/ptg/ PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - HOW IT USED TO BE AND HOW IT

>>132090932
MAGA

File: hey_awoo.png (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

AWOO~!

File: 1484310135899.jpg (6KB, 198x198px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 198x198px

MILLER STRIKES AGAIN

File: 1472109053974.jpg (22KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x400px

I love Kellyanne.

And I can't sleep.

File: 1491865221296.jpg (246KB, 1125x1125px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1125x1125px

Be aware 4chan server are experiencing speed and connection issues right now. Posting will be slowed. Posting without an image is easier due to low bandwith needs. Thank you for your attention.

File: IMG_0023.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>132091255
JUST

File: 1498946671338.png (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Disavow civcucks.

Prove you all care about your race and culture.

If you are not right of Trump, you are the enemy

File: 3d awolf.gif (3MB, 240x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 240x320px

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgMRP4KOALw&app=desktop
NRA ad, pretty good with personal commentary.
>http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-01/2nd-amendment-comes-europe-czech-republic-enshrine-right-bear-arms-constitution
The cze wants freedom, in the process of getting the best amendment, will compete with burgers on the "SHALL NOT" deparment.
>>132091218
Awo you too.

>>132091299
Real gookmoot server hours suck. They commonly are aleviated by 4am some rare times longer.

>>132091225
>gookmoot's fault?
Yes. 3am-4am. Real gookmoot server hours.

File: Awoo_Activate.gif (70KB, 590x600px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 590x600px

>>132091218

File: The Pigs Have Won Tonight.webm (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>132091255
Have a webm pig.

>>132091337

>not having exactly the same political positions as Trump

EAT LEAD, COMMIE!

>>132091198
I don't know where you're getting your information from, but I don't think anyone here is actually a Civic Nationalist.

If you're going to shill, at least post something relevant to us. Then you may get a few (You)s

>>132091467
Earlier there were a shit ton of civcucks.

They are the cucks of the right.

>>132091429
WTF I HATE BACON NOW

File: meme image 1.png (173KB, 696x931px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 696x931px

>drumpf supporters

>>132091559
There's a middle ground. Only accept immigration from white nations and encourage white birthrates while not wanting to go full genocide on the shitskins.

>>132091703
>used the template, and now it's properly hatted
Take muh (you)

>>132091703
Well, at least you tried on the hat

>>132091744
>a Canadian

Is Trump only accepting white immigration?

No, he's saying

>I only support LEGAL immigration!
>I want America to become Mexico but LEGALLY!!!!!!

Euros aren't moving here.

Browns are, illegally and legally. Legal spics still have 10 kids a couple. Becky has a dog or Jamal's kid. It starts with culture. Fix it, then change the government.

BASED NIGGER bullshit isn't fixing anything. Pandering to minorities is shit no matter what your political party is.

File: 1488580718772.jpg (74KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 800x420px

>>132091255
I'm just listening to a podcast to pass the time.

>>132091559
>Earlier there were a shit ton of civcucks

We're on multiple layers of irony, trolls, and sarcasm here. /pol/ made the Hillpepes for laughs. So I wouldn't take anyone claiming to be a "civcuck" seriously.

>>132091881
Without DACA and refugee programs mexicans and africans are too stupid to even get a working visa

>>132091881
>http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/07/01/illegal-alien-allegedly-tazes-scalds-rapes-mom-front-children/
>An illegal alien is one of three teenagers who are accused of scalding a Georgia woman with hot water and raping her in her home near her children.
You`re preaching to the choir.

>>132091881
I didn't mention Trump, but the obvious argument against you on that is that there is no way in hell he can just come out and do that. Needs to be a slow burn and this is how you start.

I think the pandering to minority thing is trying to get the 10% or so who aren't human waste to actually vote. It's not like he's changing his policies for them.

post itt if you love president trump

File: 1467152096833.gif (2MB, 286x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 286x400px

Sorting the archive is so enjoyable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_hBzXU0MsY

File: chartoftheday_10061_the_countries_receiving_the_most_asylum_applications_n.jpg (142KB, 960x776px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 960x776px

>>132091881

File: 1498637427376.png (35KB, 400x280px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 400x280px

>>132091218

File: 36894806.jpg (62KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 250x250px

why do you faggots larp for trump
this is my only single question
is it because you hate your existence and are too weak you kill yourselves so you want the world to do it for you faggots?

What's good fellow based black guys? Yo, they can call me an Uncle Tom, but I just want to MAGA. You feel me?

File: Un-Budget-Top-10.png (16KB, 702x440px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 702x440px

>>132091881
And the people that feed the folks that afterwards they claim the only solution for real help is sending them to your country, everything taxpayer expenses, obviously.

>>132092129
wat

>>132092129
>>132092143
So what Discord are you faggots on?

File: 1482212597644.gif (2MB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x375px

>>132092129
>larp
>implying

>>132092143
Yoyoyo my biggas, I just met the stepfather of my son he is like he don't want no mo kids with my sidebitch, how is he gon save the white race?

File: 1485231596377.jpg (36KB, 380x389px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 380x389px

Anyone else still find it hard to believe this is actually happening?
I mean who would have ever expected that Donald fucking Trump would ever become President?

File: 1440642354398.png (119KB, 288x299px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 288x299px

Reminder to report shitposters
Reminder to report those that respond to shitposters

>The nativist parties that had flared up in the early 1840s died back to embers after the elections of 1844. Recovery from the depression mitigated the tensions between native and foreign-born workers which had sparked the riots of that year. Even as the volume of immigration quadrupled following the European potato blight of the mid-forties, the accelerating American economy seemed able to absorb all who came. The Mexican War and the ensuing controversy over slavery focused political energy on those issues. War against a Catholic nation might have been expected to fan anti-Roman sentiments—except that the Democratic war party was also the party of immigrants, while the Whigs, who had earlier dallied with nativism, opposed the war.

>In the 1852 presidential election the Whigs, led by anti-nativist William H. Seward, tried to appeal for the Irish and Catholic vote. General Scott, Whig presidential candidate, was a high-church Episcopalian who had educated his daughters in a convent. As commander of American forces in Mexico he had protected Church property. In 1852 the Whigs planted friendly Irish questioners in audiences addressed by Scott, giving the candidate a chance to declare how much he "loved to hear that rich Irish brogue." But this clumsy effort backfired, for while Irish Americans as usual voted Democratic, many Whigs were offended by the appeal to "paddies" and stayed home on election day. As the slavery issue knocked southern Whigs loose from their party, a renewal of ethnic hostilities did the same in a number of northern states.

File: pokemon.png (31KB, 733x482px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 733x482px

>>132092305

>>132091429
Haram

>>132092305
so report leafs?

File: file.png (264KB, 587x396px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 587x396px

Yeah I don't know how can anyone can defend this

>Several causes contributed to this revival of nativism. Immigration during the first five years of the 1850s reached a level five times greater than a decade earlier. Most of the new arrivals were poor Catholic peasants or laborers from Ireland and Germany who crowded into the tenements of large cities. Crime and welfare costs soared. Cincinnati's crime rate, for example, tripled between 1846 and 1853 and its murder rate increased sevenfold. Boston's expenditures for poor relief rose threefold during the same period.

>Native-born Americans attributed these increases to immigrants, especially the Irish, whose arrest rate and share of relief funds were several times their percentage of the population. Natives were not necessarily the most nativist. Earlier Protestant immigrants from England, Scotland, and especially Ulster had brought their anti-Catholic sentiments with them and often formed the vanguard of anti-Irish rioters and voters in the United States. Radicals and agnostics among the Forty-eighters who had fled Germany after suppression of the 1848 revolutions carried to America a bitter enmity toward the Catholic Church which had sided with the forces of counterrevolution.

>Indeed, the Church entered a period of reaction during the papacy of Pius IX (1846–78). The 1848–49 revolutions and wars of unification in Italy made Pius "a violent enemy of liberalism and social reform." He subsequently proclaimed the doctrine of papal infallibility and issued his Syllabus of Errors condemning socialism, public education, rationalism, and other such iniquities. "It is an error," declared the Pope, "to believe that the Roman Pontiff can and ought to reconcile himself to, and agree with, progress, liberalism, and modern civilization." The American Catholic hierarchy took its cue from the Pope. Archbishop John Hughes of New York attacked abolitionists, Free Soilers, and various Protestant reform movements as kin to the "Red Republicanism" of Europe.

Does anyone have a link to the montage of libtards chimping out, with this as the music?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST2H8FWDvEA

File: 1496509311254.gif (2MB, 270x378px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 270x378px

>>132092248
Feels great. Still have a bit to do before we hit the memescape though.

>>132091703
I think you described a democrat by accident. Might want to revise.

>>132092248
Feels good, man.
Happiest I've been in my life.

>Immigration had caused Catholic church membership to grow three times faster than Protestant membership in the 1840s. Pointing with pride to this fact (which Protestants viewed with alarm), Archbishop Hughes in 1850 delivered a well-publicized address The Decline of Protestantism and Its Causes. "The object we hope to accomplish," said Hughes, "is to convert all Pagan nations, and all Protestant nations. . . . There is no secrecy in all this. . . . Our mission [is] to convert the world—including the inhabitants of the United States—the people of the cities, and the people of the country . . . the Legislatures, the Senate, the Cabinet, the President, and all!" The archbishopric's newspaper proclaimed that "Protestantism is effete, powerless, dying out . . . and conscious that its last moment is come when it is fairly set, face to face, with Catholic truth."

>Such words fanned the embers of anti-Catholicism. Folk memories of Bloody Mary, the Spanish Armada, the Gunpowder Plot, the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and Foxe's Book of Martyrs were part of the Anglo-American Protestant consciousness. The Puritan war against popery had gone on for two and one-half centuries and was not over yet. In 1852 the first Plenary Council of American bishops, meeting in Baltimore, attacked the godlessness of public education and decided to seek tax support for Catholic schools or tax relief for parents who sent their children to such schools. During 1852–53 this effort set off bitter campaigns in a dozen northern cities and states (including Maryland). "Free School" tickets drawn from both major parties, but especially from the Whigs, won several elections on the platform of defending public schools as the nursery of republicanism against the "bold effort" of this "despotic faith" to "substitute the mitre for our liberty cap." Archbishop Hughes replied, branding public schools as wellsprings of "Socialism, Red Republicanism, Universalism, Infidelity, Deism, Atheism, and Pantheism."

File: 1498664001288.jpg (45KB, 750x720px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 750x720px

Merry Christmas

File: 1491370910416.jpg (141KB, 1000x1414px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1000x1414px

Lewd awoo collection for real wolf hours. Very lewd.
https://imgur.com/a/qzNK5

>>132092525
Trump never said 2 genders and he lets Trannys shit in his toilets.

>In the midst of these school campaigns, Hughes threw the hierarchy into another emotional struggle, this one over control of church property. Catholic churches in many areas were owned by a lay board of trustees representing the congregation. This accorded with Protestant practice but defied Catholic tradition. Attempts by the clergy to gain control of church property reached into several state legislatures, which refused after acrimonious debates to sanction clerical control—and indeed, in some cases tried to mandate lay control. In July 1853 Monsignor Gaetano Bedini arrived in the United States as a papal nuncio to adjudicate the property dispute in certain dioceses. After doing so in favor of the clergy, Bedini toured the country to bestow the papal blessing on American Catholics. Much of the Protestant and nativist press erupted in frenzy. "He is here," exclaimed one journal, "to find the best way to rivet Italian chains upon us which will bind us as slaves to the throne of the most fierce tyranny the world knows." The Church's role in suppressing Italian nationalist uprisings in 1848–49 also aroused radical expatriates from several Catholic countries against Bedini, whom they labeled the "Butcher of Bologna." As Bedini's tour continued, riots broke out in several cities that he visited, and upon his departure for Italy in February 1854 he had to be smuggled aboard a ship in the New York harbor to escape a mob.

>>132092329
Oy vey you filthy anti-irite, this is like another Gorta Mór

File: shitty gorsuch meme.jpg (49KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x480px

These hours are the worst

I hate timezones

>>132092549
Man, this is a long list. It'll take me a couple hours to sort through this.

The temperance movement also exacerbated ethnic tensions. Before 1850 this movement had been primarily one of self-denial and moral suasion aimed at persuading the Protestant middle and working classes to cast out demon rum and become sober, hard-working, upward-striving citizens. As such it had enjoyed an astonishing success. But conspicuous holdouts against this dry crusade were Irish and German immigrants, for whom taverns and beer gardens were centers of social and political life. A perceived rise of drunkenness, brawling, and crime especially among the Irish population helped turn temperance reform into a coercive movement aimed at this recalcitrant element. Believing that liquor was a cause of social disorder, prohibitionists sought passage of state laws to ban the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages. They achieved their first major victory in Maine in 1851. This success set off a wave of "Maine law" debates in other legislatures. The Democratic party generally opposed temperance laws while the Whigs were divided. Fearful of alienating "wet" voters, Whigs refused to take a stand and thereby estranged the large temperance component in their ranks. Coalitions of drys from all parties captured control of enough legislatures from 1852 to 1855 to enact Maine laws in a dozen additional states including all of New England, New York and Delaware, and several midwestern states.

File: 1498709794572.png (478KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 900x900px

>>132092549
that's a lot of lewd wolfgirls

File: smooth.jpg (163KB, 1200x840px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1200x840px

>>132092637
Makes the happenings feel great though.

>>132092044
There are 10 House Reps and both Senators that are Republicans for Georgia. They all should be sent this report so that they can speak about it when they come back from the July 4th holiday recess during the time when Congressman can speak to any topic they wish during sessions

File: please understand!.png (385KB, 1394x1345px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1394x1345px

>>132091467
i think a lot of us are """"civic nationalists""""

File: week023.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

BLOWOUT CALENDAR

WEEK 23 OF TRUMP'S REIGN

GET ME PAST THE THUMBNAIL

When you lose, you win.

Archive: https://mega.nz/#F!gSQGHbRb!bA0Hr6dTEnSX4HEqcokkTw

===========================

MONDAY JUNE 26TH
#1. 9TH CIRCUS ___DESTROYED___!!!!!: MUSLIM BAN APPROVED: https://archive.is/bSd9Q
#2. 3 CNN REPORTERS RESIGN: https://archive.is/nWnXK
#3. CNN ___DESTROYED___!!!!!: PROJECT VERITAS DROPS BOMBSHELL VIDEO: https://archive.is/Q1a2T
#4. ACOSTA BTFO: https://archive.is/OJFaL

TUESDAY JUNE 27TH
#1. CNN DISGRACE TO ALL MEDIA: https://archive.is/DHAU7
#2. WATCHA GONNA DO: https://archive.is/DIyld
#3. CLINTON CRONY MCCABE BTFO: https://archive.is/itgTS
#4. ANOTHER LIB RUSSIA HYPOCRITE: https://archive.is/IfUTG

WEDNESDAY JUNE 28TH
#1. WATERGATE REPORTER SCOLDS PRESS: https://archive.is/ioOhp
#2. MUH ISLAMOPHOBIA NARRATIVE BTFO: https://archive.is/NZnGz
#3. CNN TWITTER FAKE AS WELL: https://archive.is/y8TES
#4. RUSSIA = NOTHINGBURGER: https://archive.is/1cpUK

THURSDAY JUNE 29TH
#1. MUH 17 AGENCIES BTFO: https://archive.is/jkzQE
#2. DACA ON THE BTFOING BLOCK: https://archive.is/dJUFq
#3. OBONGO GREEN ENERGY LEGACY BTFO: https://archive.is/f0nd0
#4. HOUSE PASSES ILLEGAL-IMMIGRATION BILLS: https://archive.is/JtDd6

FRIDAY JUNE 30TH
#1. JOE BTFO: https://archive.is/TR0GO
#2. WE SPACE NOW (AGAIN): https://archive.is/uvDSI
#3. AP BTFO: https://archive.is/ETjbS
#4. TRANNIES BTFO: https://archive.is/hmt8A


BONUS:

TRUMP NATO DEMANDS MET: https://archive.is/vKjDe

>>132092178
I feel like letting you in on this. The state of /pol/ is just business as usual despite constant (((shill attacks))) and (((the_donald))) coming over and fucking about. It's all a ruse. It's so elaborate. There's a third group somewhat pulling the strings if you would, and these are the trolls who leave behind red herrings to send wandering eyes wandering.
It's just trolling. Most of it. There's liberals and conservatives that take it seriously, but their taking the ultimate bait.

>>132092464
I don't think so
Exhibit A: >>132092549
Look, cartoons you can masturbate your tiny drumpflet penis to
After all have to relax after a long day of flailing around an EPIC Sargon of akkad kekistan flag

>>132092397
I can see it in my head - can't find it.
I even have it saved somewhere on my hard drive.

>These laws, like Prohibition in a later generation, were frequently honored in the breach. Nonenforcement was widespread; legislatures or courts in several states subsequently repealed the laws or restricted their scope. Those who wanted to drink could continue to do so; those who did not had stopped doing so under the influence of the earlier moral-suasion phase of the crusade. By 1861 only three of the thirteen states that had legislated prohibition were still dry. The larger significance of the prohibition movement in the 1850s was not the laws it enacted but the impetus it gave to nativism. A Catholic newspaper classified prohibition with "State Education Systems, Infidelity, Pantheism," abolitionism, socialism, women's rights, and "European Red Republicanism" as "parts of a great whole, at war with God." Temperance advocates replied in kind. "It is liquor which fills so many Catholic (as well as other) homes with discord and violence . . . fills our prisons with Irish culprits, and makes the gallows hideous with so many Catholic murderers," declared Horace Greeley's New York Tribune. "The fact that the Catholics of this country keep a great many more grog shops and sell more liquor in proportion to their number than any other denomination, creates and keeps alive a strong prejudice against them."

File: 1498916011001.png (17KB, 353x388px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 353x388px

>>132092742
I like to think that /ptg/ is made up of mostly low-key ethnonationalists who are using a civic nationalist playbook.

Stormfags and outspoken white nationalist agendas aren't viable and practical options (yet). We have to take a page out of Alinsky and get things done in quiet increments. That's what has been proven to work.

>>132092742
You can tell who the unironic autists are when they cry about t_d. As though pol has ever accomplished anything without a normier mouthpiece.

>>132092569
>Trump never said 2 genders and he lets Trannys shit in his toilets.
God forbid. I am voting democrat next time.

>>132092637
It has only been like this for a week or so. Prior to that these were comfy hours.

File: 1489219529470.jpg (401KB, 800x1153px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 800x1153px

>>132092829
> being this triggered by literal cartoons

>Buffeted by the winds of anti-Nebraska, anti-liquor, anti-Catholic, and anti-immigrant, the two-party system in the North was ready for collapse by 1854. And it was not only the antislavery Republicans who picked up the pieces. In several states a new and powerful nativist party seemed to glean even more from the wreckage. A number of secret fraternal societies restricted in membership to native-born Protestants had sprung up by the 1850s. Two of them in New York, the Order of United Americans and the Order of the Star Spangled Banner, had merged in 1852 under the leadership of James Barker. Against the background of Protestant-Catholic clashes over public schools, the Bedini visit, and temperance campaigns, the dynamic Barker organized hundreds of lodges all over the country with an estimated membership ranging up to a million or more. Members were pledged to vote for no one except native-born Protestants for public office. In secret councils the Order endorsed certain candidates or nominated its own. When asked by outsiders about the Order, members were to respond "I know nothing." Because of their secrecy and tight-knit organization, these "Know Nothings" became a potentially powerful voting bloc.

>They drew their membership mainly from young men in white-collar and skilled blue-collar occupations. A good many of them were new voters. One analysis showed that men in their twenties were twice as likely to vote Know Nothing as men over thirty. Their leaders were also "new men" in politics who reflected the social backgrounds of their constituency. In Pittsburgh more than half of the Know-Nothing leaders were under thirty-five and nearly half were artisans and clerks. Know Nothings elected to the Massachusetts legislature in 1854 consisted mainly of skilled workers, rural clergymen, and clerks in various enterprises. Maryland's leaders were younger and less affluent than their Democratic counterparts.

File: 1493665534650.jpg (61KB, 700x396px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 700x396px

Why is some guy spamming a history less on now? Are these guys retarded?

>As a political movement, the Know Nothings had a platform as well as prejudices. They generally favored temperance and always opposed tax support for parochial schools. Their main goal was to reduce the power of foreign-born voters in politics. Under federal law, immigrants could become naturalized citizens after five years in the United States. In a few large cities Democratic judges obligingly issued naturalization papers almost as soon as immigrants got off the boat. Most states limited the vote to citizens, though several allowed immigrants to vote within a year of establishing residence. By the early 1850s the heavy wave of immigration that had begun in 1846 was showing up in voting rolls. Since immigrants were preponderantly young adults, the number of foreign-born voters grew faster than their proportion of the population. In Boston, for example, immigrant voters increased by 195 percent from 1850 to 1855 while the native-born vote rose only 14 percent. Because this "foreign" vote was mainly Democratic, Catholic, and wet, its rapid growth had alarming implications to Whigs, Protestants, and temperance reformers—and even to some native-born Democrats of the working class who found themselves competing with foreign-born laborers willing to work for lower wages. Rural residents also resented the growing power of the immigrant vote in the cities. The Know Nothings called for an increase of the waiting period for naturalization to twenty-one years. In some states they wished to restrict officeholding to native-born citizens and to impose a waiting period of several years after naturalization before immigrants could vote. They did not propose limits on immigration per se, though some Know Nothings probably hoped that by making citizenship and political rights more difficult to obtain they might discourage immigrants from coming to the United States.

File: 1484037708779.jpg (473KB, 910x900px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 910x900px

>>132092759
Thanks, Sir Roger Scruton.

>>132091881
The RAISE act, which Trump supports, would make immigration merit based again. Aka 95% white instead of 95% shitskins

>Most Know Nothings in northern states also opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In some areas they joined anti-Nebraska coalitions in 1854. This raised the complex question of the relationship between Know Nothings and the new Republican party. The antislavery movement grew from the same cultural soil of evangelical Protestanism as temperance and nativism. Some free soilers viewed slavery and Catholicism alike as repressive institutions. Both were "founded and supported on the basis of ignorance and tyranny," resolved a Know-Nothing lodge in Massachusetts, and thus "there can exist no real hostility to Roman Catholicism which does not embrace slavery, its natural co-worker in opposition to freedom and republican institutions." The support of immigrant Catholic voters for the proslavery "Hunker" wing of the Democratic party cemented this perceived identity of slavery and Catholicism. So did frequent editorials in the Catholic press branding the free-soil movement as "wild, lawless, destructive fanaticism." Competing with free blacks at the bottom of the social order, Irish Americans were intensely anti-Negro and frequently rioted against black people in northern cities. In 1846 a solid Irish vote had helped defeat a referendum to grant equal voting rights to blacks in New York state. "No other class of our citizens was so zealous, so unanimous in its hostility to Equal Suffrage without regard to color," commented the New York Tribune bitterly. " 'Would you have your daughter marry a naygur?' was their standing flout at the champions of democracy irrespective of race and color." In 1854 a Massachusetts free soiler summarized the issues in the forthcoming elections as "freedom, temperance, and Protestantism against slavery, rum, and Romanism."

>>132092883
I tried finding it on youtube, but to no avail.
Maybe it was deleted from there?

I think it was called "Night of the Walking Liberals" or something like that. Mind reuploading it to something like vidme or something like that, if you find it?

>On the other hand, many antislavery leaders recognized the incongruity of nativism with their own ideology. "I do not perceive," wrote Abraham Lincoln, "how any one professing to be sensitive to the wrongs of the negroes, can join in a league to degrade a class of white men." William H. Seward had battled the nativists in his state for more than a decade. The New York Republican platform in 1855 declared that "we repudiate and condemn the proscriptive and anti-republican doctrines of the order of Know-Nothings." An "anti-slavery man," said George W. Julian, founder of the Republican party in Indiana, "is, of necessity, the enemy of [this] organized scheme of bigotry and proscription, which can only be remembered as the crowning and indelible shame of our politics." Since "we are against Black Slavery, because the slaves are deprived of human rights," declared other Republicans, "we are also against . . . [ this] system of Northern Slavery to be created by disfranchising the Irish and Germans."

>Genuine free soilers also deplored the Know-Nothing craze as a red herring that diverted attention from "the real question of the age," slavery. "Neither the Pope nor the foreigners ever can govern the country or endanger its liberties," wrote Charles A. Dana, managing editor of Greeley's New York Tribune, "but the slavebreeders and slavetraders do govern it." Dana vowed in 1854 never to mention the Know Nothings in the Tribune "except to give 'em a devil of a whale." George Julian even suspected that this "distracting crusade against the Pope and foreigners" was a "cunning" scheme of proslavery interests "to divide the people of the free states upon trifles and side issues, while the South remained a unit in defense of its great interest."

>>132092769
It was the timing, couple lefty fags on some discord.

The_donald doesn't come here and do anything, that was pol anon's project and the faggotry that is reddit comes here in the form of the litany of anti-trump subreddits that know pol behind that knife in their backs.

File: 1498947408422.jpg (414KB, 634x746px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 634x746px

>>132092742
Not really. Just nigger faggots like you.

How many times will you post that strawman drawing?

>>132092890
Exactly my thinking on the matter.

>Nevertheless, as a matter of political expediency, free-soil leaders in several states formed alliances with the Know Nothings in 1854 and 1855. In some cases they did so with the intention of taking over the movement in order to channel it in an antislavery direction. Massachusetts provided the clearest example of this. In that state the issues of the Mexican War and Wilmot Proviso had reshuffled political alignments so that a coalition of Free Soilers (including Conscience Whigs) and Democrats had gained control of the legislature from 1850 to 1852. The coalition elected Charles Sumner to the Senate and proposed or passed a number of reforms: a mechanic's lien law, a ten-hour law for laborers, general banking and incorporation laws, prohibition legislation, and re-apportionment of the legislature to shift some power from Boston (with its Cotton Whigs and its large Irish vote) to central and western Massachusetts. The conservative Whig and Boston vote narrowly defeated re-apportionment in a referendum in 1853. This provided the main spark for the Know-Nothing fire of 1854 that swept out of western Massachusetts and kindled the whole state, electing the governor, an overwhelming majority of the legislature, and all of the congressmen. The Whig establishment was traumatized by this conflagration. "I no more suspected the impending result," wrote a Whig journalist, "than I looked for an earthquake which would level the State House and reduce Fa-neuil Hall to a heap of ruins."

>>132093046
If I find it I'll upload it under that title.

File: Sam Kinison_GivesULifeAdvise.jpg (231KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1920x1080px

>>132093031
>>132092984
>>132092947
>>132092888
>>132092676
>>132092574
>>132092497
>>132092383
>>132092329
>>132093109

File: 1480432519569s.jpg (11KB, 228x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 228x250px

>>132093160

>>132093113
I love that our little colony triggered Reddit's ownership so badly that they permanently compromised the site's reputation by doing manual database edits of comments and votes.

>>132093160
Until you provide a counterargument or show me a WN LARPer who actually helped the white race in any way.

>Free Soil/Republican leaders like Charles Francis Adams and Charles Sumner were taken equally by surprise. But that was not true of all free soilers. Indeed one of them, Henry Wilson, had much to do with the outcome. Like many of the younger Know-Nothing voters, Wilson had been an apprentice and journeyman shoemaker in his youth. The "Natick Cobbler," as he was called, became a shoe manufacturer, went into politics as a Whig, and in 1848 helped found the Free Soil party. In 1854 the new Republican party nominated Wilson for governor. Whigs, Democrats, and Know Nothings also nominated candidates. Shrewdly perceiving that the nativist frenzy would overwhelm the other parties, Wilson joined the Know-Nothing movement in the hope of controlling it. Some free soilers expressed disgust with this strategy. "When the freedom of an empire is at issue," wrote one of them, "Wilson runs off to chase a paddy!" Wilson remained on the ticket as Republican candidate but came in a distant fourth, having persuaded most of his free-soil followers to vote Know Nothing.

>>132093189
Thank you.

>>132093002
What white people are moving to the US in large numbers?

File: stats.jpg (567KB, 1194x1806px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 1194x1806px

WHY DID AMERICAN JUDGES BETRAYED US
THIS MAKES ME SICK

File: 1480992179289.jpg (57KB, 600x532px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 600x532px

>>132092549
DELET THIS

>There was method in Wilson's apparent madness, as a choleric Cotton Whig recognized. The Know Nothings, he wrote, "have been controlled by the most desperate sort of Free Soil adventurers. Henry Wilson and Anson Burlingame have ruled the hour. . . . Our members of Congress are one and all of the ultra-agitation Anti-Slavery Stamp." The Know-Nothing legislature elected Wilson to the Senate, where he did nothing for nativism but much for the antislavery cause. The only nativist laws passed by this legislature were a literacy qualification for voting and a measure disbanding several Irish militia companies—and the latter was in part an antislavery gesture, since these companies had provided much of the manpower that returned Anthony Burns to bondage. The legislature also enacted a new personal liberty law and a bill forbidding racial segregation in public schools—the first such law ever passed. In addition, these Know-Nothing lawmakers passed a series of reform measures that earned them an ironic reputation as one of the most progressive legislatures in the state's history: abolition of imprisonment for debt, a married women's property act, creation of an insurance commission, compulsory vaccination of school children, expansion of the power of juries, and homestead exemption from seizure for debt.

What the fuck is up with all the "I'm gay why do you hate me /pol/" threads?

>>132093160
>strawman
quit shilling for a few minutes and disprove the CORE of the argument, which is that it is better to pretend to be for equality, while making changes to your benefit

Why is /pol/ so slow lately? Did everyone go somewhere else?

File: 1498097705242.jpg (119KB, 663x882px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 663x882px

>>132093247
Show me how letting your daughter fuck a BASED BLACK MAN helps the white race.

>>132091703
People still care about you anon, it's never too late to turn your life around. You won't ever succeed if you spend all your time here projecting.

Think of how happy it would make everyone else to see you being happy? You're hurting, and robbing the people you love out of the chance to see what they love, *you* being joyful and happy.

>>132093328
Bots and shills, just like the last two years.

>Republicans and Know-Nothings had succeeded in breaking down the Whigs and weakening the Democrats in most parts of the North. But in 1855 it remained uncertain which of these two new parties would emerge as the principal alternative to the Democrats. In about half of the states, Republicans had become the second major party. In the other half the American party, as the Know Nothings now named their political arm, seemed to prevail. But a development of great significance occurred in 1855. The center of nativist gravity began to shift southward. While the Know Nothings added Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and California to the state governments they controlled, they also won elections in Maryland and Kentucky, gained control of the Tennessee legislature, polled at least 45 percent of the votes in five other southern states, and did better in the South as a whole than the Whigs had done since 1848.

>>132093344
Yeah, to fucking bed.

>In much of the South the American party was essentially the Whig party under a new name. To be sure, a tradition of nativism existed in the South despite the relatively small number of immigrants and Catholics there. This nativism undergirded the American party in Maryland, Louisiana, Missouri, and to some degree in Kentucky—states that contained cities with large immigrant populations. "Citizens of New Orleans!!" proclaimed a political handbill of 1854. "You have an important duty to perform tomorrow in the election of a District Attorney. . . .ather Mullen and the Jesuits can no longer rule this city. . . . The Irish are . . . making our elections scenes of violence and fraud. . . . Americans! Shall we be ruled by Irish and Germans?" Nativist riots and election-day violence figured more prominently in southern cities than in the North. In Baltimore various gangs such as the Plug Uglies and Blood Tubs became notorious enforcers of Know-Nothing dominance at the ballot box. Ethnic political riots killed four people in New Orleans, ten in St. Louis, seventeen in Baltimore, and at least twenty-two in Louisville during the mid-1850s. In some areas of the upper South, especially Maryland, the American party appealed equally to Democrats and Whigs. But elsewhere in the South it drew mainly from former Whigs who preferred the political company of nativists to that of Democrats. And the Know Nothings' nationalism became a unionist counterweight to the increasingly sectionalist Democrats.

>>132093277
Did you even read the post or are you pretending to be retarded? The RAISE act, if passed, would replace the (((1965 Immigration Act))), so if you actually have a fuck you'd be supporting that instead of shitposting.

>>132093233
They completely fucked the site. I had no idea that it would be anywhere near that successful. They literally fucked their entire voting system and got caught advertising that subreddit as having 6 gorillion users despite it only show 400k subscribers. Hilarious.

>>132093346
provide the counterargument or go home, TRS
I know you can't, and will instead just jerk off to BLACKED porn while crying about how much you want a race war

The slavery issue soon split the Know Nothings along sectional lines. At the first national council of the American party, in June 1855 at Philadelphia, Henry Wilson led a bolt of most northern delegates when southerners and northern conservatives passed a plank endorsing the Kansas-Nebraska Act. From this time forth the party wasted away in the North while it grew stronger in the South. The logical place for antis-lavery Know Nothings to go was into the Republican party, which stood ready to receive them if it could do so without sanctioning nativism. Abraham Lincoln voiced the Republican dilemma in this matter. "Of their principles," Lincoln said of the Know Nothings, "I think little better than I do of the slavery extensionists. . . . Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that 'all men are created equal.' We now practically read it 'all men are created equal, except negroes.' When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty—to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy." Nevertheless, in central Illinois the Know Nothings "are mostly my old political and personal friends." Without them "there is not sufficient materials to combat the Nebraska democracy." Lincoln was willing "to 'fuse' with anybody I can fuse on ground which I think is right." The only hope of carrying Illinois was to "get the elements of this organization" on our own terms after "Know-Nothingism has . . . entirely tumbled to pieces."

>>132093346
The alternative, faggot, what is it. What course of action do you suggest?

>>132093361
Only thing I'm projecting is a dem victory in 2020

>In Ohio, Salmon P. Chase showed how this might be done. After winning all of the congressional districts in 1854, the Ohio anti-Nebraska coalition looked forward to electing Chase governor in the state elections of 1855. But could they do it without Know-Nothing support? Militant free soilers like Joshua Giddings thought so. The nativists, he said, were "unjust, illiberal, and un-American. We will never unite with such a party, in any compact whatever." Chase seemed to agree. "I cannot proscribe men on account of their birth," he wrote. "I cannot make religious faith a political test." He therefore recognized in January 1855 that the strength of "the Know-Knothing movement . . . may make the election of a man in my position impossible."

>But Chase's ambition soon caused him to waffle. He privately expressed a willingness to work with antislavery Know Nothings if he could do so without "sacrificing principle." "It seems to me you have said enough against the Kns, and had better hold up," he told a journalistic ally in February 1855. "My idea is to fight nobody who does not fight us." We might acknowledge "that there was some ground for the uprising of the people against papal influences & organized foreignism" so long as we insist on "the importance of keeping the anti-slavery idea paramount." In effect, Chase wanted Republicans to spurn nativist policies while recognizing nativism as a cultural impulse. In particular, he was willing to make a gesture toward anti-Catholicism but not to alienate Protestant immigrants, especially the large German vote, whose support Republicans wanted and needed. This shading toward anti-Romanism but away from a generalized nativism became a way for Republicans to absorb some Know Nothings without feeling that they were "sacrificing principle."

>>132093483
Its never too late anon, you can still find happiness of your own.
The world wants to love you.

>Chase managed to walk this tightrope without falling. The conservative Know Nothings nominated a separate ticket in Ohio. Radical free soilers threatened to do the same if Chase made any concessions to the nativists. The Republican state convention nominated Chase on an an-tislavery platform that, in the candidate's words, did not "contain a squint toward Knism." The nominees for other state offices, however, were men of Know-Nothing background—though Chase considered them "honest men . . . sincerely opposed to slavery" who "adhere but slightly to their order." Proclaiming that "there is nothing before the people but the vital issue of slavery," Chase privately predicted that Know Nothing-ism would "gracefully give itself up to die."

>Perhaps. In any case, the main ethnocultural issue in the campaign was anti-black racism injected by the Democrats, who rapidly perfected the technique of tarring "Black Republicans" with the brush of Negro equality. Labeling the Chase candidacy "Sambo's State Ticket," Ohio Democrats proclaimed that Republicans intended to sacrifice "the interests of more than twenty millions of people . . . to those of three millions of blacks." The Republican policy of limiting the expansion of slavery would inevitably become a program of emancipation, which would let loose "three to five millions of uncivilized, degraded, and savage men . . . to roam the country" and take bread from the mouths of white laboring men.

Is this nigger posting his senior research paper or something?

>Chase survived these onslaughts and won the governorship with 49 percent of the vote to 43 percent for the Democrats and 8 percent for the separate American ticket. Though they could not have won without Know-Nothing support, Republicans came to power in Ohio committed to an antislavery platform and not bound by promises to nativists. They demonstrated this political legerdemain once again in the prolonged battle over the speakership of the national House of Representatives that convened in December 1855.

>The chaos of parties at the opening of this Congress reflected the devastation wrought by the 1854–55 elections. Most estimates counted somewhere in the neighborhood of 105 Republican congressmen, 80 Democrats, and 50 Americans. Of the last, thirty-one came from slave states and a half-dozen of the rest were conservatives on the slavery question. Of the Democrats, only twenty-three came from free states and a few of these were uncomfortable in the traces with southern colleagues. Of the Republicans (not all of whom yet acknowledged that label), perhaps two-thirds had at least a nominal connection with Know-Nothingism, though half or more of these placed a higher priority on antislavery than on nativism. One of the latter was Nathaniel P. Banks of Massachusetts, a onetime Democrat and then a Know Nothing who like his colleague Henry Wilson in the Senate now wanted to harness the Know-Nothing cart to the Republican horse. The Republicans nominated Banks for speaker, but in ballot after ballot during two increasingly tense months Banks fell short of the 118 votes needed for election. The process, however, crystallized his supporters as Republicans, and when the House on February 2, 1856, finally changed the rules to allow a plurality to prevail, Banks won the speakership with 103 votes on the 133rd ballot. If any one moment marked the birth of the Republican party, this was it.

>>132091703

>Come to a party thrown for someone you don't like.

>Painstakingly craft a sign, changing the hat when it wasn't right, and also to camo because you think it will trigger the imaginary hicks in your mind more.

>Run from corner to corner of the party waving your sign, telling the partygoers they have no life, hoping someone will pay attention to (You)

>Do this every day.

File: f1b.jpg (230KB, 1200x787px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1200x787px

>>132093453
>>132093467
How about not be a coward and call out the Jew.

Stop trying to prove to leftists that you're so diverse and they are the actual racists.

Stop with the based based niggers bullshit. Minorities will vote in their interests(dem) and so will we(rep)

Trump is a good first step, but he is controlled a lot by Jews and his daughter converted and had Jew kids. That shit is creepy.

We need to go further than Trump in the future. But being civcucks and talk about, its not about race its about being BASED, will lead to white minority just as much as open border Dem cucks will

>>132093638
Get the mods

>>132093002
AHAHAHAHAHA
Trump himself said he was trying to follow a "mehrit-based system similar to the one in Canada". Canada is being FLOODED with Pakistanis who literally dump trash onto the middle of the road and don't even speak English. They form gangs and butcher each other, and have turned good towns into ghettos and no-go zones. I used to be liberal, but holy shit I despise poo-loos and chinks with a burning passion now

Why did justice dept post this funny old VHS video on youtube last week?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw0mefqIZ5Y

It is starting out explaining how all aspects of a state's operations must be in compliance with federal codes in order to receive government financial aid

>What made possible this remarkable eclipse of Know Nothings and surge of Republicans to become the North's majority party within less than two years? Part of the answer lay in a dramatic decline of immigration, which during the years after 1854 fell to less than half of the level it had attained in the first half of the decade. But the main reason could be expressed in two words: Bleeding Kansas. Events in that far-off territory convinced most northerners that the slave power was after all a much greater threat to republican liberty than the Pope was.

File: ship-of-fools-ben-garrison_4_orig.jpg (421KB, 1062x800px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1062x800px

Just saw it now.
Nice.

>>132093682
Exactly.

Even if he allows only the smartest immigrants, whites aren't moving here.

We will just get street shitters, Chinamen, and an array of other browns.

>>132093682
I don't mind a FEW poos and chinks (zero Muslims), but holy fuck did we ever go too far.

The idea behind this multiculti horse shit was to unite Quebec and English Canada. I think the succeeded at the cost of fucking everything completely.

>>132093686
Actually now that i think about it they probably just replaced the whole civil rights department in DoJ with this helpful little video

Thanks AG Sessions

>>132093686
Sanctuary cities have been warned now.

How do we deal w the fact shitskins are now more conservative than non American whites when it comes to immigration

>>132093668
Nobody here talks about blacks being based you mouthbreathing retard. It's a strawman argument. If you sperg out about Jews you lose all public support and you need the public to vote for you to accomplish anything. Trump is just a first step, but it has to actually succeed and be normalized, else we'll never get close to a white nationalist in office. Just like the leftists, you have to work through subversion.

Is this a good Gutfeld? I got a feeling it will be.

>>132093686

Nice, they were getting ahead of the sanctuary city bans.

I'm hoping they can force them to cough up the voter registrations and enable voter ID as well with these kind of tactics.

>>132093741
Found the shoe! Can you?

>>132093867
On the other hand, Trump could tweet out that the owners of all the fake media colluding against him have the same ethnic background and redpill his entire base on the JQ at least partially.

>>132094001
He has, unintentionally, taken a few potshots there, with shit like calling out Jon (((Leibowitz))), but he should go further. Just say it's all the same people, and at least a few are going to see what he means.

>>132093858
They aren't and you should get the fuck out civcuck.

>>132093668
>bitches about blacks
>has less brainpower than most of them
GOING FURTHER THAN TRUMP IS THE GOAL YOU SHIT EATING COCKSUCKER
THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT IS THAT TRUMP WAS NEEDED AS A FIRST STEP
YOU DENSE MOTHERFUCKER

>>132093988
It`s in the rock.
Good night /ptg/.

>>132094150
His daughter is a Jew now and he brags about his Jewish grandkids to Israeli fucks.

Trump is a very small first step.

File: 1485286190625.jpg (24KB, 210x240px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 210x240px

>>132094203
meant for >>132093741

>>132094150
>We are so sick of Jewish lies that Ivanka and her family all converted to Christianity! #deusvult

>>132094220
How bad is your reading comprehension, leaf?

Using all caps is nigger tier.

>>132094222
Everyone who wasn't a retard knew he was pro-Israel from the campaign. Only idiots were amazed that he was then pro-Israel in office too.

Holy shit Gutfeld went from hating Trump to finally understanding him.

>>132094259
So, he isn't the answer.

Getting rid of some illegal ditch diggers isn't going to save whites from being a minority. Legal Mexicans have just as many kids.

>>132094309
No they don't. Legal spics are barely above replacement rate nowadays.

>>132093290
that's why you don't let the judges decide!

>>132094309
He is a step in the right direction which is why we supported him. Before he ran, even talking about "undocumented Americans" was grounds for getting eviscerated in the media, now it's a standard position. It's about making small steps in the right direction instead of being a sperg and never getting anything done.

File: blair white.jpg (51KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1280x720px

>>132092931
>ywn have Blair White don wolf girl ears and a MAGA hat and present her feminine bulge to you

>The worst problem on many farms was the shortage of salt (the only means of preserving meat) and its catastrophic rise in price—from $2 a bag before the war to $60 in some places by the fall of 1862. Prior to 1861 the South, despite plentiful saline deposits, had imported most of its salt from the North or abroad. The war forced the rapid development of southern salt mines, but transportation priorities for war matériel, the deterioration of southern railroads, and shortages of labor kept supplies scarce and prices high. "There is now in this country much suffering amongst the poorer classes of Volunteers families," wrote a Mississippian in December 1862, "for want of corn and salt. . . . In the name of God, I ask is this to be tolerated? Is this war to be carried on and the Government upheld at the expense of the Starvation of the Women and children?" A rise in desertions from the army in 1862 resulted in part from the distress of the men's families. A mother of three children whose father was in the army wrote to Jefferson Davis in March 1862 that she could get no food. "If I and my little children suffer [and] die while there Father is in service I invoke God Almighty that our blood rest upon the South." A soldier from Mississippi who had overstayed his furlough wrote to the governor on December 1, 1861: "Poor men have been compelled to leave the army to come home to provide for their families. . . . We are poor men and are willing to defend our country but our families [come] first."

>Anguished southerners sought scapegoats to blame for their woes. They accused "speculators" and "extortioners" of cornering the market in essential items until the rise in price enabled them to sell for fantastic profits. "We have in fact two wars upon our hands," declared a Georgia newspaper in September 1862. "Whilst our brave soldiers are off battling the Abolitionists . . . a conscienceless set of vampires are at home warring upon their indigent families." This "band of harpies preying on the vitals of the Confederacy," these "contemptible wretches" who "would bottle the universal air and sell it at so much a bottle" had "caused the present high prices, and they are determined to make money even if one-half of the people starve." Jefferson Davis himself stated that the "gigantic evil" of speculation had "seduced citizens of all classes from a determined prosecution of the war to a sordid effort to amass money." The Richmond Examiner lamented in July 1862 that "native Southern merchants have outdone Yankees and Jews. . . . The whole South stinks with the lust of extortion."

>Despite this condemnation of "native" merchants, the Examiner and many other southerners focused on Jews as the worst "extortioners." Jewish traders had "swarmed here as the locusts of Egypt," declared a congressman. "They ate up the substance of the country, they exhausted its supplies, they monopolized its trade." Jews were said to be more numerous in Charleston than in Jerusalem; the streets of Wilmington "swarmed" with "unctuous and oleaginous" Jews who bought up the cargoes of blockade runners. War Department clerk John B. Jones fulminated in his diary against "Jew extortioners" who had "injured our case more than the armies of Lincoln. Well, if we gain our independence, instead of being the vassals of the Yankees, we shall find all our wealth in the hands of the Jews."

>>132094259
>Everyone who wasn't a retard knew he was pro-Israel from the campaign.
he was very pro-Israel even before the campaign

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm5Je73bYOY

he endorsed bibi for PM back in 2013

>>132094376
My coworker is one of 10 and her aunt and uncle have 13 kids.

I'm in Arizona, my last few jobs I was 1 of a few white people there. All these spics are legal.

Although, banning immigrants who have to use welfare is a good move.

>Such diatribes were hardly unique to the Confederacy. As in other times and places, people suffering from causes beyond their comprehension fastened on an identifiable minority as scapegoats. There were Jewish merchants in the South, of course, and some of them speculated in consumer goods. So did a much larger number of southern-born Gentiles. But most merchants—Jewish and Gentile—were as much victims as perpetrators of shortages and inflation. To be sure, many of them sold goods at markups of 50 percent or more. But when inflation was running at 10 or 15 percent a month, they made little if any profit in real terms on much of what they sold.

>By 1862 the Confederate economy had become unmanageable. The futility of trying to bring it under control was illustrated by the attempts of several states to curb "monopolies" or fix maximum prices. Anti-monopoly laws were aimed at speculators who tried to corner markets in any of several necessities, or to charge "exorbitant" prices for them. But these laws proved unenforceable, for they either created a black market or further exacerbated shortages. Richmond's czar of martial law, General John Winder, established maximum prices for several categories of food in April 1862. Farmers and fishermen immediately ceased to sell at these prices. After three weeks Winder admitted failure and lifted the controls, whereupon prices doubled or tripled. Under the pressures of blockade, invasion, and a flood of paper money, the South's unbalanced agrarian economy simply could not produce both guns and butter without shortages and inflation.

File: 1466096637953.png (66KB, 810x800px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 810x800px

>>132092742

>>132094427
I voted for him. But if we go more civcuck in future elections, whites will still go extinct and get replaced by non whties and BASED non whites.

File: 1498869944723.jpg (72KB, 557x593px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 557x593px

>>132094530
oyyyyyyyy veyyyyyyyyyyy

File: 1477093701615.gif (2MB, 350x346px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x346px

>>132094284
The Trump Curse affects people in different ways.

It either destroys you or sways your mind to him.

That is the power of Trump.

How do you report people because history fag is screwing with the thread

>>132094435
You know what really gives 'her' away?

The lips. They're not quite right .

>Believing that "we cannot carry on war and trade with a people at the same time," Sherman and Grant did their best to stop the illicit cotton trade through Memphis and western Tennessee in 1862. The two generals issued a stream of regulations to tighten the granting of permits for legal trade, banished southerners who refused to take the oath and imprisoned some who violated it, required that all payments for cotton be made in U.S. greenbacks (instead of gold that could be converted into guns at Nassau), and tried to prevent the access of unscrupulous northern traders to Memphis. But much of this was like Canute trying to hold back the waves. The order banning gold payments was overruled in Washington. And one of Grant's restrictive regulations was also rescinded after achieving an unhappy notoriety.

>Several highly visible traders who defied Grant's orders were Jews. Grant and other Union generals had frequently complained about Jewish "speculators whose love of gain is greater than their love of country." When Grant's own father brought three Jewish merchants to Memphis seeking special permits, his son the general lost his temper and on December 17, 1862, issued this order: "The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department." Jewish spokesmen denounced this "enormous outrage" that punished a whole group for the alleged sins of a few. Sensing an issue, House Democrats introduced a resolution, but Republicans tabled it. Lincoln rescinded Grant's order, explaining through Halleck that while he had no objection to expelling dishonest traders, the order "proscribed a whole class, some of whom are fighting in our ranks." Grant said no more about Jews, but six months later he summed up the frustrations "I will venture that no honest man has made money in West Tennessee in the last year, whilst many fortunes have been made there during that time."

File: 1492561912333.png (164KB, 322x395px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 322x395px

>>132094657
>How do you report people
This summer is hell.

>>132094617
You are right in the sense that Trump has to maintain at least the same level of discourse as he did in the campaign and preferably go further right and that we should reject future backsliding by other Republican candidates. What we shouldn't do is punch right when shit is already skewed this much against us.

>>132094617
you will, you aren't going to have either of the national parties run on a "white genocide" platform on racial purity, let alone one that would actually follow through with it once elected

setting yourself up for a huge disappointment if that is what you are expecting

Daily reminder that George Washington owned slaves.

>>132094657
http://www.4chan.org/faq
Here's the answers, next time read these first.

>>132094869
Apparently he also beheaded about fifteen-thousand Redcoats

>>132094793
You're right. Going extinct is disappointing.

>>132094869
Were they based? Was old George a civnat?

File: 1498966147774.png (315KB, 423x384px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 423x384px

>>132094869
K

>Because the Republican party was new, its platform was more important than usual in American politics. But of course the candidate would do even more to shape the party's image. Seward and Chase were the most prominent possibilities. But each had made enemies among groups that Republicans needed to attract: nativists, antislavery Democrats, or conservative Whigs. Besides, Seward and his adviser Thurlow Weed doubted the chances for Republican victory in 1856 and preferred to wait for better odds in 1860. The most "available" man, precisely because he had almost no political experience and therefore no record to defend, was John C. Frémont. The dashing image of this "Pathfinder" of the West was a political asset. Frémont would win votes, predicted one Republican strategist, "from the romance of his life and position." His marriage to the headstrong Jessie Benton, daughter of the legendary Jacksonian Thomas Hart Benton, who was an enemy of the Atchison faction in Missouri, provided Frémont with important connections among ex-Democrats. His role in promoting a free California in 1849 and his endorsement of a free Kansas in 1856 gave him good antislavery credentials. Frémont thus won the nomination on the first ballot. Ex-Whigs received a sop with the selection of New Jersey's William Dayton for vice president.

Why was Trump celebrating 4th of July before 4th of July??

>>132094538
>muh anecdotal evidence

If ever you wonder why you're working shitty minimum wage jobs it's because you're so fucking retarded you think your personal experience is accurate for literally all 40 million legal spics

Stupid burgers, your petty tariff war will lead to another Great Depression.

>>132094950
>civnat
Are you faggot shortening things into newspeak even more? What next, fashbois?

>Dayton's nomination threatened to upset the delicate scheme to secure North American endorsement of the Republican candidates. Banks declined the North American nomination as planned, but in return for backing Frémont the nativists expected Republican endorsement of their vice-presidential nominee. When the Republicans refused, North Americans made angry noises for a time but finally accepted Dayton. Their endorsement of the Republican ticket required them to swallow an extra-large slice of humble pie, for Frémont's father had been a Catholic and the Pathfinder had been married by a priest. False rumors circulated during the campaign that Frémont himself was a secret Catholic. Some embittered North Americans, especially in Pennsylvania, vowed to support Fillmore, but that candidate offered them cold comfort because he was only a nominal Know Nothing and his main backing came from southern ex-Whigs who could not bring themselves to affiliate with Democrats.

>As an organized political movement, nativism went into a long eclipse after 1856. Hostility to Romanism (as well as Rum) remained a subterranean current within Republicanism. But for mainstream Republicans the Slave Power, not Catholicism, was the danger that threatened American liberties. "You are here today," the party chairman had told delegates to the Republican convention, "to give direction to a movement which is to decide whether the people of the United States are to be hereafter and forever chained to the present national policy of the extension of slavery."

>>132094979
Why not

It's a free country

File: 1493229731331.gif (51KB, 316x316px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 316x316px

>>132094989
But it won't tho

>>132095033
So nothing will happen on 4th of July??

>>132094980
Arizona will be white minority in 2027.

Were your parents related or do you just hate doing actual research?

File: file.jpg (226KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1024x1024px

>>132090932
It's funny watching Drumpflings squirm when you show them the truth about their "god emperor."

>>132094869
Reminder Wahsington only started a war to lower property prices and he wanted to crown himself king of America

>In all respects the Democratic candidate was Frémont's opposite. The Pathfinder at forty-three was the youngest presidential nominee thus far; James Buchanan at sixty-five was one of the oldest. While the colorful Frémont and his ambitious wife had made numerous enemies as well as friends over the years, the dour Presbyterian bachelor Buchanan seemed colorless and safe. While Frémont had served in public office only three months as senator from California, Buchanan had held so many offices that he was known as "Old Public Functionary"—congressman for a decade, senator for another decade, five years in the diplomatic service as minister to Russia and to Britain, and four years as secretary of state. But Buchanan shared one political attribute with Frémont—availability. He had been out of the country as minister to Britain during the Kansas-Nebraska furor. Unlike Pierce and Douglas, the other candidates for the nomination, he carried no taint of responsibility for the mess in Kansas. Buchanan also came from Pennsylvania, which was shaping up as the crucial battleground of the election.

>At the Democratic national convention Pierce and Douglas drew much of their support from southern delegates grateful for their role in repealing the Missouri Compromise. Most of Buchanan's votes came from the North—an irony, for Buchanan would turn out to be more pro-southern than either of his rivals. As the balloting went on through more than a dozen roll calls, Pierce and then Douglas withdrew for the sake of harmony, enabling Buchanan to win on the seventeenth ballot. Reversing the proportions of the Republican platform, the Democratic document devoted little more than a fifth of its verbiage to the slavery issue. It endorsed popular sovereignty and condemned the Republicans as a "sectional party" inciting "treason and armed resistance to law in the Territories." Other planks in the platform reasserted old Jacksonian chestnuts: state's rights; a government of limited powers; no federal aid to internal improvements; no national bank so "dangerous to our republican institutions and the liberties of the people."

>The campaign evolved into two separate contests: Buchanan vs. Fill-more in the South and Buchanan vs. Frémont in the North. Electioneering was lackluster in most parts of the South because the outcome was a foregone conclusion. Though Fillmore won 44 percent of the popular vote in slave states, he carried only Maryland. Frémont won all of the upper North—New England plus Michigan and Wisconsin—with a lopsided margin of 60 percent of the popular vote to 36 percent for Buchanan and 4 percent for Fillmore. Large Republican majorities in the Yankee regions of upstate New York, northern Ohio, and northern Iowa ensured a Frémont victory in those states as well. The vital struggle took place in the lower-North states of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Illinois, and New Jersey. Pennsylvania and any of the others, or all of them except Pennsylvania, when added to the almost solid South would give Buchanan the presidency.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-03-18-23-1.png (343KB, 720x771px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 720x771px

APOLOGIZE!

File: 1498704691094.jpg (292KB, 1220x1440px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1220x1440px

>>132094980
Also, I have a 500,000 dollar house and 2 cars.

You have a room in our parents basement.

See, strawmen are fun.

>>132095094
>and he wanted to crown himself king of America
if he wanted to do that he could've, nobody would have stopped him

you are forgetting the part where he voluntary stepped down from power under no obligation

>29 posts by this ID

what the hell is going on in this thread?

>>132095065
*_Tuesday, July 4, 2017_***

* 5:15PM THE PRESIDENT and THE FIRST LADY participate in a military families picnic*

" "*9:00PM THE PRESIDENT and THE FIRST LADY participate in the military and staff fireworks viewing*

Us fashibois are dom over you civnattie fuckbois. Conservo polit belongs to real right and that is the alt-truth. gg no re

>Democrats concentrated their efforts on the lower North, where they presented an image of Union-saving conservatism as an alternative to Republican extremism. The old issues of banks, internal improvements, and the tariff seemed of little interest in this election. Even the newer ones of temperance and nativism affected only regional pockets. Democrats of course went through the motions of branding Republicans as neo-Whig promoters of banks and protective tariffs or as bigoted heirs of the Know Nothings. But the salient issues were slavery, race, and above all Union. On these matters northern Democrats could take their stand not necessarily as defenders of slavery but as protectors of the Union and the white race against the disunionist Black Republicans.

>These Yankee fanatics were a sectional party, charged Democrats. That was quite true. In only four slave states (all in the upper South) did Frémont tickets appear, and the Republicans won considerably less than one percent of the vote in these states. If Frémont won the presidency by carrying a solid North, warned Democrats, the Union would crumble. As Buchanan himself put it, "the Black Republicans must be . . . boldly assailed as disunionists, and this charge must be re-iterated again and again." Southerners helped along the cause by threatening to secede if the Republicans won. "The election of Frémont," declared Robert Toombs, "would be the end of the Union, and ought to be." When the September state elections in Maine went overwhelmingly Republican, Governor Henry Wise of Virginia put his militia on alert and wrote privately: "If Frémont is elected there will be a revolution." Senator James Mason of Virginia added that the South "should not pause but proceed at once to 'immediate, absolute and eternal separation.' "

File: 1498716696290.jpg (177KB, 400x800px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 400x800px

>>132092549
>no hats

My autism won't allow it.

>>132095166
Mods are asleep at the wheel, we're on our own till sunrise.

>>132095194
You're an idiot.

File: IMG_9747.jpg (277KB, 750x930px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 750x930px

More false muslim/religion of peace propaganda:


“How come you don’t know about that?” Ayaz [the muslim speaker] said. “How come only Islam has terrorism? The KKK had 5million members in the 1920s. Lynching of black people was normal. It was routine . Why don’t we look at ourselves, too, as well as others? You have alternative facts? Then go to a different lecture.”

He quoted Koran verses to explain how there is no compulsion to convert people to Islam, how extremists who believe that “hate me more than they hate you,” and how Islam means peace, and soon, he began to veer.
“So Islam is not what you see on TV, okay?” he said. “I know Fox News. It’s not news. It’s the WWF, okay? Don’t use them as my spokesperson. When you say, ‘These people are animals and we have to blow them up,’ don’t say, ‘This is Islam.’ It’s not. And 99.9percent of us will agree we need to condemn these people and it hurts us even more because they’re saying that God said this? Muhammad said this? Never in a million years.”

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-04-32-00-1.png (67KB, 2048x377px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 2048x377px

>>132095194
das rite

>>132095166
Spam which is not being addressed by moderation for some reason. Their response time to spam last night was 30+ minutes, now their response time is over 45 minutes.

>>132095166
Weekends.

File: sagiri.jpg (4KB, 74x262px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 74x262px

>>132095131
Doc did nothing wrong.

I have a real quick question here. Why is Trump being an absolute madman as of late? He really doesn't need to right now, and it's not helping him. Is it a code that needs to be deciphered?

>These warnings proved effective. Many old-line Whigs—including the sons of Henry Clay and Daniel Webster—announced their support for Buchanan as the only way to preserve the Union. Even Frémont's father-in-law Thomas Hart Benton, despite his hatred of the Democratic leadership, urged his followers to vote for Buchanan. Other Whig conservatives in crucial states like New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois voted for Fillmore (whose campaign the Democrats secretly helped to finance), thereby dividing the anti-Democratic vote and helping place the latter two states in the Democratic column.

>Not only would a Republican victory destroy the Union, said Democrats, but by disturbing slavery and race relations it would also menace white supremacy in both North and South. "Black Republicans," an Ohio Democratic newspaper told voters, intended to "turn loose . . . millions of negroes, to elbow you in the workshops, and compete with you in the fields of honest labor." Democrats in Pittsburgh pronounced the main issue to be "the white race or the negro race" because "the one aim of the party that supports Frémont" was "to elevate the African race in this country to complete equality of political and economic condition with the white man." Indiana Democrats organized a parade which included young girls in white dresses carrying banners inscribed "Fathers, save us from nigger husbands!"

>>132094646
I wonder how many other people this has happened to.

>>132095234
then start posting awoos, at least it will attract that one sperg janitor who hates her with a passion

>>132095273
Because he doesn't give a flying fuck. If you piss him off he is like a bear and will maul you and your group then sit on your corpse. He holds a fucking grudge so I wouldn't recommend fucking around.

>>132095066
>>132095143
HOW DOES THAT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT LEGAL HISPANICS ARE BELOW REPLACEMENT FERTILITY YOU MENTALLY RETARDED FAGGOT? HOW THE FUCK IS THIS SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND?

File: file.png (21KB, 577x129px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 577x129px

>>132095273
>Why is Trump being an absolute madman as of late?

listen to what our Queen is saying!

>These charges of disunionism and racial equality placed Republicans on the defensive. In vain did they respond that the real disunionists were the southerners threatening to secede. In vain also did Republicans insist that they had no intention to "elevate the African race to complete equality with the white man." On the contrary, said a good many Republicans, the main purpose of excluding slavery from the territories was to protect white settlers from degrading competition with black labor. To refute the charge of egalitarian abolitionism, the free-state "constitution" of Kansas contained a provision excluding free blacks as well as slaves. "It is not so much in reference to the welfare of the Negro that we are here," Lyman Trumbull told the Republican convention, but "for the protection of the laboring whites, for the protection of ourselves and our liberties." Abolitionists like Lewis Tappan and William Lloyd Garrison denounced the Republican party precisely because it "had no room for the slave or the free man of color. . . . Its morality . . . is'bounded by 36 deg. 30 min. . . . It is a complexional party, exclusively for white men, not for all men."

>>132095273
Because it gets him a lot of (You)s from the media

>>132095323
Nothing I does gets their attention besides the mod protecting /sg/. There is a guy sitting there with his finger on the button.

File: 5.jpg (58KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x600px

this is my fascistfu
say something nice to her

>>132094989
That would make sense if the US had a trade surplus. It does not. I think Canada is the only country they have a surplus with.

>But Republican denials failed to convince thousands of voters in the lower North that the party was not, after all, a "Black Republican" communion ruled by "a wild and fanatical sentimentality toward the black race." Democrats could point to many Republicans who had spoken in behalf of equal rights for blacks. They noted that most men now calling themselves Republicans had voted recently for the enfranchisement of blacks in New York, Wisconsin, and elsewhere, and that the Massachusetts legislators who had ended school segregation now backed Frémont. Democrats could also point to endorsements of Republicans by prominent black men like Frederick Douglass, who declared that Frémont's election "will prevent the establishment of Slavery in Kansas, overthrow Slave Rule in the Republic . . . and [put] the mark of national condemnation on Slavery." Next to the taint of disunion, the tarbrush of black equality was the biggest obstacle to Republican success in large parts of the North.

>Republicans knew that to win they must attack, not defend. They perceived the Achilles heel of the opposition to be subservience to the slave power. "The slave drivers," declared an Ohio Republican, "seek to make our country a great slave empire: to make slave breeding, slave selling, slave labor, slave extension, slave policy, and slave dominion, FOREVER THE CONTROLLING ELEMENTS OF OUR GOVERNMENT." A Republican victory, predicted a meeting in Buffalo, would ensure "for our country a government of the people, instead of a government by an oligarchy; a government maintaining before the world the rights of men rather than the privileges of masters."

>>132095356
>David Limbaugh
Did Rush finally convert to judaism?

>>132094610
Good thing TRS never creates strawman comics

>>132095407
Learn English or get the fuck out.

>The precise point of Republican attack was Kansas. Shall I speak of "the tariff, National Bank, and internal improvements, and the controversies of the Whigs and Democrats?" asked Seward rhetorically in a campaign speech. "No," he answered, "they are past and gone. What then, of Kansas? . . . Ah yes, that is the theme . . . and nothing else." A lifelong Democrat who decided to vote Republican explained that "had the Slave Power been less insolently aggressive , I would have been content to see it extend . . . but when it seeks to extend its sway by fire & sword [in Kansas] I am ready to say hold, enough!" He told a Democratic friend who tried to persuade him to return to the party: "Reserve no place for me. I shall not come back."

>The campaign generated a fervor unprecedented in American politics. Young Republicans marched in huge torchlight parades chanting a hypnotic slogan: "Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Men, Frémont!" Henry Wadsworth Longfellow found it "difficult to sit still with so much excitement in the air." A veteran politician in Indiana marveled: "Men, Women & Children all seemed to be out, with a kind of fervor, I have never witnessed before in six Pres. Elections in which I have taken an active part. . . . In '40, all was jubilant—Now there is little effervescence—but a solemn earnestness that is almost painful." The turnout of eligible voters in the North was an extraordinary 83 percent. The northern people seemed to be "on the tiptoe of Revolution," wrote one awestruck politician, while a journalist confirmed that "the process now going on in the politics of the United States is a Revolution."

File: 1487162810120.jpg (148KB, 850x1330px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 850x1330px

>>132095323
Not just any awoos. THE awoos.
You know what I'm talking about.

>While this passion mobilized a large Republican vote, it deepened the foreboding that drove many ex-Whigs to vote for Buchanan or Fill-more. The Pierce administration also took steps to defuse the Kansas time bomb. Overwhelmed by his inability to control the violence there, territorial Governor Wilson Shannon resigned in August. Pierce replaced him with John W. Geary, whose six-foot five frame and fearless manner made him a commanding figure. Only thirty-six years old, Geary had pursued several careers with success: attorney, civil engineer, Mexican War officer who had led an assault at Chapultepec, and the first mayor of San Francisco, where he had subdued outlaws in that wide-open city. If anyone could pacify Kansas in time to save the Democrats, Geary was the man. He reportedly said that he went to Kansas "carrying a Presidential candidate on his shoulders."34 By facing down guerilla bands from both sides and using federal troops (whose numbers in Kansas reached 1,300) with boldness and skill, Geary suppressed nearly all of the violence by October. Kansas ceased to bleed—temporarily at least.

File: 1492245588254.jpg (12KB, 268x284px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 268x284px

Does anyone think that a mod might take care of the spam if someone Drumpfspammed the thread? They normally at least address that.

>>132095388
I think that they just mass report anything they don't like in their ting little hug box, hence, why everything gets deleted so quickly there

We need a mod with a finger on his button in /ptg/, that would sure give brock's boys something to think about

File: IMG_9748.jpg (268KB, 750x822px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 750x822px

So no one cares about this?...

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-03-51-27-1.png (247KB, 2048x1280px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 2048x1280px

>>132095396
she's not an asian, drop her

>The dawn of peace in Kansas brought some disaffected northern Democrats back into the fold. As they took stock of the greater number of northern than southern settlers in the territory, they saw that popular sovereignty might make Kansas a free state after all. While 20 percent or more of traditional Democrats in the upper North appear to have voted Republican in 1856, the figure in the lower North was probably 10 percent or less. This partial resurgence from the disaster of 1854 enabled the party to recoup some of its earlier losses. From only 25 seats in the House, northern Democrats rebounded to 53, though they were still outnumbered by 75 southern Democrats and 92 Republicans. Most important, while Frémont carried eleven northern states with 114 electoral votes, Buchanan carried the remaining five (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Indiana, and Illinois along with California) with 62, which added to his 112 from the South gave him a comfortable margin. Buchanan was a minority president in the popular vote, however, having won 45 percent of that vote nationally—56 percent in the South and 41 percent in the North.

>Southerners did not intend to let Buchanan forget that he owed his election mostly to them. "Mr. Buchanan and the Northern Democracy are dependent on the South," noted a Virginia judge after the election as he outlined his idea of a southern program for the next four years. "If we can succeed in Kansas, keep down the Tariff, shake off our Commercial dependence on the North and add a little more slave territory, we may yet live free men under the Stars and Stripes."

>>132095508
It someone were to hypothetically get on 9 or so different gates that they had to report some spam in /ptg/ it often gets ignored.

File: 1498770045230.png (508KB, 1065x699px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1065x699px

>>132095353
>LOOK AT ME TYPE IN ALL CAPS

ILLEGAL WETBACKS HAD A TON OF KIDS THAT MAKES THE WHOLE FAMILY LEGAL NOW

TRUMP ISN'T KICKING OUT ANCHOR BABIES

SPICS HAVE MORE KIDS THAN WHTIES

WHITE WOMEN ALSO HAD KIDS OF OTHER RACES

YOU NEED TO GET OUT OF YOUR BASEMENT, GET A JOB AND SEE WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING OUT THERE

>>132095521
Why is this doctor making his faith be apart of his work? Just do your fucking job.

>>132095521
No, Minnesota is a lost cause anyway. Just sell them to Canada already, they'd love the extra Muslims.

>Success in Kansas would require a bold strategy to overcome the estimated two-to-one majority of free-soil settlers. The proslavery legislature, elected by border ruffians in 1855 and still the official lawmaking body, was equal to the occasion. Meeting in January 1857, it ignored Governor Geary's request to modify the draconian slave code that prescribed the death penalty for certain antislavery acts. Instead, the legislature enacted a bill for what amounted to a rigged constitutional convention.

>Specifying the election of delegates in June, the measure entrusted country sheriffs (all proslavery) with the registration of voters, and designated county commissioners (also proslavery) to choose judges of election. Given the record of previous elections in Kansas, little acumen was needed to discern the purpose of these provisions. To top them off, the bill specified that the new constitution drawn up by the convention would go into effect without a referendum.

>Geary was appalled. He had come to Kansas as a Democrat who "heartily despised" the "pernicious" doctrines of abolition. But he soon became convinced of the "criminal complicity of public officials" in trying to make Kansas a slave state "at all hazards." This started him on the path to free soil and a career as a fighting general in the Civil War and Republican governor of Pennsylvania afterwards. In 1857 he vetoed the convention bill. The legislature promptly passed it over his veto. At loggerheads with territorial officials, his life threatened almost daily, without support from the lame-duck Pierce administration, Geary resigned on March 4, 1857. After leaving Kansas he gave an interview in which he condemned its "felon legislature." Geary had put down lawless elements in the nation's toughest town, San Francisco, but Kansas proved too much for him.

>>132095396
>fascistfu
/ptg/ is civic nationalist

if she was a based non white, then they would love her.

>>132095561
Often, it actually does get adressed, at least if I do it. People need to be more liberal with the report button, it's there for a reason

File: feels.jpg (152KB, 875x1437px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 875x1437px

>>132095051
There was a dream that was Rome..

>Faced during his first days in office with the same Kansas problem that had wrecked the Pierce administration, Buchanan was determined that it should not ruin his. He prevailed upon Robert J. Walker, a Mississippian who had served with Buchanan in Polk's cabinet, to go to Kansas as territorial governor and give it a state constitution drafted by orderly process and approved by a referendum. More than a foot shorter than Geary in height, Walker was his equal in courage. But he too found Kansas more than he could handle. Though a southerner, he acknowledged that the free-state men had a majority in any fair election. The problem was that the election of delegates scheduled for June would not be fair. Arriving in Kansas at the end of May—too late to change the electoral procedures—Walker urged free-state men to participate anyway. Not wishing to sanction the legitimacy of this election, they refused. With only 2,200 of 9,250 registered voters participating, proslavery delegates won all the seats to the convention scheduled to meet at Lecompton in September.

>These farcical proceedings got Walker's governorship off on the wrong foot. His sharpest critics were fellow southerners. They opposed a referendum on the forthcoming constitution; Walker favored one. From the moment he arrived in the territory, therefore, he had to endure hostility from southerners on the ground and back East. When word came from Washington that Buchanan backed the governor's insistence on a referendum, southern Democrats rose in righteous indignation. "We are betrayed," they cried, "by an administration that went into power on [southern] votes." All four southern members of the cabinet turned against Walker. Several state legislatures and Democratic state conventions censured him. From Mississippi, Jefferson Davis denounced Walker's "treachery." Several southerners dragged out the time-honored threat to secede unless the administration fired Walker and backed down on the referendum issue.

>>132095595
>>132095586
I thought it would be relative to the discussion lately: washington post (Joe), false narrative that islam is peaceful and nowhere in it does mohammad call for jihad, one muslim speaks for all muslims, etc

Jesus Christ mods. Do your jobs.

>>132091429
That's a really comfy pig.

File: Joker_this.gif (446KB, 300x186px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 300x186px

>>132095455
I feel like they're making these spelling and grammar mistakes on purpose just to fuck with them.

File: 1491760346296.png (288KB, 670x1098px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 670x1098px

Awoo~

>>132095455
America needs to make English the official language ASAP

File: islam anime.jpg (418KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1000x1500px

>>132095221
>>132095521
>islam means peace
what's unique about it? sounds like the usual CAIR bullshit

>This pressure caused Buchanan to cave in. The South won yet another of its Pyrrhic victories. Before this happened, however, Kansans went to the polls yet again, to elect a new territorial legislature. Walker persuaded free soilers to vote this time by promising to enforce strict fairness. But lo and behold, the initial returns seemed to indicate an astonishing proslavery victory. Closer investigation uncovered the curious phenomenon of two remote districts with 130 legal voters having reported almost 2,900 ballots. In one case some 1,600 names had been copied onto the voting rolls from an old Cincinnati city directory. Throwing out the fraudulent returns, Walker certified a free-state majority in the next territorial legislature. This action provoked more bitter outcries from southerners against "tampering" with the returns.

>While this furor continued, the constitutional convention completed its work at Lecompton. The document that emerged was in most respects conventional. But it declared that "the right of property is before and higher than any constitutional sanction, and the right of the owner of a slave to such slave and its increase is the same and as inviolable as the right of the owner of any property whatever." No amendment to the constitution could be made for seven years, and even after that time "no alteration shall be made to affect the rights of property in the ownership of slaves." Here was the solution of a problem of urgent national interest, offered by a convention representing one-fifth of the potential voters in Kansas. And to make sure that those voters did not reject its handiwork, the convention decided to send the constitution and a petition for statehood to Congress without a referendum—in defiance of all pledges by Walker and Buchanan.

>>132095741
Why do faggots post this gay little cartoon cat?

What kind of adult does that? Alt lite shut ins are cringe.

>>132095586
Didn't some muzzie doctor just get arrested in MI for slicing up girls vaginas?

>>132095745
For some reason that shouldn't be a shock to anyone it has been politically contentious among socialists, communists, and so called "progressives".

>With Democratic control of Congress, and southern control of the Democratic party, proslavery forces believed that this desperate gambit would succeed. But it was too barefaced for most Democrats, including some southerners, who sought a way to preserve the form of a referendum without its substance. On November 7 the convention modified its position. It now mandated a referendum, not on the whole constitution, but only on two alternative slavery clauses designated as the "Constitution with Slavery" or the "Constitution with no Slavery." This seemed fair enough—except that the constitution with no slavery specified that, while "Slavery shall no longer exist" in Kansas, "the right of property in slaves now in this Territory shall in no manner be interfered with." In effect, the constitution with no slavery merely prohibited the future importation of slaves into Kansas. Free soilers saw this choice as a Heads you win, Tails I lose proposition. They therefore denounced it as "The Great Swindle." Much of the northern Democratic press joined their Republican rivals in expressing outrage at this "dirty piece of work." Even if free-state men voted for the constitution with no slavery, they asked, what would stop slaveowners from smuggling human property across the 200-mile border with Missouri? Once in Kansas this property would be as "inviolable" as any other. Several southern states banned the importation of slaves, but such laws had proved meaningless. And in any case, the chances of defeating the constitution with slavery were problematical, because the convention put the polling machinery for the referendum in the hands of the same officials who had shown so much previous skill in rigging elections.

File: 1474924896992.jpg (222KB, 958x899px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 958x899px

>>132095317
Krauthhammer seems to be coming around too.

I think Cruz is the most famous example.

>Governor Walker denounced the outcome at Lecompton as "a vile fraud, a bare counterfeit." It was "impossible" that Buchanan would accept it, said Walker, for as recently as October 22 the president had reiterated his support for a fair referendum. But proslavery men who smiled and said that Buchanan had changed his mind were right. To one northern Democrat who bitterly protested the president's reversal, Buchanan said he had no choice: if he did not accept the results of the Lecompton convention, southern states would either "secede from the Union or take up arms against him." Walker left Kansas never to return—the fourth governor in three years to be ground between the millstones of slavery and free soil.

>On December 3, 1857, Walker's friend Stephen A. Douglas stormed into the White House to confront Buchanan on the "trickery and juggling" of this Lecompton constitution. To give Kansas statehood under such a travesty of popular sovereignty, Douglas warned the president, would destroy the Democratic party in the North. If Buchanan insisted on going through with it, Douglas swore to oppose him in Congress. "Mr. Douglas," replied Buchanan, "I desire you to remember that no Democrat ever yet differed from an administration of his own choice without being crushed. . . . Beware of the fate of Tallmadge and Rives," two senators who had gone into political oblivion after crossing Andrew Jackson. Douglas riposted: "Mr. President, I wish you to remember that General Jackson is dead, sir." The gage was down for a duel that would split the Democratic party and ensure the election of a Republican president in 1860.

>>132095804
yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItCRG0PGxps

File: 1489913711051.jpg (326KB, 850x1201px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 850x1201px

>>132095791
>Alt lite
>/ptg/ is civic nationalist

Is this your first attempt at trolling or are you just severely mentally challenged?

File: 1498975916930.jpg (267KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 900x1200px

This alpha male totally convinced me that based niggers and spics led by attack Jews are the future of our country.

>>132095089
Excuse me but did you win the election? That's right no you didn't

>The "fraudulent submission" (Douglas's words) of the Lecompton constitution to Kansas voters occurred on December 21. Free soilers refused to participate in this referendum, which thereby approved the constitution "with slavery" by a vote of 6,226 to 569. (As usual, an investigation found 2,720 of the majority votes to have been fraudulent.) Meanwhile the new free-soil territorial legislature scheduled its own referendum for January 4, 1858. Voters this time would have an opportunity to accept or reject the whole constitution. Proslavery voters boycotted this referendum, which resulted in a poll of 138 for the constitution "with slavery," 24 for it "with no slavery," and 10,226 against the constitution.

>Congress now had two referenda to choose from. Fire-eaters below the Potomac heated up their rhetoric to ensure the correct choice. Yan-cey in Alabama talked of forming committees of public safety to "fire the Southern heart" and "precipitate the cotton states into a revolution." Governors and legislatures stood by to call conventions to consider secession if Congress refused to admit Kansas under the "duly ratified" Lecompton constitution. "If Kansas is driven out of the Union for being a Slave State," asked South Carolina's Senator James Hammond, "can any Slave State remain in it with honor?" The southern people, declared a Georgia congressman, intended "to have equality in this Union or independence out of it." These threats stiffened Buchanan's backbone. On February 2, 1858, he sent the Lecompton constitution to Congress with a message recommending admission of a sixteenth slave state. Kansas, proclaimed the president, "is at this moment as much a slave state as Georgia or South Carolina."

>>132095791
>cat

File: 1498956014088.jpg (219KB, 880x580px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 880x580px

>>132095913
/ptg/ is alt lite civcucks.

Thats why so many people want you to go back.

But, since you're all under 18 you don't seem to understand that.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-10-37-32-1.png (274KB, 1536x1544px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1536x1544px

>>132095913
Don't bully him, based fashypede might cry!

>>132095915
Thats actually kinda funny.
>tfw too self-aware and sane to do this kind of IRL trolling

>The Lecompton issue gripped Congress for several months. It evoked more passion than even the initial Kansas-Nebraska Act four years earlier. The lineup was the same now as then—with two significant differences: this time Douglas led the opposition; and the new Republican party dominated northern representation in the House. Douglas's political future hung in the balance. If he had supported Lecompton, southern backing for his presidential nomination in 1860 would have been assured. But in those circumstances the nomination would have been worth little. The millstone of Lecompton would sink Democratic chances of carrying any northern state. Douglas did not hesitate in his choice. He could never vote, he told the Senate, to "force this constitution down the throats of the people of Kansas, in opposition to their wishes and in violation of our pledges." Telegrams and letters by the bushel poured into Washington praising Douglas's stand. "You have adopted the only course that could save the Northern Democracy from annihilation at the next election," ran a typical letter. Douglas even had the novel experience of seeing himself lionized by such members of the opposition as Horace Greeley, who wanted to adopt him as a good Republican.

>get distracted by a whore
>come back
>TRS is still upset
Will it ever end?

File: 1489690153345.jpg (192KB, 850x601px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 850x601px

>>132095915
Why do you keep projecting this imaginary strawman unto us?
The only thing you accomplish is annoy us and convince us you are retarded.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-04-07-50-1.png (1MB, 1536x1919px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x1919px

>>132095915
I know, anon

And now, they got to our beans

BEANS!

>>132096050
Eight years, anon. Eight years.

File: 1498793530665.jpg (10KB, 197x255px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 197x255px

>>132096050
They started a new campaign last week so this should continue for awhile and it is most certainly not just them.

>>132096037
Doesn't in n out print bible verses on the underside of bags and drinks?

File: 1498974529807.jpg (1MB, 1920x1552px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1552px

>>132096085
8 years pedes!

>From the South, however, came little but eternal damnation. Southerners professed "astonishment" that the Illinoisian had turned against them. "Douglas was with us until the time of trial came," said a Georgian, "then he deceived and betrayed us." A South Carolinian lamented that "this defection of Douglas has done more than all else to shake my confidence in Northern men on the slavery issue, for I have long regarded him as one of our safest and most reliable friends." As the controversy sharpened, southern rhetoric toward Douglas became more heated: he was "at the head of the Black column . . . stained with the dishonor of treachery without a parallel . . . patent double dealing . . . detestable heresies . . . filth of his defiant recreancy . . . a Dead Cock in the Pit . . . away with him to the tomb which he is digging for his political corpse."

>>132096061
This kind of thing really pisses me off.
The subtle indoctrination and brainwash is everywhere.
Stay vigilant !

>With its southern-dominated Democratic majority, the Senate approved admission of Kansas as a slave state on March 23, 1858. In the House the administration could count on at least half of the northern Democrats, as in 1854. But this time that was not enough to win the battle. "Battle" was not too strong a word for events in the House. On one occasion during an all-night session Republican Galusha Grow of Pennsylvania walked over to the Democratic side to confer with a few northern Democrats. Lawrence Keitt of South Carolina shouted at him: "Go back to your side of the House, you Black Republican puppy!" Replying with a sneering remark about slave drivers, Grow grappled with Keitt and knocked him down. Congressmen from both sides rushed into the melee. "There were some fifty middle-aged and elderly gentlemen pitching into each other like so many Tipperary savages," wrote a reporter describing this 2:00 a.m. free-for-all, "most of them incapable, from want of wind and muscle, of doing each other any serious harm." But Alexander Stephens believed that "if any weapons had been on hand it would probably have been a bloody one. All things here are tending my mind to the conclusion that the Union cannot and will not last long." On April 1, in a dramatic roll call, 22 (of 53) northern Democrats joined the Republicans and a handful of Americans to defeat Lecompton by a vote of 120 to 112. "The agony is over," wrote a Douglas Democrat, "and thank God, the right has triumphed!"

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-03-54-09-1.png (758KB, 2048x1290px) Image search: [Google]

758KB, 2048x1290px

>>132096050
Dropping Tactical Blackpills is a full time job, anon

>>132096054
Look at what you posted.

A naked cartoon character with cat ears.

Have you ever even spoken to a woman?

Why doesn't U.S. have space corps?

File: 1403368087039.jpg (59KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x640px

>>132096061
>>132096159

>Spurning this subterfuge as a bribe, Kansans defeated it on August 2 by a vote of 11,300 to 1,788. During this time Kansas had resumed bleeding from a number of wounds. Jayhawkers and border ruffians raided and ambushed each other with considerable ferocity. In May 1858, almost on the second anniversary of the Pottawatomie massacre, a pro-slavery band evened the score by seizing nine free-state settlers from their cabins and shooting them by firing squad (four survived their wounds). John Brown himself reappeared in the territory. His band invaded Missouri, killed a slaveholder, and liberated eleven slaves and a good many horses and took them to Canada.

>Free-state Kansans organized a Republican party and elected two-thirds of the delegates to a new constitutional convention in 1859. Kansas finally came in as a free state in January 1861, joining California, Minnesota, and Oregon, whose entry since the Mexican War had given the North a four-state edge over the South. Kansas also became one of the most Republican states in the Union. Though most of the free-state settlers had originally been Democrats, the struggle with the slave power pushed them into the Republican party, which regularly rolled up two-or three-to-one majorities during the early years of statehood. With enemies like the Democrats, Republicans scarcely needed friends. As if Kansas were not enough, the Buchanan administration, the Supreme Court, and southern Democrats ventured several other actions seemingly designed to assure Republican victory in the presidential election of 1860.

>>132096167
Why are you screen shotting random shit posts?

Did you not leave the house today?

File: ndfa.jpg (46KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 300x300px

>>132095455
>>132095407
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_q9HV9otUM

>>132092829
You sound mad. Sounds like you're the one with issues. You're posting here with us. Sort yourself out.

File: 1489690127409.jpg (598KB, 842x1080px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 842x1080px

>>132096028
I really hope you are just fishing for (You)'s.
I can't even imagine the amount of cognitive dissonance to reach such a conclusion.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-03-58-10-1.png (662KB, 1536x1626px) Image search: [Google]

662KB, 1536x1626px

>>132096141
Do you think the jews are responsible for making electronic music gay, too?

I've reported this nigger 4 times now. When comes the ban?

>Dred Scott lived all but two of his sixty-odd years in obscurity. The fame he achieved late in life was not for himself but for what he represented. Scott had been a slave of army surgeon John Emerson, who had taken him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and at Fort Snelling in the northern part of the Louisiana Purchase (now Minnesota) for several years in the 1830s. At Fort Snelling, Scott married a slave also owned by Emerson. She gave birth to a daughter in territory made free by the Missouri Compromise while Emerson was returning the Scotts to Missouri. After Emerson died and his widow inherited the Scotts, white friends of Dred Scott in St. Louis advised him in 1846 to sue for freedom on grounds of prolonged residence in a free state and a free territory. Scott did so. Thus began an eleven-year saga that started as a simple freedom suit and escalated into the most notorious cause célèbre in American constitutional history.

>>132096208
Its on the way, Maltanon.

>Scott first lost his suit but then won it on re-trial in St. Louis county court in 1850. On appeal the Missouri supreme court overturned this decision in 1852 and remanded the Scotts to slavery. The case was beginning to acquire political significance. Missouri courts had previously granted freedom to slaves in cases similar to Scott's. In overturning those precedents and asserting that Missouri law prevailed despite Scott's residence in free territory, the state supreme court was reacting to proslavery pressures. Scott's lawyers, who now included a Vermontborn resident of St. Louis, thought they could win the case if they could get it before a federal court. Scott's owner having moved to New York, the lawyers appealed to federal circuit court under the diverse-citizenship clause of the Constitution which gives federal courts jurisdiction over cases involving citizens of different states. In 1854 the circuit court for Missouri accepted the case (thereby affirming Scott's status as a citizen) but upheld the Missouri court's denial of his suit for freedom. Scott's lawyers appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Proslavery elements welcomed this move. The potential of the case for resolving crucial constitutional issues had become clear. And the Supreme Court had a southern majority.

>>132096229
Jews decide what music is mainstream. Electronic music isn't mainstream so no, probably not.

But I forget you guys like Jews now because one is fucking Trump's daughter.

>The justices first heard arguments on the case in 1856 and held it over for reargument in the 1856–57 session—perhaps to avoid rendering a decision before the presidential election. Three main questions were before the Court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory—that is, did Congress in 1820 have the right to ban slavery in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36° 30'? The Court could have ducked questions one and three by merely reaffirming the decisions of the Missouri supreme court and the federal circuit court that Missouri law governed Scott's status. Precedents existed for doing so; the Supreme Court itself in Strader v. Graham (1851) had refused to accept an appeal from the Kentucky supreme court which had ruled that slaves from Kentucky taken temporarily to Ohio remained slaves under Kentucky law. And indeed, for a time it appeared that the Court would take this way out. On February 14, 1857, a majority of justices voted to reaffirm the Strader principle and let it go at that. Justice Samuel Nelson of New York began to write the decision. But a few days later the majority reversed itself and decided to issue a comprehensive ruling covering all aspects of the case.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-02-03-43-13-1.png (279KB, 2048x1296px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 2048x1296px

Reminder that /ptg/ is full of kekistani redditor cucks, all alt righters go for intellectuals discussions over to TRS

>Why did the Court take this fateful step? Answers to this question have been uncertain and partisan. Only fragmentary accounts of the justices' confidential discussions leaked out, some of them years later. One interpretation of this evidence maintains that the two non-Democrats on the Court, John McLean of Ohio and Benjamin Curtis of Massa-chusets, stated their intention to dissent from the narrow decision prepared by Nelson. Their dissent would not only uphold Scott's freedom but would also affirm black citizenship and endorse the right of Congress to prohibit slavery in the territories. Not wishing these dissents to stand as the Court's only statement on such contentious issues, the southern majority reconsidered its decision to ignore them and voted to have Chief Justice Roger B. Taney write a comprehensive ruling. Thus, according to this interpretation, McLean and Curtis were responsible for provoking the vexatious Dred Scott decision that superseded Nelson's innocuous opinion.

File: 1485816016787.jpg (53KB, 328x336px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 328x336px

>>132096180
>Look at what you posted.
How new are you to 4chan?
Is this your first day here?
Maybe you should go back to pleddit if this sort of stuff bothers you.

>But the truth appears to be more complex. For a decade the question of slavery in the territories had threatened the Union. Politicians had been trying to pass the buck to the courts since the Compromise of 1850, which had provided for expedited appeal to the Supreme Court of any suit concerning slave property in the territories of Utah and New Mexico—a provision repeated verbatim in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The problem was that because these territories did not prohibit slavery, no such suit materialized. But here, conveniently, came a suit from another part of the Louisiana Purchase. The yearning for settlement of this question by "judicial statesmanship" was widespread in Washington during the winter of 1856–57, especially among southerners. Alexander Stephens, a friend of Justice James M. Wayne of Georgia and a distant cousin of Justice Robert Grier of Pennsylvania, wrote privately in December 1856: "I have been urging all the influence I could bring to bear upon the Sup. Ct. to get them no longer to postpone the case on the Mo. Restriction. . . . I have reason to believe they will [decide] that the restriction was unconstitutional." Other southerners exerted similar pressures on the Court. They seemed to be succeeding. Two weeks later Stephens reported that "from what I hear sub rosa [the decision] will be according to my own opinions upon every point. . . . The restriction of 1820 will be held to be unconstitutional. The Judges are all writing out their opinions I believe seriatim. The Chief Justice will give an elaborate one."

Baking

Worry not

File: 1498972165837.png (85KB, 622x564px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 622x564px

>>132096328
I've never been to that site.

Here you go civcuck

>The five southern justices did want to rule against Congress's right to ban slavery from the territories. Some of them had indeed begun writing opinions to that effect. But the difficulty was in getting the two northern Democratic justices, Grier and Nelson, to go along with them. This was why the southerners had reluctantly decided to sidestep the issue with Nelson's narrow ruling. Word that McLean and Curtis would raise the broader questions in their dissents gave southern justices the pretext they needed to change their minds. They approved a motion by Wayne that Taney should prepare a decision covering all aspects of the case.

>There still remained the problem of cajoling a concurrence from at least one northern justice to avoid the appearance of a purely sectional ruling. Nelson could not be persuaded—he had already written his opinion and was probably miffed by his colleagues' intent to bypass it. But Grier was pliable. He was also from Buchanan's home state. The president-elect was anxious to have the territorial question resolved. In response to a suggestion from Justice John Catron of Tennessee, Buchanan brought highly improper but efficacious influence to bear on Grier, who succumbed. Taney had his northern justice and could proceed with his ruling.

>>132096308
Stephen Miller and Roy Cohn are Jews. Not all Jews are internationalist traitors.

>>132096359
Its gay as fuck. Your parents fucked up.

Seems the lefts slave drivers have gone batshit

File: 1488726421128.jpg (317KB, 977x1208px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 977x1208px

>>132096392
>>132096392
>>132096392

NEW THREAD

>>132096392
>>132096392
>>132096392

FRESH BREAD

>>132096392
>>132096392
>>132096392

>>132096414
BASED JEWS playing both sides?

Hmmmmmmm

>It was an opinion he had long wanted to write. Eighty years old, the chief justice was frail and ill. The death of his wife and daughter two years earlier in a yellow fever epidemic had left him heart-stricken. Yet he clung to life determined to defend his beloved South from the malign forces of Black Republicanism. In his younger days Taney had been a Jacksonian committed to liberating American enterprise from the shackles of special privilege. As Jackson's secretary of the treasury he had helped destroy the Second Bank of the United States. His early decisions as chief justice had undermined special corporate charters. But the main theme of his twenty-eight year tenure on the Court was the defense of slavery. Taney had no great love of the institution for its own sake, having freed his own slaves. But he did have a passionate commitment "to southern life and values, which seemed organically linked to the peculiar institution and unpreservable without it." "Our own southern countrymen" were in great danger, he wrote; "the knife of the assassin is at their throats."6 Taney's southern colleagues on the Court shared this apprehension, according to historian Don Fehrenbacher; Justice Peter Daniel of Virginia was "a brooding proslavery fanatic" and the other three were "unreserved defenders of slavery." Because of this "emotional commitment so intense that it made perception and logic utterly subservient," the Dred Scott decision was "essentially visceral in origin . . . a work of unmitigated partisanship, polemical in spirit [with an] extraordinary cumulation of error, inconsistency, and misrepresentation."

>>132095556
Can you stop posting TRS screenshots? You've been doing this all day. It's getting old

File: 1485458615421.jpg (306KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 600x750px

>>132096223
>Did you not leave the house today?

He said, while going 30+ posts around 5 Am in the morning on a saturday night.
Shilling in a thread about something he doesn't like on a cambodian basket weaving forum.

>>132095864
Krauthammer is a real stand-up guy these days

>>132096229
anyone happen to listen to synthwave know why that guy that does the awesome videos keeps getting copyright banned? i mean is anyone other than kavinsky truly capitalizing on synthwave that wouldn't benefit from the promotion?
i mean these are guys digging up old computers with the intention of making music, you'd think they'd be happy people listened at all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgPXqoY0yYs

i didnt even know it was a thing until i came across some kraut posted this link.

File: 1362525956895.jpg (54KB, 540x539px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 540x539px

>>132096758

File: 1488.jpg (135KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 800x1200px

>>132096414
wow 2!