>"A 2007 study provided evidence that individuals with Asperger syndrome, a high-functioning autism spectrum disorder, score higher than other individuals on Raven's tests"
It all makes sense phamalam
Welp, guess I'm not autistic. I have no damn clue what it is.
Pretty sure It's 5 yeah
every row and column contains the 3 different symbols. One of them is without the bottom line, one of them is normal, one of them misses the "peak" The missing symbol is the wave, and the condition the wave has to be in is normal, thus 5
Did this make sense at all?
Guess I have the autism.
You are a winrar.Also look at the pattern it makes in the matrix.
I hate this test.
It's a reminder that spending all day on 4chan is literally causing brain damage.
I first took it years ago and got a 120
Took it a few years later and got a 112
I just took it recently and got a 104.
http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf try this one.
Speaking of which, I'm stumped on this one.
All these tests are so stupid. You shouldn't get to call yourself anything that has good connotations in a societally recognized sense unless you've actually done something worthwhile.
Notice how popular these tests are with teens and people who need a reason to justify their innate feelings of fundamental superiority.
If you do well on these pattern recognition tests then congrats, you can recognize patterns, unless thats gotten you into an Ivy League school it doesn't matter.
IQ tests are usually a good indication as to whether or not a person has a mental handicap.
Scoring abnormally high, or low is the indication.
Underdeveloped brain, schizo, autism, add, adhd, etc
Pretty easy actually
Not sure how people are scoring less than 150 at least
I got all of them right. I don't understand what this is supposed to show; I am still baffled by human interaction, making peace with my parents and effective career choices.
This test just means I can solve jigsaw puzzles and impress girls with spatial reasoning. What does any of that have to do with general intelligence?
Seems like a test made by mid-century robots for other robots to jerk off over, e.g. this thread.
idk i lost it at 16 senpai
Did you not read OP's post? People with autism *specifically* do better on this test. You getting every one right and then not doing well socially or career wise makes perfect sense.
This shit is easy. The first 30 questions were an absolute joke, and 20 of the last 30 were just about following some very basic patterns.
I don't think this is an "intelligence test", but rather an "idiot test". Even if you got them all right, I don't think it REALLY means that holy shit you are a genius. But if you got enough wrong to get a score below 120, then you are probably an idiot.
the fuck does this shit mean?
how can i just get my result /60?
>this shit is easy
>didn't even get over a 150
It means when you are, like, 18 or under, each correct answer will give you a bigger score.
So a 20-year-old who gets them all right may get a score of 180. But a 6-year-old who gets them all right may get a score of 250.
It's because the older you get, the smarter you tend to be... up until a certain age, anyway.
I'm smarter than all you cucks. You should all really consider killing yourselves if your IQ isn't at least 130. Damn. The unintelligent filth in this world. You all make me cringe.
i don't fucking get it tho, why does it focus on kids aged 6-16.5? shit why not just put for children 6+?
goddammit a simple score out of 60 would be so much simpler than this shit.
>also, implying the people who got +150 didn't just put "100" or "5" as their ages because they didn't think it'd be taken into account
>i don't fucking get it tho, why does it focus on kids aged 6-16.5?
I dunno. Probably because IQ tests can actually be important for kids. Not one adult who does an IQ test is there for any reason other than to kill time and perhaps feel good about themselves.
I don't believe my IQ is that high. This test seems like utter bullshit.
Did anyone get higher than a 162 or am I the king of autism?
This is the only post in this thread that made me actually understand what the fuck was going on with that question. Thanks, anon.
Everyone else who got it right but didn't explain is a piece of shit autist who can't use words like a civilized person. I hate picture tests so much.
It is, not only this thread, EVERY thread on 4chan ever has results averaging 140 in my experience. It's because the tests are stupid as fuck. You can literally train yourself to be better at this shit which isn't how IQ works.
>people on r9k
They may be smart in that NEET sort of way where you can look at things from outside the box as what they really are as a result of not being integrated into society and being able to form more objective opinions. But aside from that? People on R9K are retarded.
>all pepople on r9K
>getting IQ's of 150 and above
>feeling great about themselves
You just were trolled ladies, by a troll site.
I've been deliberately lowering the baseline. I log on thousands of times a day and answer 1 or 2 questions correctly - then repeat daily. That's why you sperge lords look better. The 98 corresponds to 3 correct answers from question 40 onwards. Do tge experiment yourself.
IQ measures potential. It doesn't really measure so much anything now
> taking this test on adhd without meds
Its like I have been saying; so called "culturally impartial" IQ tests are just autism superpower tests. You can get 156 on one of these and still be dumb as a bag of shit practically speaking
>That will never get you laid
You think fags that argue over shapes give a shit?
It isn't made to measure autism, but obviously there is a correlation between autism and higher scores on some iq metrics. You should have understood that much from reading the op though.
I did really well on the test in like 1st grade. Almost skipped a grade apparently because of it. During reading or some shit they had me go to the 2nd grade classroom and do worksheets with them. Apparently I was doing better than them too
Then I changed schools and became pants-on-head retarded or something. Formally exited the gate program in 7th grade because fuck the extra work for literally zero incentive or reward.
i think the test is bullshit. seems way too easy to accurately determine.
I don't see what the value of n is but they do list the average which is actually slightly lower than it should be for a standardized iq test. +3 SD is outlier territory and things get a little wonky at the extreme ends. One thing is for sure though, 3 is higher than 0,even if that 3 is not as accurate we'd like.
i honestly have no idea what you're talking about.
value of n?
SD is standard deviation?
is this test even an accurate assessment of intelligence is what i'm asking? seems way too easy. imho a good iq test would be one that every question is very difficult to figure out (notice this test the first like 40 questoins are pants on head, then even the last few ones arent' taht difficult). if they had one where all the qeustions were hard af then it could actually pick out smart individuals.
yeah, I call bs. By the normal distribution they provided the results we're getting are impossible. Unless all geniuses browse /r9k/
so /r9k/ is a congregation of geniuses?
okay this what make sense because i read intelligent people have a harder time getting sex, appreciate social events much less, spend all freetime doing something other then socializing or getting dat pussay.
i mean i think it might be some cognitive dissonance that i want to belive i'm highly intelligent thus the reason i'm recluse and social failure. but then again i think retards are that way too kek.
stfu you're not nikolai tesla. you realize this man was responsible for the oscillator that helped us create such an efficient energy grid. you've probably never thought to engineer something like the internet, or a rocket ship, or a sofware.
genius is in application what you have done y
I actually fucking tried on this and figured it was all patterns... How the fuck is this possible? Am I being trolled or something I don't get it
talking shit on a image board wow such pathetic attempt at and ad homineum. i tell you what if i this was irl and you told me to suck on your dick i'd wallop you you little cuck.
actually the autism test is whether you spend the 30min it takes to finish the whole thing on their slow ass website
well, seems like there's no doubt that I'm autistic
never am I that smart but seeing those patterns was no problem somehow
i think it's suppose to be on time limit too which might make score worse, i didn't time but i was less then 60mins, maybe more than 30minutes though
the test is pretty easy. the last question was the only one that I had trouble thinking of answer, but went with 2 because i think it was going first-second=third (or third-second=first) in 1st coloum, 2nd coloum was first+second=third (or third+second=first). can't remember if it was one way or the other.. but i did same with last and thought it's either 2 or 4, but if it goes - then + then 3rd would be minus. and the 2nd with 2 in the circle looked more in place then out of circle if followed a 'pattern' from the first 2 coloums.
aight im guessing that whoever gets less than 120 are people who arent autistic enough to finish the whole thing cuz that shit was easy
Am I autistic enough or i have to try harder?
this site is shit... we're all stephen hawkings hurr durr.
FYI I'm in med school & top 10% of my class
I think it's less time based and more to do with age. It gives you a few extra points for being younger.
>Your IQ score is: 159
>Your IQ Classification is: Genius
Say it aint so.
Most of them were so fucking easy a 10 year old could do them, can normies really not recognize basic patterns?
Get out of here Chad leave this thread for those of us with autism ;-;
I guess I now realize why I'm 22 and I'm still a virgin, but somehow in the military.
guys i think its legit. its cited with a bibliography and everything.
ive done the "actual" IQ test with a psych and this test was part of that test, so i think the actual test uses many different kinds and then averages the results.
On the actual test i got really high on the visual problem solving. so getting high on this for me was expected.
Also somehow i was given someone else ban from 2013 just then.. any idea why?
tell me everything about yourself
i need to know what you do
what your occupation is
how many times i need to jerk it to tranny porn per day
pls check >>26304966 for some fairly challenging tests brobots
let's step it the fuck up
>Registrant Name: Domain Administrator
>Registrant Organization: Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
>Registrant Street: 1114 Avenue of the Americas
>Registrant City: New York
>Registrant State/Province: NY
>Registrant Postal Code: 10036
>Registrant Country: US
>Registrant Phone: +1.2127758700
>Registrant Email: email@example.com
Owner of website:
Pic related. Are you robots really gonna let this Stacy push you guys around and try to tell you how smart you are? You know she's kidding, right? You realize this is just a scam and she's getting off on telling a bunch of autists how "smart" they are while she lies on the desk in her cushy corner office on the 40th floor being railed by a lawyer-Chad, right? Fuck.
>she's getting off on telling a bunch of autists how "smart" they are while she lies on the desk in her cushy corner office on the 40th floor being railed by a lawyer-Chad, right? Fuck.
Well, you lost me here.
Go back to faggit and post frog memes there
Intelligence is your brain's ability to compute meaningful outputs from inputs. And there are so fucking many inputs out there. Finding out rules of sequences of some shapes just shows how good you are at finding out rules of sequences of some shapes.
It doesn't show how efficent your brain works.
I always knew I was good at puzzles. I'm not s-m-r-t though. But lol I love all the geniuses in r9k. I guess it goes to show this is what leaving humanity behind gets you. I could probably do better if I did it again, I was rushing through it.
5. Im on mobile but I'll try to explain without looking back at pic.
>Order is always wave triangle slope, just starts at a different shape. Like when it starts at triangle the end will be wave. So it's a wave.
>2 have a bottom line each row. So it will have a bottom line.
>1 is cut off each time, in this case it's triangle. So that means wave won't be cut off. I kind of forget the rest of the pic now but I'm almost sure that's the answer.
Continuing now that i looked at it again. There are 3 versions of the same shape. Full triangle, bottom cut off triangle, top cut off triangle. There is one wave with the tip cut off, one with no base, so it's a full wave this time.
There are 9 total squares. There are 3 "base" shapes: triangle, wave, sloped triangle.
There are 3 possible "mutations" to each shape: intact, top missing, bottom missing.
9 total possible combinations of shape x mutation. Answer is the missing one.
Guys everyone should start using this one. It's probably way more accurate. I got a 160 on the first one test in OP because that shit just tests whether or not you aren't retarded. This one will bring your ego right back down to earth: http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf
Committing sudoku from the shame.
I'll see you guys on the other side.
But I seriously believe that this test adds 40 points to your calculated score
Each row has two sharp peaks and one blunt.
Each row has one of each shape, obelisk, triangle, and curved triangle.
Each row has just one open base.
With these rules in mind:
The bottom row has a blunt and sharp, therefore X must have a pointed peak.
You see a curved and straight triangle, therefore it must be an obelisk.
There's an open and closed base, therefore X must have a closed base.
This is a standard question you'd see in an IQ test. Once you've done any IQ test and your thought process has standardised to these rules (which are always really similar), these get very simple to solve.
I don't see what this has to do with autism.
I scored 140.
I'm jelly of all you 160+ fags. In most standardized tests the limit is 160, Mensa limit is 162 I believe. Diminishing returns I guess, but not according to this picture.
>You need an IQ of 175 to know you're intelligent and be right
From the site:
>Nigel replied that this was a very bad idea since you could do deliberately badly in the first test! It took me a few seconds to grasp his meaning - that you could artificially inflate the difference in your scores and thus score better in the proposed test.
How is this not immediately obvious, I thought of it before it even came up.