[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
AN-94 at 300 meters
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 56
Thread images: 6
File: 13395463.jpg (412 KB, 1200x1600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
13395463.jpg
412 KB, 1200x1600
AN-94 at 300 meters
what do you think?
>>
File: 13395461.jpg (330 KB, 1200x1600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
13395461.jpg
330 KB, 1200x1600
a closer look
those pic is not mine though
>>
>>28438312
Nothing too special for a 74. What were the shooting conditions? Was it standing, kneeling, prone? What fire mode? How long did it take?
>>
File: laughingwhores.png (468 KB, 449x401) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
laughingwhores.png
468 KB, 449x401
>>28438312
>50+ cm "group" at 300 m
>roughly 6 MOA

Very impressive, comrade Nikonov.
>>
>>28438312
That looks like he's got his entire finger in the trigger well, doesn't know what a sight picture is, and is standing on one leg while mouth-breathing to shoot.
>>
>>28438355
>What were the shooting conditions
in a Russian army shooting range
>Was it standing, kneeling, prone
squatting
> What fire mode
semiauto
>How long did it take
seem like he finished a full mag
>>
>>28438375
>doesn't know what a sight picture is
they have peep sight on AN-94, not open sight like AK
and the shooter complaint about he cann't hit anything at 100 and 200 meter with iron sight
>>
>>28438312

I think you suck at this.
>>
>>28438312
it's a rifle not a shotgun

shoot groups not willy nilly
>>
>>28438494
Apparently he can't hit anything with peep sights, either. Was it Michael J. Fox firing?
>>
>>28438356
iron sights*
>>
Lmao you guys serious? I'd love to see some of your "groups" at 300 yards with iron sites...lol keep it coming /k/.
>>
>>28439710

Are YOU serious, nigger?
He managed to hit a silhouette sized target roughly 2/3 of the times, shooting supported.
That is sub par no matter how you look at it and if you think otherwise, you have some seriously low standards.
>>
Don't listen to these guys. They are being hard on you; at 300 meters with iron sights, you did pretty decent, but it does leave room for improvement.
>>
>>28439884
The Russian Army has some seriously low standards, though. They're still fans of the fire saturation thing
to them, volume of fire is far more important than accuracy.
The US thinks this too, but to a lesser degree, yielding soldiers that can still shoot straight
>>
>>28438312
>>28438321
I'm assuming the white marked ones are part of one group, and the unmarked ones are once he got the sights on.
I'd say he did ok on the latter. It's mostly an up/down string on most holes so I'd guess he was probably doing it offhand, maybe sitting, or at least something other than a solid bench.
I shoot 400 yards fairly often with ak irons, or very similar, that's what I'm basing it on. He would have clanked my targets on most shots anyways if I brought them to a closer 300m.
>>
>>28439884

>anything less than 40/40 with irons in army marksmanship qualification is sub-par

lol
>>
>>28439884
Post some of your supported 300 meter shot groups with iron sites.
>>
>>28440023
Lmao confirmed for not serving in the past 20 years.
>>
>>28440804
...do you keep random pictures of your groups on hand to show to an internet anime discussion board?
>>
>>28440826
Nope I'm assuming you don't as well. It's because you can't do it as well as that guy.
>>
>>28439710

I haven't shot a grouping over an inch in almost a decade
>>
>>28440843
Sure you haven't.
>>
>>28438312
I think it looks like shit. Is that supposed to be an improvement over the AKM because it doesn't look that way at all.
>>
>>28440835
dude that's like a 15 MOA group he's got going on.

I generally shoot groups of about a foot with AK irons at 300 yards, which is ~4 MOA. Not great, but better than our conscript in the OP.
>>
>>28440879
Yeah I'm sure you do. Those pics are some serious proof.
>>
File: 1448229141067.jpg (95 KB, 640x480) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1448229141067.jpg
95 KB, 640x480
>>28438458
>slav
>firing position
>squatting
Full kek.
>>
>>28438312
>AK
>Accuracy
>>
>>28440902
you realize the average AK can shoot ~2 MOA, right?
>>
>>28440930
I'm sure it can, just do not for one second believe that you, or the average AK owner can shoot 2 Moa.
>>
>>28440804
>HOW CAN YOU SAY ITS SHIT LETS SEE YOU DO BETTER!

I thought this fallacy was dead.

Better tell surgeons that it's okay to remove the wrong organ because the average person can't perform surgery.
>>
>>28440879
Bullshit, my friend is an amazing shot (he was the DMR for his squad on his second deployment) and at 300m with an aimpoint he can group his AR15 at around 5-6 inches. Shooting my AK74, which he has alot less experience with, he can group it at 10 inches with irons.

All of this is prone of course. Iron sights are not conducive to precision shooting, just good enough to hit a man. Anyone claiming to shoot 5 inch groups with an AK at 300m is full of shit.
>>
>>28440949
Nutnfaggot shots submoa with his sgl using irons, fuck off nogunz
>>
>>28440954
Bullshit
>>
>>28440958
Maybe there are two videos but even he wasn't impressed with the group sizes on the gold standard video.
>>
>>28440969
>average AR15 is a 1.5 MOA rifle
>optimal conditions it can shoot a 4.5 inch group at 300m
>AK74 is a 2-3 (lets say 2.5 which is less than it really is IMO)
>AK74 can shoot a 7.5 inch group at 300m

None of this factors in the human eye trying to use the shit sights at that distance, merely the inherent accuracy of the gun.
>>
>>28440954
Reading comprehension, my man.
4 MOA at 300 yards is about a foot, or 12 inches.
>>
>>28441001
Your stories are bullshit
>muh friend is a sniper guise
>he doesn't use irons because muh accuracy
>aimpoint
Ask me how I know you're a lying piece of shit
>>
>>28441012
Yea and the picture is not 15MOA thatd be a fucking 45 inch grouping.
>>
>>28440958
And lol no, they were def not sub Moa groups unless there was a different video. Pretty sure you just go to the 25 yard indoor range and chicken wing shoot a man size target at 10 yards.
>>
>>28440993
Regardless if he was impressed or not he shot submoa with irons, you haven't refuted my point
>>28441023
He has a video on shooting with irons alone with the sgl and he measures the groups on cam, they are submoa, cry harder nogunz
>>
>>28441020
He never said the dude didnt use irons lol.

Do you understand what MOA is?
>>
>>28441021
Either way it's pretty fucking big. Off the paper at both top right and bottom left, I reckon over 3 feet
>>
>>28441032
I'm going to look for the video you claim. But yeah keep shooting .5 Moa at a 1000 yards with your nugget onegunz.
>>
>>28441048
Each group is only about a foot I don't know what your smoking but the ones with white around them are a different group from the ones without.
>>
>>28438312
duty as fuck
>>
File: Slav_magic.webm (3 MB, 640x480) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Slav_magic.webm
3 MB, 640x480
>>28440878
anything can be an improvement over the AKM
>>
>>28442935
jesus, are all these fucks actually drunk?
>>
>tfw that's my average grouping at 100m standing up
>>
>>28440958
No, he shot one 3 round group that measured 1.25" at 100 yards and a bunch of same sized groups at 45 yards which means fuck all because a one time 3 round group is retarded...
>>
>>28442941
>>28442935
its automatic fire, which isnt too bad for 100m
>>
>>28443039
if that's the case why are the holes appearing so slowly?
>>
>>28438312

I think that rifle is ugly as sin, holy shit.
>>
>>28443105
>thinking you mag dump

if you notice its several short groups of 2-3 shots
>>
Not bad for standard army in maximum effective range...
>>
File: 1430587641257.gif (737 KB, 117x186) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1430587641257.gif
737 KB, 117x186
>people are actually believing op
>what is reverse image search

you underage fucks always manage to prove that /k/ is the easiest board to troll
Thread replies: 56
Thread images: 6
Thread DB ID: 365788



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.