Convince me that literary taste is objective without using your

>>7657056
>objective
You should know that using this word in the way you are using it shows what a pleb you are. Please go back to watching anime, it's more suited to your malfunctioning faculties.

Anonymous 2016-02-03 20:17:11 Post No.7657079
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 20:17:11 Post No.7657079 [Report]

File: latest.png (278KB, 1004x768px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1004x768px

>>7657056

JEKYLL JEKYLL HYDE
JEKYLL HYDE
HYDE JEKYLL

Anonymous 2016-02-03 20:22:19 Post No.7657099
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-03 20:22:19 Post No.7657099 [Report]

The ideal Platonic form of a good book exists in a non-physical, non-mental plane.

We call those books "objectively good" that more closely conform to this ideal Form.

Q.E.D.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:22:58 Post No.7657872
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 00:22:58 Post No.7657872 [Report]

>>7657056
>literary taste
Of course taste isn't going to be "objective" you dummy. This doesn't mean that there aren't any real aesthetic values though.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 01:19:12 Post No.7658055
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 01:19:12 Post No.7658055 [Report]

>>7657872
This. Taste isn't objective, but quality is.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 02:48:47 Post No.7658341
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 02:48:47 Post No.7658341 [Report]

>>7657099
Ten to one you can't actually DESCRIBE the alleged Form, though.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 02:56:49 Post No.7658369
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 02:56:49 Post No.7658369 [Report]

File: tumblr_inline_ngqd7t6TSM1qfj23z.jpg (85KB, 500x619px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 500x619px

>>7657056
no

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:00:16 Post No.7658376
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:00:16 Post No.7658376 [Report]

>>7657056
Having fun isn't hard when you've got a library card

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:01:33 Post No.7658382
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:01:33 Post No.7658382 [Report]

>>7658055

Same applies to you. >>7657072

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:40:15 Post No.7658480
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:40:15 Post No.7658480 [Report]

>>7658055
In all honesty, even quality is objective: diamond's worth, the worth of gold, "fine" wines, etc. It's just a value that is collectively agreed upon, or sometimes decided by the market.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:49:54 Post No.7658499
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 03:49:54 Post No.7658499 [Report]

>>7657072
Why would you choose to use the word in its archaic form?

What word do you use for the modern day "objective" then, in place of it?

On another note, how exactly did we get from objective/subjective meaning of relation to the object/subject to objective/subjective meaning fact/opinion anyway?

Was it after Kant? I think that's the latest in history I saw it used in the old fashion.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 06:25:40 Post No.7659003
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 06:25:40 Post No.7659003 [Report]

>>7658480
Insofar as objective is no longer objective. Get a fucking dictionary.

Anonymous 2016-02-04 09:23:13 Post No.7659422
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 09:23:13 Post No.7659422 [Report]

>>7657056
Convince me that reality is objective without using your personal tastes cuck

Anonymous 2016-02-04 09:34:41 Post No.7659437
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 09:34:41 Post No.7659437 [Report]

>>7657057
This. Read 'Tradition and the Individual Talent.'

Anonymous 2016-02-04 10:05:12 Post No.7659473
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-04 10:05:12 Post No.7659473 [Report]

>>7659437
I don't think you understand what that word means.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/