Grenfell link no one is talking about

>>130143649
Archive or screenshot please https://archive.is/2aUhs

>>130143675
Eh?

File: Trump Grenfell Tower.jpg (303KB, 1704x959px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1704x959px

>>130143649
Pure Coincidence

>>130143649
>horde of muzzies arrive
>have no concept of fire safety and burn down their poorhouse
>blame conservatives

>>130143675
How have you not seen the Archive Nord yet? He wants you to stop linking to the guardian directly. Use archive.is to save pages and link from them.

>>130143649
This is a way better conspiracy than 99% of the retard shit that gets re-shit-posted around here.

>>130148098
Ah ok my bad. Thanks for the info.

More like its to firm up Labour support amongst shitskins in the area by blaming the evil Tories for the whole thing

>>130148098
it's just fucking annoying
like a dozen clicks from /pol/ makes any difference to the millions of clicks a site like the guardian gets every day

>>130148551
Interesting but I can't see it. Labour would be utterly stupid to do this in an area with a 20 vote majority.

The way I see it is, you have to look at who is benefitting from this? It isn't the owners of the building because their reputation is in tatters and the future building regulations this will bring in will costs them a fortune. It's obviously not Labour for the reasons I mentioned earlier. Only the Conservatives benefit. Especially when a second GE is looking more likely.

>>130149506
>Loses multiple seats across the countru
>Thinks a solid tactic is to dogpile on Kensington to win it back

Any tory with their head screwed on straight would be looking to finish off the SNP and keep plinking away at marginals.

Could they vote?

And the fridge is the responsibility of the ll, a tory.

>Apparently the death figure could easily pass 200

there's only 60 people missing so stop talking nonsense.

>Burn a building down AFTER the election whilst a conservative government is in power to gain more votes for conservatives

nice one OP
you really thought this through.

>>130149506
No the owners do benefit in the long term because the land the building sits on is worth a tonne and what they'll do is build new buildings and sell them for crazy prices.

Most of the people killed in this will still vote at the next election desu

>>130143649
Apparently the death figure could easily pass 200.

In our newspapers they only say 17 or so deaths and dozens of hurt ones. So which is it?

>>130149415
This.
Also if your goal is downing ad revenue for click baits just use an ad blocker

Winning by 20 votes may seem like a slim margin, put in the context of overturning a majority of 7000.