0-100km/h times or 0-55mph for you yankdoodles How fast can

>>14236443
You know britbongs also use mph faggot.

File: 11355725_1657965847823764_1166044384_n(1).jpg (269KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1080x1080px

8ish maybe on a nice day.

>>14236443
Imperial uses -60MPH you doofus.

>>14236443
7.something, I think. Don't actually know offhand.

>>14236455
*0-60 MPG

>>14236447
shut up brit your basically a aussie/canadian/kiwi therefor = yank so stfu bongbrain
>>14236455
we dont use mph here in aus since the 80's brah

0-60mph in 6.6 seconds

>>14236463
wut car?

>>14236443
>0-55 not 0-60
Well my 0-60 time is 6.7

We get it fatcunt you have a slightly faster shitbox. Now fuck off before you destroy another transmission.

>0-55

>not 60

>not actually 62 to be exact


Shouldn't you be at school?

>>14236443
100kmh is 62mph, m8

>tfw you need to shift at 90kmh

About 6

>>14236579
>using imperial in 2016
ah well at least my shitbarge shifts at 80

>>14236606
I don't use imperial.

>>14236607
idk i never bother with miles

fuck merricans doing 55 everywhere must suck

Aussies practically have a culture of losing their licence and driving anyway reguardless of speed posted limits ai

All the cars I've owned:

06 Civic Si: 6.2
02 S2000: 5.7
15 STI: 4.6
13 911: 4.3

If I want to stick to the current trend, next car will have to be in the 3's.

>>14236626
get a ls swap or just a 90's econobarge with something v8ísh in it you'll like the change i went from revvy i6's to a 350 and loved it but its not everyone thing

better yet chuck a cam in it and rev to 8000

>>14236443
sup falcunt

>>14236616
>fuck merricans doing 55 everywhere must suck
Uhhh... no. Most of their highways have a 65mph or 70mph limit (even 85mph in Texas), which is around 110km/h to 115km/h, similar enough to our highways. They usually seem to get away with doing 80mph though, while cops will hand you a $400 fine and take three points off your license if you're caught at 130km/h here.

>Aussies practically have a culture of losing their licence and driving anyway reguardless of speed posted limits ai
Just about every episode of Highway Patrol, they manage to catch someone driving without a license, without rego, usually speeding, so I'd have to agree with you there.

>>14236640
who is this falcunt?

My names Darren and i drive a falcon dickhead

>>14236659
>My names Darren and i drive a falcon dickhead
No, your name is Sean Finn and you used to drive a Falcon, but now you have a VX Commodore.

>>14236667
Lies i drive a bog stock fg xr6t auto

>>14236659
>i drive a falcon dickhead

gay

>>14236674
See this is why ford owners are gay

>>14236640
>>14236667
I initially thought the same thing, although there's too much grammar in his posts to be falcunt. Even if they seem to match IQ levels.

>>14236443
4 seconds.
Getting the traction to do that perfectly isn't always easy though.

>>14236443
0-55 mph is like 4.9 seconds for me. 0-60 mph is like 5.3 seconds.

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-14 at 10.00.57 AM.png (2MB, 2164x1156px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2164x1156px

>>14236626
>15 STI
>4.6 seconds

>trusting zeroto60times.com

around 8 seconds

7th gen accord 4 cylinder

The k24 engine has some pep, but the car is just too heavy for it, not underpowered, just not fast

Somewhere around 5.5-6 seconds

10.2 seconds to 60 according to torque on my phone

1984 380SL

>>14236443
5.2 0-60 forester xt

>>14236443
About 9-10ish seconds.
It's a 4 Cylinder 1992 Ranger so its not fast.
It is a stick though, so its fine to drive.

4.1ish based on 1/4 mile time

>>14236443
100 kph is 62 mph, not 55.

File: 123_280E_0477110307_(14wik).jpg (578KB, 1350x827px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 1350x827px

31 seconds.
Diesel masterrace

File: 1332538852314.jpg (49KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x374px

>>14236443

0-55mph

2001 E320 4matic: 7.0

2001 ML 430: 7.4

2005 SLK 350: 5.1

1995 MX-5: 8.6

File: 1448134265941.jpg (53KB, 514x536px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 514x536px

11.7s E36 M43B16
15.5 Audi 80 B3 1.8 90hp
14.5 Twingo C3G 55hp

>>14237256

>5.2 seconds
>pig fat forester

Not even a chance hahahah

Maybe 7 seconds for you on a perfect day. More like 8-9.

>>14237269
I dont believe that, you are probably at 12-14. 9-10 is what my 5.0 explorer will do, though it is pig fat (4200 lbs) as all hell with AWD.

File: 1413840749996.jpg (19KB, 358x304px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 358x304px

>>14236443
>0-55

>>14236443
too much tire smoke

scanguage says my 2015 jetta does 0-60 in 7.3 seconds.

Id guess 6.7 or so for 0-55 since those last 5 MPH do seem to take a bit.

TBI so it only runs at full potential once in a while.

Have never timed a 0-60 with t actually delivering fuel properly, but probably not much quicker than 12 seconds, and that sounds like a stretch to me.
>How fast can your shitbox go?
My civic runs out of steam at 98mph, trans issues and the autos are limited at 100 anyway.
My 4cyl Comanche tops out around 90 something
I've taken my 6cyl Comanche to about 105-110

File: DSC_8807.jpg (3MB, 3216x2136px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3216x2136px

like 27 seconds. maybe a bit faster but not by much.

0-60 MPH on 8.6 seconds supposedly.

But it takes around 10 seconds in the real world.

>>14237638
If you're quick enough with the shifts you can do it.
The second you hit 62 or so though acceleration is awful.
Overdrive/fifth gear is useless except for the gas mileage increase.
Helps that its practically empty all the time and I have good tires on it.
I might be a bit off, but its still probably around 10 to 11.
The engine is in excellent condition, almost every time I take it in the mechanics always remark on how clean it is.

>>14237655
How is that even usable? You literally could not merge at highway speeds.

If your car takes 30 god damn seconds to get to 60 MPH or even 55 I consider it deathtrap status. Seems like anything that slow is too anemic to do any real work. Besides 18 wheelers of course.

>>14237670
people tend to move the fuck around you in a classic

and in a big ass truck they avoid you too

>>14237628
You missed the 2006 xt part
http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle-make/subaru-0-60-mph-times/

>mad because pigfat forester will beat most murican musl

>>14237670
>Seems like anything that slow is too anemic to do any real work
speed /=/ power

the fuck nigga? you even contradicted yourself by saying an 18 wheeler works even though its slow.

lol

File: teaser_i3.jpg (100KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 600x338px

>>14236443
0-60 in 6.6 seconds.

Too bad the car itself has no redeeming features other than good acceleration.

>>14237680
>http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle-make/subaru-0-60-mph-times/

Didnt we all agree that they post times that seem too good or too low?

I bet real good money that if you put on a scanguage or some other accurate gauge you get a time much worse.

The best 0-60 times are achieved by professional drivers in new cars. Both of which you dont have.

File: DSC_7019 edit.jpg (2MB, 4288x2848px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4288x2848px

>>14237670
I just stay in the right hand lane and cruise at 55, all the time. it's pretty easy.

>>14237684
Im saying that an 18 wheeler gets an exception because they haul what? 70,000 lbs or more?

Some guys F150, F100 or whatever the hell isnt nearly the same and being just as slow greatly reduces its value.

>>14237702
Your post about 0-60 time at least confirms that my dad had good reason to hate going from a 70 F100 with a 360/4spd to a 77 with the i6 and a 4spd


>>14237707
good acceleration is a luxury. Plenty of trucks use weak little 4cyls (look at yotas little shittrucks from the 80s) and do work just fine.

File: 11055260_10204404949271252_7494013191643399221_o.jpg (508KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 2048x1152px

>>14236443
0-60 in 3.5 seconds, when the rear bumper is attached properly anyway.

>>14237717
Seems like a death trap if you cant properly merge or get the hell out of the way.

Guess you just drive like a grandpa to be safe.

3.3s

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-14 at 1.21.44 PM.png (50KB, 1506x176px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1506x176px

>>14237680
Oh gee what a surprise!

>>14237702
Stop posting that shit box in every thread. Like we get it. You think you're a cool kid because you have a shitty ford. Oooooookay

>>14237717
Yeah its the i6 but it's the c6 auto. 4 speed wouldn't be too bad.

>>14237799
>ok ;)

>>14237817
4spd yeah but plus the 4x4 running gear and a large set of swampers.

>>14237799
What are you getting mad about? /o/ is full of threads where you post some random fact about your vehicle and everyone reposts their shitbox a hundred times over.

>>14237835
Oh damn that's a pig. Only car ive driven with similar performance was my buddies 93 ranger 4x4 that was lifted on 33s, with a 5 speed. Thing had a bone stock 4 banger and was not regeared. It was a complete pig

cheers yankdoodles

>>14237655

90hp diesel hilux, tried some app to clock 0-100 times, could never get any result cause app mistakes gear changes for braking, that's how slow it is.

About 8 seconds, maybe 8.1

4 & a half

2012 Civic Si
Stock is 0-60mph in 6.3 or 6.5 depending on who you ask.

I'v gotten mine down to 5.3 without FI.

>>14236443
With the last tune done on e10 98ron I can get to 100kph in 4.1 seconds hoping for the next car to be under 4sec

>>14239214
an noice what she put out on the dyno?

im getting 226rwkw

>>14239218
She's got 270awkw very fun to drive but missin me skylines m9

4.somethingseconds, 997.1 C2S

>>14239218
Takin it on a 1000km road trip this weekend will be fun takin it to 90 mile beach and teach me mates how to drive manual, there 3 of em all mid 20s can't drive manual baka in dissapointment

2013 5.0 stock 0 to 60 4.3
with my mods 0 to 60 3.6

>>14239240
Lol i was 23 before i first learnt so theres always time

Whats your bloody subi putting out at the wheels you kiwi! haha
>>14239244
rwhp?

>>14239251
270 kw/389hp mostly stock with a few mods it's a 98 sti hatch wagon

>>14239269
shieet that would walk my car whats the top speed on that ?

335i: 4.9 sec
LS460: 6.0 sec

>>14239277
5.0l v8?

Damn thats not bad if stock

>>14236443
>cannot into conversion

100km/h is approximately 62mph.

lrn2math

>>14239284
another bait bites the dust AHHH
>but your 7mph off or whatever
i meant 0-100 or the yankpoo equiv not some fucking pissmatch ya cunt ai

>>14239274
Fastest I've seen the gps was 280kph but I live in Auckland so speedin can be risky lol pretty sure it could do 300 but it's sketchy at high speed

>>14239292
would the cops rape you at that speed?

here in nsw there isnt many straights long enough but i got over 220 a couple of times

>>14236970

http://www.motortrend.com/news/2015-subaru-wrx-sti-first-test/

>>14239303
>has to launch at 7000rpm to get under 5 sec
Shieeet

>>14239298
If your clocked 40kph over car gets impounded, instant licence loss for 28 days, then you have to go to court, biggest fine I got was 38kph over which was 500 and 50 demerit points ( we get 100) but they wouldn't be able to catch up, cops in nz use v6 auto commodores

9 seconds.

A very safe car. Not scary at all. Is very peaceful to drive. Almost luxurious.

My heart rate is always low so I will live longer than you young shits and your powerful engines that mean nothing.

You think your future employer is going to ask how much hp your car has during a job interview? No. He may as well ask how big your dick.

>>14239298
Most cars in nz are jap imports limited to 180 so anything over 200 in my eyes is good considering our shit roads

>>14239321
Holy shit i'd get raped if i was caught cops here use fucking 600hp fpv hsv's

Still would be a mad race thats for sure

>>14239332
Fuck yea that would be interesting, I've outrun the cops on backroads in a auto rb25de r33, cops for 1 in nz can't drive for shit let alone use all ther 260hp hahaha

>>14239251
520 n/a
mods jlt cai, boss 302 manifold comp stage 3 cams, jpc heads, bbk long tubes bbk xpipe bassani exhaust, e 85 tune 4.10 gear

>>14239341
aussie cops are intense i ran from a local once their like bloodhounds lol
>>14239331
lol my folden v8 doesnt have a limiter they knew what they where doing :p
>>14239349
Nice how much did that set u back in freedom$?

>>14239310

That was for the regular WRX, not the STI.

>>14239291
ay, rack off ya dag.

>>14239363
make me mcstooge

>>14239351
Damn man do they let tickets slide? Or change me for ya? I got caught driftin on Mother's Day last year which is normally instant licence loss car impounded for me it would be 2500$ fine coz of history but he gave me a ticket for driving a vehicle liable to cause annoyance, he saw the kids seats in the back and asked if I had kids I said yes he asked wat the kids thought of the car and told him they love the noise, was rb30det r33 with 450hp/330kw he was a nice cop

>>14239351
to much, kiinda sucks not being able to machine my own heads.

File: image.jpg (71KB, 500x363px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 500x363px

>>14236443
13 seconds new but it still feels quick

>>14239390
Yeah bit like that isnt it

i wish i had a decent jack cant even get under my car atm and sucks 2x in a dirt garage
>>14239385
Depends i'd say if it was a local HWP and he was having a good day he might let me off.

They have the policy that if they cant prove it you can walk so i just book it whenever i see one

>>14239283
its a 4.6L V8 pushing 380 HP

>>14239412
I was sliding round a roundabout and got up to 120kph in a 50 no1 was around, cop even complimented my car control he was nice but still 1 in a dozen

>>14239426
notbad for a 2tonne car

Never really tested it with a timer of any kind but according to various sources, somewhere between 3.8-4.2 seconds to 60 mph.

01 E46 M3 coupe.
6MT.
Stock other than KN CAI.
Under 4.5 seconds from a dead stop. Wheel spin in first and second up to about 55mph.

I have video proof.

>>14239562

https://youtu.be/oZ1Dhi42ZRg

This is the best run with a total shit launch. The one with wheel spin up to around 55 is another vid which shows a local business so not posting.

Was like 30s outside and my fuel filter and FPR had issues which is why SES light is on. Now that I've fixed it, I can do a hair better.

Best stock I6 motor in this world.

>>14236465
EP3 Civic Type R

>>14239631
> best work l6 motor in thus world
Except for the jz rb and Barra right
Kek

>>14236443
>100kmh
>55mph
>Yuro education
100kmh is 62mph ya dingus, 5 seconds on google could have told you that

>>14239525
WUT CAR MANG

>>14239654
post shitbox times or gtfo

>>14239642

Before or after you put $40k into them?

>>14239631
E93 328i, dead stock. 6 flat even with pigfat exhaust and retractable hardtop. Based krauts.

>>14239685
> I dokt know anything
You need to put 40k of repairs into the bmw just so it doesn't explode when you launch it roflmao

>>14239692

Boy here we go again.

I put 800 miles a week on her. I probably won't spend any more than $3 to $5k (give or take a grand or two.) over a 100k mile period which includes preventative maintenance.

>>14236443
About 7 seconds
1995 Jaguar VDP

It weighs 2 tons and is geared for a max speed of 245 km/hr. I could get it down with a new diff, which is on my future list.

>>14239663
996 Turbo

>>14239719
thats not bad at all

snap oversteer bad?

>>14239631
downhill?

Who knew those were this beastly.

>>14239670
Somewhere around 7.5 seconds or so

2005 Honda Accord 4 banger

>>14239705
6cyl or 8?

File: kawaii retard.jpg (859KB, 2163x1437px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 2163x1437px

>>14239349
>he put cams in his coyote

>>14239704
More expensive than a turbo xr6
and am inferior engine

Bmws are shot

>>14236443
100kmh works out 62mph

Can you eurocucks not into math?

>>14236443
0-60 in 5.3
Mazdaspud 3

>>14239631
not bad
>Best stock I6 motor in this world.
Barra xr6t wants a word with you
>>14239751
this

>>14239738
4l I6

>>14239761
Honestly, the barra is too mid-engine for more people. Having an engine that close to the dashboard can cause problems with the clusters and there's no way to fix that seeing as how the barra is considerably more mid-engine than any other inline 6. That's what my friend told me, he now drives a BMW for that very reason.

>>14239734

Flat road in the country.

And new one. Made under 1 hr ago. So so. 3rd to about 7k in 5th.

https://youtu.be/CelgTy7wX9g

>>14239748
got them for free why not

4.5

It's a 6 speed manual so I'm not sure how confident I am that I would hit that.

>>14236443
5.6

>>14239732
No, it helps that the Turbo is AWD instead of RWD though.

>>14236443
>0-100km/h times or 0-55mph for you yankdoodles
>How fast can your shitbox go?
I honestly dunno what my 0-100km/h time is, the full 1/4mile though is 12.2sec

>>14241492
What's your 60 ft and trap

File: 2012quarter.jpg (73KB, 597x800px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 597x800px

>>14241502
Shit photo, is old.
(before anyone gets excited, this was bracket racing- look it up if you don't know)

0-60 in 6.3 seconds

I think I do it at 5.8 (bud with an iPhone)

2010 bmw 328I manual