everything breaks down over time, so yes it is technically true. if you are asking that a woman sleeping around will wear out her vagina, you vastly overestimate the damage a penis can do to a vagina. babies do WAY more damage
Girls definately get broken in, most likely nerve and emtional desensitizing, but the set up can still be tight. Tight/loose has low correlation to use. Beef flaps are actually just excess scrotum from the surgery.
So I'm just going to ask because I've never seen this anything like this presented:
Can any person who is a fervent supporter of the idea that frequent sex elongates the labia link me to any *respectable, peer-reviewed, replicated, and meta-analyzed* journal study that supports this assertion?
Google "the husband stitch." The trauma of childbirth is roughly equivalent to 25-30 additional sexual partners in a woman's lifetime. Doctors who are up to date on medical research understand that this extra wear and tear on the vagina can cause it to flop out and become unusable, so they stitch it up extra tight. Imagine women who have a lot of sexual partners NOT getting this procedure done and you can understand how blown out cunts become a legitimate problem.
>Women do something immoral/bad/cruel to men directly or indirectly >Men react negatively to this since they are the object of the bad >Women begin a whole expansion of victim logic with the male reaction as the primary cause >Women "overcome" the oppression/bigotry/hate etc of men by doing something immoral/bad/cruel to men directly or indirectly >etc
The problem with women is they latch onto the reaction and treat is as if it were unprovoked. It amazes me.
>women sleep with lots of men (sluts) >men are unhappy >I have to lie to overcome the bigotry and slut shaming etc
The absolute core is that most women don't see that their actions have consequences.
>>25833044 >every week people defend whoredom Why are whores so fragile that they constantly need defending? Links http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf http://www.medicaldaily.com/ignorance-bliss-when-it-comes-marriage-fewer-partners-youve-had-more-likely-your-298752 http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2012/08/more-promiscuity-data.html PDFS http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_028.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
>>25833683 >he's still calling me a woman despite my dangling penis You must be one of those low IQ negroids I keep hearing about that posts here. Maybe if you had a touch of white genetics you wouldn't jump to conclusions like a feral ape.
>>25833655 Sluts are gross because it's easy for a woman to be one. A man needs to be charismatic and somewhat attractive to get laid, all a woman needs to do is give consent to any of the guys currently pursuing her.
>>25833131 It's not an inaccurate metaphor, you're retarded. The physiology of women degrades with use, The physicality of the road also degrades with use. This is a simple comparison, and is logically sound.
>>25833044 i think it is a myth. i fucked a girl who had two children and she was also what you could call a slut. her pussy was some of the tightest ive ever had.
the problem isnt a physical one its an emotional one. men will always find girls who hve had multiple partners as unworthy wifes/mothers. its a natural instinct that comes to most men. i dont know why, maybe it doesnt make sense and its unfair but it has always been that way i doubt it will ever change
Here's the problem with promiscuous/slutty women. If a woman is promiscuous, that means that she has had a number of partners one after the other. In order for a woman to move from one partner to the next, that means she was rejected by or rejected her previous partner. These women are women who have a storied history of rejecting and being rejected.
The takeaway is that if you invest in a slut, you are investing in a woman who either: 1) has spent a lot of time rejecting her previous partners because she has made poor decisions or because she is constantly searching for better or 2) has been rejected by a number of men because of her own defects.
Regardless of whether it's option 1 or 2, these women are not worth investing in. By saying she has a "blown out" vagina, it is a metaphor for describing the one thing she has valued about herself and brought into relationships as being unworthy of investing in.
I don't know why this is even an argument. Obviously the only thing that matters is the size of their previous partners. If a girl has been dating Shane Diesel for the past 5 years then her cunt is going to be a cavernous void for anyone with an average penis. She will also be psychologically dependent on the huge cock and will probably never get the same satisfaction from a regular one ever again, even after her vagina has shrunken back to its regular size.
And while the cunt can be stretched to a degree and will retain that level of stretchedness for a period, the baseline is mostly genetic. Things like masturbating with 8 inch girth water bottles (like my ex) and giving birth will change that baseline, but most cocks arent big enough to permanently change anything. Again, the main change is psychological - if a girl has enjoyed a giant cock in her past, then you will probably never be capable of satisfying her in the same way. If she has slept around, this increases the chance she has enjoyed a monster.
>>25833044 >female forums have plenty of women asking how to tighten their vaginas after child birth, some women's vaginas have been absolutely ruined >young female forums have plenty of discussions about 'stretching out' their vaginas for sex >females will continue to tell men that childbirth doesn't do anything to the vagina and if it did women could just do some kegels >females will continue to say you can't stretch out a vagina Women are fucking liars
Childbirth stretches vaginas. Sex stretches Vaginas
Women are ridiculously insecure about their vaginas and will continue to lie to all men about why their cunt hole is too loose
>>25834644 >virgins are ridiculed mercilessly >no social justice campaign I wonder why when these people are obviously only interested in equality and are completely selfless. Social justice campaigns aren't just things pushed primarily by women forcing politics onto everyone else to justify their own shitty lifestyle
>>25834644 >No one is a loser. Just because I like to mooch off my parents, watch anime a lot, gain weight, have no social hobbies, and never had a job, I should be held at the same standard as an independent responsible worker
>>25833084 A more accurate analogy than a road is any other muscular part of the human body. Rather than degrading with use, muscles (and the vagina is mostly skin and muscles) degrade with non-use. That's why most 4chan users are so weak and immobile.
>>25834833 Having a lot of casual extremely intimate contact with people you don't plan on having any sort of actual relationship with tends to correlate with low self-worth. That's all I said. Sorry if I'm of the apparently misguided opinion that your actions have something to do with who you are as a person, I'm not hip to all the research millenials are privy to that excuse them from any sense of responsibility.
>>25834470 Childbirth literally tears vaginas you mong, it's not the same thing.
Nor is purposefully stretching something the same as it being stretched by sex. A guy can fix phimosis by stretching it, but he won't end up with a stretched out floppy foreskin if he has sex a bunch of times.
Fucking lel at the typical idiots defending sluts because they probably have a slut of a gf themselves.
Whores are good for a pump and dump and that's about it. I don't know why some men are so fucking keen on pretending that they're good girls, that they aren't carrying mental baggage from whoring it up and so on. Have some self-respect, for fucks sake.
>>25835064 But it is, it retracts literally every time, and often will move back forwards a lot.
It works for any part of the body though, your mouth doesn't get stretched out even though it's constantly being expanded and contracted, your anus doesn't even if you engage in regular anal sex (ignoring extreme cases, because it is possible to purposefully stretch out any part of your body if you choose to), why is a vagina the only part of our body that apparently does?
These fucking retards are running to the defense of sluts because they believe that by showing sluts that they're on the sluts' side, they will prove their value as mates and get sex out of it. The tragic irony of it all is that their presupposition follows the rules of the game: men have to prove they're worthy of sex and women will give it to them as a result.
It's hilarious because the sluts in the pro-slut camp are busy scurrying like a box of rats and climbing over each other to tear apart this system so they can get what they want. But it will never change because all social progress relies on sex as the end goal.
TL;DR, betafags try to win over sluts by saying that winning over sluts for sex should no longer be a thing.
>>25835021 >but he won't end up with a stretched out floppy foreskin if he has sex a bunch of times That's because foreskin isn't actually stretching like a vagina is but foreskin STILL DOES get looser over time with constant use of the penis
>>25833396 Just have to say that I'm pretty sure this picture is fake. If I remember correctly the girl got a cut on her thigh and they took they picture because it looked funny. It is not menstrual blood.
>>25835244 The anus stretches, but from general anal sex, it won't turn into a loose hole. It's also a different kind of orifice, so might have not been a great example.
>>25835241 Obviously it's not the same way, but it still stretches, and a foreskin has no way of becoming less stretched over time. You're seriously delusional if you think it gets looser without you purposefully stretching it though.
>As (sic) a male ever shamed a female because she was a virgin?
Of course not. Because men demonstrate their value by being able to convince women to fuck them. Women do not bring any of their own value to the table. They are the arbiters of value. It's awful.
99.99999999% of social/scientific/economic/_____ progress is a function of a man trying to impress a woman (or women) into sleeping with him. He displays his fitness to procreate through his actions. The women just run around choosing who to fuck.
Men who understand that this is ultimately the end game have a choice of either playing into the system by realizing this and trying to play the game as well as they can and get as many women as they can. Or they choose to opt out of the game because they realize that relying on women to be the ones who choose what is worthy of pursuing is a load of shit.
By being slutty, women are undervaluing their ability to judge and push society forward by manipulating men. How society moves forward is no longer a function of men being successful when women are whimsical and indiscriminate about whom they choose to fuck.
>>25835164 One could speculate the vagina traditionally only had a few partners at most, and they'd be of average size. These days a woman could sleep with a dozen 8" men in a month if she really wanted to. Evolutionarily everyone would know if a woman was slutting it up, and she'd face all that backlash from trying to cuck (it obviously didn't stop them, as the 10-15% of false-fatherhood statistics show).
>>25835900 >has her retarded claim that there's no difference between one person doing something and many people doing something btfo >f-fat virgin hat meme if you were less stupid people might value you for something other than your body
>>25833044 Not a myth, ignore the roasties saying otherwise.
I've had sex with virgins and hey what do you know, some were so tight that they had to spend time STRETCHING THEIR VAGINA to be able to have sex, but the women I've had sex with that weren't virgins had looser vaginas.
>>25835954 >analogy of comparing a body part to a piece of clothing Analogies have to actually be closely related for them to make sense. Besides, a t-shirt doesn't resize as long as it doesn't get worn by people who are too tall/fat for said shirt, meaning a single fat/tall person (cock) can resize the shirt (vagina), meaning that analogy is flawed in favor of healthyminded people (such as myself and "dumb roasties").
God job, fucknuts, you made me do this, you had the choice to walk away.
>>25836006 Guess you never read the story of the woman who separated from her husband for a few months then fucked a man with a 9inch dick then got back with her 6inch husband and couldn't feel anything.
>>25835954 The analogy doesn't make any sense though, unless you were guaranteed that both the people and penises were all consistently very large. If you're a fatty and you share your shirt with 100 skinny people, it won't fit any differently. If a girl has sex with her hung boyfriend 100 times, it will affect her more than if she has sex with 100 people with varying sizes (that are statistically more likely to be small to average than huge). And sluts probably have less sex than those in relationships anyway. Someone in a relationship might have sex multiple times a day due to the frequent proximity, the sluttiest of sluts might have a one night stand once a week.
None of this really matters though, because there's nothing to back up the idea of dicks stretching vaginas in the first place. Not even porn stars have visibly changing vaginas over the course of their careers.
>>25835993 >you must take a huge financial hit on your taxes MFJ gets a lot of benefits >you must have kids >you must have a mortgage Nigger do you plan to rent your whole life? And you can marry someone who doesn't want kids. >The concept of marriage is restricting and antiquated. Monogamy is fine What is the actual difference senpai? Explain in great detail to me.
>>25836032 She didn't say she literally stopped being able to feel him, it's that she realized the sensations were weak in comparison (something she wouldn't have known before trying a big dick). Once you try something better, the previous thing isn't going to measure up anymore. It's just common sense.
I just realized I wasn't being clear. What I meant to say was that all of that shouldn't all of sudden become a requirement because you're married.
It just makes no sense to me to have a legally bound contract of togetherness with someone
Especially since people change a lot in a lifetime. You may not want to be with the person you're with for the rest of your life, and Divorce is very expensive (and most of the time kind of damaging in many senses of the word.
You might as well just work on yourself and do what you need to do for you to be situated in life before you legally bind yourself (and your stuff) to someone else.
It's real because little babies vaginas and little kids vaginas are non-roastie. I haven't seen a lot of young vaginas, just changing family member's diapers, but I've definitely never seen a roastie one. So where does the roastie come from thing?
>>25836103 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labia_stretching It's real but these people use weights, I feel like you'd have to have a monster thick cock or she has a super tight vag and lots of dry sex to actually stretch the labia through sex instead of weights.
>>25836168 I tried monogamy myself for a few times when I had really thought "she was the one". But, invariably, they'd leave. Maybe they'd get bored of me, maybe the metalhead next door was more their thing, whatever.
Now I just keep things going with 3 or 4 at a time. Happier than I've ever been before. Never going to have a family, sure, but wasn't planning on it. And in light of my previous experiences, I'm probably going to move in with a bro for the whole co-op living thing.
>>25833044 probably. i remember seeing a thread on /lgbt/ a couple years back where a gay guy admitted he'd wrecked his ass and it was really loose. everyone told him there wasn't anything he could do about it except maybe get surgery.
i don't know anything about female anatomy but i expect the same thing can happen to girls. aging isn't a meme. our bodies don't last forever. you put it through a lot and it can wear down quick.
>>25833655 It is the CURRENT YEAR, you guys! You have to rethink your attitude towards morality because it is CURRENT YEAR!! Have you noticed, that over the course of the last 365+ days a WHOLE YEAR has passed??
>>25836246 >but i expect the same thing can happen to girls Not really, assholes and vaginas are not the same. Asses are supposed to be exit only and don't bounce back as easily. But the freaks who fuck their asses up tend to use gigantic dildos, the likes of which cannot occur in nature, so your average slutty chick isn't going to get loose from real dicks anyway.
>>25833189 Only if you stretch it really far then you have to get it stiched up for it to heal correctly. I had stretched ears when I was edgy and I took them out on day and like two weeks later they were small enough for normal earrings again. The ear isn't a muscle like the vagina is though.
I don't get why are people surprised that men don't want women who have been sleeping around a lot. If you consider average-sized man with average dick then a whore who's had many partners likely has been with someone bigger. And she will compare and she will laugh at the guy. She will tell all her friends and when they break up, she will tell everyone else.
>>25838437 >She will tell all her friends and when they break up, she will tell everyone else.
And no one will believe her. Everytime, a girl who'll trash-talk her ex is the same kind of girl that before will have gone on and on about the very same guy being the best lover ever, when they were still together.
It's always the type of chick who couldn't stop praising her new bf that will resort to putting him down once they are seperated. All that it is about is sour grapes, really.
I don't really think that's true. People will laugh unless they know for a fact she is wrong. Only reason this wouldn't matter is if the guy was legitimately big, like I don't know 7" maybe? If you're anything around average, people will laugh at you and you will always be that guy.
>>25838580 Cuck fantasies? See, I was a retard in high school. The typical friendzoned faggot and thanks to that I got to be around women. And they didn't consider me a partner, probably didn't even consider me a man at that point. Thanks to this they spoke without inhibition. Let me tell you, this isn't a fantasy. They laughed very often at rumors that guys were small(and small was anything under 6"). To add on that they laughed lot at manlets. Pretty much everything that /r9k/ thinks is true.
Obviously when they were in a group with men they considered desirable they would NEVER talk about this. I got to hear this thanks to being considered non-threatening and essentially non-male.
>>25838544 But why would they believe her? Like I said, every time I've heard a girl trash-talking a guy, saying that he was a bad lover or that he had a small dick or whatever, it was a girl who before that had been going on about him being a great lover or him having a huge dick. It's always the girls who have been dumped who resort to doing shit like that. And the best part of it? They often are still trying to get back together.
>>25838632 >saying that he was a bad lover or that he had a small dick or whatever, it was a girl who before that had been going on about him being a great lover or him having a huge dick You realized this. I wouldn't expect anything else. You think most people do? You most people even care? No they just want a cheap laugh to elevate their social status. They don't care if it's true or not, they just want to gossip and laugh at someone.
>>25838629 Who cares about what women say? If you're desirable you are going to get laid anyway. Also, women suck at judging sizes and distances. Some dude probably told one of them that his 3,5 incher was 6 inches long, or something.
>>25833131 All what I'm going to say in regards to this anons >>25833084 post is that the only pussy I ever seen in person was a hookers and she had the most disgusting roast beef pussy I ever seen with a gross asshole to boot.
Fuck off deniers. This is true. It's common sense. You don't have to have been around the block to comprehend this.
>>25838759 Well that's nice and all but the statistics don't lie. I mean you have this obvious disparity. Despite what I've posted you see many men with girlfriends. What does this prove though? Either that what I've posted is wrong. Or that women will date men they consider to be shit for whatever reasons. Maybe because they can't get anyone else at the moment and need someone to pay the bills. It would make sense.
>>25833102 Couldn't they just easily look through this guys phone records or even his internet history through his IP and know that he was the one who posted the ad on craigslist? I guess if they lived together then he could get away with the second part but not the first. Unless he set this all up with the johns in person.
>>25839278 My point is there's no way to measure it without asking, his 25 is an ass pull why should I find it more reliable? >>25839270 Here are the numbers for 25-44, may be median or average or fuckknows but it aint 25. There's even a 15 or more spot! www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm#numberlifetime
While I agree with everything you guys are saying. The fact of the matter is that cute virign girls don't exist anymore.
I'm 22 years old. Every girl I know claims to have had sex with 3-5 people. And that's just the number they're WILLING to tell you, most of them are probably in the double digits area. And these aren't some roastie sluts either, most of these girls are medical students, law students or in a STEM field of some sort, I only know a couple of girls who aren't in any of those and they're never bigger whores. Most of these girls aren't even the "one night stand" kind of type, it's just that they've had multiple long term boyfriends by the age of 20, so the number is BOUND to be at least 2-3 by the time they reach 20.
The sad fact of the matter is that this is only hurting ourselves. I personally hate women now because of this shit, I'm not even joking. I hate women with a passion.
>>25839331 >why should I find it more reliable? As far as I'm concerned anything that a woman says about the number of her sex partners is by default less reliable than anything else said by anyone else.
>>25839361 > tfw 5 years in with a pure virgin girl
Granted, her psychology was a complete mess when I met and she's abit over religious. So how is it possible for her to exist then? Not even ugly in the slightest or tumblr weight.
> virgin but she is anon. Tight enough that I couldn't even finger her for a long time and a hymen so closed up I was surprised it wasn't operated on. > miles of blowjobs This is something I never cared about, but she was adamant she never did it. Hell I remember she was crying her eyes out when she told me she has kissed another guy before me, thinking she did something absolutely filthy and slutty. Considering she told me things that would make me more inclined to leave her than her blowing a few guys, i'm certain she never did it
So again, pure virgin girls do exist. Even if they spend the next few years making your life miserable because of how unstable they are and hiding razors everywhere to cut themselves, but hey.
>>25839559 No, i'm sure of it. The problem with cutting is that some people do it purely for attention and even parade their cut marks as if saying "yeh, I cut myself, i'm this quirky LOL :DD". Others do it to release endorphins and feel good, simply because that's how they attribute pain. It's a mix between pain being a strong emotion and something that anchors them to reality and a form of punishment and release. Basically feeling that you did something bad and atoned for it. In a way they don't even feel pain at that point, but a feeling that's very similar to a runners high. These kind of people hide their cut marks fanatically and are that much harder to treat in general.
>>25839613 Probably, I don't deny that our sex used to be really bland at the start and probably still is now. Hell, I wont deny she was my first sexual experience as I was for her. It took us a couple years to even get to that point. I wouldn't trade the overall feeling of being with her now for a couple shots at better sex, considering it will only get better over time. And we both prefer just cuddling and being together anyways, rather than fucking so that's a bonus aswell.
>>25839883 > you don't have any idea how science works do you
These kind of areas of science get shut down easily and swiftly if you don't follow the status quo. Bringing up a paper to your peers on racial differences, pedophilia, gender differences, sexuality, mental illnesses and other fields deemed a social "taboo" and you will be labeled as a racist, pedophile, sexist, homophobic or any other shitty tag attached to you.
I'll be honest tho, I've never ever heard anything happen in the field regarding the whole sex makes you stretched, but there have been more than a few highly regarded people who have had their life and career ruined, simply because they attempted to tackle a subject while being as neutral as possible to the outcome and simply digging for scientific facts on the subject (pedophilia and racial differences especially).
But to work those muscles out would require kegel exercises. The average whore lays back and doesn't really focus on contracting those muscles for a significant amount of time while getting pounded. The only women who I found that actually focuses on kegels are prostitutes.
I honestly wouldn't care about a girl's sexual history if they did most of the work in the relationship and made more money than me, and didn't make me feel cucked
yet if they ever held off on me when I needed them, or acted like a hardcore prude, and also had me do much of the work in the relationship or made me deal with a lot of shit I didn't want to deal with, and I found out they had a sexual past? Fuck you, this isn't worth it
>>25838774 >the statistics don't lie yea the online dating statistics. what the fuck else are you supposed to judge on when its online dating? they type like a nice person? men will fuck anything with a hole, women are the choosers, but they dont only choose 20% of men.
>If you're not having sex with anyone, you are "frigid"
Top kek, I love how these cumdumspter whores like to make shit up about how men treat them to justify their whorish ways. "Frigid"? What straight man EVER called a woman "frigid" because she is not a slut?
>>25836634 I've never seen a nuclear reactor, but with enough books I know how it works. I've never been to Europe, but talking to europeans and with non biased news, I know what it's like. It's the same deal as people who claim that the Moon landings aren't real, or that, heck, think it doesn't exist. Just because I've never been there or never seen it, doesn't mean it wasn't documented or that there were no witnesses.
>>25843352 >"Frigid"? What straight man EVER called a woman "frigid" because she is not a slut?
Are you a virgin? Guys don't call girls frigid for not being a slut. Guys call them frigid for not sleeping with THEM or for not sleeping with them often enough. There are very few things worse than a frigid gf.
I'm not even a woman, but find myself feeling mind-boggled by the ignorance around this.
>One ex was disloyal, a self-proclaimed "slut," but had an innie >Other ex was a disloyal, but a cheater rather than a slut, and had an outie >Mom has four kids and regular sex, also has an innie (don't ask how I know)
Point is that it's genetics. I'm sure some of you know this but feign ignorance to piss of female posters/lurkers, but it's saddening that some of you really believe it. Holy shit.
>>25847197 Most people ITT agree that a vagina physically, more or less, stays the same.
The whole discussion here is about how sluts are terrible for relationships and dating one is literally cucking yourself.
>Let's random Chad's fuck her, orgasms, tells her friends about it >Best years of her life
>Finally finds a beta that she forces to take her out onto dates, teases him, and tells him to "wait" for it, gets upset and refuses to have sex with him when he doesn't buy her gifts and flowers and doesn't treat her nicely.
>>25839883 There absolutely are scientific taboos that will never be researched, because doing so would destroy your career. That's assuming you could even get funding at all. The most obvious example is any study trying to correlate intelligence/capability/negative thing to race or gender. Any study about pedophilic origins (they're just sick fucks of course!), and plenty of other social issues.
>>25838629 >crush on hs broke up with bf >"he was a total asshole and had a small dick!" >mimics his size with her thumb and pointer finger >"you know that's the average size for a guy, right?" >"hahaha... what? no way my former bf was way bigger!" >...
>>25838629 I was in classes with just girls for the last 4 years of high school. You're an idiot. Don't pay attention to what these girls said around you, that's just what they're like in groups. Their friendships are competitive, but in a different way than men are.
>>25853353 I can read, but clearly reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. The word myth doesn't refer to something that is strictly false. It's more equivalent to saying something is "hearsay", which doesn't mean it's true or false, just unsubstantiated.
Yes, you could use the word myth in reference to something that is false, but you can also use it to refer to a claim which is not yet validated. I hope this helps, my autistic friend.
>>25853692 >My point was the word, like many others, has varying uses and isn't bound to just being an equivalent of the word false. Except that's not true. On top of being illiterate and retarded you must also be schizophrenic because apparently you're the only one in the world who has heard it used that way get help
>>25853801 Again, as I said in my opening statement, there is a show which is built on the premise of validating or invalidating myths. So clearly, there are others who have heard and used the word that way.
>>25853937 Yes, that's why they test to see if there's truth to those claims or if they're completely false. If they were already established as false, there'd be no need to test them. You basically reiterated what I said about myths being unsubstantiated claims.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.