[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Half of you think this is acceptable public...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender

Thread replies: 35
Thread images: 3
File: 1453225108208.jpg (86 KB, 650x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1453225108208.jpg
86 KB, 650x1000
Half of you think this is acceptable public advertisement, half of you don't.
Who is right and why?
>>
>>5575210
half of me sages this thread half of me doesn't give two fucks

i am right
>>
>>5575237
lol
>>
>>5575210

well it reminds people how gross-looking fat thighs are, which isn't something you could normally learn just by looking at a fat person (because they'll be wearing clothes)

that might encourage some people to stop throwing their physical health in the garbage for no reason
>>
>>5575210
Is that an ad for cottage cheese?
>>
Nothing wrong with being naked. Plus if more people were nudists you would see significantly less fat people too.
>>
>>5575210
i love lush shampoo though
>>
File: 1450160592393.jpg (38 KB, 413x395) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1450160592393.jpg
38 KB, 413x395
>>5575458
>>
Who cares? Is it the nudity itself that hurts their feelings or the fact that the models aren't conventionally attractive? Would they react the same if the latter weren't true? Either way, what I find hilarious is that the people who would cry about being offended over this are the same who'll tell SJWs they need thicker skin.

Bottom line: it's just an ad, not porn. Grow up.
>>
>>5575528
I absolutely never even thought of that but.. It's honestly true. Back when I was 70 pounds heavier I would hide in clothes.
>>
>>5576110
Yeah fat acceptance only works because you're only temporarily nude and can then retreat back into your Spanx for the rest of your day.
For nudists being healthy and fit is like the equivalent of wearing nice clothes. It's not a requirement but you feel good doing it. Body acceptance is important of course but showing your body to the world will make you more self conscious no matter how much of a Tumblr SJW you may be.
>>
>Most people are unattractive
>A sect of marketing has now realised this
>Chooses people everyone can plainly see are not the ideal physical specimens
>"Oh my god, they care about everyone, including me!"
>"I'm going to buy their products; they must be ethical."

Quick reminder no bar is too low for advertisers.
>>
File: 2eoab60.jpg (54 KB, 540x549) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
2eoab60.jpg
54 KB, 540x549
>>5576176
>>
What is this even an advertisement for? Cottage cheese?
>>
>>5575210
Would smash
>>
>>5576263
>breast cancer survivor
i don't get why breast cancer is this big bad boogeyman. it isn't very deadly, only 3%, and rather easy to treat, isn't it?
>>
>>5576695
That wasn't the point of the pic, anon, the point is she's missing a boob.

I agree with you otherwise. It was more about a clever marketing campaign for profit in the end. They ignore that men get breast cancer, too.
>>
>>5576695

I'm no expert anon but iirc risk is inherited so a lot of women have mastectomies to reduce the risk of cancer; which destroys their boobs and for those who cannot afford expensive reconstruction privately (in countries where this is either unavailable publicly or has huge waiting lists) leaves them flat chested and nipple-less for years.

There is a disproportionate focus on cancer funding for women though.

>http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2007-06-13/a-gender-gap-in-cancerbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice
>>
>>5575210
>>5575210

>not even 6 beers
>hell no
>get on the train
>get on the train
>>
>>5576693
Fuck it, i'm desprete.
>>
>>5575888
>conventionally attractive
>>
>>5575210
It's pretty gross but I don't think non-sexual nudity is evil. I do think this is a terrible ad for a company since it probably really turns people off.
>>
>>5575210
>Always liked Lush
>Only recently realised I was gay

Man I am dumb
>>
Does anyone else thing lush products smell like shit? When i have to walk past the shop i struggle to breath, its all so powdery and heavy and makes me heave.
Not surprised to see them jump on thr naked fat women bandwagon
>>
>>5581382
YES
they work so good, but they smell like funeral
>>
>>5581395
My friends rave about how good it smells but i dont have a clue how they arent gagging. Id probably be more open to trying their products if i werent so poor
>>
>>5576693
the two on the ends for sure
>>
>>5575210
won't show them from the front so it's technically still shaming them, why would the want to show their faces/ugly gunt etc.

rather what they should do is put an actually attractive chubby girl and not support this insane idea that people who let their bodies turn to actual shit rather than carrying a little extra weight deserve to be lied to constantly

the physical contact between the women is also unnecessarily suggestive, asses are clearly being groped in a lewd fashion
>>
>>5581417

I use their shampoo and soap and actually the reason I like them so much is that they don't smell strong?

The stores are obviously reeking because nothing is packaged but after using their products I was struck how they don't smell strongly.

Going back to regular soap or shampoo now is horrible, it's all so overly perfumed.
>>
>>5575210
It's acceptable, but I think it's gross.
>>
>>5576812
Women are more important. They need to shit out babies. Men are only needed for their sperm.
>>
>>5575210
How can people be attracted to girls
They're so gross
>>
>>5582313
The shaving cream stuff is pretty good. It stinks of strawberries,
>>
>>5575210
as a lesbian: would. fuck. every. single. one. of. them.
>>
>>5582625
Jesus have some standards girl. You don't have to virtue signal 24/7
Thread replies: 35
Thread images: 3
Thread DB ID: 441817



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.