Marriage equality in Australia

>>53947346
it's not real marriage tho
I don't get it

Well it is not real marriage anyway so who cares.

>>53947385
>>53947411
This.

What is it with tourists and dying in Australia? It's not like they haven't heard it can be fucking dangerous here if you're a dumbcunt

next of kin should be listed for civil unions even if it's not religious marriage

australia should do separation of state thing and do civil union regardless of definition

File: laughingtrump.jpg (50KB, 662x563px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 662x563px

>>53947385
>>53947411
>It's not real marriage because it hurts my feelings!
You do realize that marriage is a government thing and not a religious thing, right?

>>53947528
I'm not religious. It is still not a real marriage.

>>53947528
>being baited this easily

>>53947528
It can be both.
And yeah, it's not acknowledged in Australia so their government agrees with you too.

>>53947618
without religion what is the institution responsible of the "real-ness" of marriage?

>>53947648
Biology.

>>53947648
The number of penises

>>53947669
lol wut.
How do you explain marriage with biology?

>>53947669
no!

if that's the case then explain the discrepancy of non-married live-in couples in continental europe with multiple children

>>53947698
Marriage is for procreation and raising of children. If it does not involve this then it is not a real marriage, it is just two people fucking.

>>53947707
A bunch of liberal faggots trying to undermine the bedrock of a society.

>>53947739
they've been doing it since after ww2

the "liberals are destroying us" is not the reason why you don't have a wife

>>53947739
>for procreation and the raising of children
This hasn't been the case for a while, it's not necessary for that anymore as an institution.

>>53947739
>marriage is for procreation and raising of children
Procreation and raising of children does not necessitate marriage.
It would be ideal, but still that's a pretty weak argument man.

>>53947822
>This hasn't been the case for a while
It is always the case,a ll that changed is that less people are having real marriages. A society cannot survive without real marriage.

>>53947797
The liberals are destroying us is why the west is dying.

>>53947863
>Procreation and raising of children does not necessitate marriage.
Of course not, but marriage is the best place for this.

>>53947346
> Australian Flag
> Is a homosexual and a weaboo

AHAHAHA

>>53947888
Don't extrapolate your local cuck fetish on to global marriage policy, birth rates are fine in the west if you don't flood your population with trash.

>>53947944
Birth rates are not economically sustainable. You just want social liberalism without having to deal with the reality of what it means to have a dwindling population. So you deny this truth in order to avoid the realisation that you yourself are part of the problem.

>>53947995
A large part of modern industry is rapidly moving towards automation in the coming decades. It's not sustainable to keep piling on more and more worthless excess population to compete with fewer and fewer jobs.

>>53948076
>This same prediction that marxists have been making since the 1800s has still not come true

>>53948118
That's not an argument anon.

>>53948177
Yes it is. The point is that it is one of those predictions that is not backed by evidence and has been made for hundreds of years.

Other notable examples being apocalyptic predictions and the socialist revolution predictions.

>>53948214
What people in the past thought is entirely irrelevant to the modern world.

>>53948266
t. idiot doomed to repeat the mistakes since he does not learn from history

>>53947918
> NZ flag
>

>>53948292
In the context of this specific argument, what I said is true. The exponential technological progress and the implications of that are something no one can answer but modern people. I'm sorry you don't have an answer and refuse to look at what is in front of you, but humanity has not had an equivalent to what we are experiencing now.

>>53948382
Except that automation has not occurred.

>American leftists are this delusional

>>53948445
Automation is currently occurring, and has occurred in parts of many industries already. A completely automated workforce does not need to appear for automation to have a tremendous impact on the workforce.

>>53947528
It can be a social thing, and you can't have a family with two guys, it's biological dead end

>>53948496
>it's biological dead end
That used to be the case.
Not everyone does the nasty to make babies anymore.