Why does Hume's "problem with induction" only

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-01-18 15:41:05 Post No. 7598986
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: mmagadhgaf.jpg (42KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:41:05 Post No. 7598986 [Report]

Why does Hume's "problem with induction" only seem to only apply to social sciences

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:43:06 Post No.7598993
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:43:06 Post No.7598993 [Report]

File: 09WCvY3.jpg (98KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

It doesn't

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:45:56 Post No.7599004
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:45:56 Post No.7599004 [Report]

>>7598993
what do you mean

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:48:08 Post No.7599016
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:48:08 Post No.7599016 [Report]

Because people don't care if something is truly 'proven' if it can consistently produce tangible results

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:49:29 Post No.7599019
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:49:29 Post No.7599019 [Report]

Wat. Hume was focused directly on natural science.

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:54:31 Post No.7599038
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:54:31 Post No.7599038 [Report]

>>7598986
Who is this cunny bunny?

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:55:57 Post No.7599040
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-18 15:55:57 Post No.7599040 [Report]

Read Popper. He's basically establishing scientific philosophy in the tradition of Hume. Not free of problems, but then again who is?