envy the strong, don't worship them. Team up with others who do not have the top spot, and remove the one's who do.
This is common sense for most social animals in the wild. Apes overthrow abusive alpha's all the time.
I'm really not sure where you're going with this. So you DO agree with me to some extent?
I have more basis for saying you blindly support the wealthy considering you support Trump; a person who was born into wealth, dodged the draft and had no challenges or bootstraps to pull up. You do that yet you show no evidence to WHY he would be a good president other than he's the "least bad".
Yes, the wealthy Zionists need to be gassed, but don't devolve into merely hating on the wealthy and big businesses (i.e. Bernie tax plan) because of their success, many of them are legitimately successful and, whether you like it or not, are vital to the economy. They must be purged, however. I don't support Trump, by the way. I said that he was the least bad candidate, but you greentexted me so that means I made a boo-boo. Also, just like the other anon, I am not going to spoonfeed you. You can mistake my lack of information for whatever you want. I am not going to walk you through the path of life. I have a argument cartoon, but you wouldn't like that either, so.
I wasn't calling you the goy, you idiot. I was agreeing with you.
I am so disillusioned, whatever will I do with myself once I realize I was so baseless in every field of my argument, or lack thereof!
I'll tell you one thing. That's it. What do you want to know and I will argue my standpoint to shut your slimy Jew mouth up.
That's one sided, a person should never "idolize someone", but use them as an example or what they did as inspiration.
Envy won't help either. If the person with high status is doing well for themselves and contributes why is that an issue for yourself? Concentrate on what you have put in time and effort from there.
Apart from the "only Jewish wealthy people can be bad" and Trump we both agree with eachother yet because you decide to strawman immediately then go all "dirty commie!" on me afterwards you've fucked it up.
Post that argument cartoon, if it makes a convincing argument I might be swayed. Spouting shit about "spoonfeeding" does nothing but imply you're hiding a lack of a good argument.
Ted Cruz is the best candidate, or at least that's what he wants everyone to think. It seems like he has some kind of connection to everybody. My biggest bit with him is that he tries to convey his attitude as one characterized by virtue, but it comes off as pathetic and pandering. Although every candidate beats their chest to gain votes (Trump is not excluded from this), Cruz has made his version of it incredibly pathetic, once you dig a little. For example, New Hampshire has a drug use problem, so he says that his half-sister died of drugs and this is relevant now. It is pretty petty, in my opinion, but still forgivable. However, the biggest thing he is guilty of is something that is not synonymous with his character alone; rather, it is synonymous with the majority of the candidates: they shit all over Trump while actually supporting many of his standpoints, they just don't like him and don't want him to win (see, Cuckservative). Disregarding the fact that he is not even American, bought out by every company that other anon wants to abolish for all the wrong reasons, and has a disgusting rat face (to match his past), I do not see him as being an honest president.
you are totally missing the point.
a person with high statues don't willingly help others unless they can help him.
that's why people with high statues have large circulation of friends. they keep trading social points with other people so they remain relevant
if a person with high statues would be ok with just having few friends like any normal person would have he would slowly lose his statues over time
You were the one who strawmanned me in the first place, defending your strawman over mine. The cartoon mocked your kind of people, saying that if you can't form an argument that supports my worldview and appeals to my character, then you are a moron idiot Trump supporter, etc.
So your main issues are bullshit abstract things like "muh honesty" and "muh lack of pandering"?
Trump really is the new Farage. A meme candidate that will look like he's going to win something then fail miserably when things get serious and "muh feelings" turns out to not be a legitimate governmental policy.
Strawman here, strawman there. The fact is that you replied to me first with nothing of substance, therefore making me assume you were the kind of person I talked about in my first post.
You're different people, but the second reply basically just reiterates the "bleeding heart liberal" bullshit of before.
I gave you my standpoint on why I don't like him. You want to talk about his economics and geopolitical stances, because I think you'll pull stuff like >>26323710 and then it'll all be for shit. Okay, I am the die-hard Trump supporter because I don't like a candidate, regardless of anything else I say. leddit must be down.
We're all so back with the times and so simple-minded, just like you predicted! Pat yourself on the back, chum! Good on ya! Thread derailed, schlomo! Now what do you want to do.
I'm convinced you don't know what I'm saying and, frankly, I don't think you know what you're saying either.
This was originally about why people should be with their own kind and how the modern culture discourages that at every corner, until scum came around and said that heritage doesn't matter and that you are mistaken, and how this candidate is bad because of this and how agreeing with them is le sooo typical, guh. This is how threads are derailed, because idiots enjoy fanning the flames and watching people scamper. You are a part of the same culture I talked about, you are the kinds of people that need to be purged.
>I'm convinced you don't know what I'm saying
You're right about that, but I know that a central committee is antithetical to communism and there has never been a communist state.
Why do you want to have children? Do you think you have that many good traits, ideas, genes etc. to be passed on? Also with the state of things in general I don't currently think it's worth it or even necessarily right in any capacity to bring more people into the world.
Why do people want to keep stretching this horrible shit out into infinity? Why does it matter to people so much to be remembered?
>there has never been a communist state
this is what I was referring to, why the assumptions I made were valid. You are literally proving them true, but call them strawmen all you want. Expand your horizons and embrace a different point of view instead of calling everyone who doesn't agree with you a mindless Trump supporter who sucks big business cock and is le right wing. Maybe they have arguments that are valid.
With the proper guidance, nourishment, environment, etc. a child can be raised as a mature and responsible, non-degenerate. If you don't want to pass on your genes, okay. Enjoy your life as you will.
No, in fact I don't really hold any hard left or hard right views. I lean more left economically, more right socially, for example. Anyway, isn't free-market capitalism inherently libertarian?
I don't get what the original spat was about. It seems that we should disagree, but it devolved into a childish spat. What did we originally disagree with? You're right socially, so you should agree with me that the modern culture enables faggots and sexual deviants to abuse the sanctity of tradition. Then you assumed that I was a Trump fanatic or something about the right (which would pit you with me, supposedly, as well) and I assumed that you were an OWS and a "bleeding heart liberal" (you just said you are economically left, so some of my statements were valid).
Where are you on the chart?