[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Critique me!

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 50
Thread images: 23

>>
Some pothead who goes to my school
>>
This nigga watering pants
>>
fix your fucking aspect ratio
>>
>>2741101
How? Its 1000x1000
>>
>>
>>
There's two types of photographers
>>
Where can I improve?
>>
On my dadio shit
>>
>>
>>2741110
to imply that there are two types of photographers would indirectly imply that there are only two types of photography

try again
>>
>>2741164
I was more trying to show one is a gearfag. Tbqh they are pretty vapid cunts
>>
>>2741105
Would be cooler if he wasn't trying to mind meld with himself
>>
>>2741561
How is one a gear fag, because she actually has a camera. At least she's out using it. She's better than most of /p/. Still a shitty photo though
>>
>>27415>>2741576
>How is one a gear fag, because she actually has a camera. At least she's out using it. She's better than most of /p/. Still a shitty photo though

I'm talking about the girl taking a selfie of the bitch behind her with the camera.
>>
>>2741599
You should work on your storytelling, it wasn't really clear to me that you intended to portray the girl with a smartphone as a gearfag because she took a selfie of the girl behind her with a dslr.
>>
>>2741600
OK thanks. How's the rest of my photos?
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-11-20-24-03.png (735KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-11-20-24-03.png
735KB, 1080x1920px
What you think?
(It's a screen shot of the image because the actual one is 15MB)
>>
>>2741104
They're all stretched out you fucking retard.
>>
>>2742371
you couldn't just turn the phone 90 degrees in any direction and THEN screenshot it?
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-12-22-00-08.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-12-22-00-08.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>2743103
>>2743103
Happy?
>>
>>2742371
foreground is a tad dark,
you could fix the white balance too
the pastel color of the light is nice though
>>
>>2743111
yes
much better
>>
Is my bokeh shit
My phones focus is broken so i'm probably going to be taking only these kinds of photos now (lg g3).

>embedded file in image (????), cant upload it here

http://imgur.com/nEUfRMY
>>
Good subjects, but your framing is a little crowded, especially in the portraits.
>>
>>2741111
By never coming here again. Goodbye
>>
jesus fucking christ are you missing some chromosomes?
>>
>>2741098
op photo is cozy af
>>
>>2743123
cancer snapshit
>>
File: 62583711.jpg (82KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
62583711.jpg
82KB, 400x400px
"OH HAPPY DAYS" said Susan in a sassy black voice
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-13-13-10-03.png (2MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-13-13-10-03.png
2MB, 1080x1920px
What does /p/ think about traperture s work ?
https://www.instagram.com/traperture/?hl=en
>>
>>2743562
dog shit
>>
>>2743563
Why?
>>
>>2743571
It's nothing but boring mundane shit made to look sort of pretty/trendy with processing. It's processed well, and lit interestingly, but there's still nothing in the photos but manhole covers, and shoes, and empty streets. They're desktop background images made for 15 year old boys to be EPIC. But there's nothing there.
>>
File: IMG_20141223_013347-1.jpg (1MB, 3200x2368px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20141223_013347-1.jpg
1MB, 3200x2368px
>>2743603
Couldn't you also consider it its own style? I know its nothing like fine art and all but I still find some of his images striking and intriguing. (Side question: who do you think is the best photographer with a similar aesthetic?)
>>
>>2743614
>Couldn't you also consider it its own style?
Moody photos of nothing? Sure, it can be its own style, but calling something "its own style" doesn't somehow make it better. There's nothing to take from any of those photos. They aren't places you want to visit, you gain no information about anything in the scenes, etc. It's just visual pandering for the sake of visual pandering. The contents of the photos don't matter at all. They're completely interchangeable, and have no relation to the processing or mood.
>>
>>2743618
I think there is something to be said for a photograph having a cool aesthetic. Of course he won't be winning any awards with his photography,but work like his is in a way more marketable. Photos that look cool people want on calenders and as screen savers. Also work like his almost universalises photography it shows that someone can pick up a camera and make boring shit athletically pleasing and all you need is some editing skills. I totally agree that his work is nothing technically special, but his ability to make boring photos interesting has its own appeal.
>>
File: 1452310488290-b.jpg (72KB, 482x464px) Image search: [Google]
1452310488290-b.jpg
72KB, 482x464px
>>2743405
>jesus fucking christ are you missing some chromosomes?

Fuck you
>>


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-48.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-48.png
1MB, 1920x1080px
1/5
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-37.png (847KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-37.png
847KB, 1920x1080px
2/5
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-30.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-30.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
3/5
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-21.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-21.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
4/5
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-03.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-01-13-19-39-03.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
5/5
Been going for pastel colors. Also a little blue tint. (I like how it looks, but it could be shite.)
>>
>>2743752
Exposure seems off. Also highlights are blown out.
>>
>>2743761
>>2743762
>>2743763
>>2743764
>>2743767
>This film has been modified from its original version. It has been formatted to fit your screen
>>
>>2743772
Kek.
They are screen caps. Don't think /p/ would appreciate the 20mb jpegs the screenshots are of.
>>
File: IMG_0189.jpg (381KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0189.jpg
381KB, 1000x667px
Repost from another thread but fuck it.

Went out for my first shoot today. I have a newfound respect for good street photography. Plenty of ISO 3200 1/640 shots because I'm an idiot.

1/2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 70D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:01:15 23:35:11
Exposure Time1/400 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating1600
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height667
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_0165.jpg (525KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0165.jpg
525KB, 1000x667px
>>2745489

2/2

Anyone nice enough to take a look at my shoot today and tear me apart? I'm sure I'm making tons of composition mistakes.

http://imgur.com/a/aXOjL

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 70D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5372
Image Height3581
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:01:15 23:41:33
Exposure Time1/125 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1000
Image Height667
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Thread posts: 50
Thread images: 23


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.