It seems weird to me that Tumblr type women are a-ok with forcible theft but not forcible sex. Both are a type of rape, especially if you accept their especially lax definition of the word.
Most of them feel that it is right to have the government "even things out" by taking money from the financially privileged whether or not they consent, and giving it to the financially underprivileged.
What about the sexual equivalent? Ugly people are sexually underprivileged by no fault of their own, just how they were born. This could be evened out by government enforced equal redistribution of sex.
This would entail forcing the sexually privileged to share their bodies on occasion with the sexually underprivileged. This would ensure everybody of all walks of life, body type, disabilities, etc. gets quality sex now and then.
Under a corrupt government? YEA.
>weak institution >leakage of tax dollars
he probably flies everywhere on his private helicopter and sends his children to private school, has his water privately plumbed through his personal well and fire proofed his home.
wat now? wat now.
One of the leading theorists who inspired the 60s radicals - Marcuse - suggested that if society progressed far enough, into socialism, it would probably become quite sexually egalitarian, because if you couldn't separate people by wealth, then success wouldn't be attractive; if everyone's kids were cared for, women wouldn't have to pick their mates particularly carefully becayse the subconscious fear that their kids wouldn't pass on their genes would go away.
It's probably specious, but you can compare to bonobos; the females in that species mostly control society, but without much hierarchy (amongst the females or anywhere else). They do it by making sure that everyone has as much sex as they want. The males individually have the same vicious impulses that chimps do, but the females will band together to put down individual males such that they never build power - and "put down" often just means "fuck him til he forgets about it". Bonobo society is honestly pretty close to an economic and sexually egalitarian society - socialism, insofar as genes are wealth).
your money? i don't see taxes from my paycheck as "my money" why do you see it as "my money"?
would i like to take home more net pay? sure but as long as you can not spend your money most people have more than enough to live well within their means.
sounds like you are salty because you couldn't buy their 7th private jet for your newest wife from Gondola land.
Check uno + dos autismo. The government adds nothing to the equation other than rounding up the sheeples money, that's fine and dandy, but they shouldn't be telling us it costs X5 and pocketing X4.
>but they shouldn't be telling us it costs X5 and pocketing X4.
so your problem is the non-transparency of how the government spends tax money. like you should have control over what the government spends because you are a 1%er and pay taxes.
>has nothing to refute my points
>calls me illiterate
and you're the raging over the fact that people have different -opinions- than yours.
thanks for proving my point that you feel entitled to control everything even the U.S. government because you are a 1%er and pay taxes.
i do work, and i do pay about 40% in taxes and w/e else that they put on my paycheck. but guess what? i got over it and learned to live well within my means, and to not look at the gross pay but at my net pay.
you just refuse to live within your means and if you are wealthy you're just as stupid as the strawman you beat because you're the one that is leaking money and you're blaming the U.S. government for it.
legalizing prostitution is fucking splendid, it will basically fix everything wrong with our society including sex for drinks culture. woman will actually have to do something else besides existing
While I dislike tumblr feminism as a whole, let's break down your idea of socialism being theft.
I assume you're talking about Stalinism or Bolshevik Communism, as they're the best examples of forcible removal of wealth.
Capitalism has weird ownership ideology and laws. At its base, it's all money. Money is the inviolate token of ownership. And there's only so much of it. So when small amounts of people hoard it, the things that is has the value to acquire (food, housing, medicine, education etc.) are unavailable to those who have little or none. Couple that with the fact that they have more than they, as single people, could possible ever use of any resource attained by money, and the fact that in effect, their money grants them ownership of quite a lot of things that people should have a right to, taking their wealth and spreading it is what needs to be done.
Sex is not necessary for a person to live. If you really wanted to go down this route, the government would produce stipends, or subsidise prostitutes.
But this is redundant, cause sex isn't a right, nor should it be.
i think you are completely missing the point
imagine a basketball team having open trials, anyone can tryout including men woman and dogs from all ages.
after trials are done only 10 black men gets accepted and they form a team (a good one)
now imagine a basketball team that everyone can tryout including dogs woman and men, but now it accepts everyone including fat and unfit people, and there is no score because winning would be offensive to the other team
>its population is not of a fine level of intelligence.
literally "stop liking what i don't like".
i think you are trying too hard at this point. i am right, struggle against it all you want but i told you this for free.