OBJECTIFYING WOMEN THREAD

All of them
All of them
None of them

If you say otherwise you are not a robot btw

>>25673248
>no traps

baka senpai

>>25673248
Any. I would date any of them.

>>25673248
All up to 150
All up to 150
All above 150

I have standards.

>>25673248
>90-100-110

so every woman who is heavier than me is a no-no

>>25673361
gain some weight, skelly.

>>25673329
this is my answer too

140 looks like the ideal imo

>>25673248

160 doesn't look bad. but 170 is too high test 5 me.

>>25673428
I think after 140 they stop being "curvy" and become fat, if we're talking ideals, 120/130 is mine.

>>25673248
>All
>All
>----

>>25673248
110, 130, & 150. There's an obvious pattern there, so either one would do. I love big hips and pear shape. The rest are pretty gross.

>>25673475
But not 120 or 140?

>>25673532
No, they're gross. Look up pear shape, dude. Those girls have no hips in accordance to their waist or shoulders. 120 is a box and 140 has is a box with fat legs and no shape or thigh gap, which is a pretty good indicator of a nice hip to waist ratio (only if they aren't skeletons though).

>>25673248
>Who would you date?
110-120-130
>Who would you fuck?
110-120-130
>Who would you never consider fucking?
rest

>>25673606
Scratch that, 120 is a box with broad shoulders. Which is worse.

File: 5foot4.png (1MB, 2181x435px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2181x435px

Changed a few pictures

>>25673997
Yeah 110-170 a bit unsure about 170 but eh sure. Under 110 is gross.

>>25673997
<=130 desu phamily

File: Hill Climb Girl.jpg (536KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1280x720px

>>25673248
100/110 is the best

>tfw you will never do squats with her
>tfw you will never train for mountain bike races together

;_;

>>25673248
100-160 here.

I see nothing wrong morally with objectifying women. They objectify men all the time, and apparently that's fine.

>>25673997
Just to be clear though 130 is miles ahead.

>>25674470
This is the era of the woman. They have the upper hand nowadays. It's okay to strike back.

>>25673997
140 should be changed.

Those tits are way worse than any of the previous options.

File: 1405721326500.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>25674444
>you will never play at 10 fps like her
feels good man

nice quads tho

90-150
but 130 is the hottest image

File: 1452415392869.jpg (139KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 600x800px

From 100 to 160 I would date and fuck, 90 could pass for both if she's got a cute face.
170 and 180 would maybe fuck.

>>25673248
>5'4
>90 to 100 for date and fuck
>never consider anything past 110

>>25673248
To be honest I would probably fuck all of them at least once. 170 & 180 isn't gf material tohugh

the hips on 130..... i want to shower her with cuckbux

>>25673248
110
120
130
are best, but I'd obviously give anyone from 90 to 140 a chance
>implying they'd give me one

>>25673248
>no large breasts on any of them
What's the point

>>25673248

180
180
anything under 180

between 100 and 160. I think that's a pretty good range

Everything from 100-150 is great with 130 being perfect.

all except 170 and 180, they look old af

These girls are all different heights

I prefer them on the chubby side personally

>>25675509
Literally they're all 5'4". I intentionally chose women of the same height.