I need a straight answer from someone here who won't ban

Redwood hasn't been a mod for years.

>>399892
Redwood was confirmed to be an active mod last year by the leaked IRC logs so thats wrong. I just need to know if he still is a mod now.

File: 1450235327052.gif (966KB, 500x579px) Image search: [Google]

966KB, 500x579px

>>399995
>he actually believes leaked IRC logs

>>400005
Judging by /co/ moderation they are legitimate since they correspond with bans similar to the ones Redwood carries out.

File: 1389399354723.gif (229KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 500x375px

>>400011
Nothing anyone says will ever convince you otherwise so I question the purpose of this thread.
You already have the truth in your head

>>400320
Listen, for reasons I know for a fact that the IRC logs are 100% real.
And redwood was an active mod up until last year. Its up in the air if he still is, but its highly likely. I just a confirmation is all. Im not gonna do anything if he is.

He might not be a mod, but he'll always be a nigger.

>>400361
I flipped a coin and got heads so yes, Redwood is still a mod. Use that information as you will.

>>400371
I wont believe you until you cut off a chicken's head and the body stops running around with the legs pointed up at sunrise.

>>399872
Are you upset that you actually have to obey rule 3 with respect to racism on /co/ because of a black moderator, Anon?

Everybody who dislikes redwood is both a racist and a pedophile as those are the people redwood banned left and right.

I for one embrace our redwood overlord.

>>400361
We're just anons here. You won't get a mod answer and hiro is as enigmatic and random as ever and would only give you a picture of a redwood tree as a response

bump for mod documenting

>>399995
Hot off the presses

[13:22:50] Anonymous: Hey Redwood are you a mod?
[13:23:01] Redwood: Nope.