/cat023/ general

first for this record is shit

>>47586070
its pretty good, i really enjoy the sounds he uses, its got a real analog techno feel that is pretty unique to the time/scene. Solid 7/10

third for first anon is wrong

i do actually really like this

one of my top albums so far this year

>>47586102
>its pretty good, i really enjoy the sounds he uses
Quality /mu/ music discussion, ladies and gentlemen.

>>47586137
hehe

pretty much the definition of a For the Fans release, I can't see many casual rdj listeners overwhelmingly digging it and maybe only one or two proper techno listeners, however, I happen to be a fan so I'm chuffed to hear it. solid record, might actually prefer it to the caustic window comp

The latter option.
I think I might give the analord series another listen too

>>47586137
well i mean like he has specific noises that are kind of signature to that SAW I/AFX era of very bouncy analog noises

>>47586137
quality observation, upboated.

way more colourful than i was expecting

mumbly is a tune

It's a nice unreleased novelty. It can't be the album of the year because it wasn't even meant to be released. It isn't a disappointment because it wasn't made to please anybody.
As for my anonymous and lowly opinion I love it because I am an RDJ fanboy.

http://strawpoll.me/1926172

Muh dik

It's like the missing link between Classics and SAW 85-92. I think it would have been a classic if it was released when he made it

>>47586236
don't know about that,it is good though, mumbly in particular

part of me thinks RDJ intentionally fucked up some of the tracks on the record

the Muttley live sample sounds better than the actual Muttley for some reason

https://mega.co.nz/#!WtxQzKSb!tZ7EsGROmkf8Jq443WDqHe_lLavCQuYNME07qAdw7co
V0 link

I'm not sure AOTY, but it's a great release. It doesn't sound totally dated, but definitely RDJ at an different period than where he's at now.

I like it though. Kinda like a lost stepping stone in how he got to where he did.

And most every track is really enjoyable. I'd love if this got a bit more popular with the EDM crowd and we saw a bit more ravey style stuff like this slipping into the current EDM scene

How anyone can call anything other than Fingertrips the best track on here is beyond me.

>>47586267
it's in the OP.

>>47586236
no lmao

File: ANh6Dg.png (131KB, 1280x774px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1280x774px

whoever made this rip can suck my fucking dick

this is awful

>>47586255
But I feel like it has elements of both fused together, I don't know. Maybe it is a stretch to say that.

>>47586270
>EDM
Shut the fuck up.

>>47586285
beggars can't be choosers, asshole. take what you can get

>>47586287
no I agree on that, just calling it a classic is a bit of a stretch. I'm glad to've heard it, gives more insight into rdj in general

>>47586137
like your post is any better :^)

>>47586314
Oh gotcha.

File: Caustic Window - Caustic Window LP - 10 fingry c3-caustic window LP -cat 023-.mp3.png (193KB, 624x389px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 624x389px

>>47586285
:)

>>47586236
>>47586287
Muttley samples the break from Phloam and the noisy elements from Schottkey 7th Path.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rOSGjnNJYU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvNTJS2nZG0

I'm just happy to hear some original music from RDJ

>>47586285
Apparently it was made by professionals at some mastering house or something.

>>47586313
We can still complain that supposed "professionals" did a shit job and broke one of the fundamental rules of making a proper transfer.

>>47586347
Hearing that right now. Cool stuff

>>47586333
what does it mean

when were these done? sounds like sometime between icbyd and rdj album

>>47586361
Actually, on second thought, Rephlex were given the files for post processing themselves. So this might have been their doing. Which is even more hilarious.

>>47586361
honestly it sounds fine to me

>>47586390
http://everything2.com/title/CAT023

>>47586390
Likely between the late '80s and early '90s, the latest possible recording year being 1994 when the test pressings were cut.

>>47586411
It may sound fine, but the fact is that there is clipping damage to the waveform.

>>47586442
But if it sounds fine, is it really a problem?

>>47586474
Not for me, because I didn't pay money for it.

>>47586333

>spectral
>the same thing as clipping

Yeah bud, you know what you're talking about.

>>47586361

What a crock bunch of shit then. Same people who probably loudly master albums.

>>47586490
>

>>47586442
Every single Mars Volta album is far worse so fuck it.

I love it so far but it's SO lo-fi, even lower quality than SAW 85-92. I like the composition but I'm afraid of getting a headache.

File: IT IS YOU.jpg (55KB, 600x433px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x433px

>>47586562
>it's SO lo-fi

confirmed for not listening to lo-fi music

File: those things etc.png (11KB, 628x77px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 628x77px

>>47586137

>>47586562
nah its not that bad

>>47586562
b-but lo-fi is good

>>47586347
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rOSGjnNJYU
Why did the remove the bass from the break on Muttley?

fuck you I like this

>>47586589
The SAW 85-92 were literally recorded direct to cassette tapes, you can't get much more lo-fi than that.

File: richarddjames.jpg (72KB, 797x1200px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 797x1200px

http://strawpoll.me/1926172/
http://strawpoll.me/1926172/
http://strawpoll.me/1926172/
http://strawpoll.me/1926172/
http://strawpoll.me/1926172/

I honestly didn't expect it to be this good. I'm surprised.

Naps - Hydrate

Who is this guy?
So far so good.

>>47586734
It doesn't necessarily sound extremely lo-fi though. It's a bit unpolished sure, but not lo-fi.

Lo-fi is early Daniel Johnston

>>47586807
And early Dirty Beaches.

>>47586807
lo-fi can be used both as a more vague adjective and a genre descriptor, both saw 85-92 and "1990" could reasonably be described as lo-fi just with different intention

Why do electronic musicians look like hobos?

File: 1402184925066.png (370KB, 500x753px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 500x753px

>>47586739

>>47586833
bc they don't make any money

>>47586833
cos they spend all day on their computers

>>47586285
That's probably what it sounds like on the source material as well. Blame Richard.

>>47586869
richard owns a tank

oh boy time for RDJ album ratings (non-Aphex Twin edition)

Rushup Edge > Hangable Auto Bulb > Confederation Through > Caustic Window comp > Analogue Bubblebath 3 > Analogue Bubblebath 1 > Surfing on Sine Waves > Bradley's Robot > Analogue Bubblebath 4 > Caustic Window LP > Analogue Bubblebath 5 > Bradley's Beat > Universal Indicators > Power Pill >>>> GAK

didn't bother w/analords cause too much

File: Quality.png (22KB, 809x46px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 809x46px

kek

>>47587014
That was for the Analord series, which was top-notch.

>>47587002
analord is really cool you'll appreciate it when you get round to it, especially seeing as you like rushup edge so much. also props for having analogue bubblebath 3 as your fav bubblebath, cat 008'97-B-1 and (cd only track #1) are dope

>>47587081
no I heard the Analords. love 'em

didn't bother rating them cause they're way too much.

>>47587111
oh right gotcha

so the tuss is 100% confirmed richard right

>>47587156
considering it was published under his name i'd figure it's safe to assume he is the tuss

>>47587156
Yeah, all the tracks appear under his name on the BMI music publishing database.

http://strawpoll.me/1926541
http://strawpoll.me/1926541
http://strawpoll.me/1926541
http://strawpoll.me/1926541

>>47587156

Also wondering if anyone had info on this, was there ever any definitive answer from RDJ or Rephlex that it's him? Or is it just that everything points too much in his direction to believe it's anyone else?

>>47587156
no it isn't, it's his cousins the Tregaskins

They didn't want fame so they just released their recreational doodles under his name

>>47587200
it's pretty much blatant, as the guys above me said. see the tuss wiki page for more evidence

also, it just sounds like him

is steinvord richard

Is mumbly muttley? Haven't listened yet

Why'd he change the name te fucker

>>47587310
>Is mumbly muttley
yup

>Why'd he change the name te fucker
cause he a tricky fella

he also slowed it down a bit when compared to the live sample apparently

>>47587285
Idk I've heard tonnes of shit

most likely its a collaborative project and therefore he /might/'ve been involved in one or 2 tracks but its not really dead typical of his style so iunno

its not bad though

>>47587310

Yea Mumbly is Muttley, apparently Rich got the track names from digging back into his archives although in the Paradinas rundown of CAT023 he mentions Rich referring to it as muttley, maybe he hadn't settled on a title or something and just decided to go with mumbly

>>47587373
it has a sample like "i dont know why you even bother talking" so prolly it was intended to sound like he was saying mumbly. the sample's from the muttley cartoon though, obviously

Was Gargattarax Llany ever confirmed him?

>>47587426
How would've he acquired the rights to use that Dastardly sample? Popcorn and R2-D2 were omitted from the Caustic Window comp because he couldn't clear the sample reights.

File: NGC253web1090sfsd.jpg (296KB, 737x734px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 737x734px

hey guys

>>47587445
not him, some other dude whose name i forgot

File: NGC253web1090eelee23.jpg (296KB, 737x734px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 737x734px

oops

>>47587454
ooh i dunno actually good one

maybe that's why it was put off release? or one of the reasons anyway, could be

but boc have sesame street samples and all sorts

>>47586285
YEAH, everything needs to have a dynamic range of 22!! right? Compression is never okay!

>>47587523
why would anyone use this art over the OP

File: wtfamireading.jpg (104KB, 613x533px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 613x533px

>>47587523
>737x734

>>47587537
>compression
the pic shows clipping, not compression m8

learn the difference

>>47587527
BoC also sampled Pink Floyd and Ligeti in Happy Cycling, I'd guess they have less trouble with acquiring sample rights than RDJ does.

>>47587561
oh shit really? I knew ligeti but I'd never noticed that, and i've listened to mhtrtc more times than i've spoken to girls

which track is it that it samples?

>>47587553
I know, I was just speaking in general.

>>47587598
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S49XwdRMcy0

>>47587598
you should probably listen to it a 3rd time

>>47587644
damn I guess it never clicked

and I have the zabriski point dvd

>>47587653
holy shit lmao

>>47587653
hmm. seems i've been owned on the web

>>47586333
that's not what he was showing...

fingertrips is proper aphex twiny

glad this has been released

File: Le.png (59KB, 377x326px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 377x326px

>>47587653

"i am le epic richard i have le 1000 unleleased albums but i will no lelease them heheheheh i am le french meme"
this is an actual quote btw

Why did we have to go through the whole process of buying the record and ripping it when the whole time the guy that made the music in the first place was involved? Couldn't he have just ripped the master tapes?

What percentage should I speed up Mumbly to get it to sound like the live version

>>47587923
But that would make too much sense.

>>47587944
15% is sounding good, 25% is too fast

>>47587923
because rich is a dick

So when is he gonna drop another album?

>>47588160
one his ex-wife dies and as a result is unable to leech off his output

>>47588160
my guess is when he dies (in our lifetime) warp'll put out the 20 or so he'd been sitting on in a big boxset, it'll be remembered as one of the biggest events in electronic music.

>>47588212
>>47588195
would you be willing to kill someone for new rdj material

>>47587923
He doesn't have the master tapes any more.

>>47588234
I'd kill rich for a new rich album
he's probably got more than his fair share of unreleased trax collecting dust

>>47588212
Can they do that? Wouldn't he need to have signed a contract specifically saying they can use it? or like they'd have to get permission from lorna and derek or something

>>47588275
How is that even possible? I've never heard of an artist losing/getting rid of their masters.

>>47588312
you must not listen to a lot of music

>>47588312
are you kidding me? itcotck dude you know that

>>47588350
I don't know how that means he hasn't listened to a lot of music.

>>47588275
>>47588312
>>47588372
This is false. He does have the masters - that's where he found the old names he'd written for each of the tracks (or most of them anyway). The truth is, the terms of the crowdfunding agreement between Joyrex and Richard/Rephlex were that the audio had to come from the record in question, not the masters. Bullshit, but par for the course with RDJ.

>>47588373
it happens all the time

>>47588039
he just doesn't care man

>>47588388
yeah but the itcotck masters were lost dude they were lost

>>47588451
What's itcotck?

>>47588493
in the court of the crimson king, by king crimson

its that /mu/ core album you never got around to listening to

>>47588493
in the aeroplane over the cock

>>47588493
in the cock of the crimson king

>>47588524
Oh, I didn't catch on to the acronym (hadn't ever seen anyone call it that). Huh, I never knew the masters for that were lost. Anyway, I was talking specifically about the Caustic Window LP masters.

>>47588451
They were found, though, weren't they?

http://www.king-crimson.com/album/inthecourt

It's on eBay now.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/291170661954

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWOo52avr44
>tfw this wasn't part of CAT023

>>47588647
I know, right? I wanted that track so bad. I can't believe it wasn't on the album. To think he has stuff like this that's ever farther unreleased than CAT023 and is STILL that good.

So I used a plugin for Audacity called ReLife to remove most of the clipping and figured I might as well upload it. It sounds quite a bit better.

Caustic Window - Caustic Window LP [1996] @ FLAC
>IDM, 1990s
https://mega.co.nz/#!OE4hWIBB!f6h7Squds184t_oJTTsQtM357vrDbWUXzguTTMiscjA

>>47588584
yeah
but they WERE lost
i was just making the point that it happens, though this is probably the most famous case

>>47588702
dope cheers for the upload

>>47588702
>FLAC
This is sourced from the original FLAC download?

>>47588728

Of course. The tags are all correct and everything.

>>47588644
holy shit
i'm actually mad
i actually feel anger. this is the most bullshit thing to happen in the history of music

>>47588745
Awesome. Do you have a link to the original FLAC archive?

>>47588760
Why? Calm your tits. Half of this is going to charity, too.

>>47588760
same here

>>47588772

I do but I'm about to leave to go somewhere, I just figured it was somewhere in the thread.

>>47588644
hope the buyer rips it too beacuse honestly I don't trust Rich's mastering of this album

nice unreleased novelty

if you were expecting anything else you deserved to be let down

>>47588772
how about you send the tens of thousands of dollars that this non-release garnered to charity?

>>47588771
reported

>>47588771
do it faggot

>>47588805
Well, it was ripped by that "pro studio" and then sent to Rephlex for final quality control. It's hard to say who's to blame for the clipping, but either way, it's at least listenable. Only archivists should be angry about this rip, and even then, only on a technical level. The clipping isn't even that bad.

>>47588861
This isn't a non-release, no matter what anyone says. The $67k this raked in on Kickstarter is essentially $67k raked in on sales of the digital rip. He's entitled to 100% of that since he made the music. Maybe more like 95% since he didn't have to do the work to distribute it, but whatever the case, you get the point. Of course, he wouldn't even be getting that much because the whole purpose of the Kickstarter was to raise $9,300 which was the original seller's negotiated asking price. This is a free market - that seller could ask however much he wanted. And this auction works in the same way too - people will pay whatever they are willing for the record. In fact, they may even decide to pay MORE with the knowledge that half of the proceeds go to charity.

Think about it for more than thirty seconds. It seems obscene at first (and to be honest, I think it is because I don't believe in money for digital goods, but not everyone subscribes to that philosophy) but this isn't the crime of the century.

So why doesn't James want to release all the <2000 songs he hasn't released so far?

>>47589042
he is releasing stuff under unknown pseudonyms, he's prolly just bothered by the fame and pressure he's got. look at how the more casual fans are receiving this release, they think its crap cos they only want masterpieces. rich doesnt want to make masterpieces, he wants to make the music he likes. unfortunately that doesnt always sell or bode well critically

>>47589042
2 busy fucking russian hookers

>>47589087
Oh, makes a whole lot of sense.

>>47588843

I really enjoyed it, but also knew it was going to be late 80s-94 era RDJ. I think some people seem to have been expecting RDJ Album part 2 or something

>>47589035
How do we know the clipping is from the ripping and not part of the masters themselves? SAW had some serious clipping as well.

the aesthetic of this release inspires me .
does this style have a name?

>>47589168
this, I have a feeling that the 'masters' behind the ripping process would not have done this, it must have been that fucker rich

>>47589140
tbh was expecting more banging techno similar to the Analogue Bubblebaths and stuff like CJ Bolland etcetera

only stomper meets that criteria unfortunately

>>47589168
The audio files themselves are clipped. It's highly unlikely that the clipping was natural and the soundwave just appears that way when amplified to its highest level without further damage. It's hard to describe, but I am 99.9% sure this is clipping from the transfer/post-processing.

Man I'm on the first track and I'm LOVING it already. So pretty

>>47589123
they'll milk it all posthumously btw so don't worry you're missing out, in a sense its kind of clever though cause people end up scouring releases to find rdj and in the process end up helping out a load of uncommercial artists and getting into an otherwise quiet area of music once they realize how much good shit there is

>>47589228

That's fair enough if that's what you wanted from it. I liked Fingertrips, Airflow, 101 Rainbows and Squidge in the Fridge, those had a kind of SAW-ish quality to them, Rainbows was actually cast off from SAW85-92 according to the Paradinas rundown

>>47589228
I was surprised to find so much AB4/5-ish (Flutey), SAW 85-92-ish (Squidge), Polygon Window-ish (Fingry and, to some extent, Fingertrips), and even Mike & Rich/GAK-ish (Jazzphase) stuff on this. Not too many of these tracks are clearly "Caustic Window" in style. I wonder if that's part of the reason it was shelved. The main reason was that Rephlex wanted to start releasing more records by artists other than RDJ, so it wasn't necessarily quality concerns about the material at all, but it could have been in part.

>>47589035
i'm not saying its a crime, i'm saying its bullshit. the whole thing is bullshit.
if you want to release an album, release an album. keep in mind, this was to raise money for a vinyl rip, not to distribute the actual music. james didn't authorize use of the masters. the whole thing is a cash grab, no other way to look at it.

>>47589042
more like <2000 albums, the dude is more prolific than merzbow and lil b combined

>>47589497
The only reason it's a cash grab (in my opinion) is because they basically sold digital copies of the music. I don't believe in money for digital media. Had they agreed to press the album on physical media and had that be what people were paying for, I'd be 100% okay with this.

>>47589180
goregrind

>>47587540
underrated post

>>47589573
if they used to original masters i might even accept it as a legitimate business venture

someone needs to upload the FLAC version to mutracker

tfw no qt q-chastic

>>47589767
it's on what tho

>>47589767
>mutracker
I thought that died a while ago?

>>47589811
nope

>>47589810
yeah so upload it to mutracker

>>47589853
but muh grapes

File: 1382906262884.gif (167KB, 500x308px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 500x308px

>>47589853
i already do it in 320

>>47586070
Hey guys! I can't use Mega, my browser doesn't support it! Could someone be so kind as to upload this to Mediafire or zippyshare please?

>>47589974
hold up

>>47589974
15%

>>47589573
yfw paid digital-only labels

>>47589974
chrome kept crashing on me whenever I tried to upload but here u go 320

http://www24.zippyshare.com/v/70283036/file.html

>>47590375
Thanks!

This might actually be my favourite RDJ related release.

>Who dat then?

>I'm being hacked!

kek

>>47589974
there's an iOS, android and even a blackberry app for mega
there's also extensions for firefox and chrome that make it run better
so yea, you have no excuse for it not to work

>>47590709
>elitism

>>47590709
>>47590709
my OS is outdated, I can't use browsers that support Mega.

>you have no excuse for it not to work
why are you spending your time being an ass? someone uploaded it for me. chill the fuck out, spergtron.

how does my inability to use mega affect you?

>>47590788
This place needs it. Severely.

>>47590788
>can't even use mega
no it's really not elitism
it's you being outmoded and asking for spoonfeeding

>>47590865
that wasn't me

I wasn't asking for spoonfeeding, I was asking for a fucking link. doesn't affect you, stop being an ass.

>>47590846
nerd

>>47590896
Untermensch. Off with you!

Now at fingertips. Mumbly is so fucking good

>>47591520
the live version that's 15% faster is better imo

>>47591520
>>47591603
phloam > mumbly

>>47591616
Tfw airflow

>>47591616
That wasn't on cat023 anon

>>47591653
I know

>>47591616
P-PSHH P-PSHH PSHH BZZ P-PSHH P-PSHH PSHH BZZ P-PSHH P-PSHH PSHH BZZ

File: 1400861578231.png (159KB, 483x432px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 483x432px

Airflow

>>47586137
that's a whole lot better than your comment chief

this is easily his best album. not even kidding

>>47592178
-___-

>>47592329
seriously. saw is one of the worst albums ive ever heard. i fucking love this one

File: eric.jpg (59KB, 400x421px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 400x421px

>>47592360

101 rainbows ambient mix g1-caustic window LP [cat 023] confirmed best track

>>47592360
lol gd 1 m8

>captcha: beetinue confidence

>>47592506
was intended to be on saw 85-92 originally. that wouldnt have worked at all but you can see it comes from the same artistic stirring pot

101 Rainbows and Squidge in the Fridge are GOAT tier

>>47592554
Squidge is totally SAW material too if you think about it. Just listen to the drums.

>>47592599
You mean Fingertrips and Phlaps.

>>47592654
yeah definitely the latter parts of the track the way the hi-hats are reverbing themselves space in the mix is total saw but the piano riff is just corny as fuck, would've killed the mood

>>47592684
Probably why it wasn't on SAW, really. I agree, everything else is great except the piano.

>>47592654

I did forget Fingertrips, also GOAT. I wasn't so keen on Phlaps on first listen but it's definitely growing on me, one of the more aggressive sounding RDJ tunes I can think of, it sort of reminds me of Ventolin in some respects

What album cover is everyone using?

>>47592962
this one: >>47587523

the one that came with it looked messy to me

Am I the only one who thinks popeye is pretty good?

>>47592962
the OP one

>>47593015
iunno, its fine, it just seems like a standard track/experiment he probably made in one sitting

>>47592962
what does it matter

Well it's obvious why it was never released. It would have been really odd to release something like this *after*

>Both SAWs
>SOSW
>All the other CW stuff

It sounds very early/amateur to me (in a cutesy way) - still experimenting with different sounds, seeing what fits, etc. Doesn't sound like he'd mastered it yet, but he was on his way.

Definitely something for the fans, especially those who have been following RDJ ever since he started.

File: photo(1).jpg (248KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 640x1136px

>>47592962

>>47593220
reminds me more of the on and didgeridoo singles, kinda just more of a fun dancy side to his music than anything overly serious.

>>47593161
WHY IS EVERYONE SO RUDE AND CRANKY HERE

>>47592962
I think making your own is the only answer.
Decide your own fate.

File: 1402944906987.jpg (335KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 500x500px

>>47592962
may not use this but it's a good one, poastin for others

File: 1402945031108.jpg (765KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 1500x1500px

>>47593836
another srsbznz-mode album cover

File: Screenshot (43).png (888KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 1366x768px

>>47593225

>>47587523
I like it

File: 1401814243088.jpg (7KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 200x200px

>>47587523
what face is that on the cover?

looks like a twisted scan of sir billi

Where would you rate cat032 in comparison with Rich's other unreleased stuff?
imo:

Analogue Bubblebath 5 > Melodies From Mars = Caustic Window LP > Joyrex Tape

>>47594144
Swap MFM and CW and that's how I feel.

>>47593899
>iTunes

>>47594253
"=" means its the same quality dingus

>>47594439
i think he ruse'd you.

>>47587523
>wanting black bars when cycling your Albums sections on your ipod

>>47594287
>being autistic

You need to die.

File: Man of Feel.jpg (140KB, 865x1600px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 865x1600px

Guys is it Acid Techno or Brain Dance?

>>47594711
IDM

>>47594777
the first track sounded a bit acidy, but the second is like a deadbeat child from his I care and Richard D

>>47594825
>the first track sounded a bit acidy
acidic

>>47594711
"Experimental Electronic"

>>47594889
Had a bit to drink

>>47590673
>"If you do it, you'll die"

10/10 aoty

File: 10351382_895052973845364_2065735149759770360_n.jpg (20KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 540x960px

>mfw RDJ is in this thread

sup mang

>>47595621
Is he?

If so fuck you Richard why don't you give us more tunes

>>47595814
>just gave us a whole double LP worth of music
>why don't you give us more tunes

be grateful you fuck

>>47595967
I'm grateful for cat023 but not grateful for the fact that it's the first in many years

Maybe we'll get the rest post-mortem

Anybody have a FLAC link?

>>47595994
nerd

>>47595967
>just gave us
$67,424 speaks otherwise

>>47596017
I heard that was still pretty generous as it's less than he could have gotten with a standard release but I cannot say if that's true. Anyone know? How much would Rich get if he released cat23 normally?

>>47595994
Uploading now. Come back here or in another cat023 thread in about an hour.

>>47596147
thanks bro

>>47596147
bump

>>47596147
bamp

>>47596193
>>47597671
>>47598649
https://mega.co.nz/#!U5lXRCDa!4jk8kbg7F3Eg4QBuxV203rp2d4OF1ijWXAat-2KtICs


flac, caustic window, cat023, cat 023

File: aww shit nigga.jpg (68KB, 630x504px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 630x504px

>>47598976
Thanks anon

File: Caustic Window LP Cover-01.png (1MB, 1800x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1800px

Just thought I'd drop by and add my cover to the collection.
Let me know what you think, anons!

http://www.redbullmusicacademy.com/magazine/mark-pritchards-worst-tour-ever

>tfw fell asleep during airflow

>>47586739
He looks like some vapid cunt in this pic.

>>47602113
Say that to his face, fucker, not online and see what happens. Reminder that he owns a tank.

To whoever wanted Mumbley to sound like the live version: increase the track's speed by 5 in Audacity.

>>47588160
soon

>>47602431
no by 12,5%

>>47599921
kek

File: 1374755853002.jpg (26KB, 600x548px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x548px

>>47593899
>15 albums

>>47603991
>reading comprehension

>>47602113
he looks like a major qt

>>47604192
I wouldn't mind going gay for him, frankly.

>>47603991
it means 15 songs, which is what he selected when he clicked on the album