Terms that when spoken makes you automatically disregard the

"Black Lives Matter"

>white privilege
>socioeconomic factors
>folks
>people of colour
>gender binary
>heteronormative
>bigot

>>59973581

All of my this.

Womyn
Cis
Privilege
equality

>>59973401
>decolonization
>white privilege
>social justice
>"allies" in the lgbtbbq sense
>1488
>heil hitler
>ALLAH U ackbar
>not all muslims
>islamophobia
>europe was never christian

>>59973401
>bourgeois
>fascist
>racist
>sexist
>nigga
>masses
>LBGTJKLMNOP
>rape
>misogyny
>glass-ceiling
>wage-gap

>>59973401
>gentrification

File: 1449568276200.jpg (93KB, 960x949px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 960x949px

Anything that comes out of a liberal's mouth.

>>59973581

>Bigot

A fine word when used correctly. If someone is bigoted it means they're biased, and thus their opinions aren't really worth considering.

>socioeconomic factors

Socioeconomic factors objectively exist and have an impact on human society. To deny this makes you delusional.

>>59973782
>>59973774
>>59973581

Why only terms associated with liberalism and not their right-wing lunatic counterparts? Are you guys really this mentally ill and biased? Such a lack of objectivity is pretty shameful and indicative of brain damage.

>>59973401
>per se
>bud(dy)
>pyramid scheme/welfare witchcraft jargon, eg: participation failure, performance indicator, jobactive, newstart, postmanagement, etc..
>"I'll facebook her"
>"Malbourne" and associated shell > shall, elk > alk. Melbourne people do this so fucking often it makes me want to rip of my ears
>people who slur the letter g
>people who pronounce v instead of r

>>59973954
>Socioeconomic factors objectively exist and have an impact on human society. To deny this makes you delusional.

Yeah, but if you live in the first world, you can climb out of the poor class to reach at least the lower middle class.

>>59973401
racist
misogynist
homophobic

File: 1439498304691.jpg (47KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 960x960px

>>59974105
There are crazy right-wingers, but their crazy is different. Liberals crazy is changing the meaning of words. For example

Real racism: I hate niggers, they should all die

Liberal's interpretation of Racism: I'm against affirmative action

>>59974105
What right wing lunatic counterparts?

>Israel is our ally

Is probably the only thing that makes me disregard a "right wing" opinion immediately.

>>59974105
Because liberals would rarely if ever die for their ideology. They are wormy little traitors willing to betray their own beliefs if they don't find support in them.

They a horrid abomination and a disgusting awful image of humanity, truly proving that "nigger" transcends even race and roots itself into political ideology as well.

>>59973401
>thin privilege
>white privilege
>male privilege
>basically any privilege
>triggered
>fat cats/greedy ceos/1% pay fair share
>cisgendered

Spoken as a lower middle class fat white heterosexual male that grew up with just about every kind of person on the planet in cosmopolitan North Carolina.

File: australia.jpg (59KB, 468x700px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 468x700px

>>59974177
What's a "middle" class?

>>59973774
Kike kike weasel like.

>>59974384

Calling people/things Jewish is an exact analogue to liberal buzzwords like "racist" or "patriarchy." You have entire belief systems built on lies as foundations.

>>59973782
Bourgeois has a genuine meaning and isn't exclusively used by faggots, though it mostly is.

>ignorant
>delusional
>racist
>bigot
>xenophobe
>islamaphobe
>white privilege
>black lives matter

i could go all day

>>59974312
All left wingers are nutjobs.

File: Zarathushtra.jpg (2MB, 1502x2400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1502x2400px

>>59973401
Privilege
patriarchy
gender binary
trans anything
referring to God as a "bearded man in the sky/sky daddy"
cultural appropriation
diversity

___ privilege
heteronormative
patriarchy
cis-anything
___ shaming
mansplaining

>>59974105
>right-wing lunatic
Add another term to the list!

>>59974652
Yeah that's true when you ignore the massive overrepresentation of Jews among the wealthiest people in the world and in the American government and the media

>>59974652
Yeah all those mainstream right wingers in the media and academia calling things Jewish as a bad thing. Oh wait.

>>59974147
>bud(dy)
>a fucking AUSTRALIAN bitching about someone else's jargon
pls

File: it is time.png (74KB, 307x333px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 307x333px

>>59973774
>>1488

It might be a stupid saying but its a great quint to roll.

>>59974105
1488 and heil hitler is now associated with liberalism.

Tell me more.

hegemony

>>59974588
Oh noes it's topskin1488 he's gonna Shoah me with his quotations of hitler and worship of a dead faggy austrian. Oh noes.

>>59973401
"Hell, ___ ___ ___"

>>59974825
Not to mention the history of Jewish involvement in leftist revolutionary movements and general degenerate ideologies. And the Soviet Union.

>>59973401
>Problematic

>>59973401
privilege
trigger

>>59973401
>problematic

>>59974652
>Anti semitism and calling things Jewish is "right wing" in any way
Are you serious? To give you the benefit of the doubt, I will say that it is an American thing.
>incoming invocation of nazis while there are neither right wing nor relevant to the conversation

I don't disregard someone just because of it, but
>let me pick your brain
kinda comes off as condescending to me.

>>59975106
>oh noes

Either
>>>/2008/
Or
>>>/Reddit/

>>59974825

Over-representation is effectively a buzzword on 4chan because you think it gives you carte blanche to make any unproven claim you want. It also represents a really hilarious double standard, in that "over-representation" is your entire basis for believing whites to be better than others. Whites are over-represented in accomplishment, and are therefore the master race. Jews are over-represented in accomplishment, and are therefore [buzzword related to parasitism], [buzzword related to greed], [buzzword related to evil].

The way 4chan drones use "over-representation" is akin to associating a decision made in a room with 3 Jews and 97 non-Jews with Judaism because they are technically over-represented in the room. You do this routinely. For example, despite the fact that the US government is populated almost exclusively by white Christians, you regularly refer to any decisions it makes as "Jewish" because Jewish people exist in the government and exist in lobbies that petition the government. You think over-representation gives you justification to make these ridiculous, irrational assertions.

>>59973401
>economic equality
>GMO

>>59975242
Cuckservative detected.

>>59975268
>being a nazi

Either
>>/1933/
Or
>>/Stormfront/

That's your argument. I expect nothing less from a fine national socialist scholar with a phd in meth chemistry and oi punk culture.

File: 1451687067722.jpg (33KB, 368x475px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 368x475px

>>59973401
>X is like a facist

>>59974825
That's like saying that there is an over-representation of chinks and whites in Ivy league schools.

It's just culture, Jews simply don't spend too much money

>inb4 liberals

>>59973401
>Problematic
>Gold Standard
>religion of peace

Anything PC/Liberal/SJW related
>otherkin
>transfat
>trans-anything

>>59974177
The middle class and income mobility grows smaller every year, especially in the anglosphere.

>>59973401
>feminism
>problematic
>progressive
>tolerance
>any and all gender words
>racist
>nazi

>>59974105
>biased

Wrong thread, buddy.

>>59975395
Honestly though I think it's worse to be associated with people that call themselves Nazis today than be associated with the historical ones. They're not comparing you to some doctor or lawyer in 1935, they're associating you with some dumb fuck skin head who snorts meth, beats his gf and lives in a trailer.

>>59975387
>implying im a "nazi"

No

But I'm not hostile to them. Why would I be? They are better than the left and the mainstream right, though I agree ta a dead ideology but there is stuff to be learned from it.

>>59975395
Is that book a joke?

>>59973954
>human society
>delusional
>objectively exist
You're doing a good job of using words/phrases just like OP's asking

>>59975562
You mean people that barely even exist outside of the media?

Have you ever met one of these people? I haven't.

>>59973401
>literally

>>59975635
The real right hasn't existed since 1968. Read Daniel Fribergs "the real right returns" good primer to what right actually should be. It's not nazism.

File: 1451691926200.jpg (32KB, 480x474px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x474px

>>59973401
>Anything and everything derived from Marx
>occupy Democrats watermark

>>59975316
your argument kind of falls apart when you can prove jewish nepotism and relative incompetence while proving relative white superiority.

>>59975747

And by that you mean words which are used accurately and appropriately but trigger you and are therefore invalid. I hope you get incurable cancer. It's a relief that your pathologically delusional argumentation strategies carry exactly zero weight outside of your subhuman hugbox. What's it like knowing that every intellectual that has ever existed looks at you and everyone similar to you like you're less than a person?

>>59975772
Unfortunately I have met them. They tend to be people like Kyle or sinead from renegade radio or whatever. Hippy pagan types who are total losers.

The actual skinheads are pretty much gone replaced with the neo pagan types

These fetishists are just counter culture try hards who have no interest in anything but being special. They're not a whole lot different from social justice warriors.

>>59975316
No idea what you are talking about. Money rules the world, and who controll the flow of money? The jews have succesfully accumulated wealth by instigating conflict and waging war, only because they controll the money. In the end governments are just puppets that are played against eachother

>>59975890

By that you mean when you make a list of "good things whites done did" next to a list of "bad things the evil jooz done did," the list supports your agenda. You're not fooling someone with literally triple your IQ points, you inbred moron.

>>59975835
I know. I am probably more familiar with alt-right/arktos stuff than you. National Socialism is a failed ideology but I find people on /pol/ who rage against it suspicious.

>>59975451
I know its not at all what you meant but

>tfw transfats and "unhealthy" things are actually good for you and the kike media has gotten it wrong for fucking decades and its one of the reasons for the dropping testosterone rate amongst men

never trust a fucking nutritionist. Just don't be a fucking retard with your food and you can eat whatever the fuck you want and be infinitely healthier than any of the dumb faggots following meme diets and eating fads.

Just about the only thing you should actively avoid is having a lot of sugary food.

>>59973401

quantum

File: 1439813363249.gif (133KB, 311x366px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 311x366px

>>59973401
problematic

>>59976100

Jews don't control the money, that's literally neo-nazi propaganda. Suspicion of /pol/ shilling lead me to discover that when you rank the banks of the world by assets, you reach at least #25 without finding a single Jewish owner or CEO.

And yes, I already know you're going to respond to this by magically attributing all financial power to some institution with a Jew at the helm. When you're as unintelligent as the average /pol/ user, people can literally predict your fallacious responses to being shit on.

>>59976132
I don't inthink national socialism is in the bin of history with communism and liberalism as Dugin says.

Maybe you are more familiar with Arktos im not having a pissing contest about it. I'd rather talk about practical ideas not autistic fantasies like many people.

>>59973838
Sums it up for me!

File: 1451602643590.jpg (128KB, 1100x733px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1100x733px

>>59973401
More to the point

>bigot
No need to explain this one.

>Any of the -phobia
Literally an attempt at reducing diverging opinions to madness. The people using it probably don't consciously think of the implications of their terms, but the overall frame of thinking with these words is quite clear. It's an attempt at forcing psychiatry to your opponent. Re-education camps aren't far.

>bourgeois, class-conscious, all things related to class conflicts
Fallen out of favor in the last 15 years but you still find it here and there. Won't write a long essay on it. Of course people will rarely bring up the real economic struggle, that is, between net tax payers and net tax receivers.

>populism
Not so curiously contradictory with the previous one. The idea of popular outrage, particularly in matters of "identity", is unbearable to some. Anything that doesn't fall into the complete universalist globalism is pure evil.

>neo-liberal
An easy strawman. Even in 1920 Russia there were people courageously calling themselves bourgeois (only to be massacred later). There are people calling themselves satanists. But here there is no one. Neo-liberalism is a perfect boogeyman for the simple reason that no thinker has ever claimed to be neo-liberal. There is no corpus of texts canonically recognized as presenting neo-liberalism. It is an imaginary ideology that has never had anything but enemies. Even going in with far too much good faith in neo-liberalism bashers, there are many theories called neo-liberalism, that are contradictory with each other, not in a few details, but in general.

>social justive
When the usual justice and social justice clash, which is to be followed? Wouldn't the social justice be unjust there?
Just say egalitarianism. Because that is what you try to force in this "justice".

>ignorance, educate yourself, ...
The terms add nothing to discussion. Always explain a particular point instead.

>>59976128
Shlomo, why do you come here day in day out to argue with people who will never agree with you? You are never going to make an effort to understand any anti-Jewish feelings beyond the memes and shitposts, we get it, not everything is literally the fault of the Jews and the world is more complex than that, but that doesn't mean there aren't genuine questions to be raised about the uniquely Jewish influence on western culture and American foreign policy.

>fascist
>that only Mussolini quote on corporatism even though the person posting it has no idea what corporatism actually is and just thinks that it means Apple and Microsoft owning the government

>>59976623

I'm not trying to get you to agree with me, in fact, I didn't even read your post beyond that first sentence. I come here occasionally to poke a hole in your echo chamber and remind you how lowly and pathetic you are next to actual human beings with a semblance of intelligence and rationality. The entire population of worthwhile people in the world wishes nothing but suffering on you, and I find it entertaining to remind you of that. Your entire belief system is based on logical contradictions and schizophrenic delusions.

Every single person on this board is a subhuman. You are the worst, least intelligent garbage our civilization has ever produced. I'm guessing most of you were born to low class trailer trash. You're unfathomably stupid and the fact that you believe circle jerking with other unfathomably stupid individuals lends you credibility is just hilarious. Even just this one thread is fallacy and hypocrisy after fallacy and hypocrisy. It would be sad if it weren't so fucking hilarious.

>>59976276
What are central banks, what is the us treasury, what is IFM. You can see it in practise right now. Look at ukraine which loaned billions to ukraine which it never can pay back, now ukraine and its assets are a state controlled by the imf which is controlled by the us treasury which in turn is invested with goldmansachs jews.

>>59976864

So basically you do mental backflips around the hundreds of trillions of dollars controlled by enormously influential banks owned by white Catholics and Chinese to claim all that money is actually controlled by DA JOOZ. That doesn't sound like bullshit at all.

>implying you even know anything at all about central banks or treasuries beyond what you read in some shill neo-nazi .jpg

File: 1317824299243.png (58KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 200x200px

>use of fascist in regards to clearly Marxist behaviour
This appears to be especially common with regards to the EU as well the behaviour of Marxist groups like Antifa.

>heteronormative
>racist
>homophobe
Heteronormative is a funny one. It's absurd that there are people out there that take exception to heterosexuality being the norm.

>>59976841
>lol I hope u all die of cancer and everyone hates you and your stupid and probably poor too! Also you smell of poo and ur stupid

Lmao

Pathetic.

>race
>reverse-racism
>straight white male
>black people
>constitutional
>liberal
>conservative
>independent
>libertarian

>>59973401

Cuckservative. I've started calling these blokes chicken cons because they walk around going 'cuck cuck cuck' all the time like a fucking chicken.

Real conservatives haven't got time for your shit kiddos. Too busy building walls and turning back boats.

>>59977150
>owned by white christians and chinese
You dont actually believe this right?

>xism
>xphobia
>income inequality

Anybody proclaiming the end of the world can also be summarily dismissed whether they be talking about climate change or genocide

>>59973401
Neoliberalism
Climate change
Polyamory
Indigenous
Zionist occupation

Health Care - should be medical services if it's not for veterinary animals or children

governance - further abstraction from "government" where it's at least implied that men with interests and agendas are doing the governing

of-genitives (person of interest, colour, etc.)- seems to fit with the SJW cadence somehow. Most of the time noun phrases, adjective phrases or relative clauses sound better to me

>>59975451
Transfat is okay if they're referring to the actual thing that is in certain foods.

File: image.jpg (356KB, 1013x700px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1013x700px

>>59973838
Works for me.

>problematic