2WD Cucks

>mfw he thinks his shitty haldex FWD bias AWD system is good

File: 1416020792554.gif (2MB, 390x277px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x277px

>AWD
>transversely mounted engine

>>14197491
Meanwhile, any good track car worth it's salt is RWD - because AWD setups are heavy and unnecessary. RWD provides more than enough grip for anything below 600hp.

>>14197558
>having below 600hp
europleb detected haha

>>14197558
FWD KEKS

>>14197491

Go back to leddit

>>14197491
Nice drivetrains losses you have there, shame if something happens to the gas prices

>>14197491
I kind of wish my explorer was RWD, its AWD and plenty pigfat because of it. I dont need AWD ever really.

It does have a LSD rear that I rebuilt recently and I believe most RWD ones had it as well so that would suffice for me.

File: 1422009389004.jpg (119KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 600x900px

>>14197509
>mfw 35:65 split

you mirin?

>>14197558
http://www.worldtimeattack.com/index.php/2015-results/

>mfw top 3 are dominated by AWD and FWD

lol RWD losers

>>14197491
AWD/4x4 is better in trucks, SUVs, and other non performance shit cars.

AWD is shit in performance cars that are not super cars

all AWD adds is fucking oversteer to a vehicle that normal would understeer.


I own a 2.5 RS with a blown coupler, welded that fucker in for now. RWD subaru is best subaro. so much fun

>>14197781
>2.5 RS
literal shitbox. Try a real sports car before bad mouthing Superior Wheel Drive

>>14197797
fuck off. I had it AWD for years.

converting the 2.5 to RWD is so much fucking fun, I dont think I'll ever fix the coupler.

also, read what I fucking said earlier.
>AWD is shit in performance cars that are not super cars

>>14197580
>Hellcat Charger(707hp):RWD
>Hellcat Challenger (707):RWD
>Viper(645):RWD
>CTS-V(640):RWD
>Z06(650):RWD
>GT500 (662):RWD
Plenty of US cars with 600+ hp and RWD.

>>14197822
You've made a mistake anon. There's shitboxes, sports cars and super cars. Your RS is not a sports car, it's basically corolla tier performance.

>>14197781
You're confusing oversteer and understeer there anon.

>>14197830
>>Hellcat Charger(707hp):RWD
>>Hellcat Challenger (707):RWD
Shred tires like a motherfucker, break traction whenever they feel like it. Fun, but not very fast around a track.
>>Viper(645):RWD
Fuckhuge tires. Literally the only way to tame that much power.

File: 97.6%.png (138KB, 408x439px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 408x439px

>>14197491
>mfw this ff and fr shitposting has became cut vs uncut /b/ tier memeing

>>14197491
AWD is best over 400hp, where the cars tends to be traction-limited (e.g. Compare the Porsche 911 "S" vs "4S" - identical in every way except AWD, and AWD posts the better track times), but drivetrain loses and weight penalize AWD under 300hp (e.g. Compare the BMW 328i vs 328xi - identical in every way except AWD, and RWD posts the better times.)

>>14197846
All because a few people losing to Mexican civics, now it's their life mission to let everyone know they're a cuck

>>14197558
600hp RWD vs 600hp AWD
https://youtu.be/dXg6JPwTMtE

File: 013.png (121KB, 385x306px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 385x306px

>tfw you will never own a mid engine AWD car with a 40:60 split

File: 1452238191299-1.jpg (45KB, 640x344px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x344px

>>14197491
I have similar thoughts whenever I see a "prerunner". 4×4 or GTFO.