>In her version, the protagonist will be a woman Women

File: huysmans_joris-karl_a_rebours_paris_g_charpentier_et_cie_1884_d5371866g.jpg (79KB, 625x1024px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 625x1024px

nothin personnel, kid

>>74587532
ree women out and all that aside,
what directing credentials does she have that makes her a good choice to direct an adaption of this acclaimed novel?

There's nothing wrong with that as long as the actual film is good. It's one of my favourite books but all the adaptations I've seen suck ass

>>74587570
none, she made one film and it was dreadful

>>74587584
hmmm i see

>>74587626
fuck you
MAGA

>>>/tv/

>>74587626
this looks like it was made by a 15 year old /pol/ user
kys. dubs and everyone you ever loved dies.

>>74587532
im okay with this
dorian gray is a shit person. just like women

agree

If Dorian is played by a woman what will happen to all the homosexual themes? Why is Annie trying to erase gay men from their liturature?

>>74587740
lezzi lez

>>74587626
MAGA
Make American Gay Again

>>74587532
I wonder if she'll eschew the novel's entire homoerotic subtext so that she can advance her shitty agenda

>>74587626
What a witty and well played bait and switch im so very impressed

File: 1500471882766.jpg (2MB, 2900x3900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2900x3900px

WTF. ok i fucking get woman what to be equal and all that jazz. They can have it whatever idc about feminists. But how are you going to fucking with homosexual literature that's about MEN. that's the whole fucking point you bitch.

Actually a Picture of Dorian Gray movie starring a woman sounds good since women age so terribly. A lot of women are absolutely bonkers about growing old.

>>74587626
MAGA

>>74587740
Is the book gay? havent read it just seen the 50s(60s?) film

>>74588083
As >>74587841 said it is loaded with gay subtext to the point that it's become a distinguishing feature in most circles.
>>74587979
Replacing gay subtext with a tragically backwards grender commentary is a sad move to see from Annie. You'd think she'd have at least one friend who'd consider this stuff if she's as much of an artist as she postures herself to be.

Movies are so terrible now anyway who cares

>>74587977
homosexual men act like females

>>74587977
They completely destroy decent stories just for the sake of vanity. It's embarrassing. Women should be held to much higher standards and be faced with adult responsibilities for once.

>>74588316
Who would have thought faggots have women issues?

I'm OK with this, and will definitively going to see it. It's going to be shit it will be entertaining. Typical arrogant artist who thinks they're a Renaissance man.

>>74587626
MAGA btw haHAA

>>74588408
we definitely do
the "lgbt community" is just a label, it seems like we all generally hate each other

>>74588279
>>74588442
as much as i'm mad for a woman trying to destroy a classic piece of homosexual writing, both of these are very true and it should be worth a few keks

File: 6533b1ef012cacb7efe513865fcab399.jpg (92KB, 564x699px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 564x699px

Just imagine the anger of Morrissey

>>74587532
the issue isn't that in her adaption the protagonist is a woman, but she's not a filmmaker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_(film)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et2kJUZ8t34

>>74588311
only the ones without common sense

>>74587626
We're all gonna die, but MAGA

File: 1446910052802.png (832KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

832KB, 600x600px

>>74587532
Yep, my misogyny is shining bright.

>>74588533
wow that is an awful movie

>>74588533
Even if she were a good filmmaker it would be an issue

This bitch is gonna be taken down a notch after the review, so why are yall bitching

>>74588852
In her eyes it will only vindicate her when the evil misogynist society doesn't like it

Because XX was so great...

>>74587532
>a film about a woman obsessed with being beautiful
This feels somehow like, from the SJW POV, it should be super offensive or something.

Does this mean no new album? Has she given up music so she can pursue a career in mediocre movies?

>>74587532
Didn't she direct an awful AWFUL short film?

>>74589063
See
>>74588533

Just read the book recently and I didn't notice any homosexual subtext. He was engaged to be wed to a woman in the novel too.

Is it just projection by homosexuals? A heterosexual man can't be vain and deviant?

>>74587626
Make America goop agaim

>>74587626
MAGA

>>74589395
well wilde was gay af

>>74587561
stfu frog retard

>>74587626
I wish we had a good president who would MAGA

>>74588532
Oh boy, the ranting will be furious and neverending.

To be honest, if a work by Oscar Wilde had to be adapted by a musician, then it should be by Morrissey.