>muh Muslims are violent and all Christians are peaceful
>neglect to mention that the Crusades
Please explain this one to me. Does terrorism only matter when Muslims do it? Why can't we all recognize that the Abrahamic religions are all evil and disgusting and we treat them with the same standards that we treat Islam?
The Crusades were about ridding the Holy Land of the Islamic infestation (Christians had been there way longer).
Just imagine how peaceful the world would be today if our ancestors had destroyed the sandniggers.
crusades is a meme anyways, only the first one was successful
in all the others crusaders got rekt
Tell me if the West didn't bomb the fuck out of the Middle East and killed thousands upon thousands of innocents including women and children. Would we have a problem with ISIS and Islamic extremism today? If the Palestinians weren't massacred by the Jews and treated like garbage by the Jews? Would Islamic extremism be what it is today? The answer is no in both cases. You can't talk about the effect without talking about the causes.
The fact is most of these terrorist attacks are political reactions against the imperialism of the Western world.
The point is that every religion has had a violent past. Islam is a new religion when compared to Christianity and Judaism, it's experiencing the same thing that Christianity and Judaism experienced. It is slowly but surely getting modernized.
I have. Old testament is both less violent and not followed by christians. Christianity is based on the teachings of, well, christ
ausfag islamic apologist shitposter. hidden, saged, etc.
To be fair, the Gospels were corrupted a LOT by jewish followers who would often flat-out make up shit to twist things to their narrative. WE really only have vague ideas of what he ACTUALLY said.
That's what Islam says as well I believe. Muslims believe that the New Testament was corrupted and desu I think they're right. Read about the Gnostic gospels and read about the Council of Nicaea.
Christians chose which books to put in the Bible and which to exclude. Hmm.. sounds a little fishy don't you think?
I know this is bait but
>talking about the crusades
>posting a picture of the Siege of Malta, where the barbaric Ottomans who would have pushed into Europe and conquered so much land were the aggressors
didn't christians reform their faith because saying the emperor is send by god wasn't such a good idea?
or like seperating state and religion?
You got any sources on that?
All I know is non-Muslims are protected under Islam as dhimmi citizens.
“Allah forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for Allah loves those who are just.” (Al-Mumtahanah: 60: 8)
I'm an atheist btw. All I want is to be consistent when I criticize religion. I don't have a soft spot for Christianity unlike you guys. I think all religions are largely destructive if you give them enough power. Even Buddhism in some cases has gone violent. Because religious people are sometimes nutcases.
They became violent because of muslims threathning their beliefs and way of life
>>muh Muslims are violent and all Christians are peaceful
Why yes, that is true (except I would not use the word "all" as there are always exceptions). For hundreds of years humans from all over the world never feared going into a Christian country, but they certainly were leery of going into non-Christian countries. Christian countries always have been the most beautiful, safe, and pleasant. Non-Christian countries...not so much.
Because there is only one interpretation of the Sharia right? LOL
Anyway I don't support Sharia but don't act like non-Christians like Jews were having a dandy time under Christian rule either.
Crusades were a few wars; all of RECONQUEST.
Meanwhile Islam has basically been wageing OFFENSIVE wars throughout it's entire existence. About 1,400 years of constant, offensive war. Be it Sunni vs Shia; or a Jihad.
Hell; I'll even give you an extra toe to stand on. The Reconquista. Which was also a war of Reconquest.
Christanity has never launched an unprovoked attack against Islam. The only offensive holy wars Christianity has ever waged against Islam were wars of reconquest.
Lol Thomas Paine was one of the biggest critics of Christianity
>neglect to mention that the Crusades
no wonder you're wallowing in /pol/
Always talking about crusades, never talking about islamic genocides (plural).
270mil dead tears of jihad
>Christians haven't Crusaded in over 500 years
>Muslims are currently Jihading right now
>WHY ARE YOU MORE AFRAID OF MUSLIMS YOU IGNORANT BIGOT!
Wasn't the middle east ahead of the game until Islam was created in 500-600 era?
Qu'ran tells Muslims to kill unbelievers. Stop shitposting
The Crusades were actually a reaction to the muslim unlawful occupation of the Holy Land and the rest of the Middle East. Muslims as always are the fucking problem. Kill all those mudshit faggots.
If by protected, you mean publicly beaten, humiliated, and forced to pay higher taxes, then yes.
all abrahamic religions are trash and filth. Anyone who follows religion is either dumb or poor, and easily exploited.
With the access of information coming to people everywhere, the tide will turn and this mind scam will be no more.
CAN YOU SAY QUANTUM COMPUTER?!
that's it. These fucks crucify people and fucking post on YT, having human knowledge under fingertips.
I'd rather have Christianity than Islam in the world. Most Christians are average folk anyway who just believe in God and the extremists are looked down upon, unlike in Islam.
Christianity is still shit, but it's less shit than Islam.