>>26293184 There's tons of evidence out there showing women rate men much lower on looks than men rate men on looks. A 5/10 to a woman is what men consider a 7-8/10. The opposite happens to men, they rate women higher than women rate themselves.
>>26293714 >Anything even slightly related to psychology it's not science This is not true at all. A lot of psychology is hard science that deals directly with observations and neurological problems which lead to a manifestation of psychological issues. Hell, even the sample okcupid did is valid as science since it was a survey and it dealt with a very large sample size. It is not hard science that determines the cause or bases hypothesis' off of directly observed observations, it is a survey of a group of people that points out a trend. This is valid in science, but is not valid for arguing 100% of cases or trying to determine biological causes. The survey may not be perfect but is more valid than no evidence or personal experience, which is what you seem to be basing your opinion off of.
If you're not basing your opinion off of personal experience then what evidence do you have that supports it?
>>26293896 So stop fucking complaining. Either sleep with a "hot" manwhore, or pick a virgin. There are plenty of dudes who just slip through the cracks through no fault of their own. Not all are gross.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.