Why are boys taught to peacefully resolve conflicts when they are young?
Why does the education system effeminize boys?
Young boys should not be taught by women at primary school age. They should be given a strong masculine foundation from which to develop.
The reason so many of you are virgins is because you lack the fundamental traits of masculinity and manhood. Women don't want a man who is emotionally compatible, they want a protector and a commander. Modern feminism poisons the mind of our youth by slandering real men. If you were to return to your primal roots and act like nature intended then you would not be a robot.
>Why are boys taught to peacefully resolve conflicts when they are young?
Not entirely right, considering the fact that everyone in our modern world are actively taught to peacefully resolve conflicts when they're young. Yes, a teacher will spend 1h talking about how we rounded up a table to sign a piece of paper, but will only spend 10 minutes on the war that made this event happen.
Sex doesn't really matter in teaching history, because no one can blindfully change history manuals and get away with it, also considering internet is a commodity to quickly check up facts.
As a whole, I don't understand your point on the "feminization because females are eaching our kids poison", but I understand that you are perplexed by own the educational system can just toss away wars like it was saturday morning news.
Oh and I would suggest reading the entire body of work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, he retakes a lot of the same ideas you're exposing without the r9k bias obviously. I suggest starting with his first Discourse.
Conflict resolution isn't the problem. The problem is all the ways in which society demonizes masculinity while completely forgetting that masculinity is what it actually wants.
Chad isn't just successful because he was born attractive and rich, but also because these attributes got him excused from institutionalized emasculation.
I'm sure you all remember at least one Chad in school who would constantly get into shit but never suffered any consequences despite the crazy shit he got up to. He bullied, he got into fights, he got wasted and fucked bitches at parties and then beat the shit out of their bfs when they complained and he got away with it because he was so attractive and daddy's money can always pay bail. He was allowed to remain masculine while other guys aren't. Those guys become nu-males.
You don't necessarily have to be a violent dick but you do need to develop confidence and assertiveness.
the sad truth is you're obsolete. any dipshit with an AK can be a protector, and our commanders are hyperintelligent humans and computer algorithms predicting the flow of commerce. the grain thresher takes the jobs of 300 farmers. and over and over with each new form of automization of manufacture a large swath of population is deemed pointless.
now it's impossible to tell the hard working useless people from the slackers, and when the boot comes down the only people who can avoid it are the ruthless ones who bank on the right skills, and you're afraid because you're starting to be afraid that you didn't choose the right set. so you do what you do best. you get territorial. you try to control in the only manner you know how. and now you're here posting topics like putting your dick in a woman's vagina and ejaculating is the highest fucking honor in the whole cosmos.
so, can you explain to me why marriage inequality is going to help society succeed?
Women can certainly give correct guidance to young boys and bolster their ambitions, as long as they have a proper understanding of masculinity. It's just feminism poisoning them. That being said, of course male role models are more than necessary, too.
Where did you get that picture, OP?
Huh? I wasn't taught the way of peace. I was a raised by a single mother who hit me when I misbehaved. Then I grew tall and strong and nobody touched me again. Nobody at all. Men or women.
Go read What Men Know That Women Don't by Rich Zubaty then go KILL your mother.
Letting women influence children is the worst thing ever, especially boys after a certain age.
The Anatomy of Female Power is another very insightful book.
You are welcome, retards.
i'm just too pure and well tempered for people to handle, just my presence makes them feel guilt for their own bad choices.
they get to know me and realize how innocent and reasonable i am, they see that i share with them and never expect anything back.
they see discipline and energy at the same time, they see reason.
When I was a kid, I attended a primary school which only employed female teachers. My year was comprised of a class of 30, only about 8 of which were boys. The way they taught males was honestly abysmal:
> Zero tolerance bullying policy
> No 'throwing games' because you might hit a girl in the face
> Anyone who bought a football in from their house would get a call home
> Isolation if you played any form of physical game without first asking a teacher (save from dumb shit like tag)
> Outrageous pandering to girls in all academic situations
That school ruined me for years, girls hated me for being such a massive pussy. 2 of those 8 guys actually left school before going on to secondary; they couldn't take the overwhelming social change that real education purveyed. Pretty sure they go to 'special' schools now, and nobody ever gave a shit about them
The education system does indeed feminize young boys
Two hours of phys ed should be mandatory and young boys should be encouraged to wrestle and shit
Fighting should not be an instant punishment
Young boys are the most penalized for talking out during class