If China is so confident on the ability to sink carriers and crush US fleets with missile spams, then why are they building their own?
If carriers are such shit, why does every country that can afford to build them produce them?
Force projection. China is saying a lot of imperialistic fuck fuck games in the waters around their country claiming a lot of islands that other countries also claim. To make their claims stick they need to be able to project force across large distances, carriers would let them do that.
Pretty sure that's their land based pilot training thing.
We know they have one carrier in service, and there are pictures around of the real second one in construction.
Fuck, they've even confirmed it officially. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-12/31/c_134968258.htm
>If China is so confident on the ability to sink carriers and crush US fleets with missile spams, then why are they building their own?
To fight nations other than US after burgers would be BTFO.
There is historical evidence to back this up. All the SEA guys are wailing about is 'Muh Feelings'.
Reminder, supporting anti-Chinese sentiments on the South China Sea conflict is the same as supporting libertarian anti gun soccer moms and Sanders.
then how come libertarian gun of soccer mother is unlabeled drivel? i highly suggest that this topic should of turn into sour because of mixed america feeling like >>28660590 and group of us should of cease all this discussion of People's Liberation Army Navy is unbeatabre.
That map is fucking hilarious, Chinks are greedy as fuck. Only reason they want their own carriers is because the US just parks one of theirs in the waters they claim and can't do shit other than cry.
As expected of those who cannot allow themselves to believe in facts and historical data. Once China becomes the lone superpower, maybe history will be altered to the Party's will too.
Your logic is flawed.
If they would be shit, no one would care about sinking them and developing technology to do so.
They have these missiles BECAUSE carriers are awesome and useful. Und if you destroy enemys stuff that is useful to him....well thats basically warfare.
And when country x destroy all carriers of country y, it would be nice to have some carriers for country x to keep the coasts and sea around country y secured.
We develop these missiles to destroy them because WE CARE
Nigger, China boasts itself as an economic powerhouse but in reality, it cannot even feed its own people. Farmers are so underpaid and taken for granted that they are forced to crowd into cities for the sake of getting jobs, causing even more problems in the country's food supply.
And they did not even bothered to fix that problem.Chen Xiwen has declared that China has stopped its goals of pursuing self-sufficiency in food and has officially become the greatest importer of agricultural products next to the US
Supreme leader Sanders will not find your post agreeable. He is very pro gun. Your bolt action rifle is enough to protect you. Turn in your kid killers or face the consequences.
>There is historical evidence to back this up
Oh China, you should stop drowning yourself in nonsensical propaganda once in a while
yep. and it's all staples.
the US and EU trade and export close to a net zero of food imports/exports
>but dat doesn't make sense
by $ amount
>wut r u implying anon
They import grain, corn, wheat, etc. from us and we import luxury goods like chocolate, wine, beer, etc. from them.
if we cut off trade with Yurocucks they'd starve to death as Ameriburgers complain about having "swiss chocolate" made in south america in their Ghirardelli and no more heineken. Because the US is the planets grainbelt. Because even if we weren't, we have the biggest navy. And the most, largest, best aircraft carriers. And the threat of the US stopping food imports and blockading anyone who tried to import food to them would keep any other official imports out of the region. American Empire will grow rarger.jpg
All your proofs are beased on UNESCO figures that are paid by American money? No wonder they are driven out of Russia. Very much propaganda. China does not have the muslim problem like America, conflicts are resolved peacefully like HongKong persona non grata.
China is peaceful.
>China is peaceful.
China executes more prisoners than any civilized countries combined
China's ranks as the lowest in terms of internet freedom in 65 developed countries
China's press freedom is one of the worst in the world
China ranks as 84th in economic freedom while USA is at 14
China's rank in the Freedom index are one of the worst in developed countries
China's police brutality was referred to as a common everyday sight
And lastly, China's view on women are one of the worst in civilized countries
And this is not including the cases of corruption, organized crime, counterfeit goods, theft, piracy, and other issues that your oh so peaceful of a shithole proudly shows
>China executes more prisoners than any civilized countries combined
As provided by some American backed NGO to provide disinformation
>China's ranks as the lowest in terms of internet freedom in 65 developed countries
Still peaceful, my peaceful stands
>China's press freedom is one of the worst in the world
Only plugging disinformation provided by America, press freedom does not mean everybody speaks the truth most are anti China and are just propaganda.
>China ranks as 84th in economic freedom while USA is at 14
Statistics provided by American backed NGO meanwhile China still manufactures iPhones.
>China's rank in the Freedom index are one of the worst in developed countries
If you mean has little LGBT or Multiculturalism then that is good.
>China's police brutality was referred to as a common everyday sight
Culture shock if comparing police actions between different nationalities
>And lastly, China's view on women are one of the worst in civilized countries
And that's not bad actually.
Why does it have to be about weenie wagging, dude?
Anyway, the EU is only a small part, coffee and cocoa from south america, vanilla from Mexico and Madagascar, sugar from various island nations, spices from Asia, etc.
Luxury goods and spices are almost as important to a populace as raw staple crops, as it helps maintain order and an entire section of the civilian market.
>sugar from various island nations
>doesn't know about florida
>where we make so much sugar we have to subsidize it because it isn't profitable to make that much goddamn sugar
>hundreds of thousands of acres of sugarcane
>luxury goods are as important as staple crops
yeah because if the US cut off your yurocuck food supply you'd just subsist on chocolate and wine
>burgers mad that they have to drink folgers instead of fair trade coffee made from the crapped out beans monkey eat in columbia
>the same as starving to death
you may have a point there, the tumblristas would shit bricks at the threat of shitty coffee and making food from "staples" instead of imported french cambert and artisan goat meat from the finest czech mountain farms.
>And this is not including the cases of corruption, organized crime, counterfeit goods, theft, piracy, and other issues that your oh so peaceful of a shithole proudly shows
No freedom of speech, religion, or the press; No voting rights; imprisons and hardcore tortures critics= Great country!
How much of your monthly income is in 50 cent denominations?
Whenever I see a Chink saying that a source is American propaganda, I can't help but laugh.
It makes me wonder if the reason why they are so defensive is because they themselves are aware that their government cannot be trusted.
All those information that anon posted are common sense that you can easily find through a short google
Honestly, I love China and I'm moving to Shanghai soon but this is why we need Trump. Trump would probably be the most powerful person in history if he became president, considering his personal wealth and his ability to strongarm people. Hillary and most other candidates are shills and are small time in terms of worldwide influence in comparison to Trump.
Yes it does.
Saying a country is "peaceful" simply because everything unsightly is restrained and/or kept hidden from view is like saying that gunpoint threats are a good way of keeping civil order
>What'll they do when it's "done"? Flood the entire area?
Do you think they couldn't or would't? They could literally send a few thousand guys with shovels and picks to clear dig out that bit of land. Or just issue a few thousand grenades per man to a regiment and tell them to get on with it. Hell sending a ten thousand prisoners with spoons is entirely doable if the Party commands it.
Honestly theres nothing wrong with executing lots of people
If America executed criminals instead of giving them life in prison without parole, it would be in the thousands/tens of thousands every year, and all of them would deserve it.
This ofc, isn't even counting the foreign invaders like illegals, the negros who target whites, and the treasonous liberals who deserve death.
Capital punishment costs more than lifetime imprisonment.
Not to mention the chances of wrongful execution that would greatly shame the court of justice.
The only benefit that you can get from capital punishment is the fear value and better prison space. None of which are enough to compensate for the loses
When the autistic retards on /k/ see anything positive or even neutral, such as updates on chinese military projects, they feel uncomfortable, and immediately call the guy a paid shill so their autistic minds dont have to process the info they are seeing.
Peaceful is characterized by having the majority of those descrpitive words. China is, of any nation, not disordered.
It may be violent, it may be corrupt, but it is peaceful.
If disorder is all that matters was America during the government shutdown not a peaceful nation?
China is a peaceful country by any reasonable standard.
>the EU can't be bothered to grow enough wheat to feed itself=they can't grow enough wheat to feed themselves
Why bother farming like bitches when we can sit about making booze and just buying wheat on the cheap from across the pond? Sounds smart to me.
You realize it is meant to sway Chinese, and not foreigners who the CCP gives 0 fucks about?
If anyone is BTFO, it's not Chinese people and Zhang, but the CCP.
/k/ posters really believe the CCP is on /k/ shitposting. How would they even track your "patriotic" posts?
>China is at #124 most peaceful country in 160 countries
>China is a peaceful country
The point is that, if you claim yourself as a powerhouse but you have a large margin between the poor and the rich, then you are nothing more than a sand castle.
In the food pyramid, the ones at the top need the ones below. But the ones below can live without the ones at the top. If you refuse to take care of the majority of the population, then its only a matter of time till your country destroys itself
Straight from the 2014 report you illiterate.
Also, 98% of countries in the world aren't at war. 108/197 says nothing about if the country is peaceful or not.
By your standard and this Index America isn't peaceful.
The ones at the top do need the ones at the bottom, but in China's case it doesn't matter if a load starve, they have more than enough peasants to get stuff done and a well established apparatus to get them to do it.
Either way calling one peaceful and one not is completely abitrary.
According to the top of the page both China and America are in the middle of the pack for peacefulness.
But in my view only a certain number of countries are not peaceful. Those at war or that have large scale wars in their countries.
Syria, DRC, Mali, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, etc.
China and America are peaceful countries. They just aren't as peaceful as Western Europe.
Shitposters can't let their bias go and realize that if China isn't peaceful than neither is America.
Alright. If you see it that way.
But the asshole kept saying America was peaceful even though the index shows America and China neck and neck.
I just am tired of the anti-Chinese hate and shitposting on /k/. 50 cent shill! Wahhhh
This whole board has gone to trash. You can't say "China" in a thread without getting a shitpost reply.
Every thread on the Chinese military has obvious trolls baiting about the Vast Superiority of China, and then the discussion about weapons turns into geopolitical shitposting.
Are posters on /k/ the most insecure people on Earth?
If they 50-centers stopped using the phrases "so-called", "american propaganda", and "ngo disinformation", it'd be much more difficult to pick them out from a random assortment of anons. As the situation stands now, its really too easy.
the average 18 year old gentleman in certain areas of detroit has certain traits. Therefore, people will generalize and assume that most 18 year old gentlemen they see in certain areas of detroit have those traits.
Its the same way with /k/. Most China-posters are idiot 50-cent jobbers, and so we assume that China-posters that use the characteristic style of 50-cent posters is in fact a 50-cent post.
>tl;dr : If it looks like a duck