When will the Normies realize that there are WAY too many people in the world?
This is a huge issue. We already ran out of jobs. There will still be millions of unemployed people even if every available job is filled. And soon we are going to start running out of resources.
Something needs to be done.
They do realize, but they try to find unreasonnable solutions (space travel) or they have weak minds and don't want to go over their values by doing what right for humanity.
And they also blame people who try to help the world saying they're chaos makers.
It's hard to see clear with a wall of irrational values in front of their eyes.
I think it's religions that just can't square with the reality of it.
Star-Trek is one such religion.
To realize overpopulation is real is to realize God is a bad guy.
To continue to deny it just lets you gain control over the morons that comprise it.
the jews are right about this one, overpopulation is a problem
Fuck off, kike.
Niggers are the huge issue. Not White people.
>already ran out of jobs
Nobody actually believes this is how that works, right?
>millions of unemployed people
>there is a constant, flat number of jobs in the world
Nobody actually believes this, right?
>running out of resources
Fuck off, kike.
If any of you don't know this, overpopulation and global warming are the latest leftist agendas.
It's the fucking old people. People in our society today live longer. Because of that, regular young Joes such as ourselves cannot fucking replace them and must do without a job until then. The young are being replaced by the old. Can you believe that?! Because of the independence we give to old people, we do not have the option of taking care of them with a job that is ours, but they now take care of themselves with a job that should be ours, while we have no job at all. Think about it. Modern day medicine has cucked us all. It is good no doubt, but there are very ill-effects and we, the young, are the victims.
Jobs are human construct not natural resources.
There is more than enough space / resources for all of us - the efficiency of everything we do is shit.
If we would upgrade absolutely everything in absolutely every big consumer country energy consumption would be 1/10 of what we have now.
What needs to be done? - Education, changing of administration, infrastructure - and mostly a new political system or at least competent leaders.
+ this earth is a place on which we live for 70 years on average and that just for humans in the last 200 years, it's not our kingdom... we spend 20 years developing, educating 20 years free for all where we compete with others and work hard to spend 20 more years alone just like we started...
Wake up, embrace Jesus.
In the leftist universities they're teaching that overpopulation isn't actually a problem. The only "problem" is that we don't distribute resources efficiently enough for everyone to access them. Supposedly with a proper global socialist system we could keep growing for quite a while.
It's too many old people. If we got rid of the old, all of the solutions would be available to us since old ways would be taken out of positions of power and advancement could begin.
>There is more than enough space / resources for all of us - the efficiency of everything we do is shit
This is a statement of fact at a point in time. It does not project into the future. Any exponential rise in population ( given a fixed space per human, say 1/2 cubic meter ) leads to a growth in the required volume of a sphere of space to contain them whose radius soon must grow at a superluminal velocity.
The human race becomes a ball of meat expanding at greater than the speed of light.
People don't take that seriously because it amounts to genocide advocacy.
Besides, there is no reason to actively kill people for it. It's not the amount of people, it's the aggregate resource consumption against production. We can improve production or cut consumption and bam, we don't need large scale murder. But that's what we call "sustainability" to differentiate from the murderboner.
Sustainability is just another one of those terms people use to sweep the issue under the rug. The amount of administration and burden of responsibility is too great if we choose sustainability. Not only that, but the incompetence in today's politics would make the attempt futile. Genocide, I am against also. What I am advocating is euthanasia of persons above a certain age with certain qualifications.
Our future(the World's future) seems dim. Imagine, 100 years ago the world was at war. Today, I cannot see the path of peace. Europe is under terrorist attacks, the US is weakening militarily while Russia grows stronger and the Chinese also. Turkey is still garbage waiting to spill over into Europe and neighboring countries. Nuclear armament is underway in North Korea and Iran. Our world is controlled by 'you know who' and there is nothing we can do about it. The poor grows as the rich fatten. Is it really true, as the many scholars throughout European history have claimed, that Jews are evil and scheming?
the something that NEEDS to be done is those groups of people that want to be left well enough alone, and protect their patches of lands and minor industry in their groups should be protected at all costs.
anyone that intrudes or try to live of their work without putting in will be forced out. smaller scale than countries, this is the only way for anything at all to function in the future.
you can't save everybody and large portion will have to be left to their own devices.
>Technological advances can accommodate the food and energy needs of a population far larger than the one that exists today.
That's true but a world where 1 in 2 people are Africans with an average IQ of 75 cannot.
That's a progress over half a millenia and we can support more people now.
It is a problem, but not for Europe or specifically Germany, Germany is overpopulated, which is why Germany needs to get their lands in the east stolen by on the piast lie back, which is owned by the underpopulated and thanks to communism underdeveloped Poland, but having no birthrate is a BIG problem
No such thing as underpopulated. We need less people, not more. What the fuck?
Not enough water. It's called water scarcity. And it's taking place in the areas where most of these European migrants are coming from. Africa, Middle East, India, etc
It's seriously the only way, but no one has the balls to call it like it is. They think love and acceptance is going to save the world or suddenly not make Africa the violent 3rd world shit hole that it is. It's in their nature.
Asians are literally >25% of the overall global population you chink loving beta cuck shit
Every time this thread gets posted I post the same answer:
1. Kill all the jews and muslims
2. Cull 95% of the rest of the shitskins, with the biggest cuts going to India, China and African countries where the birthrate are over 3
3. Do nothing for the other countries with birthrates under 2
4. Stop all 3rd world immigration to 1st world countries
Problem fucking solved.
Africa can "develop", sure it can.
No. The world is over populated. Germany is only "underpopulated' according to globalists $$$. Germany is only "underpopulated" if you're trying to keep up with the rest of the 3rd world in terms of having billions of children. We don't need to have more. They need to stop having children altogether for like 20 years.
Look closer. The problem is not the entire population. It's Africa and Asia.
As Africa receives more humanitarian aid, the more they will reproduce. Some countries in Africa have an average of over 7 children per mother.
The middle east is reproducing very rapidly too thanks to Ahmed and his 8 wives.
The economic immigration from these continents will eventually overwhelm and end the western world.
The asians will always be asians, but at least they're generally nationalistic and keep to themselves, so I don't see the problem there.
Many people already know of this issue. But nobody does a thing about it, and when someone tries, they get labeled for being racist, promoting genocide and eugenics etc..
I guess the problem is, that there is no money in it, aside from literally "saving the world", you get nothing by solving the issue of overpopulation. Companies don't gain anything from having fewer employees and customers. Countries don't get advantage in having fewer men in their armies. The social sistem doesn't benefit from having four old people on one young person and so on and so on. It has been like that since the dawn of civilisation, it is completely driven by overpopulation.
It is much better for the eco friendly lefties to put taxes on stuff and provide subsidies to their friends who get into renewable energy. That's just trying to cure the symptoms, not the disease.
The other problem is, how do you get all of the world to cooperate on this? If one country decides to lower it's population by, say 50%, the others will start to get itchy just thinking about all the resources going to waste in a country that will soon be unable to defend itself.
World government perhaps? Nope. The bigger it is, the worse it works (see USSR, EU,... ). Given the current situation, I can see only some deadly virus wiping most of us out, or a war, a big one.
But let's just say nothing catastrophic happens in the next 50 or 100 years, what can we do about overpopulation? One child policies? Genicide? Eugenics? Something else?
I think we should only regulate the world's total agricultural production. Stop increasing it and then start decreasing it. The total population will then start to decrease and a damn lot of other issues will diminish as well. Simple and effective.
Yes it's globalisation. There is money in having a lot of working slaves. But this plan will backfire when Africans destroy everything.
Globalists such as the Bilderberg group. Many of whom are philanthropists of sorts, helping Africans with disease and aid. Bill Gates ring any bells? That's part of the problem right there.
Oh, fuck, my sides!
Go read the UN Report on global food production - North America alone generates enough food to give every human being on earth 'Murica level calorie intake
>I work at the UN, thus the flag
The EU alone has over 2 million jobs unfilled for more than 9 month due to a lack of trained workers for those positions. Most are good-paying skilled trades jobs.
America has another 3 million skilled trades jobs unfilled for more than 9 months
South America only has about 1 million of them.
You guys are being fooled.
>North America alone generates enough food to give every human being on earth 'Murica level calorie intake
>give free food for the rest of their lives to everyone, as long as they swallow this pill
>All the useless sign up for it
>The pill (let's make it either blue or red for shits and giggles) makes them sterile
>Something needs to be done.
Human colonies throughout the galaxy. Problem solved.
The Southern Colorado River in the US carried 1.2 the amount of fresh water needed for every human on the planet.
Lack of food and lack of water are about a
LACK OF POWER
whether it is economic, political, or military.
You guys are like crabs in a bucket.
Besides, the long term UN population projections are for peak population to be relatively soon and then a sharp drop as the Boomers croak, then a long, slow decline.