/advanced/

>>61839078
I've been listening to this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSeNSzJ2-Jw

>>61839078
>a) People who've been listening to music seriously for 5+ years
>advanced
lol Try 20 years.

File: grande.jpg (60KB, 719x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 719x720px

this is bit pretentious, but ill bite

>>61839098
How many +35yo you think post on /mu/?

>>61839078
>Don't be offended, this is not meant to be pretentious, its just some of us have moved past the general essentials, p4k BNM and the latest hype album and have more developed tastes. No /mu/core, BNM, Fantanocore or chart music allowed.
If that was true, you wouldn't be posting here.

>>61839128
Where else do you suggest?

so we can only talk about shitty improv style music in this thread?

I have been "seriously" listening to and playing music for over 20 years and it is elitism like this thread which is killing the media form.

But by all means, let's wank each other off over field recordings in the internets biggest rendition of the Emperors New Clothes...

>>61839125
I'm one.

>I heard pierre schaeffer once

>>61839146
If you had been listening to music for 20 ears you wouldn't make such a niaive, ignorant post like

>so we can only talk about shitty improv style music in this thread?

>>61839145
>pleb detected
>possibly underage b& detected

>>61839145
Well, why are you posting here in the first place?

File: 1452894323398.png (18KB, 906x906px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 906x906px

>>61839146
>>61839159
lol u guys this dumb?

>>61839078
I'm 28 years old, I'm probably older than the majority of people on /mu/. I've studied music theory in college for five years. I play more than five instruments including guitar and violin. I'm part if a rock duo and I perform monthly at various places. We've been working on an album since 2014. I think I know what I'm talking about.

Am i allowed to post itt?

>>61839161
post some fucking music then, show me your patrician appreciation for industro-swedish-folk-wave or whatever it is this week

>>61839182
that makes zero sense

>>61839185
I like music and I am on the internet.

Ah yes, serious music for serious people like me.

>>61839188
i would say no
but dubs says yes

>>61839078
>/mu/
>People with musical training and regularly perform music

>>61839186
>let's discuss it on /mu/
lol
>>61839203
>I like music and I am on the internet.
But why here, of all the other places on the internet?

File: cover.jpg (192KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 600x600px

Can we talk about this album? I think "advanced" listeners who are still fans of rock music would enjoy it.

>>61839125
>implying you need to be 35+ to have been listening to music for 20 years.

>>61839186
go on then, post some mongolian freestyle jazz or whatever ultra specific "genre" you have in mind

>>61839206
*tips fledora*

>>61839202
>industro-swedish-folk-wave
>>61839229
>mongolian freestyle jazz

Are you so ignorant you think outside of p4kcore and the essentials there is only chart pop or ''lol so obscure EAI''? Do you really think /mu/ talks about ALL regular music except ''normiecore''?

>>61839225
that album cover is horrendous
why didnt they think about this?

File: 51ZWr2hIj8L._SL500_AA300_.jpg (26KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 300x300px

An interesting album. Thoughts?

>>61839243
This.
You could honestly post classic ska or country music ITT, because only "advanced" listeners even consider approaching those genres.

>>61839243
I am not implying that /mu/ represents all music in the world - there are a limited number of users and a limited number of threads at any one time, from a specific demographic.

The issue is the term "serious". How does something being more obscure make it more "serious"??? Or even "better" in any reasonable way?

File: abilene.jpg (56KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x500px

goat post-hardcore

>>61839276
townes van zandt is the bomb diggity

>>61839276
I know loads of retarded dickheads who listen to ska music

there isn't anything inherently better or worse about any style of music, its just what you happened to be conditioned to enjoy based on your personal life experiences

File: R-1024407-1196877416.jpeg.jpg (201KB, 599x592px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 599x592px

>>61839261
Good music doesn't need "aesthetically pleasing" art in order to sell.

>>61839278
I didn't say the music had to be serious, the listener.

Its obvious from one look at the catalog the majority of /mu/ are 17yo who only been listening to music ''seriously'' for the last 6 months.

File: 1453117161864.jpg (656KB, 615x1530px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 615x1530px

>>61839125
turny

>>61839306
First-wave ska though? Pre-reggae ska?
I don't mean Shitlight Manifesto obviously.

>>61839319
it doesn't have to, but it should. i like album art.

>>61839360
Not him but I like some first wave, prefer 2-tone though.

Been checking out early mento and rocksteady lately and the first wave of dancehall, its really good, not sure what happened.

>>61839323
This website is not the forum you are looking for mate.

>>61839398
I'll go elsewhere if you can name site that is not genre specific and with decent traffic.

>>61839374
I actually think the cover of Snakes is nice.
Hell is Invisible is the ugly one, but you really shouldn't judge a book by its cover, or else you end up listening to shit musicians who could afford to hire a decent graphic designer.
For instance, I'm a big Othon Mataragas fan, and he has some of the worst album art of all time, but he's fucking awesome.

File: Ghost-Opus-Eponymous.jpg (154KB, 608x611px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 608x611px

Does /advanced/ like black metal?

>>61839360
I'm British so it may be different but I know a whole group of guys who religiously listen to early ska music and they are absolute imbeciles in every way imaginable. I doubt a couple of them even have basic literacy skills.

This doesn't reflect the music for me, but for you it clearly does. The age old bullshit pleb/patrician nonsense.

>>61839419
The what.cd forums
Steve Hoffman forums
Both are more serious listeners and not genre specific.

>>61839419
http://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewforum.php?f=4
Here you go. Great art lover community over there. Highly rec.

>>61839419
>wipe my ass
>pay my bills
>find my websites

fuck off

>>61839444
Again though, a stupid person can be an advanced consumer of art.
I know a lot of stupid gutter punks with great taste in that kind of music.

File: b536088b2cb56d10ffccd30b73a4df86.500x500x1.jpg (60KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x500px

>>61839078
>21
>music 16-17 years
>instruments 15-16 years

>>61839446
I don't use what.cd or any sharing site, will look at Steve Hoffman but seems very rockcentric.

>>61839456
Hilarious

>>61839460
There are no better sites, thats the point

>>61839481
What are their reasons for listening? "Because I like it!" or "Because it rocks!" is not an advanced-listener opinion of music.

>>61839490
>Hilarious
What are you talking about?

>>61839490
>but seems very rockcentric.
That's what advanced listeners look for.

Maybe you are not an advanced listener?

>>61839520
You mean classical.

>>61839501
A lot of them just live the life.
They're crusty kids who like GG and Leftöver Crack and stuff. The old ones who actually lived in the scene just have a taste for it.
Who needs to give a reason when your whole essence just screams crust punk?

>>61839430
i understand where you're coming from and you're absolutely right

>>61839531
No, I mean rock.

faux intellectualism =/= advanced listener

>>61839531
Nah man

They should listen to a variety of music. Never settling on one genre no matter how big the genre might be.

>>61839565
I bet you've never even listened to Julian Cope.

>>61839437
that isn't black metal
ghost is just occult-ish hard rock
god damn i hate that band

>>61839548
>Who needs to give a reason when your whole essence just screams crust punk?
Then they are not advanced listeners.

Crust punks are fucking idiots btw.

File: 4969.jpg (48KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x500px

recently returned to my high school days
it's all butthole surfers, faith no more, hammerhead and pic related
good times

>>61839565
classical > jazz > r&b = rock = electronic = pop

>>61839578
Non sequitur

>>61839272
>Radiohead
>Interesting

>>61839485
>spends this long listening/playing music
>still likes oasis
proof you can be a pleb for decades

>>61839601
Why?

File: bonsai.jpg (661KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 800x800px

who brainiac in here?

>>61839605
>>61839616
You clearly haven't been listening to music seriously for 20 years

>>61839601
"rock" and "pop" are a bit too broad to be placed like that

>>61839586
>Crust punks are fucking idiots btw.
I don't disagree, but who are you to say what an avanced listener is? If someone is more into a specific genre of music than I am, I'm not afraid to admit that they probably have a more advanced undertanding of said genre.
Only stupid people assume that smart people "appreciate art" more than stupid people.

File: a0154710291_10.jpg (1MB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1200px

You guys like soul/funk music?

Any good albums/comps you been listening to?

File: cover.jpg (652KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 1280x1280px

What did you guys think of pic related from last year?

File: dwelling.jpg (413KB, 1170x1176px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1170x1176px

>>61839437
this is advanced black metal
fight me

>>61839651
>they probably have a more advanced undertanding of said genre.
But you just said
>Who needs to give a reason
Clearly they don't know.
>Only stupid people assume that smart people "appreciate art" more than stupid people.
Except we are looking for the reasons they appreciate the music, not their intelligence (despite the correlation)

>>61839280
Could you please link to this?

>>61839675
i don't know what this is and will check it out. great cover, imo
thanks for the rec

>>61839708
like a download? the whole thing is on youtube
but i can upload to mega if you like

File: 1453068910361.jpg (62KB, 611x594px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 611x594px

"I HAVE A MORE ADVANCED TASTE OF SOMETHING THAT IS COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVE"

get the fuck over yourselves.

>>61839710
link me when you find it?

>>61839078
I love Joanna Newsom.

>>61839078
Haha holy shit
How far up your own ass do you have to be to try and create a thread like this?

Also
>implying anything that is popular is not worth listening to
>implying people that are listening to music for 5+ years are automatically advanced
>implying people who regularly perform automatically have better taste than those who don't

Congrats, you just made the most pretentious post in the whole year, and it's not even February yet.

File: distal.jpg (269KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1200x1200px

some fiery midwest emo that has impressed me lately
czech it out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C80DJibiAE
i am advanced i am advanced music listener please enjoy rupaul track this is new taste

>>61839708
http://www.mediafire.com/download/dpdakka4dogk164/Abilene+-+Two+Guns%2C+Twin+Arrows.zip

found in the archive, you nitwit

>>61839765
Quit whining pleb.

>>61839693
I've never actually asked any of them why they like the music, because I know why they like the music. It's a rock sub-genre. You don't need an erudite understanding of popular music to be an advance popular music consumer.
Assuming that pop music appreciation requires any knowledge whatsoever is pretentious. This is why stupid people can have great taste in popular music.
Art music requires more of an understanding, which is why most people don't bother with it, but that doesn't make them wrong, and it doesn't make their taste bad, because they can have great taste in whatever music they choose to explore.

>>61839646
you're right, only 18 years

>>61839806
>Art music requires more of an understanding
Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, the list goes on. I'm totally patrician guys. I even listen to NPR's classical station on the radio.

>>61839675
Looks good. Didn't really listen to any free improv last year. I have no idea what makes good improv these days.

>>61839825
Well, I found the pleb.

File: download.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

yfw op thought he was onto some sort of exclusive club of performing musician genius's and all he got was to be btfo in his house faggatory.

HAHAHAHHAHA GLORIOUS

>>61839850
Nah, I listen to art music, I can't be pleb.

>>61839809
Well one does not seriously listen to music when they are 2.
>>61839806
>I've never actually asked any of them why they like the music
What do you think their answer will be? Remember we're talking about Crusties here
>You don't need an erudite understanding of popular music to be an advance popular music consumer.
If you can't properly explain why you appreciate something, you shouldn't be listening to it, let alone posting in this thread
>This is why stupid people can have great taste in popular music.
You mean listening to the right things for the wrong reasons?
>but that doesn't make them wrong, and it doesn't make their taste bad
I didn't say being a pleb is bad. Just that they shouldn't be here.

What are you doing here?
>>61839871
See >>61839565

>>61839825
not NPR it's USC's station you stupid fuck 91.5 KUSC that's how I know you're lying and that's how I know you are a poser and not a real patrician

fuck off

>>61839850
>pleb
No smart person would use this word unironically. It's sort of funny how this joke went from "meme" to "legit classification" I mean it is IRL but you get the point

File: masturbatorium.jpg (130KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 600x600px

everyone pls stop arguing and listen to this

>>61839871
Sure you can, if you don't know why you listen to art music.
My whole point is that the axiomatic triangle exists for a reason.
Advanced art music consumption requires a different approach than advanced pop music consumption.
Advanced folk music consumption is by far the most hardcore though.

>>61839888
>faux intellectualism =/= advanced listener
You might want to tell that to OP and a lot of other people on /mu/.

>>61839897
Used to be the same station as NPR where I live but it was separated a couple years ago I think. You do realize that radio stations differ depending on where you are right?

>>61839922
This thread was probably never about the music and OP wanted to troll or stroke his ego which I don't know is worse

>>61839601

you will die alone.

>>61839899
Bruh. Did you even read his post?
Calling someone a pleb is just an all-purpose hyperbolic insult.
Why would you think I'm using it seriously to reply to his obvious shitpost?

File: article-0-19AC00B7000005DC-789_634x754[1].jpg (55KB, 634x754px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 634x754px

>>61839924
>My whole point is that the axiomatic triangle exists for a reason.
So that advanced listeners like me can feel superior to the plebs that listen to popular music, yes. And traditional music is a dumping ground for music by dirty mud hut people. I'm glad someone made a way of easily distinguishing these blights on music from the actually good music.

>>61839949
>did you read
I don't know how to read. My reading comprehension is at grade school level and I don't care. Im writing from the heart and back motherfuck

>>61839976
Not the point of the triangle.
Good and bad music exists in all three categories.

>>61839998
You're obviously not an advanced listener. Please leave this thread.

>>61839604
Not really. You would know why if you ever listened to him.

>>61839938
:(
let's make it about the music, anon
i need your help

>>61840016
I just came here to try and talk about Pyschic TV.
Ended up getting into this shitshow of a conversation.

File: pianobassdrums.jpg (352KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1000x1000px

the necks, anyone?

>>61840058
Im in too deep to care, also
>:(
Everytime I see this I feel im not in on a joke

>>61840083
Did you listen to Vertigo?
If so, how was it?

Its funny you all bitch all day about the state of /mu/ and presented with a thread to discuss something other than /mu/core and normie shit you still all bitch like little girls.

>>61839871
as a man who has performed classical for 10+ years, I kindly ask you to go fuck yourself

File: Stockhausen_CD_Catalog_2.jpg (233KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 800x533px

who /stockhausen/ here?

>>61839629
Brainiac is best DAYToN band
they did texting spek b4 it wuz cool

>>61840104
i haven't yet. still in the backlog. will check it out today.
what's your fav necks album, anon?

>>61840135
truly wunderkinds, they were

>>61840127
I once listen to some of his work . The beginning of it was good but then it got dull quick in middle and ending. Maybe I should listen to more of his work tho.

>>61839188
Upload it

>>61840145
I enjoyed Chemist and Open. Haven't heard any others desu.

>>61840175
I suggest you this documentary about him and his producing process. I found it very interesting.
https://player.vimeo.com/video/128795728

>>61840127
i love him
sternklang blows my mind every time i listen to it. it's like faust but so much more engaging. dude was insane but he left behind some great stuff.

>>61840212
thanks

will watch

>>61840205
check out bass. drums. piano. and hanging gardens
especially hanging gardens

>>61839998
>people still trying to argue that music is not entirely subjective

it is complete fucking fact

a fact which renders threads like this as obsolete.

>>61840240
woops
piano. bass. drums.*

>>61839579
>>61839683
>advanced
>falling for memes

>>61840107
let me explain why that is

>that is the music they like and thus wish to discuss
>it really is that simple

>>61840258
>renders threads like this as obsolete.

No it doesn't, nowhere did OP say this thread is for ''objectively'' better music.

Think of it like a Powerlifting general on /fit/, its for those who've moved past Zyzzz and gone further than the essentials and sticky.

>>61840261
since when is sabbat a meme

>>61840293
Obviously this doesn't cover everyone, does it.

>>61840107
I'M TRYING TO GET THIS GOING, DESU

>>61840307
i'm talking about the ghost meme
sabbat is godtier black japanese metal along with abigail

>>61840368
ok good, thanks for clearing that up

>>61839125
Not everyone who listens to music was ignorant about it until the internet told them what to listen to.

File: 1442276150063.jpg (26KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x462px

>>61839586
>generalizing a type of music
>calling people who enjoy any type of art you don't like idiots

You sir are not advance

>>61840240
Thanks. Will do.

>>61840258
Yeah, that's not the point of the thread. It's /advanced/ not /good/.

This thread is embarassing

>>61840444
This board is embarassing.
This thread is meh.

>>61840444
it's only embarrassing because of the whiners (like you)
if you actually look, there are people posting some interesting music

>>61840479
Idc, the premise of this thread is absurd and OP should feel embarrassed for even thinking to do this

>>61840029
Explain it.

>>61840479
Yeah. Plus there's good discussion about why this thread exists, and why album art shouldn't matter.
Be the change, Anon.

>>61839114
great album, those emo kids def deserve more attention for their post-rock antics.

File: 1453121654981.jpg (522KB, 1367x1744px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1367x1744px

Does /advanced/ like experimental pop?

>>61840502
most of the premises for threads are absurd. i applaud the ones in which good music is shared nevertheless

Why has nobody mentioned post Avantgarde experimental new Jazz ?

>>61840557
How is that experimental?

>>61840557
Please don't mix these two awful threads together.

>>61840509
Well, you seem to be implying that rock music listeners are more advanced than classical listeners, but nobody with that attitude has explored rock music thoroughly enough to have even heard one of the most influential musicians in the genre.

File: steamingcoils.jpg (88KB, 500x499px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x499px

>>61840557
maybe im gettin too old but st. vincent doesnt fit the bill of "advanced" experimental pop

i would say a lot of zolo, like pic related, fits better

Anyone want to discuss soul in here?

>>61840557
if i was a mod, i would delete this post because frankly my sensibilities are offended

>>61840615
That looks interesting

Will check out

>>61840641
How deep does the soul tunnel go anyway?

>>61840502
Why?
>>61840298

>>61840545
you're absolutely right
you should check out their split with shotmaker, another underrated emo/post-hardcore group from the mid-to-late 90s

File: Laurie-Anderson-Big-Science.jpg (31KB, 675x675px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 675x675px

>>61840557
"yes"

>>61840660
All the way to the cotton fields.

>>61840602
Ooops you didn't seem to explain it, even though 1) you made the claim initially and 2) this is a thread for advanced listeners who are expected to articulate their thoughts and 3) You implied you were not a faux intellectual.

Lats chance to explain it.

>>61839078
>listening to music seriously
>listening to music seriously
>listening to music seriously
>listening to music seriously

File: astley.jpg (191KB, 930x922px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 930x922px

one of my favorite ambient albums ever

>>61840686
please stop whining and post music. you are only feeding the trolls, dawg

>>61840686
I'm just going to assume this is b8, because I actually don't know what you're saying now, and we've clearly gone past the point where the discussion can be productive.
Check out Julian Cope if you like rock music.

>>61839775
Their second full length was an improvement in my opinion. Have you heard The Little Explorer? Crash of Rhino member were in that band while it was still a thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbouAPUjE4Y

>>61840686
>complains about grammar/articulation
>Lats
>Lats
>Lats
>Lats
>Lats

dear me /mu/, dear fucking me

File: scg.jpg (404KB, 1393x1197px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1393x1197px

>tfw no weird avant-garde friends to wear dope masks and play Moroccan songs with
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHZU4cgDZYc
jdimsa

>>61840719
>feeding the trolls
He is the "troll" though.

>>61840740
holy shit this is really good. thanks

File: folder.jpg (202KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1000x1000px

>>61839350
Thats a nice chart.

Anyone here like playing other peoples records of other people playing with other peoples records?

>>61840759
images with this resolution make my peen tingle.
saved.

>>61840739
Oh look more excuses.
>Check out Julian Cope if you like rock music.
It's not relevant because I've alreday heard it.
>>61840748
Ooops did you thi9nk this was reddit?
>>61840719
You might be in the wrong thread, this is for advanced listeners.

>>61840785
i think the caretaker did that

>>61840759
Do you like Culturcide?
Someone rec'd me their album Tacky Souvenirs recently, and I thought SSG fans would really enjoy it.

>>61840293
kek, the sheerest truth i have seen today

>>61840796
I would have just left the thread, man.

>>61840821
Yeah I heard about them. Haven't heard a full album of theirs yet but I really like this song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3eHM-4DcT8

>>61840748
i hear people talk about reddit on here but i don't know what it is other than some type of forum that is used in a derogatory way

someone tried telling me that everyone both posts on 4chan and reddit and it is a way to outlet both of your personality types, although when on either site they pretend that they use that one exclusively - it's the ultimate meme in a way

>>61840557
>experimental pop
nice b8, bruv

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg09Mb3TXXA

>>61840840
Feel free.

>>61840861
I actually don't post on reddit, but I don't use reddit as an insult either.
I'm pretty sure only closet redditors use reddit as an insult.

>>61840671
>shotmaker
fuck yeah, have you listen to their LP's?

>>61839146
Fucks like you killed /mu/.

This place used to be leaking with elitisim and that's what made it fun to come here. Sure, there were p4k and popular albums posted but many people were competing with each other for the most obscure taste

Now it's all retards like you that defend Grimes and Yung Thug

I never thought I'd enjoy Christian Techno

>>61840693
This is nice

>>61840104
I liked it

>>61840923
I feel you, it may not be the most productive thing to do but it was definitely much more interesting and exploration even if it meant on a superficial level.

>>61840973
explorative*

File: front.jpg (238KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 600x600px

Anyone know any more non-hip hop that's predominantly made out of samples? The Avalanches and Solex are really good but I haven't been able to find too much more. Most other stuff I've found is stuff like Negativland (like Stock, Hausen, and Walkman) that's basically sound collage. Which is fine but more structured music would be nice.

>>61840923
this desu~

it used to be that /mu/ was self-actualized enough to understand that there were people out there who actually know more about music than they did, and by setting aside their autism for a minute they could find a cool album

now everyone who uses the internet is insecure so they spend all day defending the same three or four current shitty poptimist's choices

File: 1443851807362.jpg (958KB, 1874x2055px) Image search: [Google]

958KB, 1874x2055px

>>61841002
You called try this genre called turntablism.

>>61841002
You've listened to The Books right?
Maybe John Oswald?

>>61840905
of course!!! mouse ear (forget-me-not) is fucking brilliant

>>61841046
*turntable music

The top 2 rows basically.

https://rateyourmusic.com/customchart?page=1&chart_type=top&type=album&year=alltime&genre_include=1&genres=Turntable+Music&include_child_genres=t&include=both&limit=none&countries=

>>61840887
THIS

>>61841093
Not that there's anything wrong with being a closeted redditor, other than what I just said was wrong with it.

>>61841077
haha, I like you duder. stay safe out there.

File: DevoOhNoItsDevo.jpg (43KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 300x300px

I'm an advanced listener

>>61841015
>>61840923
>we should all hate the popular artists we actually like, just for the sake of progressing discussion

kill urself

>>61839114
A link to this?

On yt there's almost nothing

>>61841183
>we should all spam chart pop, memerap and radio rock because one anon gets upset

kill urself

>>61841183
>false dichotomies
>kill urself
If they actually liked any of them, they wouldn't encourage others to hate them.

>>61841164
I fucking wish DEVO had stick with this sound
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQjwUyne3kQ
Just imagine

>>61841186
if it's not in the archive i can upload it to mega

>>61841183
>I have no reading comprehension and just reply to people after skimming the buzzword in their posts

Good one family

>>61841164
haha this record spuds a smile on my face :)

>>61841229
Hardcore era is my favorite for sure

>>61841164
Is this album the trve intersection of /mu/core and advanced listening?

>>61841260
Its just /mu/core (ie spammed all the time).

File: hard attack.jpg (154KB, 600x604px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 600x604px

>>61841128
will do, fellow comrade

check this one out

>>61841183
in all seriousness, whether you're trolling or not you should kill yourself

File: coneheadslp1.jpg (548KB, 1200x1188px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1200x1188px

>>61841257
if ya like their goofy hardcore i would check out the coneheads

lol this is dumb OP

>>61841300
>clearly not /advanced/
plz go

File: Philosoraptor.jpg (68KB, 496x640px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 496x640px

>>61839078
Thank you, finally a serious thread for a serious listener like me. I hope that all of you, my epic friends, only listen to field recordings and minimal music.

>>61841300
Back to your Fantano thread.

>>61841322
Yes, the only alternative to /mu/core is field recordings and minimal music.

Idiots.

>>61841322
You didn't even read the thread.

>>61839188
Pretty sure I've seen this post before...

>>61841053
pretty sure the books can be described as collage judging by the randomness of their music

Thoughts on Antonin Dvorak?

>>61841218
>>61841227
>>61841250
>I don't excel at anything in life, so I ONLY listen to music no one else has heard to make myself feel better

If that's the game we're playing I only listen to the sound of my shoes shuffling through the snow and the changing rhythm of my step, fucking beat that

>>61841281
oh no it's devo is apparently a meme but their albums are still way better than /mu/core (my favorite poppy synth one is probably new traditionalists though)

>>61841354
I don't know if "randomness" is the word I would have chosen.

>>61841367
>the sound of my shoes shuffling through the snow
>changing rhythm of my step, fucking
>beat that
Oh the sounds everyone else hears on a daily basis?

Grow up ya pleb

>>61841367
in that case i recommend the stockhause piece "sirius" which includes the sound of shoes shuffling through snow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7twVeOlmJBY

>>61841299
my man, who here zolo?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEU2RzAKZww

>>61841282
will definitely do

File: ragas-and-sagas2.jpg (375KB, 909x898px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 909x898px

Anyone here like stuff like this?

>>61841367
>I ONLY listen to music no one else has heard

Who said that? Nowhere has that been implied or required ITT

>>61841367
see >>61841293

>>61841412
Is there quite a lot of /trad/ music on ECM?

>>61841421
This. At least two people must have heard it if they're discussing it.

>>61841421
>its just some of us have moved past the general essentials, p4k BNM and the latest hype album and have more developed tastes. No /mu/core, BNM, Fantanocore or chart music allowed.

File: a0766615619_16.jpg (31KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 700x700px

what do my fellow /advanced/ listeners think of R Stevie Moore? pic related; his best tape

>>61841421
>>61841422
who else /nolife/ here?

>>61841459
Well you are a supposed advanced listener. YOU need to tell us what YOU think

If you can't, you don't belong here.

>>61841451
I'm not seeing your point?

There are thousands of albums with thousands of listeners on RYM and last.fm etc that have never been posted on /mu/ but aren't in the slightest bit obscure.

Oh wait, did you think /mu/ talked about everything, lmao

>>61841451
There's nothing untrue about that statement.
Elitism is good for you, and that's the ugly, unpalatable truth.

File: 1280x1280.jpg (385KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1280x1280px

actually, this may be the best r stevie moore tape

>>61841341
>Back to your Fantano thread
I have never once watched a video of his or visited a thread about him

>>61841459
I fucking love Goodbye Piano and California Rhythm

Need to listen to more of his work. Anymore recs by him?

>>61841467
lol casualfags

>>61841459
I love Robert Steven Moore.
My favorite is Phonography.

>>61841475
>I'm not seeing your point?
Read the reply chain.
>There are thousands of albums with thousands of listeners on RYM and last.fm etc
Then go discuss them on the RYM forums and the last.fm forums.
>>61841477
What band are you in again?

>>61841483
There is hope for you then.

>>61841243
Nvm, found it :)

File: 0112rstevie_lg.jpg (57KB, 500x795px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x795px

>>61841474
R Stevie Moore is fucking awesome. He's my Facebook friend. A lot of people think his stuff sounds kinda muzaky at first, I did, but once you lock into his genius it's almost more profound than the beatles. incidentally, his cover of "I'm Only Sleeping" is superior to the original

>>61841513
>Read the reply chain.
Nope, no one said anything like that.

>Then go discuss them on the RYM forums and the last.fm forums.
No, I'll do it here on this music board.

>>61841513
Photon.
We don't play shows but we're a band.

>>61841186
>listening on YT
You're in the wrong thread, newfriend.

>>61841487
Glad Music is his best studio album. Stevie Moore Often is one of the earliest tapes that's pretty much a masterpiece front to back. "Why Should I Love You" which appears on both in different versions should've been a hit

>>61841524
His Beatles cover album is GOAT.
He should do another Beatles tribute album with Tonetta.
/mu/ would cream their collective jeans.

>>61841524
No I mean a musical analysis. I have friends who toured with him too, so what you just said is not useful to /advanced/ listeners.
>>61841537
How long have you been studying music theory?
>>61841533
>Nope, no one said anything like that.
Oh was this not you? >>61841421
>No, I'll do it here on this music board.
Suit yourself. Enjoy being called an elitist.

>>61841513
Maybe you need to lie down and take some pain relievers for your butt. You don't have to post in the thread if you don't like it, at least it's better than another kpop general.

>>61841586
Oops did you think this was reddit?

>>61841582
I've been studying music theory at some level for most of my life, but I'm mostly an advanced popular music consumer, so I'm by no means deep with it.

>>61841619
>at some level
So not seriously.

You probably shouldn't be here.

>>61841565
thanks!

>>61841582
Yeah that was me, quoting you.

>Enjoy being called an elitist.
Like I care.

>>61841613
Are you suggesting that just because this is 4chan you have some sort of obligation to be antagonistic, and that I have no right to point out to you that what you're doing is completely childish?

>>61841630
You don't need advanced knowledge of music theory to be an advanced consumer of popular music. Just art music.
This thread isn't /classical/.

OP is a faggot for being pretentious and approaching it like this.

If you want a /serious/ discussion, then make the discussion about what you want it to be about, not who you want to participate. build it up and they will have a sad cum bb, or something like that.

so, for the next thread, make a format for discussion instead, that touches on aspects of discussion you feel are generally lacking in /mu/. something like.

#rules

post one (1) album.

comment on
1. cultural relevance (music before and after)
2. musical complexity (break this down into multiple categories - have these be set in stone)
3. lyrics

etc etc.
basically by asking people to truly review an album you'd get more in depth discussion.

not by saying "lel we are superior pls join us in circlejerk".

at least put on your trips next time so i can filter you.

>>61841641
>Yeah that was me, quoting you.
So as you can see, you said it.
>Like I care.
Then stop replying.
>>61841659
Wrong. See >>61839078
>>61841644
What do you mean?

I think this sums up the premise for these threads best.

>>61840298
>>61840298
>>61840298

Its not about ''advanced'' music.
Its a general for people who want to talk about music other than the same old /mu/core and BNM because they've ''advanced'' past it.

>>61841677
>cultural relevance
get out you fucking commie

>>61841677
This, basically because OP wanted a "serious discussion with advanced listeners" but all conversation resorts to
>I like this!
Which is the same as it always is.

>>61841684
Notice the words "theory" and "formal" are not in the OP whatsoever.

>>61841717
>b) People with musical training and regularly perform music
I know you want to be pedantic just to post here, but use yer noggin.

>>61841677
No NO!

This was an successful thread . Trust me. If you want a successful thread like this you need to a little b8 get it going. A regualr thread like this with no b8 would die with little to no posts.

>>61841548
Can't listen in Spotify, can't listen on Apple Music, can't listen on yt, there's nothing on slsk.

What should I do anon?

>>61841736
A and B were presented as either/or.
I am A.

>>61841759
>>61841713

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 7.09.57 PM.png (125KB, 211x208px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 211x208px

This is a legitimately interesting idea. Wonderful.

I have a question. I've appreciated solo/small ensemble piano works, usually with post-romantic leanings and perhaps a touch of jazz. Examples: Bill Evans, Brad Mehldhau, and Nils Frahm.

Problem is, only Evans is consistently interesting.

Rec me some more interesting works in this vein.

>>61841768
>>61839098

>>61841759
This.
If you want topical threads without elitism, just go to reddit.
If you want fun threads, stay on /mu/.

File: advanced.jpg (654KB, 3000x2400px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 3000x2400px

>>61841702

>>61841800
That still describes me though.

File: 1453089092765.jpg (53KB, 1248x620px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1248x620px

>>61839078
so far i see that the people with musical training have made zero posts of substance while I successfully gave some R Stevie Moore recs

>>61841808
There aren't any of those here either.

>>61841847
>posts Fantano

>>>/mu/

>>61841848
You have to make your own fun by shitposting and being an elitist.
Then you get actual discussion.
That's quid pro quo on /mu/.

>>61841834
>>61839888
Well one does not seriously listen to music when they are 2.

>>61841795
Wait, do you want modern classical, jazz, or what? The three you posted don't really have any consistent style linking them together.

>>61841906
Shouldn't you be shooting up a college?

>>61841917
YOU DON'T KNOW ME

>>61841939
Probably.

I have been here 3 years nearly.

I have started numerous threads about genres I like, none of them obscure but this is the first thread I have ever had reach 300 replies, I rarely get past 20.

Thanks.

>>61841932
Either style, and somewhere in between would be best. Either something like a sparer Music for 18 Musicians or Sky Turning Grey by Mehldau (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkMT0vLwlUM).

File: 1404103164358.jpg (4MB, 4000x5500px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4000x5500px

if you havent listened to 5 or more of these gtfo

despite some serious attempts to derail, pretty good bread

>>61842102
DESTROY ALL MONSTERS!!!!

>>61841795
>>61841479
>>61841459
>>61841412
>>61841164
>>61840759
>>61840675
>>61840615
>>61840557
>>61840127
>>61840083
>>61839683
>>61839675
>>61839667
>>61839597
>>61839485
>>61839437
>>61839272
>>61839225
>>61839146
>>61840545
>>61839078
Do anyone take these people seriously?
i havent laughed this much in a long time

this is the most

>>61839078
food for thought, wouldn't the most advanced music be one that could appeal to everyone, plebs and patricians alike? does such an album exist?

>>61842102
This thread isn't about LOL SO OBSCURE ZOMG

>>61842125
This isn't about ''advanced music'', its for people who've advanced beyond /mu/core, BNM and RYM top 100.

>>61842034
Alright, have you listened to Lubomy Melnyk, Haruka Nakamura, or if you don't mind a bit of jazz accompaniment, Ahmad Jamal?

>>61842123
what is so laughable about steaming coils or the necks or sabbat?
what prompted this response?

>>61842175
He's probably one of the shitters that got BTFO before.
Pay him no mind.

NEW THREAD

>>61842199
>>61842199
>>61842199

File: prefabricated.jpg (105KB, 600x587px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 600x587px

hello

>>61839601
classical > rock > electronic > jazz > r&b <<<<< trad

>>61839601
Classical > Electronic > Jazz > Rock > Soul > Pop > R&B

>>61843186
This is the correct order.

>>61841872
we're already here bud.