today I learned from first hand experience autosage is not a

i guess if you can find a way to contact them, it might be worth it to ask them.

MODS=GODS

>>436731
What is there to explain? If a thread isn't up to scratch or maybe had a decent topic or discussion going but got out of control/heavily offtopic then it seems to be a good compromise to autosage it instead of outright deleting. Gives it time to wind down.

>>436787
at least have the balls to post with your capcode on, you massive cuckold loving homosexual transfaggot

>>436731
Describe your encounter with this nigh-mythical thing.

Because if you were the only person replying to your thread, that wasn't a conspiratorial action by some unseen enemy. It was your topic sucking.

>>436731
>today I learned from first hand experience autosage is not a meme, but a real thing that exists
It's amazing how many new and ignorant children think /qa/ is in need of their insights.

>>436831
>he thinks I am a mod
I wish I was, then I could clean up all the generals from /a/.

autosage is an effective tool to induce a streisand effect.

>>436731
>he thought autosage was a myth

How fucking new are you? Don't tell me you actually believed the mods when they post anonymously trying to pretend it's not real?

Do you also think the Janitor logs were faked too?

>>436731

Autosage basically translates to "I dont like your thread but it's not breaking any rules so I'll just hide it."

I've only ever seen it used on /v/, which is a fast enough board where it works.

>>437537
I would ban /qa/ posters that sounded like bitches. Like OP for example!

>>437576
it's a relatively recent thing, back in my day mods showed up and humiliated you in front of the entire board

>>436864
it wasn't my topic for starters, it went as follows: a thread with 70 replies, well under bumplimit, just stopped bumping when new replies were made

you can see this at the bottom right: 12 / 0 / 11 / 1 first number is replies, last is page number, it updates intantly on page refresh or on a timer