Anyone else think that WA just passed i594 so that when they dropped this the state could get a piece of the panic action?
I'll just monitor the thread until I get banned.
The ride never ends. I know king county will cause this to pass in a heartbeat
curious...in those areas that have high concentrations of ex commiefornians....
Is there also a high concentration of hispanic illegal aliens?
The two literally go hand in hand.
Instead of purchasing a puppy or kitten, self hating liberal whites from commiefornia set up "sanctuary cities" where their illegal alien hispanic pets can reside, thereby providing cheap and on-demand cheap labor (such as gardeners or house cleaners).
Rich californians set up white suburban enclaves where nothing appears to be wrong, from where they can cheer on diversity and vote for gun control because they feel safe.
I don't see it as likely. An assault weapons ban didn't pass after Newtown, the Colorado movie theater, or any of the other high profile shootings. I don't see why there would be support for it to pass now.
Olympia lowlife here, we matching on the capital again?
California isn't that bad in terms of gun rights. The criminals have to actually tell the police the person they are about to rob is mentally unstable or depressed before doing it, where as before the criminal would just rob people, which could potentially lead to worst consequences than just a rape of a single mother by the hands of her abusive partner.
>mfw there are probably people in this shithole of a state who believe this
>the fuck is happening?
Over half of the population west of the mountains has moved to WA from OR or CA in the last 30 years, bringing all the shit-tier liberalism with them.
Over fucking half of the population in that area. It's literally the largest state-to-state immigration since the Gold Rush.
Here is your court ordered reply to ensure you don't feel under appreciated. You are special and unique, and your opinion matters. Please go with love and joy into the universe. Namaste.
Daily reminder that a Supreme Court decision in the 1960's guaranteed the tyranny of the libtard urbanites.
>"...the forces of our national life are not brought to bear on public questions solely in proportion to the weight of numbers. If they were, the 6 million citizens of the Chicago area would hold sway in the Illinois Legislature without consideration of the problems of their 4 million fellows who are scattered in 100 other counties. Under the Court's new decree, California could be dominated by Los Angeles and San Francisco; Michigan by Detroit.."
I think so. There was plenty of talk about that after Gore lost. But it all came to nothing.
See this timeline? This is you in ten years unless you get off your asses and fight. The bastards never stop.
>That whole paragraph
>The fact we don't have an electoral system locally
I thought that was the fucking reason people bitched about Gerrymandering and that we just needed to adjust the numbers. We don't have that at all?
Wow, fuck the Supreme Court, fuck this, this needs to get brought back up and fixed. This is the reason certain states are in fucking disrepair, and why Democrat areas can rot and die as they always do and drag the rest of an otherwise red state down with them because of this with no fucking recourse.
I can't even say fuck this country, because nowhere else is even close. We just need to fucking fix this.
Fuck everything. Take all of my hate.
>posts where I'm getting btfo are fascism
>(ii) Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that
30 can be held by the nontrigger hand;
Would this ban the mag well of an AR-15 that exists on the receiver below the barrel?
>(iv) A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or
33 completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the
34 firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned, but excluding
35 a slide that encloses the barrel;
>but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel;
What the fuck does this even mean? Like I know they want to ban le ebil tec9 heat shield, but would this ban just normal handguards? What about the M1 garand stock? Would this just make it impossible to hold any rifle with 2 hands?
>(c) A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following:
>(ii) A folding stock, telescoping stock, or thumbhole stock;
Isn't that by definition not a fucking pistol? A pistol that has a stock is an SBR
To answer all your questions and, especially, that one, the people that make this shit up largely don't know about current gun legislation, let alone how guns work. Or, more likely, just don't care.
>Can't find pic of Feinstein vs. Little Girl offhand, so have this