Why only terms associated with liberalism and not their right-wing lunatic counterparts? Are you guys really this mentally ill and biased? Such a lack of objectivity is pretty shameful and indicative of brain damage.
>>59973401 >per se >bud(dy) >pyramid scheme/welfare witchcraft jargon, eg: participation failure, performance indicator, jobactive, newstart, postmanagement, etc.. >"I'll facebook her" >"Malbourne" and associated shell > shall, elk > alk. Melbourne people do this so fucking often it makes me want to rip of my ears >people who slur the letter g >people who pronounce v instead of r
>>59974652 >Anti semitism and calling things Jewish is "right wing" in any way Are you serious? To give you the benefit of the doubt, I will say that it is an American thing. >incoming invocation of nazis while there are neither right wing nor relevant to the conversation
Over-representation is effectively a buzzword on 4chan because you think it gives you carte blanche to make any unproven claim you want. It also represents a really hilarious double standard, in that "over-representation" is your entire basis for believing whites to be better than others. Whites are over-represented in accomplishment, and are therefore the master race. Jews are over-represented in accomplishment, and are therefore [buzzword related to parasitism], [buzzword related to greed], [buzzword related to evil].
The way 4chan drones use "over-representation" is akin to associating a decision made in a room with 3 Jews and 97 non-Jews with Judaism because they are technically over-represented in the room. You do this routinely. For example, despite the fact that the US government is populated almost exclusively by white Christians, you regularly refer to any decisions it makes as "Jewish" because Jewish people exist in the government and exist in lobbies that petition the government. You think over-representation gives you justification to make these ridiculous, irrational assertions.
>>59975395 Honestly though I think it's worse to be associated with people that call themselves Nazis today than be associated with the historical ones. They're not comparing you to some doctor or lawyer in 1935, they're associating you with some dumb fuck skin head who snorts meth, beats his gf and lives in a trailer.
And by that you mean words which are used accurately and appropriately but trigger you and are therefore invalid. I hope you get incurable cancer. It's a relief that your pathologically delusional argumentation strategies carry exactly zero weight outside of your subhuman hugbox. What's it like knowing that every intellectual that has ever existed looks at you and everyone similar to you like you're less than a person?
>>59975316 No idea what you are talking about. Money rules the world, and who controll the flow of money? The jews have succesfully accumulated wealth by instigating conflict and waging war, only because they controll the money. In the end governments are just puppets that are played against eachother
By that you mean when you make a list of "good things whites done did" next to a list of "bad things the evil jooz done did," the list supports your agenda. You're not fooling someone with literally triple your IQ points, you inbred moron.
>>59975451 I know its not at all what you meant but
>tfw transfats and "unhealthy" things are actually good for you and the kike media has gotten it wrong for fucking decades and its one of the reasons for the dropping testosterone rate amongst men
never trust a fucking nutritionist. Just don't be a fucking retard with your food and you can eat whatever the fuck you want and be infinitely healthier than any of the dumb faggots following meme diets and eating fads.
Just about the only thing you should actively avoid is having a lot of sugary food.
Jews don't control the money, that's literally neo-nazi propaganda. Suspicion of /pol/ shilling lead me to discover that when you rank the banks of the world by assets, you reach at least #25 without finding a single Jewish owner or CEO.
And yes, I already know you're going to respond to this by magically attributing all financial power to some institution with a Jew at the helm. When you're as unintelligent as the average /pol/ user, people can literally predict your fallacious responses to being shit on.
>Any of the -phobia Literally an attempt at reducing diverging opinions to madness. The people using it probably don't consciously think of the implications of their terms, but the overall frame of thinking with these words is quite clear. It's an attempt at forcing psychiatry to your opponent. Re-education camps aren't far.
>bourgeois, class-conscious, all things related to class conflicts Fallen out of favor in the last 15 years but you still find it here and there. Won't write a long essay on it. Of course people will rarely bring up the real economic struggle, that is, between net tax payers and net tax receivers.
>populism Not so curiously contradictory with the previous one. The idea of popular outrage, particularly in matters of "identity", is unbearable to some. Anything that doesn't fall into the complete universalist globalism is pure evil.
>neo-liberal An easy strawman. Even in 1920 Russia there were people courageously calling themselves bourgeois (only to be massacred later). There are people calling themselves satanists. But here there is no one. Neo-liberalism is a perfect boogeyman for the simple reason that no thinker has ever claimed to be neo-liberal. There is no corpus of texts canonically recognized as presenting neo-liberalism. It is an imaginary ideology that has never had anything but enemies. Even going in with far too much good faith in neo-liberalism bashers, there are many theories called neo-liberalism, that are contradictory with each other, not in a few details, but in general.
>social justive When the usual justice and social justice clash, which is to be followed? Wouldn't the social justice be unjust there? Just say egalitarianism. Because that is what you try to force in this "justice".
>ignorance, educate yourself, ... The terms add nothing to discussion. Always explain a particular point instead.
>>59976128 Shlomo, why do you come here day in day out to argue with people who will never agree with you? You are never going to make an effort to understand any anti-Jewish feelings beyond the memes and shitposts, we get it, not everything is literally the fault of the Jews and the world is more complex than that, but that doesn't mean there aren't genuine questions to be raised about the uniquely Jewish influence on western culture and American foreign policy.
I'm not trying to get you to agree with me, in fact, I didn't even read your post beyond that first sentence. I come here occasionally to poke a hole in your echo chamber and remind you how lowly and pathetic you are next to actual human beings with a semblance of intelligence and rationality. The entire population of worthwhile people in the world wishes nothing but suffering on you, and I find it entertaining to remind you of that. Your entire belief system is based on logical contradictions and schizophrenic delusions.
Every single person on this board is a subhuman. You are the worst, least intelligent garbage our civilization has ever produced. I'm guessing most of you were born to low class trailer trash. You're unfathomably stupid and the fact that you believe circle jerking with other unfathomably stupid individuals lends you credibility is just hilarious. Even just this one thread is fallacy and hypocrisy after fallacy and hypocrisy. It would be sad if it weren't so fucking hilarious.
>>59976276 What are central banks, what is the us treasury, what is IFM. You can see it in practise right now. Look at ukraine which loaned billions to ukraine which it never can pay back, now ukraine and its assets are a state controlled by the imf which is controlled by the us treasury which in turn is invested with goldmansachs jews.
So basically you do mental backflips around the hundreds of trillions of dollars controlled by enormously influential banks owned by white Catholics and Chinese to claim all that money is actually controlled by DA JOOZ. That doesn't sound like bullshit at all.
>implying you even know anything at all about central banks or treasuries beyond what you read in some shill neo-nazi .jpg
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.