>>28940189 I'm fairly certain that almost all of the KKK owns a firearm. What's stopping them from just showing up at a BLM movement and having at it? Does their sense of honor prevent it because it wouldn't be a fair fight?
>>28941115 >family full of hillbillies doing hillbilly things >son gets pissed off at abusive dad >leaves and never going back >hillbilly inna city >has kids of own >oh shit, family is important >hillbilly morals floppy disc installed >move to rural area >visit family often for sake of kids >kids now hillbillies but more opportunity, less banjo I've gone more city, but hillbilly dies hard and surfaces when it is tested. I still have a lot of friends and family back there.
>>28939907 Not really because crazies will be crazies, whether its a crazy with a gun or a crazy nation with a nuke.
Just like there are some people who should not be allowed to have guns at all, there are some nations (really, most of the world's nations) that shouldn't have any nukes at all.
Specifically with nukes, mutually assured destruction only works between great/super-powers, as they have enough people to manage and enough cool-minded people in high government ranks to not do anything stupid (i.e. have a nuclear arsenal in being but never use the nukes).
But then you get to, say, the shitstorm between Pakistan and India, and a nuclear exchange would be on a small enough scale that the only thing really holding back either nations are the greater world powers convincing them that nuke usage is not a good idea. (Thankfully, tensions between Pakistan and India seem to be cooling quite considerably.) North Korea has a similar situation where the only thing really holding them back from nuking the South is a near-nonexistent nuclear arsenal and China keeping the Kim's on a leash.
And if the numerous little unstable sub-Saharan African nations/Balkan states have nukes to fire at each other, it would be a fucking nightmare.
MAD only works on a large scale between sober governments.
>>28943151 not that anon, but it's not so much the general public finding the killing justified, so much as the killer themselves thinking they were justified in killing.
Although, whenever a police officer shoots anybody & it gets national media attention, there are always a substantial number of "thin blue line" drones who will defend even the most inexcusable actions on the part of an individual officer.
It wouldn't do shit just like banning every gun. Gun laws and crime rate are independent the only difference is how often guns will be used in crime. In my middle-class canadapoor suburban I don't even need to lock the doors why because half the neighborhood have 100k+ of income some might even be millionaires will I am barely in the middle-class.
This doesn't work one goddamn bit. There are insane motherfuckers who do not care. I believe in gun control, and its purpose is to keep all the guns out of the hands of some people, not this fucked up britbong bullshit of keeping some of (the end goal being all) the weapons out of the hands of everybody.
But yeah, if every adult had a gun, we'd have less crime. But there's a better method.
As for the nuke bullshit. If a nuke goes of, world peace is a lie.
Its fairly obvious who should and who should not have nukes. People can see that, its a displayed trait of society through social interaction.
As for abuse of power, this is also a displayed trait, and should be handled by the masses. The 2nd amendment for example, was implemented for this reason. Expand that very same concept to a global scale, and you get shit like the U.N.
>>28944393 >Australian >pretending like your not part of the commonwealth Plz, Britain would've cried "BooHoo" and your PM would bend over for the queens dragon sized dragon dildo. Then you would've just given them to us.
Stay mad europoor.
>inb4 Ausfalia's not in eurrrooopppp Its still a territory that is apart of a European country. It still counts, fags
>>28939907 No. Governments are monopolies on violence. It is in their nature and purpose to start or be involved in conflict of some sort. >>28939968 And this. >>28940105 >using nukes >minor conflict Sure thing, buddy.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.