Thread replies: 323
Thread images: 151
Thread images: 151
post your film snaps or recent pics in general
Minolta x-700
50mm
>>
File: 4L_Q5kyY5iD.jpg (2MB, 3130x2075px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3130x2075px
Canon a1
50mm
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3130 Image Height 2075 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:10:30 18:16:31 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3130 Image Height 2075 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2714711
clean
i like the colours but maybe raise the shadows in the foreground?? kinda dark compared to the rest of the photo
>>
>>2714707
Who is this semen demon?
>>
post more
>>
File: 4L_dGcFU1qM.jpg (137KB, 750x495px) Image search:
[Google]
137KB, 750x495px
>>2714711
another from the same roll.
Shit quality cuz original was too big or something
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 495
>>
>>2714739
whats that spots in the clouds?
>>
File: problems.jpg (947KB, 2941x1960px) Image search:
[Google]
947KB, 2941x1960px
>>2714707
Canon AE-1 w/ 50mm 1.4
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:03 20:37:09
>>
File: 02840017 - Copy.jpg (199KB, 1000x672px) Image search:
[Google]
199KB, 1000x672px
Sure
Sears KSX-1000
forgot what film I used, maybe Lomo ISO 400?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Noritsu Koki Camera Model QSS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3045 Image Height 2048
>>
File: 02840033 - Copy.jpg (158KB, 1000x672px) Image search:
[Google]
158KB, 1000x672px
>>2714761
same roll, I know that for sure though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Noritsu Koki Camera Model QSS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3045 Image Height 2048
>>
>>2714762
same camera, some experimental color implosion film. Eh.
>>
>>2714742
lab fucked up when developing idk
>>
>>2714762
this is nice i like the pink!!
>>
>>2714749
ayy i like this one. dont even know why but its pleasing.
>>
>>2714707
OP posting one of my cat
>>
>>2714707
How the fuck did you blow highlights on print film?
>>
File: DSC_0147.jpg (3MB, 2048x1228px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 2048x1228px
Just started, any tips ?
>>
>>2714795
lightroom
>>
where's the EXIF data on these?
>>
File: Snowday 09.jpg (583KB, 1000x675px) Image search:
[Google]
583KB, 1000x675px
Pantecks Super A with a shitty zoom and Kodak Gold.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2714816
md rokkor-x 1.7
>>
File: SeaWallArchitecture3dudes.jpg (259KB, 800x797px) Image search:
[Google]
259KB, 800x797px
Mamiya 6, HP5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2644 Image Height 2655 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2010:07:03 22:33:44 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 797
>>
>>2714795
Blown highlights is really popular for portraiture work but that's up to taste, take it as it is.
>>
Natura 1600, 50mm
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Picasa Photographer Picasa Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2014:07:07 13:38:22 Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Unique Image ID 304f4b66c148fbe303e3b14ad82360c4
>>
>>2714946
lol no.
>>
>>2715124
wow. looks like a really shitty film.
>>
File: 69930002.jpg (2MB, 2048x3089px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x3089px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.01.003 2008.01.15 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089
>>
File: 69930031.jpg (2MB, 2048x3089px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x3089px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.01.003 2008.01.15 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089
>>
File: 93220008.jpg (2MB, 2048x3089px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x3089px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.01.003 2008.01.15 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089
>>
File: 78320019.jpg (2MB, 3089x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3089x2048px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.01.003 2008.01.15 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3089 Image Height 2048
>>
>>2714803
Shoot at lower iso
>>
>>2715162
It must suck having a mom this hot.
>>
>>2715162
MY DICK
tell me everything about this. whos she, what film, holy fuck upload the complete series anon. this is Terry territory but actually hot.
>>
>>2715161
Who's the model :3
[spoiler]inb4 it's a trap[/spoiler]
>>
File: 2015-12-04_08-02-45.jpg (789KB, 1062x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
789KB, 1062x1600px
F100 35mm
E K T A R
K
T
A
R
>>
File: 2015-06-03_09-46-53.jpg (728KB, 1600x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
728KB, 1600x1280px
F100 35mm
Superia
>>
>>2714749
Love it
>>
>>2714803
Not a photography enthusiast like everyone else here but I think the fat ledge is a bit imposing/distracting in the foreground, especially because of it's bluriness. Otherwise, it has potential. Is that some abandoned/new building? It seems like it's being furnished still.
>>
>>2714707
did there is flash on there?
>>
>>2715245
Nope, just blasted the highlights
>>
hipster bullshit
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2715300
ok well there's a ton of empty space over the top of her haed.
>>
>>2714749
classic, i like this one
>>
>>2715162
damn nigga
>>
>>2715189
ektar master race
>>
File: You fucked up bro.jpg (248KB, 1000x626px) Image search:
[Google]
248KB, 1000x626px
I've been shooting too much C41 and developing in Rodinal lately.
This was probably the last thing I shot that wasn't a test roll and it was only to use the last shot by request too.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Leica Camera Model M6 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.5 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:05 06:39:25 F-Number f/1.5 ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.5 Focal Length 50.00 mm Comment -Make=Leica -Model=M6 -ISO=400 Scanner Make Epson Scanner Model V550 Film Make Ilford Film Type XP2 LensTaggerVer:1.7.4
>>
File: Fujifilm Cat corrected.jpg (1MB, 1024x1270px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1024x1270px
canon a-1, 50mm 1.8 i think
Superia 400
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Noritsu Koki Camera Model QSS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1024 Image Height 1544 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:20 16:55:12 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 1270
>>
Agfa 2.8 50
Superia 400 (Shit was a dollar man)
Developed in Rodinal, cause my school's darkroom doesn't have C41...
Ignore my shit patching job
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:19 02:07:55 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 3000 Image Height 1008
>>
File: IMG_4006.jpg (142KB, 427x640px) Image search:
[Google]
142KB, 427x640px
>>2715186
Heh sorry to disappoint but it's actually my fiancee most def not a trap :P
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3648 Image Height 5472 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:05 10:05:27 Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 427 Image Height 640 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: 93220011.jpg (2MB, 2048x3089px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x3089px
>>2715180
She is a model and an "actress" doing shitty reality TV shows. I had a 6 hours digital shoot with her with hundreds of pure hot photos but lost all the data... Fortunately I always take few "Terry like" snapshits with my point and shoot minolta i picked up for 10 bucks at an online auction, so all I have left is like 5 pictures on Fuji 200 Superia
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.01.003 2008.01.15 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089
>>
>>2715413
Online auction for camera stuff?
Where at? I've been pounding thrift stores lately for stuff. Antique stores too, but they're more pricey.
>>
File: 69930020.jpg (2MB, 2048x3089px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x3089px
>>2715414
polish auction site Allegro.pl Also bought a perfectly fine canon f1 with a 50mm lens for a 100 bucks. pic related
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.01.003 2008.01.15 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 3089
>>
>>2715413
>I had a 6 hours digital shoot with her with hundreds of pure hot photos but lost all the data
digital photo, not even once
>>
>>2715436
As much as I love film, being able to preview your shots during the photoshoot is pretty much priceless
>>
>>2715443
polaroid :^)
>>
>>2714795
it's odd that people think this doesn't happen.
>>
File: 4465749274_c1535c8b4d.jpg (77KB, 500x333px) Image search:
[Google]
77KB, 500x333px
>>2715443
>>
>>
>>2715430
What camera/lens is this, anon?
>>
>>2715487
Nevermind, i'm retarded.
>>
File: PICT0021_21.jpg (724KB, 1958x1469px) Image search:
[Google]
724KB, 1958x1469px
Yashica t4 with kodak Gold 200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Zoran Corporation Camera Model COACH Camera Software COACHWare 1.0 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Exposure Time 1481089/16777216 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 0 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Exposure Index 1
>>
>>2715491
hehe it was shot on one of my fav films fuji superia 400
>>
>>2715447
right I do shoot with polaroid from time to time but it's very expensive and I can't see me using it as a tool of first choice for predictable and consistant results during my semi professional shoots
>>
File: 33edit.jpg (361KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
361KB, 1000x667px
first roll of ektar
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information Uncalibrated
>>
File: IMG_20151122_230437.jpg (2MB, 2560x1920px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2560x1920px
>>
File: IMG_20151205_132142.jpg (223KB, 1400x1050px) Image search:
[Google]
223KB, 1400x1050px
>>2715534
I forgot to resize this one, sorry
>>
>>2715534
scan it properly, faggot.
i wanna see that picture good.
>>
File: IMG_20151205_132432.jpg (211KB, 1400x1050px) Image search:
[Google]
211KB, 1400x1050px
>>
File: P555Superia66.jpg (279KB, 800x1142px) Image search:
[Google]
279KB, 800x1142px
>>2714707
>>2714711
>>2714739
>>2714749
>>2714761
>>2714762
>>2714763
>>2714790
>>2714803
>>2714822
>>2715124
>>2715160
>>2715161
>>2715162
>>2715163
>>2715189
>>2715191
>>2715305
>>2715390
>>2715413
>>2715430
>>2715497
>>2715532
I'm gone for 3 weeks and suddenly you assholes think it's ok to post lab scans again?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: scan0048k.jpg (276KB, 468x659px) Image search:
[Google]
276KB, 468x659px
f100
50/1,2
superia 200
>>
Shitperia 400
Zorki 4
J8 50mm f/2
Ayy
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 849
>>
>>2717392
m4-p
35 skopar
>>
>>2714707
I like that a lot!
First time here on /p/. I like when the background is not only blurred, but kinda in circular blurs, it's a dreamy effect
dunno
I like it
>>
File: completeguidetophotography (1).jpg (671KB, 640x6031px) Image search:
[Google]
671KB, 640x6031px
>>2717427
The effect is called bokeh. It's what happens when a photo is shot with a wide aperture to create a shallow depth of field. I suggest you read up on basic photographic theory, it'll help you understand how images are constructed.
Here's a mini guide to get you going
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:09:22 07:13:14 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 640 Image Height 6031
>>
>>2717433
>>2717433
kindly fuck off would you
>>
>>2717439
please stop promoting your youtube channel here
>>
File: _5A_0072.jpg (466KB, 1532x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
466KB, 1532x1024px
Putting the thread back on track with some film snapshots from my test roll. Will be getting 2 rolls of Ultramax 400 and one of Superia 200 back from the lab in the next day or so
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make AgfaPhoto GmbH Camera Model d-lab.2/3 Camera Software RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3 Photographer Only the Best :-)) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 400 dpi Vertical Resolution 400 dpi Image Created 2015:10:10 13:16:59 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1532 Image Height 1024
>>
>>2714931
whats the point of shooting MF for scans like this?
>>
>>2717461
The scan looks fine at that res, what don't you like about it?
I'm more concerned about the development problems.
Those splotches running down the centre left. Either water marks or uneven development.
>>
>>2715521
Don't worry m8. Only idiots would debate against digital for that kind of work (spoken as a guy who pretty much only shoots film)
>>
>>2717461
Tonality, grain to detail ratio, etc. There's a lot more to photography than fine detail. Stop being a technician.
>>
File: tumblr_ntb3uyxqLH1ru0f7uo1_1280.jpg (150KB, 666x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
150KB, 666x1000px
Bumpin some random film pix.
Kodak gold 200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 666 Image Height 1000
>>
File: tumblr_nss5dpVSjW1ru0f7uo1_1280.jpg (239KB, 670x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
239KB, 670x1000px
>>2717629
Ultramax 400
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 670 Image Height 1000
>>
File: tumblr_nyyoht392s1ru0f7uo4_1280.jpg (267KB, 683x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
267KB, 683x1000px
>>2717631
snapshit of friend on very expired superia with stupid lightleak from olympus zoom 80
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV600 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:06 19:09:09 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 683 Image Height 1000
>>
File: tumblr_ntb3uyxqLH1ru0f7uo3_1280.jpg (228KB, 1000x662px) Image search:
[Google]
228KB, 1000x662px
>>2717634
Kodak gold 200 at golden hour is a nice combo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 662
>>
>>2715562
Probably the most interesting shot in the whole thread.
>>
>>2717355
Nobody (a) knows or (b) cares who you are.
>>
File: PICT0019_19.jpg (527KB, 1632x1224px) Image search:
[Google]
527KB, 1632x1224px
>>2715497
another turist snib from oslo. t4 and Gold 200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Zoran Corporation Camera Model COACH Camera Software COACHWare 1.0 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Exposure Time 1481089/16777216 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 0 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Exposure Index 1
>>
File: 22697089637_91e604178b_b.jpg (276KB, 1024x614px) Image search:
[Google]
276KB, 1024x614px
this thread needs some
V E L V I A
E
L
V
I
A
>>
>>2717744
Holy fuck that
P U R P L E
U
R
P
L
E
why do i even fuck with digital?
>>
>>2717750
digital could do that just fine
>>
>>2717751
Nah.
>>
>>
File: 12250263_989661571107383_1272239092_o.jpg (155KB, 1668x1148px) Image search:
[Google]
155KB, 1668x1148px
>>2717634
I got the same lightleak. Is it the lens causing it? I read online that putting a tape over the filmcanister-peek window -hole :D might help with it. didn't work for me though. Seems to be bigger if I zoom with it and less if I don't.
Yashica T and Vista 1/2
>>
File: 12268912_989661567774050_2123647335_o.jpg (156KB, 1712x1156px) Image search:
[Google]
156KB, 1712x1156px
>>2717765
2/2
>>
w/o dust it's not an authentic film scan ;^)
>>
File: Velvia 02 07.jpg (416KB, 1000x692px) Image search:
[Google]
416KB, 1000x692px
First time shooting Velvia pls no bully
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: NikonEMTriX46.jpg (916KB, 1347x2000px) Image search:
[Google]
916KB, 1347x2000px
>>2717647
I am the DSLR scanning advocate.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2717765
Yes I read the same thing. I havent done that tho
>>
>>2717860
I've said it before, I'll say it again. You could adopt a trip or something so it's easier to spot you. Not even for filtering purposes. Tho it makes much more sense why you missed my post now.
>>
>>2715497
really noice picture.
>>
>>2717427
jaysus how fucking fresh are you do you even own a camera ?
>>
hello
>>
File: 2015-12-08-204715_1153x742_scrot.png (318KB, 1153x742px) Image search:
[Google]
318KB, 1153x742px
so...
is this shit normal? it's been out of stock for like several weeks
>>
I'm certainly no expert but this worked when I was experimenting with it
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/109267-REG/Tetenal_T109306_C_41_Press_Kit_for.html
no idea about the regularity of amazon's stock
>>
>>2718049
>IN STOCK: STORE PICKUP ONLY
uh huh
>>
>>2718009
amazon runs out of stock of those kits pretty fast.
get it either here http://filmphotographyproject.com/store/unicolor-c-41-development-kit-1-liter-kit
or here http://www.freestylephoto.biz/10123-Unicolor-Powder-C-41-Film-Negative-Processing-Kit-1-Liter
first link is cheaper. They also sell 1L e-6 kits while amazon only sells 1 gallon.
>>2718049
as I understand it, the tetenal, unicolor, and arista developing kits are all pretty much the same. I've used the unicolor and had no problems with it.
>>
File: ching chong u got a text.jpg (206KB, 1000x643px) Image search:
[Google]
206KB, 1000x643px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Picasa Photographer Picasa Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3296 Image Height 2119 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2015:12:08 23:07:23 Image Width 1000 Image Height 643 Unique Image ID b169d42ff026c64a5fd3adba4b376fe6
>>
File: Image48.jpg (2MB, 1732x1155px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1732x1155px
Taken on a broken Pentax MX on a fungus filled Pentax M 28mm
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpcm Vertical Resolution 240 dpcm Image Created 2015:11:11 12:02:48
>>
File: 00260016.jpg (450KB, 1000x663px) Image search:
[Google]
450KB, 1000x663px
Zenit E with Helios 44-2
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.3.0 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:09 18:06:28 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 663
>>
File: 00260006.jpg (572KB, 1000x663px) Image search:
[Google]
572KB, 1000x663px
>>2718377
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.3.0 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:09 18:06:27 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 663
>>
>"man this light is beautiful, these colors are gonna look great"
>finish the roll
>it's tmax
>load a roll of ektar
>shoot half of it with the dark slide still in
>film back fucks up and stops winding
Today was not my day. Remember kids, never operate a mamiya with a hangover.
>>
File: 2015-07-13 20.24.23.jpg (436KB, 692x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
436KB, 692x1024px
>>2718377
All due respect, but do you deem this shot as having any value? I mean, it's literally nothing with a bit of smudged brown and a generic countryside poplar-lined road, underexposed and blurry. f2@1/30, evening, windy weather, maybe?
Pic related, my helios 44-2 lens flare test.
>>
File: shitlab-1.jpg (700KB, 1024x1410px) Image search:
[Google]
700KB, 1024x1410px
Fucking shit lab scans
Can't believe how extortionate labs are in Australia. Look at those fucking highlights!?!!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Only the Best :-)) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
>>2718899
>f2@1/30, evening, windy weather, maybe?
You are right. I was trying to focus far objects, to see if I get things in focus, cause my Zenit focusing screen is messed up.
>>
File: IMG_20151213_132232.jpg (210KB, 1400x1119px) Image search:
[Google]
210KB, 1400x1119px
this is part of a series on the disaster that happened in Mariana, Brazil
>>
I do not know where else to ask
What is best:
Nikon l35 af or Olympus mju 2?
>>
>>2721029
olympus
>>
>>2721029
I bought the mju II a month or two ago, it's ebin.
>>
>>2721052
I want to own it for a long time, but in my country they are few and too expensive
>>
I think it's time to get a scanner.
>>
∆
∆∆
>>
>>2715162
Was the exorcism a success?
>>
File: decst-1.jpg (234KB, 750x750px) Image search:
[Google]
234KB, 750x750px
really only shot this one to get a handle on development times
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:13 17:54:28
>>
File: imm020_24.jpg (574KB, 1536x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
574KB, 1536x1024px
found an old Petri Computor 35, so i'll post some of my very first film shots (I'm not experienced with digital either, though)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:09:11 14:50:09
>>
File: imm011_15.jpg (496KB, 1536x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
496KB, 1536x1024px
>>2721142
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:09:11 14:50:08
>>
File: imm026_30a.jpg (592KB, 1536x781px) Image search:
[Google]
592KB, 1536x781px
>>2721144
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:09:11 14:50:10
>>
File: imm009_13.jpg (580KB, 1536x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
580KB, 1536x1024px
>>2721145
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:09:11 14:50:07
>>
File: imm005_9.jpg (369KB, 1536x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
369KB, 1536x1024px
>>2721147
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:09:11 14:50:07
>>
File: imm019_23.jpg (494KB, 1024x1536px) Image search:
[Google]
494KB, 1024x1536px
>>2721148
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:09:11 14:53:35
>>
>>2721144
Can I get a high res of this if you do not mind. I would love it for a desktop wallpaper. Just higher res than 2560x1440(old imac) would be great. I could do the rest.
>>
>>2717751
lol show us
>>
>>2714803
that isnt film
>>
>>2717355
he's faggot torrid
>>
File: img323.jpg (2MB, 2912x4458px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2912x4458px
Kodak BW400CN
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4458 Image Height 2912 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2015:12:12 23:34:46 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2912 Image Height 4458
>>
>>
Bronica + Velvia
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1090 Image Height 1090
>>
>>2721449
Minolta + Ilford
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 894 Image Height 1080
>>
File: img317.jpg (4MB, 2890x4458px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 2890x4458px
>>2721450
Now this I like!
Another shot with Kodak BW400CN + Minolta 7000 + Minolta 20mm
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2890 Image Height 4458 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2015:12:14 21:30:39 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2890 Image Height 4458
>>
>>2721450
fackin right m8
>>
File: Ghost 1-2.jpg (769KB, 618x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
769KB, 618x1024px
Kentmere 400, pushed to 1600 (I think.)
Can't remember camera, but lens was probably Nikkor 50mm E Series with stocking over the front element.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1207 Image Height 2000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:14 09:53:04 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 618 Image Height 1024
>>
>>2718009
I use the Tetenal kits, never had an issue. Readily available in UK.
>>
>>
Ignore me if this is the wrong thread, I'm gonna buy a shit load of 35mm film from b&h before going back to europe.
I shot hp5, fp4 and porta 400 for now, any recommendation? Looking more for b&w film.
>>
File: süleyman-inal-1.jpg (41KB, 960x640px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 960x640px
Dont mind me just tryin something
>>
>>2721802
And it didnt work, good
>>
>>2714761
SAN DIEGO?
A
N
D
I
E
G
O
?
>>
>>2715430
gonna need to know this film SENPAI
>>
>>2722244
read the thread holy shit
>>
>>2721800
Try out a few other of the ilford line. Learn the difference between hp5 and delta 400. Try out fp4.
>>
>>2722241
Close but no cigar
Santa Monica, labor day weekend.
If it makes you feel better I'm from San Diego.
>>
>>2717902
What the fuck is wrong with you? Stop being such a thick skulled bitch, this person comes into a thread instead of shit posting a whole new thread and just says they enjoyed something that 90% of people on /p/ also like, who are you to say they can't belong here? I'm sure your photos are nothing groundbreaking and incredible otherwise you wouldn't be on here so how about you fuck off and let someone take a genuine interest in a new hobby they not have gotten a chance yet to explore
>>
File: jftyju.jpg (1MB, 900x1360px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 900x1360px
FUCK OFF
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:11 22:53:49 Exposure Time 1/13 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 4.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
>>2722510
noice.
>>
just shot my first roll and they are all quite shit.
Only really have time to shoot at night so pics are all really dark.
im guessing i should invest in a tripod.
>>
File: train4ch.jpg (4MB, 4468x3033px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 4468x3033px
>>2722605
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 11:37:54 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 33.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4468 Image Height 3033 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: poles4ch.jpg (4MB, 5021x3269px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 5021x3269px
>>2722605
brutal feedback please and tips
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 11:39:07 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5021 Image Height 3269 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: sign4ch.jpg (268KB, 1000x649px) Image search:
[Google]
268KB, 1000x649px
>>2722622
My bad. Now i'm sorry for spamming!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 14:38:16 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 33.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 649 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: train4ch.jpg (398KB, 1000x679px) Image search:
[Google]
398KB, 1000x679px
>>2722719
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 14:36:04 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 33.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 679 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: pole4ch.jpg (356KB, 1000x651px) Image search:
[Google]
356KB, 1000x651px
>>2722720
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 14:37:35 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 17.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 651 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2721450
1/3 More from that day
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1080 Image Height 730
>>
>>2721450
2/3 more
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1080 Image Height 730
>>
>>2721450
3/3 more
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 730 Image Height 1080
>>
File: dsc_0722.jpg (524KB, 664x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
524KB, 664x1000px
>>2714707
critique pls
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 738 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:11:30 12:37:54 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2722986
I'm an internet photo critic and this is my first critique:
Anons photograph dsc_0722 is interesting but does not work for me in some aspects.
Framing: - upper rail and ggb do not meet
- upper rail is too high
- horizontal rail is too centered, should be lower
- too much space at the bottom end
>maybe a horizontal shot would work better than a vertikal
subject: - somehow too much: gull, pier, rail, bridge, ship, coast
- the gull is calm and cool but the other stuff is moving and exciting, connecting, unknown-> would prefer a flying gull
- the dof is good though
colour: - i like it
>>
>>2715189
Not a bad photo but that is a really shitty scan.
>>
>>2723081
>should
>should
>should
why
why
why
>>
File: 6yzg0f4f.jpg (267KB, 844x597px) Image search:
[Google]
267KB, 844x597px
>>2714763
just
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:16 19:21:33 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 844 Image Height 597
>>
>>2717392
you should clean out your camera, bub
>>
>>2723257
I'm an internet photo critic.
Please don't question my critique.
My critique is built on personal feels and does not have any scientific background.
Every human has a different understanding of the conception or idea of a picture and the reality. So there can never be a total consensus.
I would prefer a horizontal framing in this situation out of curiosity. Maybe that's how the picture works.
>>
>>2723264
thanks bub
>>
How many photographers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
10. 1 to do it, and 9 to say they could've done it better.
>>
>>2723081
>first critique
as well as last buddy, a horizontal photo would have taken away from the subject of the photo, the gull. The DOF adds to the fact that the GGB is not the subject.
>upper rail and ggb do not meet
why should they? the bridge is being framed by the rails. If a rail went through it, do you think the photo would be better?
>the gull is calm and cool but the other stuff is moving and exciting
what causes the rest of this photo to be moving and exciting? everything in depth is frozen, nothing in the back is moving... or exciting
Take some time and learn some of the rules of photo composition, it could help you appreciate some of the photos on this site better.
>>
>>2722986
btw, good photo anon, keep at it
>>
File: ektar scan 007.jpg (528KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
528KB, 1000x667px
From my first roll of ektar. Besides not great composition, did I do ok?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 100 dpi Vertical Resolution 100 dpi Image Created 2015:12:16 14:33:02
>>
>>2723413
Composition is basically the bulk of a photo senpai, and you really fucked up those highlights holy shit
>>
>>2723424
>fucked up highlights
>print film
try again, son.
>>
>>2723424
highlights are ok it's just maybe low contrast
>>
File: Film7136_09a.jpg (475KB, 669x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
475KB, 669x1000px
Recently developed
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:17 00:12:22 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
File: Film7140_18p.jpg (1MB, 1000x778px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x778px
>>2723445
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:17 00:17:41 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 778
>>
File: Film7140_02.jpg (901KB, 1000x809px) Image search:
[Google]
901KB, 1000x809px
>>2723448
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:17 00:12:16 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
>>2723424
ektar is pretty saturated, I'd say whatever he did (overexposed I guess) worked out pretty well because it made the skin tones smooth and not bright red.
>>
>>2722244
Fuji superia 400
>>
>>2718843
on camera flash
>>
Sorry again
What is best:
Nikon l35af or Olympus Trip 35?
>>
File: img00 resize.jpg (276KB, 707x1096px) Image search:
[Google]
276KB, 707x1096px
gonna post some recent snapshits
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
>>
File: img015 copy.jpg (310KB, 1648x1044px) Image search:
[Google]
310KB, 1648x1044px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1648 Image Height 1044
>>
File: img001 copy.jpg (325KB, 1640x1076px) Image search:
[Google]
325KB, 1640x1076px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1640 Image Height 1076
>>
File: img002.jpg (388KB, 1644x1076px) Image search:
[Google]
388KB, 1644x1076px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1644 Image Height 1076
>>
File: img009 copy.jpg (315KB, 1734x1096px) Image search:
[Google]
315KB, 1734x1096px
r cloud pics high art?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1734 Image Height 1096
>>
>>2721144
v pretty anon
>>
>>2725253
L35AF
>>
>>2717757
so? now you're letting the film fuck around with colors instead of taking control
>>
>>
File: CNV00009.jpg (636KB, 1840x1232px) Image search:
[Google]
636KB, 1840x1232px
Canon AE1P
50 1.8
Superia 400
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:06:16 11:18:57 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232
>>
>>2725435
Lovely colours
>>
File: 37260012-2.jpg (918KB, 1544x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
918KB, 1544x1024px
canon a1 and fuji xtra 400
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-29_31 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:10:31 19:53:37 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
>>2722605
I love the atmosphere in this.
>>
File: 0033_33.jpg (2MB, 3090x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3090x2048px
i think film is far superior to digital, because everything literaly looks ten times cooler.
i have a canon F1
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.11.003 (140225) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3090 Image Height 2048
>>
>>2721069
scanned version
DSLRfags BTFO
>>
>>2714803
Because he's the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now, so we'll hunt him. Because he can take it, because he's not a hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector, a Dark Knight.
Also this doesn't look like film. If this were shot with a lower iso it might work. If the person was to be the subject, get closer and make him a subject. if the city was to be your subject, actually photograph the city.
The blurry ledge doesn't add much, but I see where your thinking was. This is good, consider how to utilize leading lines like this. But what does it add when it is a blob separating the two interesting parts of the photo.
>>
File: Untitled-0038.jpg (545KB, 1000x664px) Image search:
[Google]
545KB, 1000x664px
This is a photograph of the miles of shit that surrounds my house.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 738 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:22 20:17:00 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Tungsten Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2727311
god dammit I posted in the wrong thread.
>>
>>2727282
Blue channel is blown. Uncorrectable.
>>
>>2727312
Moarliek godamnit your house is literally surrounded by miles of shit...
>>
File: eirAttacking.jpg (570KB, 800x533px) Image search:
[Google]
570KB, 800x533px
Kodak HIE with a yellow filter for shits and giggles.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3488 Image Height 2303 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2011:08:22 18:40:20 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 533
>>
File: eirSpeedboats.jpg (415KB, 533x800px) Image search:
[Google]
415KB, 533x800px
>>2727349
All of the photos from that roll came out a bit soft. Guess I should have used the IR focus mark on my lens. Oh well...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2280 Image Height 3480 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Unknown Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2012:07:27 21:43:21 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 533 Image Height 800
>>
>>2727350
Don't use IR focus because with wide band color IR 2/3 of the image comes from visible light.
>>
File: 07810021.jpg (2MB, 3045x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3045x2048px
Sears KSX-1000, stock 50mm Lens
Lomo ISO 800 film
I just really like the colors on this one
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Noritsu Koki Camera Model QSS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3045 Image Height 2048
>>
>>2727474
aw fuck forgot to resize
>>
File: Asset0016.jpg (2MB, 1222x1787px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1222x1787px
idk
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:23 20:03:36 Comment Intel(R) JPEG Library, version [2.3.0.0]
>>
>>2728007
didnt resize. im scum
my b
>>
File: Asset0011.jpg (338KB, 2048x1364px) Image search:
[Google]
338KB, 2048x1364px
hi again
>>
>>2714707
Samsung Galaxy s3 (lel) used the build in rich tone effect
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG Camera Model GT-I9301I Camera Software I9301IXXUAOF3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.4 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 32 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1216 Image Height 1136 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:07 17:12:19 F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program Metering Mode Average Focal Length 3.71 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1216 Image Height 1136 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Unknown
>>
>>2727474
Comfy as fuck
>>
File: scan034.jpg (552KB, 1024x683px) Image search:
[Google]
552KB, 1024x683px
>>2728229
but that's not film anon
Ektar, Canon EOS 3 w/ 50mm 1.8
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: Bulgarien-Fuji-C200-036.jpg (185KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
185KB, 1000x667px
just looking at my shots from this year vacations.. still remember that moment.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4490 Image Height 2837 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2015:12:26 03:22:02 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>
>>2725529
Love this.
>>
>>2729269
is she slamming you into that pole?
>>
File: ektarH091.jpg (1MB, 1000x814px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x814px
RB67 with ektar @ 30 sec
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:24 23:44:47 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 814
>>
>>2730795
I like this. Where is it at?
>>
File: 97740004.jpg (3MB, 3130x2075px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3130x2075px
From the first roll through my supposedly broken F4. Nikon E-Series 50mm on Ektar.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3130 Image Height 2075
>>
File: 97740024.jpg (3MB, 3130x2075px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3130x2075px
>>2732096
Same camera/lens/film
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3130 Image Height 2075
>>
File: 97740017.jpg (3MB, 3130x2075px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3130x2075px
>>2732100
Same setup.
Are these photos okay? I'm really new to photography and would love to hear any feedback/critique.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3130 Image Height 2075
>>
>>2732101
>Are these photos okay?
If you like out of focus snapshits?
>>
File: 151126_14.jpg (778KB, 1000x682px) Image search:
[Google]
778KB, 1000x682px
Olympus OM-2n, Zuiko 50 1.8, Superia 200
I find getting the right color out of scanned negatives is pretty tough. After a year or so I managed to get a workflow with multiple curve and color balance layers in photoshop, but it's still a very arduous process. How do you guys deal with that?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
>>2717839
No bully here, I dig it, what lens was this shot through?
>>
>>2732104
I take a "white and color balance" shot, basically I draw a circle, lines and put some color in a piece of white paper, and it's always my first photo in the roll.
I balance to it, save as preset, then edit the rest with that, small adjustments here and there.
I feel kinda stupid doing it, but if I don't do that I get frustrated with the resulting blue hue that negatives end up with after inverting and so on.
Where you at bruh? Berlin /p/leb here.
>>
>>
>>2717396
Nice! Was this at the British Library?
>>
>>2732103
Please elaborate.
>>
>>2714707
I tries
>>
File: tmp_1446-Edit 11109810529.jpg (1MB, 1840x1232px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1840x1232px
Pentax ME
Tamron zoom
Kodak Gold 400iso
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software Paint.NET v3.5.10 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:30 12:52:57 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232
>>
File: tmp_6129-Edit 21109810529.jpg (1MB, 1840x1232px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1840x1232px
>>2732444
Same again, pretty sure the lens is a Tamron 24-80 3.5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software Paint.NET v3.5.10 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:30 12:52:57 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232
>>
>>2732444
Wow, that actually seems pretty sharp for a film-era tampon zom.
>>
>>2732293
dude why ?
dont waste film. literally not a single thing done right with this pic
>>
>>2732200
I tried to white balance with a white wall once. As you would expect, it saved me some work to get the color about right, but only in shots with similar light.
My main problem ist to fix the balance of tones in shadows, mids and highlights when I removed the color cast. That's pretty straightforward with Superia when you set the black and white points of each channel in your curves layer. Fine-tuning the color balance on the other hand is frustrating. Worst of all, if I got one pic right and copy the adjustments to the next one shot in slightly different light it doesn't fit at all, so I have to start all over again.
Because of its relatively grey base color I've only shot Superia 200 in the last months. I tried Ektar and Portra before and was really happy with the result, but spending hours editing one picture was highly unsatisfying.
I live in Darmstadt and shot that pic on my way home at Ffm Hbf.
>>
>>
>>2732680
You REALLY need to read Alex Burke's blog posts about scanning film and processing color using luminosity masks. Honestly. It makes removing color casts so fucking easy.
>>
>>2732698
Not him but thanks for the tip
>>
>>2732697
Well it could be that I had to drop the brightness on them to fix the shitty as camerastore scans I got? Genuinly curious as to whats wrong with the colors beyond "being balls" they look about the same as the digital ones I took as well.
>>
File: slippery_small.jpg (200KB, 1000x728px) Image search:
[Google]
200KB, 1000x728px
my lens seems to have some sort of fuckup on the right.
>>
File: Unbenannt.jpg (683KB, 906x1462px) Image search:
[Google]
683KB, 906x1462px
Adox color implosion is best film
>>
File: 013_N13.jpg (698KB, 1536x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
698KB, 1536x1024px
>>2733086
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:12:31 13:33:24
>>
File: 035_N35.jpg (640KB, 1024x1536px) Image search:
[Google]
640KB, 1024x1536px
>>2733087
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:12:31 13:34:53
>>
>>
File: A000546-R1-15-17A-resize.jpg (845KB, 1500x989px) Image search:
[Google]
845KB, 1500x989px
Portra 400. QL17
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3637 Image Height 2397 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:31 20:15:14 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 989
>>
File: muh external water piping.jpg (211KB, 1000x670px) Image search:
[Google]
211KB, 1000x670px
Old snaps I got reminded of, labscans since I haven't retaken them with the dslr scan setup.
So I'm thinking of buying a Nikon F-mount film camera since I have two Nikkor (D) lenses (35 and 50), maybe something like an F801 since they are cheap and have AF.
I've been shooting with an Olympus OM-1 which I got for 20 eurobucks paired with the usual 50 f1.8.
I also got myself a cheap point and shit to carry around in my jacket, it doesn't get much use though since I haven't fixed the lightseals in the back.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP500 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:31 19:37:53 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 670
>>
File: muh water piping and commie building.jpg (250KB, 670x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
250KB, 670x1000px
>>2733209
Happy new year anons.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP500 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:31 19:38:13 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 670 Image Height 1000
>>
File: trash_small.jpg (397KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
397KB, 1000x667px
Anybody else used movie film? I just developed my first roll of vision2. Seems kinda shit, but it was super cheap.
>>
>>2733368
lmao that looks like literal trash. what year is that vision? i have shoot some and looks way better than that.
>>
>>2733382
2008, but it was a short end off ebay so who knows how it was stored. It probably doesn't help that it's tungsten balanced and I'm compensating in post. I think I'll shoot the next roll a stop over.
>>
>>2733388
I'd go 2 stops niqqa.
>>
File: l057 - Copy.jpg (302KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
302KB, 1200x800px
>>2733087
>points expired film str8 up in the city
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:11:07 07:24:35 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/11.0 Lens Aperture f/11.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 0 Image Height 0 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2733391
I like it, expired what and how long?
>>
Test shots from the xmas camera
Nikon F100
Nikon 50mm 1.8 D
1/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3072 Image Height 2048
>>
2/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3072 Image Height 2048
>>
3/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3072 Image Height 2048
>>
File: architecture.jpg (142KB, 1142x838px) Image search:
[Google]
142KB, 1142x838px
first roll with my pen. half frame is fun. the exposures came out pretty well with no meter.
>>
>>2734338
That's pretty soft though.
Did you miss focus?
I was so close to buying one a bunch of times in Japan recently.
Eventually pussied out because I couldn't find one with the 1.2 lense.
>>
File: Sanpshit OM-1 50mm Fuji C200.jpg (324KB, 1000x670px) Image search:
[Google]
324KB, 1000x670px
I have to spend 50 euros, 22.81 will be spent on some shit I need which isn't for photography but it's sold for cheap in a photography online store (batteries).
Same store also has great prices for 35mm film, and I have to spend at least 27.19 euros so that I get free shipping.
Agfa, Fuji, Kodak, Ilford.
Most expensive single roll is 6 euros, cheapest is 2.50.
I'm thinking Delta (400? or 100?) since I've never shot that.
Color I don't know, I've been shooting with super cheap color because I haven't fixed the light leaks in one of the cameras, but I recently got one without that problem.
>>2734274
Well, he didn't pay for it, and it's nice if he already has a nikon system.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP500 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:02 16:10:07 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 670
>>
File: highres_scaled.jpg (311KB, 1500x1026px) Image search:
[Google]
311KB, 1500x1026px
>>2734347
I think the lens is just soft. all the pictures are like that. could also be the scanner.
>>
>>2734358
Maybe it's the scanner, the frame borders and dust aren't sharp either.
What are you using?
>>
File: bacon3.jpg (187KB, 1161x831px) Image search:
[Google]
187KB, 1161x831px
>>2734361
epson 2450. it does pretty well with medium format and ok with full frame, but this is probably pushing it pretty far. also I have no film holders so I just tape the film onto the glass.
>>
>>2734369
absolutely intriguing photo
>>
>>
File: ximena.jpg (452KB, 1818x1228px) Image search:
[Google]
452KB, 1818x1228px
Canonet QL17 GIII
Superia 400 I think.
>>
File: vision6.jpg (172KB, 1000x676px) Image search:
[Google]
172KB, 1000x676px
>>2733368
Cinestill 50D - Canon AF35ML2?
new movie film but very good
>>
>>2717757
This would take literally no more than 3 clicks to do. Easy as fuck. You clearly do not know how computers generate colors and how we can control that using software.
>>
I have yet to see a single photo in this thread that is properly exposed or has proper color balance. Everything is either grainy, badly shot, badly produced, or badly thought out. If this is film, kill it with fucking fire.
>>
Kodak Ultramax/GC 400 - Minolta Hi-Matic F
pic 1 of 2
This film handles underexposure nicely, I think I'm going to make it my go-to cheapo film
>>
File: ultramax.jpg (492KB, 1457x991px) Image search:
[Google]
492KB, 1457x991px
>>2734557
forgot pic
>>
File: ultramax2.jpg (340KB, 1457x1008px) Image search:
[Google]
340KB, 1457x1008px
>>2734557
2/2
>>
>>2734274
How does it feel to be this autistic?
>>
File: 218250785.jpg (2MB, 3072x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3072x2048px
>>2734557
>>2734558
>>2734559
I definitely like ultramax, it's a great film that can be found in any drug store. pic related
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: 279266491.jpg (854KB, 3072x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
854KB, 3072x2048px
>>2734844
fucking hell I forgot to resize again
anyways I guess that's a bad example
Here's one of my favs from a roll of ultramax
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>
I'm pretty new at film and I'm just wondering if there's an optimum workflow?
How do you develop and scan your film? Do you do it yourself or just get it scanned at a lab?
Do you have any control over the size, quality etc. that they scan your film at? My city is pretty shit for photolabs and they basically just hand you a CD with 3000x2000px images on.
Also how do you process your photos? Do you have a lab correct your photos pre-scan or do you just do it in Photoshop/Lightroom?
I've been cropping/editing my stuff in Photoshop but it sort of feels like I'm cheating transferring something analog and then editing it digitally.
When it comes to printing your photos do you prefer to keep it completely analog or would you process your photos digitally and then print from a digital file?
Sorry for all the questions, and thanks!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 424 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2734928
There's many options.
>Developing
At home is cheap and easy if you have the space
Common big store labs do common stuff like B&W and C-41 for cheap
Speciality film, positives, etc. need good labs.
You can mail roll, they will develop, you can ask for a contact sheet or cd to come with the negatives for cheap and they'll mail it back.
>Scan
Labscans depend on the hardware they have. Many are shit, many do shit scans, good labs will have a drumscan but that's expensive usually.
They have presets for popular film, so everything is automatic, if it comes like shit you'll need to correct it but you'll be basically correcting a jpg, so you'll lose quality in general.
DSLR scanning is a popular method and allows for a lot of tweaking, plus it's cheap if you already have a DSLR.
Flatbed scanner is a cheap at home option if you don't have a DSLR, it's good but not as sharp (for 35mm film) as a DSLR or better equipment.
>Editing
No problem, why would it be? We've been editing/correcting film since film exists.
>Printing
Many don't even print now.
Many print "digitally" with common printers.
You can send a file to an online "store" that prints on good paper and good quality, they'll mail you your prints.
You can mail negatives to a lab and have them be print on photopaper the traditional way with an enlarger and shit but it's expensive, usually reserved for art prints.
Common big labs simply scan digitally and print digitally so the quality is shit, think something like those Kodak instant print machines in stores.
>>
>>2734965
Thanks, is it worth investing in a 35mm scanner?
Would it best to scan as a tiff rather than a jpg if I'm doing it myself? Or even raw if I do it with a DSLR.
>>
>>2734976
>Would it best to scan as a tiff rather than a jpg if I'm doing it myself? Or even raw if I do it with a DSLR.
That's the point of doing it yourself, working with raw files.
Do you mean a dedicated 35mm scanner? depends on your budget.
That said, good ones aren't cheap, and cheap ones are shit so you'd be better off with a DSLR or Flatbed.
>>
>>
>>2734983
Yes if you've got a decent scanner I think you can do even higher than 16bit
>>
Hey there! I don't feel like starting a new thread, so I'm asking here. What are the cheapest sites/stores inside Europe for buying film? I live in Finland. Thanks!
>>
>>2735018
If you are starting out with film I suggest using cheap one's like Kodak Colorplus. It's supercheap in Estonia right now. To Finland, shipping is about 10€ iirc. google shortlink /0i4anJ
>>
>>2735023
I've only shot few rolls in color (something I definitely need to practice more), and mostly worked with Ilford HP5+ and that seems to be working for my b&w stuff.
>>
>>2735018
Do you have in finland something like a website that compares prices of products online?
It's probably cheaper to buy from a store that ships within your country.
If not, amazon tends to have alright prices for film.
>>
You know /p/hagots we should probably start mentioning the film and if possible focal length or lens used.
>>
>>2735083
Because stats and exif are so much more important than photo content, composition, lighting, etc. We have to focus on what is truly important around here.
>>
>>2735085
No obviously not, it's just that I feel some people have been asking (like the one above me) about film used.
And focal length could help give an idea on how the image was composed, hence why I mentioned first focal length and not lens.
But you're right, maybe it's a bad idea and we could fall into a circlejerk.
>>
>>2735092
Just because one person is focused on the wrong aspects of photography doesn't mean we need to change to cater to them. We should take the opportunity to inform them how photography actually works.
Also, by "a circlejerk" I assume you mean "talking about photography, rather than equipment"
>>
>>2735097
I meant a gear/film circlejerk were many would start using the same film, or everyone shooting with the same camera, stuff like that.
>>
>>
File: tumblr_nss5dpVSjW1ru0f7uo1_1280.jpg (238KB, 670x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
238KB, 670x1000px
Ultramax 400. I dont think uploading what film it was taken on is circlejerk
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 670 Image Height 1000
>>
File: tumblr_ntb3uyxqLH1ru0f7uo1_1280.jpg (150KB, 666x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
150KB, 666x1000px
>>2735155
Gold 200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 666 Image Height 1000
>>
>>2714739
great
>>
>>2735106
Well everyone on /p/ uses a
>G R
>R
now, and I think our photos are much better as a result.
>>
>>2715124
i like this.
>>2715161
reminds me of that bleeblu guy's work. also nice.
>>2715430
this is why i love flim. the warmth and grain can't be beat.
>>2717629
i like the mood in this
>>2717631
>>2717636
fantastic
>>2717765
wish i took this/10
>>2721144
absolutely beautiful
>>2722986
aside from the fact that it's a bit crooked and a bit bright, i think it's just fine
>>2725435
>>2728007
>>2729224
perfect
>>
File: GqrVGQS.jpg (866KB, 2073x3110px) Image search:
[Google]
866KB, 2073x3110px
>>2729224
No everyone here is a bunch of liars, no way that film stuff looks this good. It's ancient man. Analog shit looks like shit plus takes a lot of room. Digital looks much cleaner and takes no non-digital room at all.
pic related is a real film picture, look how shit it looks. Imagine it being done in digital.
>>
File: 23867516670_3ea4091458_b.jpg (464KB, 812x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
464KB, 812x1024px
>>2735787
bad exposure and bad scan.
Here's what velvia looks like scanned on a decent flatbed.
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:04 16:30:32
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:04 16:30:43
>>
File: herc (1 of 1).jpg (442KB, 743x1100px) Image search:
[Google]
442KB, 743x1100px
Tri-X
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
>>2735993
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:04 17:14:46
>>
>>2730874
probably near a large interstate with a rig parked on the side of the road
>>
Hello /p/, I know this picture is fucking garbage but I have a question. This was shot with expired 35mm and as you can see there is a weird bend on the bike's top tube. Is this because of the film or the way it was uploaded?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Paint.NET v3.5.10 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
>>
>>2735787
it would still be a shitty picture no matter what format it was shot on
sorry you don't know how to use a SLR bud.
>>
>>2735065
Thanks, appreciate it! Minolta SRT 101 with the 50mm f/1.7 lens. think the film was Fuji Xtra 400 for the first two and 1600 Fuji for the last one
>>
File: tumblr_o0jnc5EiZ11ru0f7uo2_1280.jpg (300KB, 1280x876px) Image search:
[Google]
300KB, 1280x876px
Bumpin with some pics from latest roll of portra
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV600 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:06 12:23:25 Image Width 2560 Image Height 1752
>>
File: tumblr_o0jnahSbeT1ru0f7uo2_1280.jpg (239KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
239KB, 1280x853px
>>2738045
Literally just a sky
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV600 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:06 12:23:21 Image Width 2560 Image Height 1706
>>
File: tumblr_o0i5yvsbpy1ru0f7uo1_1280.jpg (352KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
352KB, 1000x1000px
>>2738048
Had fun with my new Bronica SQ-A
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Epson Camera Model PerfectionV600 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:05 18:11:19 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1000
>>
File: tumblr_o0jk4rjszd1ru0f7uo1_1280.jpg (259KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
259KB, 1000x1000px
>>2738051
Another bronica. I get the portra hype now
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1000 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2736177
Nice cellphone pic.
Thread posts: 323
Thread images: 151
Thread images: 151