Is there a single logical reason for prostitution to be outlawed?

why would we need it to be institutionalized and goverment curate?

we just need to depenalize it, like yurop

>>25781832
Because the last thing this government wants is men to be able to have sex with women.

It's kind of weird really, all the sex that is shoved into the media and it's pretty much illegal to buy it, hell it's illegal to have sex before marriage in some states.

This country is massively fucked up.

Umm its not outlawed? Backpages bro

>>25781832
>Just imagine how many problems were solved if that shit was institutionalized and government-curated
That would be dumb
Just legalizing it and adding basic health and welfare regulations would be better and easier and solve most problems.

File: Untitled1.jpg (56KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x480px

>Is there a single logical reason for prostitution to be outlawed?

Found the reason.
Not sure if it's logical though.

>>25781832
It would definately be beneficial if the government made it a professional business.

Roasties would probably still make up some bullshit excuse though, since a working system would make them lose all their value and power.

>>25781908
cops bro

increases human trafficking

>>25781944
Roasties already fullforce the 'sex with a hooker doesn't count' meme

>>25781883
>hell it's illegal to have sex before marriage in some states
>This country is massively fucked up.

I know, that should be illegal in all states, and heavily enforced.

>>25781975
>increases human trafficking
Actually it would probably kill it except for absolute extremes like pedophilia.

>>25781832
>Is there a single logical reason for prostitution to be outlawed?
Women hate it because they want the monopoly on sex. Then they can drive the price of sex upward (dinner dates, movies, 14 carat gold and diamond engagement ring, house, car...)

Well inevitably people would be taken advantage of and people with business capital could openly bring girls into the country solely for sex. Sure it already happens but if government had a hand in all this but much would change . Morally it makes a huge difference though, it essentially it allows easier access to forced prostitution. All parties willing, I'm down with it. But that is just not the case all the time and it would be morally damning to have a hand In that

http://themonkeycage.org/2013/06/legalized-prostitution-increases-human-trafficking/

>>25781832
Feminists and wives don't want betas to have easy access to sex because it takes away power from their pussy

Governments often dislike it because it is a way for women to earn lots of tax free cash, and when it comes to the sex trade it is the elites, the politicians, business tycoons, celebrities who want first pickings on the girls, outlawing it keeps the average Joe from getting it.

>>25781832

It all goes back to the procreation of healthy, stable and productive males being the backbone of Western society.

It's why married couples receive more tax benefits
and child support exists
and public schools

Why do you think gay MARRIAGE was federally legalized BUT not adoption by gay couples?

A couple of faggots here and there won't affect much, but allow EVERY male to get sex without the expectation or even possibility of a child being born out of it and then you may start to see changes.

You know the children of prostitutes are the worst head cases right? They can't even make it into the Army.

American family law may be outdated, but you have to keep in mind it was written with the intent of increasing the population to create a tax-able workforce and a steady supply of soldiers and government workers.

>>25781883
This, you need to keep people in the rat cage longer so they work for more and pay you more in taxes. So many people would only work enough to get less money if they knew they could afford hookers and then the government would get less tax money.

>>25782027
Let's just bring people from other countries to do slave tier jobs instead.

>>25782057
bullshit, if governments cared about healthy and productive males, they'd stop letting women fuck men over in divorce

>>25781883
>Because the last thing this government wants is men to be able to have sex with women.
Because there are entire industries which are founded on men's desire to woo women.

Diamonds? If men aren't buying them for women, the only purpose they serve is in fucking drill bits and shit. Cheap chocolate and Valentine's trash, the brand new car market? All of this is dependent on men's desire to pound wet holes.

>>25782057
The American family is destroyed thanks to the kikes in Hollyjew, the government isn't helping.

While we're at it, I say we lower the age of consent to 14. I mean, come on, plenty of men didn't havr good teenage years and want to make it up.

>>25782148
The government also is trying to enforce common core which is legit the most retarded thing ever taught.

>>25782148
yeah but does any male unronically believe women are wooed by chocolates and flowers anymore?

>>25782145

I'm not saying the government cares, I'm saying the laws (especially older laws) were written with that intent.

Still, don't you see that taking everything a man has and giving it to a female is a net benefit to the government as that man will now have to start over again?

There's a margin for error anon, the population is large enough to allow some fuck ups. At the end of the day, we're producing enough human sacrifices to keep the machine running and that's all that matters. Prostitution has the potential to seriously endanger that.

Think of it this way, prostitution, even taxed would likely result in a lower net gain to the gov than a wife.

>>25782204
It's for the kucks who are already in relationships, and who have to "prove their love" by spending a certain amount of money on her in a year.

>>25782148

>Diamonds? If men aren't buying them for women, the only purpose they serve is in fucking drill bits and shit.

Diamonds are actually pretty fucking useful in an industrial setting. The thing is the clarify doesn't really matter, the hardness does (and they're all practically the same hardness, so very rarely will a company demand a higher quality). The diamond industry is another story altogether, but in short: the price of a diamond is inflated by at least 10x

>>25782274
long term no it isn't a gain for the government or society, because now Western birthrates have plummeted and men refuse to get married or have children because there is no motivation anymore, women get all the benefits in society

>>25781832
>Is there a single logical reason for prostitution to be outlawed?
>sex trafficking
>std''s
>medical clearances
>ensuring everything is clean
>exploitation of the workers
there's more to it than just your dick OP

>>25782339
Right, I know their industrial uses. But there won't be any De Biers inflation anymore if all they're used for is industrial stuff.

>>25782367
outlawing it doesn't exactly help those issues

>>25782367
Yeah, all the things that could be legally supervised

>>25782006
>Actually it would probably kill it
how? if it's an industry how do you tell the trafficked people from the people who willingly chose to do it, why wouldn't companies outsource just to have increased profits

>>25782344

>men refuse to get married or have children because there is no motivation anymore

Oh birthrates haven't moved much, but marriage rates have. I'm sure somebody in some office somewhere is tasked with fixing that just like somebody is in charge of motivating millenials to buy cars.

if you look at countries like Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Japan etc countries where prostitution is legal and extremely common you'll notice their birthrate is dead

Increased prostitution is a signal of a decaying society where families and relationships between men and women have broken down, it's sad but it won't change unless western governments make serious changes towards changing our culture and in many cases laws

>>25782417
human trafficking is bad enough without the incentive of govenment laws allowing them to bring them here for the sole purpose of prostitution
>>25782431
medically, the expenses would be huge, and the risks are far too high for any one customer.

maybe like a medically preapproved list of clients on a waiting list would work but im not so sure how the industry would sustain itself

>>25781990
This
Morality legislation isn't bad

>>25782520
>citation needed.bro

>>25781883
>it's illegal to have sex before marriage in some states

No fucking way, where?

>>25782545
it's irrelevant you blue pilled idiot, people will be trafficked either way, rich politicians and businessmen encourage so they have sex with young children, legalising prostitution won't mean shit

>>25782585
Google the birth rates for those countries, the lowest in the world

it's just common sense, if society has broken down to the point where men prefer to fuck whores rather than get girlfriends you know something has gone wrong

>>25782006
take a look at the study I posted ITT retard, statistically that's bullshit

increasing demand just means more johns and a bigger market for the lolis

>>25782637
relevant

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/6373531/Womens-love-lives-were-better-in-East-Germany-before-the-Berlin-Wall-fell.html

the sex industry kills sex, ironically

>>25782613
You can look to the statistics from places where it is legal. There is actually an improvement in these issues, not the other way around.

>>25781832
Women hate being reminded of what they are.

>>25782729
wrong; see
>>25782029

>>25781832
Because legalizing it would be a step towards normalizing it. The legalization of prostitution combined with the sexual liberation of society would have kids just a few decades down the line stating that they want to be prostitutes when they grow up.

>inb4 slippery slope, my point is still valid

>>25781832
I'm pretty sure the main reasons it isn't involve all of the violence within the industry (ex. Pimps beating, raping, and killing girls) and the spread of std's. Even if they ask if they clean, they gonna get lied to eventually.

>>25782924
There are places where it has been legalized for a few decades and they don't have that problem.

It has been tried. The benefits out way the cost/downsides to society.

The only reason it would not work in say the US is because conservatives and feminist would have a bitch fit and actively sabotage it any way they could.