A) one girl admitted to fapping to me and sent me nudes B) my first ex sent me nudes regularly, long-distance relationship C) my second and last ex sent nudes and we had sex on multiple occasions, before the relationship ended D) a fourth chick sent me nudes after 2nd ex
I'm doing alright. Although currently there's a guy who wants to have sex with me. He's pretty blatant about it, but I haven't exactly said no. Just responded as if he never said or suggested anything sexual.
I was expecting you to ask what are these that I'm wearing on my feet. To answer your actual question, I'm still a bot man. I'm still a bot. You'd say so if you knew me. I'm just a fortunate bot. Let me say that. We all are. And it's how I portray myself and my circumstances that makes a big difference, coupled with how people react to me. You're a normie.
>>26051894 >I'm still a bot man. I'm still a bot No normie fuck, you just come to flaunt because of some twisted sense of exhibitionist proud.
There's no such a thing as a "fortunate bot". That's a mental gymnastics you use to excuse the real reason you are here. You want people here to be here in awe of your "fortunate" life. But quite the opposite, normie in denial.
>>26051894 >I'm the normie, you're the robot. What the fuck is this? Freaky Friday? You've had sex, you've had GFs, you've had girls sexually interested in you. You'd have to do a pretty good job to convince me that you're still a robot.
nah what frustrates me is every girl who is interested in me just wants to "hook up" I have no intention of dealing with some girl who has had a ton of boyfriends or jumps from dick to dick on tinder and that's pretty much all of them I can see
>>26052092 >Doesn't respond to allegation that he's a normie Silence isn't always the best answer, cishet.
Jokes aside, get real. You can be a bot and still enjoy a modicum of success, while having a positive attitude. Yes, there is an element of wanting to share my accomplishments with you lot. That's because I've been here for ~8 years with you all, aging, going through depression, suicidal ideation, and eventually getting my shit together. Somewhere along the line it became clear there was an upward trajectory, and that didn't mean I wasn't a bot anymore.
>>26052414 well i really dont like vaginas (but im not at all attracted to men) so its like, the worst combination. idk id just much rather get a bj and rub one out for her. maybe the people ive slept with are just bad at sex cuz they were both virgins when we first fucked
>>26052269 relatedly, what's a "ton" of boyfriends to you? I've had 5 bfs and 3 of them were from /r9k/. four of the five counted in total dating time is less than six months. the other has been almost a year now. I only had sex with three of them. is this too big of a number for you to work with? just curious.
>tfw any time you post your dick on /soc/ or reddit or find girls on kik they all say how big and beautiful your dick is and they want it inside them >tfw me being a kissless virgin permavirgin aspie faggot piece of worthless human shit will mean i'll never use it
>>26052851 why even post something so stupid? every man tries to touch me, because men are self-serving pigs and live for their desires above anyone else's. don't be jealous that I get more attention in a day than you'd get in a lifetime - it's your gender that does it.
>>26052826 to be frank, I wouldn't date someone like you whom has no idea of how basic spelling and sentence structure work. but what makes you think I have baggage? I just dated some guys that weren't into it at the time. one of them even turned tranny, that was hilarious. but just because I've had relationships that don't work out doesn't mean I have baggage over them.
>>26052985 You're throwing away the opportunity to actually meet her or take her out on a date or something. She's on tinder because she wants to meet cool guys. If all she wanted to do was get off, she'd use her vibrator.
>>26053032 >>26053035 I'm kind of curious how the whole "time to text back" thing is working in the "extremes"
All I've ever seen, from texting, to tinder, to online dating, to anything like that, talks about this
This whole idea that "if you return a girl's message quickly, it shows you're some desperate thirsty loser who has nothing else going for them" (yes, these exact words) even though shouldn't the girl like that you think enough of her to respond quickly? But then if you take "too" long to respond back, then she feels insulted because she wasnt important enough to respond back to in a decent amount of time.
>>26053037 >throwing away the opportunity to actually meet her or take her out on a date or something. But like I said, I'm not interested in any of that. Besides, her profile was completely blank except for one picture. Why should I put forth effort when she's obviously not?
>>26053013 >Yeah to be honest. I wouldn't date someone like you. To much baggage. >periods when you mean commas >no commas where you need commas >'to' instead of 'too' yes, I'm a stickler for grammar/spelling and I'm not ashamed.
what are you talking about, 'weren't into what?" literally, what?
>>26053085 >"if you return a girl's message quickly, it shows you're some desperate thirsty loser who has nothing else going for them" this is generalized anxiety creating problems for people where there were no problems originally.
girls don't ACTUALLY get upset you replied "too soon," as if they're sitting there with a stopwatch timing your responses. sometimes she might be doing something and text you and set down her phone, and not want to go back and reply 30 seconds later. that's just life. stop being so ego-centric and assuming it's about you; literally nothing is.
>>26053085 If you reply as soon as she messages you every single time, that is an extreme.
>shouldn't the girl like that you think enough of her to respond quickly? Not unless you're having a real-time conversation or are already in a relationship. Slow down, give her a breathing room and find something to do between messages.
>>26053171 But I don't understand why texting/messaging back quickly is a problem is people are on their phones 24/7 anyway
Like, almost every time you see a girl in public they are dicking around on their phone. Work downtime, on their phone. You're telling me they aren't responding to guys texting them, and if a guy is doing it at the same time, not to text back to soon because then you "aren't doing anything and therefore are boring to her"?
>>26053232 you're telling me - I guarantee you don't have perfect taste in women either. if you got to date your "dream" woman, they'd react in a completely different way than you'd expect and break your heart. that's just how it is. the robot ideal of dating and marrying a virgin is outdated to the times of selling women for dowry; you can't just buy a woman's compliance anymore, and if that seriously affects your dating strategy, then you have something serious to work on.
people try to get together and break up, that's how dating is.
I have to wonder why a bunch of kissless, handholdless, hugless, touchless virgins try to set boundaries on the dating world? that, to me, seems silly as fuck, famiry.
>>26053213 Even if all they want to do is check some Facebook posts between messages it'll feel like a drag to them to get a reply too soon. If nothing else, try to text a few people at once. That'll slow you down a bit.
>>26053085 yeah feminism is shit dude. that's the answer.
think of women like a human resources department. their ONLY job is to hire the right candidates (partners).
in the past, their standards made sense. "is he a hard worker?" "does he have values?" "does he respect women?" basically, is this guy good for the "company?"
feminism has told them "we're free to form a horrible unproductive bullshit company if we want! and we actively SHOULD! yay!"
all women care about are money and looks. they would rather hire a bunch of incompetent ryan goslings and hemsworth brothers than capable guys who also have their flaws. (flaws that, coincidentally, women have themselves. funny how that works.)
they say "well men are getting worse too sooo..." but we're not. we're really not. men have always been the same: industrious, intelligent, and generally fair-minded. women have always been the same: irrational, illogical, and petty. the difference is that men finally trusted them to act like people. and it backfired completely.
>inb4 "give it time"
can't even form consensus among themselves. and when they do, what happens? a party? a fucking night getting drunk at a club? a bake sale? fucking wow.
>>26053299 lol seriously though, their bullshit needs to be curtailed and I know you're watching mods, go ahead and ban me faggots, I'll be back soon enough. your faggotry will never drive me off my home board, or make me give up my trip. I have seen so many mod purges in my time, all I need to do is wait till your dumb asses are fired. ultimately, you are the expendable ones, not I, even Hiroshima knows that
>>26051433 I'm a girl and I want to go on a road trip to help every guy who never wants to post on here lonely again. But first of all I doubt just merely getting laid would help with that. Even if it did it's hard for me because I'm unattractive. I still want to be with someone who appreciates me. But even claiming to be desperate robots reject me.
It did once. It no longer does. Why? Because I have been having regular sex for years now. When I was 18 this was my home and I was just like the rest of you. I am 24 now and have been laid at least once a month for 4 years now.
>>26051894 >I'm still a bot man. I'm still a bot. You'd say so if you knew me. I'm just a fortunate bot. Let me say that. We all are. You absolute fucking normalshit idiot, I was smiling and laughing after having seen a few posts in another thread but you just ruined it all you fat fucking idiot
>have foot fetish >it would literally take zero effort for a girl to let me lick her feet >it would require no commitment >it wouldn't despoil her or anything >it would have no social repurcussions >any one could let me do it at any time, if they just felt like it on a whim >they never will >i am a virgin and have never touched a woman >my retarded sex drive makes me hate life every day that i can't accomplish this >feel constantly frustrated >i will die this way
I am beyond frustration and even anger. I am just impressed.
>>26052457 Sounds like low test, not even memeing get them checked out. When I was an alcoholic I felt this way, a week after I came off that shit and my hormones started to level out a bit more I stopped.
>>26053962 They sure can Anon. I started 4chan when I was like 16 or 17 and was a robot all the way through 20 when I moved out of my parents house. Decided to make a few changes, ended up working out and I got laid.
>>26053293 >people try to get together and break up, that's how dating is. >I have to wonder why a bunch of kissless, handholdless, hugless, touchless virgins try to set boundaries on the dating world? that, to me, seems silly as fuck, famiry. Because the 'normal way has a high chance of failure, sucking a lot of dick makes you a terrible candidate for a wife.
Marriage and family related materials. Links http://www.medicaldaily.com/ignorance-bliss-when-it-comes-marriage-fewer-partners-youve-had-more-likely-your-298752 http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2012/08/more-promiscuity-data.html
>>26054035 Youdo realize that the "book of graphs" was made by a conservative think tank? The corrosponding NSFG (the one from 1995) basically states that
>the earlier you marry, the more likely you are to divorce >the longer you've been in a relationship, the less likely you are to divorce and >blacks have a slightly higher rate of divorce than anyone else
None of the stuff the Bell Foundation claims is even in there.
>>26053451 I actually do road trips all over the western US all the time due to my work (I'm a photographer). I would consider bringing you along but I will need you to help out holding reflectors and changing lighting settings on the flashes.
>>26054198 >wanting your gf to pine for old lovers In what way is your scenario superior? http://www.medicaldaily.com/ignorance-bliss-when-it-comes-marriage-fewer-partners-youve-had-more-likely-your-298752 >>26054229 The image and link I provided sheds more light on it on it and divides it up by race, not sure if they pull from the same source. http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by#detailed/1/any/false/36,868,867,133,38/10,168,9,12,1,13,185/432,431 >>26054269 > "book of graphs" You mean the heritage one? The overlay on the heritage bar graph is from the teachman study which I'm certain was NOT a conservative thinktank, the socialpathology blog I ripped the image from was overlaying the teachman results to show that the conservatives had similar findings to the teachman study. This source affirms the same link between higher partner count and higher risk for divorce, I don't know if they are politically affiliated. http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf >>26054434 I linked from different sources affirming the same finding, about sexual partner count and divorce risk, because I knew the heritage one is tainted by claims of bias and would be dismissed.
I'm tired of all this stupid shit all the time. I want to be dead. I want out of the game. I don't want to be an animal in an animal competition trying to win the best animal prize which is decided by other animals. I don't want to think about the checklist of things I need to accomplish and regularly achieve in order to be allowed to my cock in a vagina. I don't want to worry about keeping the vagina around for a long time by feeding it money and attention. I don't want to think about Chads and betas and omegas and deltas and epsilons. It's all getting to be too much and it's all fucking stupid.
>>26054482 >In this definition, single-parent families may include cohabiting couples and do not include children living with married stepparents. I suppose I'll have to go look for it myself when I feel less lazy.
>>26054614 Sorry I couldn't find something more helpful to be fair to them cohabiting can be a very transient thing so they'd have to tweak the survey to find out how long they were cohabiting or whether this is just another boyfriend or girlfriend that will be gone soon.
>>26052785 mentioning my gender only cause it's semi relevent, but i don't see why this wouldn't work with casual sex chicks. i guess going specifically to certain girls to ask might be a bit offputting, but i'm sure you'll find some chick that thinks you're real hot and wants to get eaten out by ya.
i am pretty high though so it's a mystery if this is decent advice
>>26052946 >>26053125 >I'm a stickler for grammar >someone like you whom has no idea of how basic spelling and sentence structure work >whom has >whom >has Might have been able to overlook the 5 guys, but not this.
>tfw your girlfriend is kind of gross and pretty overweight but her pussy is super satisfying because you care about her so much and also she eats your ass Date a robot, robots. They're very rare, the true ones, but if they are, they are the best.
No. I fapped so much I have permanent erectile dysfunction and only a tiny trickle of semen even after not fapping a week.
Besides, I was too scared of make babby to ever have actual sex even if given the opportunity. I'm more comfortable staying a virgin for life and never wanting kids than betting on a condom working and/or pulling out in time.
>>26056514 The 2 are unrelated. I'm just saying how even if I haven't damaged my penis from so much wanking, the idea that there's always a risk of whats supposed to happen happening regardless of how much contraception you use is enough to make me afraid to ever have sex.
Thread replies: 124 Thread images: 21
Thread DB ID: 469701
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.