>>25715293 >Just don't talk to her right now. Sage advice. I used to talk to this girl who would barely give two word responses while I was writing a sentence or two. Long story short, I just stopped messaging her and about a week later she sent me a message. I basically only gave her one or two word responses after that and within two weeks I managed to get nudes out of her. Just pretend like you're busy, and if she's even remotely interested in you, she will message you back. If she doesn't, then drop her.
>>25715535 >either talk to me or remove me fuck that noise. personally i think YOU should remove HER.
dollars to doughnuts she won't even care. but even if by some tiny chance she does, don't respond. you don't need trash in your life. give her a wakeup call that even a fucking beta like you won't orbit her. if you do, you're pathetic.
i feel bad for you kids who haven't ascended. every minute of my day is taken with things i want to do that entertain me and advance me. no gf is seriously the best thing ever. you spend hours every day chasing and catering to bad people just because they happen to have been born with a vagina and look cute.
>>25715954 >stop throwing fits when things don't go your way, maybe then girls will actually respond to you this actually makes no sense at all, you seem to be implying that she will know if you throw fits or not before ignoring you
this is that roastie logic where we assume that women are omniscient judges of character and not just self-absorbed cunts
>>25716602 You love him and yet you disparage him on /r9k/ to improve your own image in the eyes of anonymous losers. You're a cunt, and if I were him I'd be very offended. And I am offended, because of how similar to him I am, except ripped.
Uh, no. She's probably busy doing shit. Ever had people constantly pester you on skype, even if you like them, because you're fucking busy? That's what its like. I know its shitty when they take ages to reply, then tend to reply when you're not around, but just drop some subtle conversation thing.
Like if they haven't answered my previous statement, I'll say something that just happened, usually some shit with my dog, just to see if they're still around and not replying or if they're afk, they usually reply half an hour later, having gone to eat or something.
Have any of all experienced just a complete numbness and indifference with the whole never having a significant other thing yet? This is a new development for me, the loneliness has kind of just become a boredom, I'm tired of it, I'm tired of thinking about it, I don't give a fuck about it anymore, it's all bullshit man, it's always been bullshit, i look around this site and social media and there's always someone cheating on someone or pining for someone higher up on the social dickriding ladder, it's just fucking exhausting, it's one less pile of bullshit to shovel. there are so many other genuinely interesting aspects of life and this world and i feel i've been wasting it mired in this shit.
>>25716636 Let's go through what I said: >I like his size >I'm mad about him trying to hook up with other women because it is a legitimately frustrating thing >how is this disparaging? >Never blamed him for this (and won't, in the context of his situation), just a statement of fact.
Yours is a really typical /r9k/ response:
>"you only like chads" >No, I like someone who's flawed. >"wow you're so mean to this person"
You're just mad that someone, in spite of sharing your flaws, is more capable than yourself of being loved.
>>25716880 tfw they don't even talk to you because you're notoriously prudish
sorry about your feel, though, anon.
>>25716977 You think? I don't want to be the one always asking to do things, it makes me feel nervous. At the same time, I don't want my silence to be interpreted as something rude and make him give up on me or something.
>>25716880 >>this is the only reason men will chat to you It's really not. I would never ask for nudes, I could watch porn if I wanted pictures. I would only talk to a women if I actually enjoy talking to her.
>>25718648 This. My reason to talk with women is pretty much the same as it is to talk with men: to acquaint, to see if we have things in common to talk about / enjoy talking with one another, and possibly befriend. If it's someone I know offline as well, see if it's someone with whom social interactions and events are enjoyable as well.
For nudes there's the internet, or if I wanted to actively find someone "live" to send me nudes, I'd be quite clear in that being an interest and priority. It's not like porn or nudes are hard to come by in this digital era.
>>25718523 >how does it feel knowing you only get attention because the only depth you have is the hole between your legs? Better than how I'd imagine it feels to be the person constantly giving that shallow attention.
>>25718617 >How to not open a woman 101. Well those things work for lesser and more reserved women that are not as accustomed to the attention, and all women more or less appreciate hearing these things repeated especially by random strangers daily, even if we don't respond.
But receiving a response requires the ability to push some buttons without seeming like a creeper, be amusing without seeming like a reddit gradeschool meme spammer, be nice without seeming like a beta, showing you can put in actual effort without writing a tryhard 3+ paragraph novel, and being assertive without seeming like a clingy control-freak.
>>25718838 Do you really think that person is the only one that reads those same exact messages? They literally copy and paste the same thing to everyone. You don't even get to be picky. You're literally only getting messages from dirtbags looking for 'easy' women. If they were actually interested in you I doubt someone would write a half-assed 'hey bb ur beautiful pls respond'.
>>25718930 I accept that those messages were all bottom-tier, which is another reason they don't get responses.
But the ones that can't be copy'n'pasted, which actually reference clues you've left for men to specify, tend to also contain the right amount "I feel compelled to respond to this guy and maybe get flirty."
>>25718838 >tfw you do quite well in person even with limited social skills >tfw you'd probably never be able to get any stranger's attention online within the first line through writing I prefer this over the other way around though. I don't see how men expect to have any decent chance to even simply get to know a woman through online means, where technically all men of the world could be trying to get to know (or get more than that from) the same woman. For every single woman. I guess some just don't know that online dating, tinder stuff, or even just getting to know someone of the other gender online is only really feasible for men with very good looks and means to show it upfront, men who are very strong in their writing "game", or for any woman. I met several women through games, whom are nice folk and I consider online friends, but meeting through common means like a game without being thirsty as a guy is different than online dating, "chatting" with strangers, etc.
>>25719042 It's why I'm not even trying that. I could use the clarification/certainty that both parties are looking to potentially date and if the conversation goes well enough a date can occur, as it omits the requirement of reading through dozens of potential but ever-so-ambiguous "signs" required when socializing in person as a guy to get an idea of whether or not she's interested in you romantically, but it's not worth having to deal with all the extra crap that comes with online dating.
>>25716793 >Women ignore you because don't think positively about women, and they can tell! >Believing this tripe >Putting this much stock in muh "women's intuition" If a woman's intuition about character is so good, why do they let Chad bust nuts inside them knowing that he won't stick around when it's time to raise the baby?
>>25717212 >Sorry that men have forced us to become this way, anon. Hi! few things to start off with =] 1. yes I added you because you're a female gamer, 'tis an awesome thing to see! 2. I'm Brian. 3. Don't be intimidated, but I'm not a stereotypical guy. If anything, I'll be the one in the kitchen.
>>25718838 >But receiving a response requires the ability to push some buttons without seeming like a creeper, be amusing without seeming like a reddit gradeschool meme spammer, be nice without seeming like a beta, showing you can put in actual effort without writing a tryhard 3+ paragraph novel, and being assertive without seeming like a clingy control-freak.
>>25720491 It's not about intuition, it's about your own mentality. If a person not responding to you gets you mad and you don't have the spine to stop talking to him/her and instead decide to enter in some kind of autist rage, it denotes a severe lack of confidence, that kind of shit doesn't help you in life, not only with women.
Thread replies: 83 Thread images: 12
Thread DB ID: 402623
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.