[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Has anyone written on the subject of art? More specefically tried

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1

File: art.jpg (790KB, 3200x1982px) Image search: [Google]
art.jpg
790KB, 3200x1982px
Has anyone written on the subject of art? More specefically tried to define it to include good works of such as Beethoven and exclude 50 cent? I'm trying to argue against the moral relativists
>>
on the standard of taste
>>
>>7580861
morality ==//== aesthetics
>>
Yeah there is an ENTIRE philosophy field called Aesthetics.

Lessing - Laocoön
Kant - Critique of Judgement
Schlegel/Mendelssohn write some stuff on it
Adorno - Aesthetics
Deleuze has multiple works on the subject
>>
>>7580879
Furthermore, it's pretty easy to dismiss moral relativists, they're laughed out of academia. What's his central point of argument?
>>
>>7580879
I don't want to read all that, give me a TL;DR.

I just want to BTFO feminists
>>
a /pol/ shitpost without the word cuck, im surprised, sure here's som--

>I don't want to read all that

these fucking inbreds...
>>
>>7580888
fuck off

i hate feminists too but "I don't want to read"

>>>/reddit/
>>
>>7580886
I'm dealing with a normie here.

His argument is anything can be considered art, All music, paint, film etc.
>>
>>7580934
Art used to be something to cherish

Now literally anything could be art

This post is art.
>>
>>7580934
>"normie"

You aren't on /r9k/

Define 'art' btw.
>>
>>7580861
>Has anyone written on the subject of art?
What a retarded question
>>
>>7580934
Well there are many definitions of art but going just by 2016 sensibilities I'd say he's correct.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.