You know there are a lot of posts complaining about janitors/mods. Lets keep it simple. Post your unjust bans ITT.
The lack of transparency when it comes to bans is disgusting. 4chan does have a "ban page" that they make it seems like everything is by the books but we all know its just there to make it seem like the mods and jans are fair and doing their job.
You can get banned on /qa/ for really saying something the mods don't like. Talking about things from the leaked IRC logs will get you banned on all boards, even /qa/.
So banning someone for complaining about Nintendo is justified, telling a shitposter to go back to Reddit when they clearly are from Reddit is justified, and banning someone for no reason at all is justified?
I suggest trying to post on /tv/ for a while. Most likely you'll get banned because you said something triggering or something the mods don't like.
Global Rule 6 needs to be deleted IMO. It's vague as fuck and seemingly serves no purpose other than to excuse blatant mod bias and powertripping. 99.9% of all posts everywhere could be seen as "low quality" from a certain point of view, so there's seemingly no rhyme or reason as to which posts are deemed violations of Rule 6 and which aren't.
>post gondola in a gondola thread on /v/ (which I didn't start)
>get warning for posting offtopic
>stop posting and leave the thread
>about 3 hours later I get a 3 day ban
what the fuck man
why do my warnings always turn into bans some time later?
>try to post something
>"You are banned."
>clear cache because my phone usually does this
>try to post again
>"You are banned."
>check the ban
>banned for a post I didn't make, and was about 3 days ago
>was able to post during those three days
Why is global rule 3 a thing?
LITERALLY the only time it's ever enforced is for shitty 'a-anon triggered me!' bans.
The extreme irony of that enforcement
>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: ... anthropomorphic ("furry") or grotesque ("guro") images ... or loli/shota pornography.
So the rule thematically agrees with you. It's the moderator that doesn't.
Which comes back to my point.
Mod sees something that upsets him, he's going to go 'THATS TROLLING!' and bannu.
Half of this imageboard can't distinguish between bait and differing opinions as it is, if anyone should be able to it would be the mods.
FYI, global rule 8 says you'll get banned for criticizing 4chan's policies or moderations, so you're actually breaking the rules right now.
On the other hand, that doesn't really correlate with whether or not you get banned so carry on.