>you will never be a woman >you will never be so fucking stupid that when people want to take sexy pictures of you, and for you to doll yourself up and make neoteny-enhancing poses for them, you think they are just interested in your work and your soul >you will never be so naive that you don't understand that a B- with a vagina is instantly boosted to an A+ >you will never be the equivalent of the one college athlete SO dumb that he doesn't even understand the system is rigged for him but actually thinks his essays were good >you will never live life with that naivete and stupidity filtering into everything else, so life is like a dream of life and everything is happy all the time and everyone worships you and it all seems to make perfect sense >you will never die with your head in an oven after writing 11 years worth of poems about makeup and expressing deep pathos that you just cannot possibly fit ALL the tall men's penises inside you >you will never gleefully accept domination by and slavish deference to men as your natural station without feeling your pride weakened at all by it >you will never be able to reconcile completely contradictory states and still feel like you held fast to the most difficult principles of both >you will never be the soulless worthless quintessential trivial but nevertheless content and joyous husk that is a woman
>>7556262 iktf, but am not sure if I would genuinely prefer to live in the ignorance that so many, but certainly not all, attractive women live. Is ignorance really bliss? I definitely envy the happiness of dumb guys or attractive girls, and maybe it's just a sense of attachment with my mean and lonely self, but I don't know if I'd give up what I have now for something like what those happy people have.
as a work of literature, that is, in terms of the quality of the writing "the gay science" by friedrich nietzsche follwed by ecce homo also by him. the symposium by plato is also up there, and many people would probably rate it higher than those two.
>inb4 lel gay science, HOMO pure coincidence, goyim
>>7557005 So wait, smart women are actually capable of sensing that every time they reach out to interact with the world, men roll out a red carpet and carry them along it instead of actually letting them?
Do they freak out or something? I guess a protective bubble of dick can become a prison of dick if you're aware of it and want out.
>>7557044 ...dude how stupid do you think they are? It's obvious when you talk to someone and the want something from you. Being a hot girl prolly feels like having people constantly trying to sell you things.
>>7557178 Is butterfly really that old? I bet she's really good at fucking by now. I'm sorry she'll never call me an illiterate pleb and choke the life out of me while she burgles my cums with her pussy.
>>7557090 I worry that as we age gradually stop experiencing qualia and become philosophical zombies because I sometimes get the feeling that's happening to me lately and I know a true philosophical zombie wouldn't write this post but that doesn't stop me from feeling the feeling or worrying about it so more and more I feel the part of my mind that follows along generating the narrative of my identity falling behind in time and it's like I have lost time not lost to memory but lost to experience in the moment like the exact opposite of zoning out while driving so you could say I have a similar concern I guess it's more that I'm concerned I can feel myself gradually becoming less real
>>7556133 >linguistics misconstructed by anti-philosophy guy Not really. His earlier work was good though. >>7556204 hahaha >>7556276 >muh transcendental math Nah. His extra distinction of analytic and synthetic, supposedly independent of the a priori /a posteriori distinction is nonsense.
>>7557005 If they were so clever, I'd think they realize their situation isn't something bad. If they can comprehend others positions, they can actually make more out of it.
I also had a gf who knew that whenever some guy offered her to teach something, they really want to bang her. She spoke about, me without me asking, how many girls (and people in general) have no determination in life, how chicks seek drama, stick with abusive guys, etc. She herself told me how she observes that even the ugly girls get good sex (she was shocked and angry that putting in work, and looking like her, didn't give much more advantage - good looking guys would bang down too). She knew guys try to get pussy and often, when they try to achieve something, it's also just for status and thus for pussy. She would tell me (again, without asking) that she knew people would always come up try to speak to her at parties and that this isn't the case for guys.
And she wrote one of her Bachelors thesis Masters on Wittgensteins Investigations (>>7556133)
She is protective of herself but I don't think she would at any point consider the fact that people are friendly to her (because of the omnopresent theme of sex in this world) a disturbing thing to her.
Tell me how things between you and those girls ended.
My ex broke up with me, and me being not in the city much was part of it. She had negative sides to her: Foremostly being a complete egoist (thus I would have always to fear she'd break loyalty and she would never make sacrifices for someone else - the kind of person who never wants children). She's the kind of girl that tried to be extra good in bad and extra kinky in bed, but maybe more to think of herself of a person with an awesome sex life than actually enjoying the thing in itself. Same goes for partner, being better and hotter than other peoples at events and parties, etc. Not sure if I like this or not. But she has many good qualities that I now always seek for in girls and they are not to find. Sorry for the rant - I've not seen her in 2 years and never talked about her, except when I show her pics to other chicks for the purpose of make them insecure about themselves infront of me, lel
I just tried to read the Wikipedia article and it's new abstract heights for me. tbqh it sounds more loose than the psychoanalytic theory of autism I read (a PhD thesis I looked into when I tried to find out what Lacan is all about)
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.