Girl I know posted this on Facebook. Is there hope, anons?
>Inb4 Normiebook comments
lol why is there Jim Leavelle looking at the pussy like Lee Harvey Oswald just got shot
The girl that posted this has already tried showing off her body, but soon realized she cannot compete with more genetically superior females. And so she takes a step back and pretends to take the moral route in order to gain some validation by bringing down the value of sluts.
Not that I disagree with it, but this is just a roastie whore trying to redeem herself
That's a valid way to get to an opinion, imho
Blaming her for this (although I don't think that's really exactly how it happened anyway) you just be pushing some moral imprative
>you only came to the conclusion I agree with after trying the other thing didn't work, so I don't root for you even if you share my view now
True, in a way.
I feel that she's most likely the one with low self-esteem. She has zero things to show off - no ass, no boobs, no pussy on fleek - and she feels that the women who do have those things are below her. If she had those things, she wouldn't be complaining about them.
Everyone seeks validation from others, even the woman who posted the comment on facebook. That's what the #justsaying hashtag is for. She wants others to validate her feelings, it's the only reason to post them in the first place. The other difference between her and the other girls is that she gets her validation from criticizing them and being different to them.
In conclusion. What you got here is a case of one sour bitch. I've seen it before, it can't be cured.
>pic related, probably mens reaction to her
>OP please post pics of this bitch.
This is basically women who failed striking out on their own retreating back into the female sexuality cartel and trying to shame successful women
Nothing women ever do is for the right reasons
Fleek generally means top notch, great condition.
Like "did you see her ass? Shits fleek!"
"I just went to the salon, guuuurrlll, my eyebrows is fleek! Daa fuk!"
It came from worldstarhiphop
Hey friend do you have the complete version of that picture you posted?
Would be appreciated
I couldn't get the full version of google images either, the only results seem to be down
>resting bitch face
got u covered familia
Pretty hot. Disregard what I said.
Their might be other issues with her though, on a personality level.
But I suppose she does have legitimate points.
she's a feminist
It just means she's aware enough that she dislikes attentionwhores. She probably still dates around and lets numerous guys pound her in doggie and pull her hair and smack her.
>he thinks if women don't stay sluts he will ever get laid
lel. If women are as loose as you say now, and you can't get laid, what do you think will happen when women stay with one man for the rest of ltheir life?
Modern slut culture enables 90% of women to compete for the top 10% of men.
Traditional morality ensures a more even spread of the pussy, so average guys have a chance. Can't say anything about the clinical autists on here though
Naaa, I thought she had legitimate points even before I saw her pics
Some girls are legitimate attentions whore, though I don't see what the problem is.
True. She could have one of those vajayjay where the meat is all hanging out instead of one of those cute kissable innies that makes you lick your tongue just thinking about it....
This is a classic example of "I'm not like the other girls" or special snowflake mindset. She hopes that people will think she's "not a slut."
That or she's just ugly and self conscious.
Good message, but it only makes you look like you're seeking attention for good behavior and no one likes that. I'd rather see women actually prove they can do this with action, not by posting about how good they are on social media.
The vast majority of Women do not have the intellectual capacity to advance the human race in any meaningful way. Their only biological function is to find a suitable mate and raise healthy children
The differences between male and female brains are negligible. The reason we don't see women in science fields more is because of their lack of access. Women in our society are taught from a young age that they need to be pretty and inoffensive, and are often discouraged from pursuing interests in STEM fields, much the same way men are discouraged from professions in childcare or nursing. The lack of women in STEM fields is cultural, not biological. Basically, beliefs like yours are the reason women don't become scientists.
Do you think Hugh Hefner looks at the world today and thinks, "I used to pay these sluts?"
go check the stats in norway/sweden/switzerland so you can come back and report to us how even tho women have equal or greater rights to become literally anything they want, as well as them teaching boys all sorts of backwards shit to keep them subservient as to give girls an even higher leg up.
you cannot possibly create a more "equal" environment for girls than that of those 3 countries.
I don't see the point you're making. The argument was about whether or not women have the capacity to become contributing, valuable members of the scientific community, which they objectively can. Making men subservient is not a goal of feminism and all you're doing is bringing up irrelevant data in an attempt to push your own agenda and further reinforce your victim complex.