>>5524215
What the fuck are you even talking about? How do you think we learn about humans?

>>5524229
What I'm saying is that the only way to prove the early childhood thing is to put several children through a simulation of rape/exposing them to pornographic materials and track them as they age to see how they've matured.

It's terrible, but it would help a lot.

>>5524233
You're a fucking moron. There are other ways to research things than raping a child you edgy fuck

>>5524233
>It's terrible, but it would help a lot.
It wouldn't, you fucking moron. Traumatizing helpless children to glean a tiny bit of knowledge by testing hypotheses that we already know are bullshit helps nobody but you and your fantasies.

>>5525116
How do we already know they are bullshit? Can you provide proof that sexual deviance is genetic and that early childhood has no effect on said deviance?

File: mythbusted.jpg (13KB, 500x243px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 500x243px

>>5525818
>ask gay person if they were traumatized when younger
>no

>>5525818

Being sexually harassed by female peers in my early teens and only allowing myself to form friendships with males may have consolidated any doubts about my sexuality.

But family life was/is generally happy and the theorised dichotomy of Mother/Father influence is completely inapplicable to my situation.

No nazi experiments needed to figure out 99% of the origins for us subversive degenerates.

/pol/ sure does turn bad people worse

As a quick note, in order for experiments to be scientific, they require controlled variables. Controlling variables within human lives is very difficult.

One way scientists try to counter this is by increase the number of experiments, or the sample size, that they study. The thought is that by increasing the variance in people you're studying, you can then average your results and that'll reduce the chance that the results you get might be an outlier from the general population of people.

The catch to this is that, for some things, you can get fairly effective results just by letting people go about their daily lives and conducting a survey with an even larger sample size, to further reduce the chance that the non-controlled variables are creating outliers in the study.

So, with that, we can either do something like

- Rape 10,000 children and study them.

or we can do something like

- Survey 100,000 people using proper statistical methods.

The second type of study provides valid insight, just like the first one, with the added bonus of NOT HAVING TO FUCKING DIDDLE KIDS IN YOUR BAT-SHIT CRAZY /POL/ CAMPS, YOU MENGELE-AGGRANDIZING FUCKWIT.

Hopefully this post will help you understand the beauty that is the study of statistics.