>It's justifiable to shoot to kill someone who is only robbing you
Really, Americans?
>>53653180
but how do you know he wont try to kill you after he rob you?
>>53653258
White people don't kill each other, they only kill other races.
>>53653180
>I will give my money away to some scumbag and let him go free to take from others
>someone who is only robbing you
or your neighbors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLtKCC7z0yc
Well if you shoot to wound they can sue you, so...
if they intend to rob you they might just kill you too, especially niggers
fucking aussiecuck
>>53653258
It's easier to kill someone then rob them than it is the other way around. If they wanted you dead they would be already.
>>53653180
>can't handle a bunch of emus
>doesn't know how to handle robbers either
The fuck Australia?
When everyone has a gun in order to protect themselves from everyone else who have a gun to protect themselves from everyone who has a gun to protect themselves from everyone who has a gun you have to assume they have a gun and shoot first.
SO HOL UP
Do aussies just let people rob them? For free? No wonder Lebs and boat people come in droves the whitey is weak.
>>53653180
Well, it isn't justifiable to shoot someone who is asking for money, but it is justifiable to shoot someone who is threatening you with violence. Why the fuck would it not be?
>>53653180
A gunpoint, yes.
My friend got robbed by some black guys in Florida, walking down a well lit street at night. They punched him so hard his jaw broke, and they literally ripped the back pocket off his jeans to get his wallet out. If the punch had been just a few inches higher he could be dead.
Robbery is a life or death situation.
>>53653180
You don't understand. You need to act like this if you want to survive in a non-white country.
>>53653510
mora riittää, ei ny tarvii ampua
>>53653398
Unless they don't know you're there. If someone is robbing someone else and they're carrying a weapon they could very well panic and hurt the homeowner just as much as the homeowner could panic and hurt them. It's ultimately dumb to at least not be carrying a weapon yourself when you hide or hunker down and wait for them to leave.
>>53653611
Better to ventilate them from a distance than risk blood contact and all the disease they're probably carrying. Besides, there's never any winners in a knife fight
>>53653494
I don't actually know anyone who has been mugged or robbed while they were home here
For shops they're all insured against it so it doesn't matter if the robber takes money
>>53653436
Yes, that's exactly how it is here in Texas. Every day everyone is shooting at everyone else, it's a constant barrage of gunfire 24/7. Stay where you are.
>>53653616
I guess there's a difference in that pretty much no robbers here would be carrying a gun
>>53653398
Wrong. The best way to rob someone is to keep them quiet with the threat of force, have them give you the money so you don't need to dig through their pockets, then kill them so they can't report it.
If you open up with killing them they'll usually have time to scream, and you're stuck patting down a bloody corpse when you should be running.
Only when they're in my house, 2bh, and even then, I'd hope they'd fuck off when they saw the gun.
It's shoot or be shoot.
>>53653616
lmao, literally >>53653436
You have to have a gun and shoot them because it's safe to assume they have a gun and might shoot you.
>>53653703
No. What the fuck.
Minor robberies go on the bottom of the to-do list for the police. Armed robberies go about midway. Murders go to the absolute top and the FBI might be called in.
You'd be a pathetic criminal.
>he doesn't want to kill criminals
>>53653631
but it's more fun and better exercise
>>53653303
>White people don't kill each other, they only kill other races.
Germanics are 100x whiter than Anglos
>>53653699
They don't need a gun to be violent though. House robbers are more likely to be drug abusers or impoverished, or just desperate in general. There's really no reason to not have something for self defense unless you're worried about that something being stolen or a family member hurting themselves with it. You don't take precautions with seat belts and other safety measures.
>>53653749
lmao I LITERALLY never mentioned a firearm in the scenario, nor did I mention you attacking them on first sight.
>>53653769
I don't know about you, but I've had more than my share of wrestling with junkies and niggers. Don't really miss it desu
>>53653180
Yes, really.
I'm not saying that I'd actively go for a fucking headshot or something, but frankly if you threatened me with force I couldn't give half a shit if you survive. People who deserve to live don't fucking rob others.
>>53653762
That depends on who's getting robbed and where it's happening. In a lot of places the top of the list is already clogged with a dozen cold murder cases that they can't get a lead on.
If someone else initiates aggression without provocation you should absolutely be able to put them down. Why should you put you life at risk for the sake of a violent criminal who has wronged you?
FACT: Attempting to kill them makes you more likely to die
>>53653180
Never understood why a criminal would rob in the first place.
>Pickpocketing is easier and less likely to get caught for
>>53653920
only if you're a beta auscuck lmao
>>53653920
I'd rather die defiant than live a bitch.
Especially when there's a non-negligible chance of dying a bitch.
An eye for a eye leaves the whole world blind
>>53654093
Better the world be blind than only eye-stabbers can see.
>>53653180
My stuff is worth more than their life.
Why shouldn't it be legal?
>>53654151
rekt
>>53653799
3 am nakkijono on kansan perinne
>>53654093
This is a matter of self-defense not revenge.
>>53654202
It's not self defence if they're only robbing you
My right to feel safe is more important than anyone's life.
>Let someone take my shit
They are fucking breaking into your home, taking your shit, and potentially threatening your or your family's life if they are armed. You have every reason to kill the fucker, they are a criminal who is actively wronging you, they don't deserve compassion.
>>53653920
Source on those FACTs?
>>53653303
but only blacks commit crimes and only whites get robbed so that doesn't apply here
>>53653180
>He waz a good boi HE DINDU NUFFIN
>Auscucks
>>53654242
>>53653920
Forgot my image
>>53653180
Yes, really. He practicaly said it was okay when he broke into my home
>>53654221
Not more important than mine bitch.
If I see you I'll probably kill you first famlad
>>53653180
Yes, really
Go fuck yourself with your "guns are illegal so I'm safe" bullshit
>>53654227
Your replaceable shit is really worth more than someone life?
>>53653180
He believes the already violent Australian culture is anything like the violence in American culture and that people don't just decide to kill in yanky land as it is easier than dealing with a live victim hence requiring a similarly lethal response from 'victims'.
If some cunt comes with the intention of hurting me why should I go easy on him? Why should I face jail for his decisions, if eh had kept his hands to himself he would be fine, why should I be punished for his inability to obey the law?
>>53654219
>>53654219
>>53654219
How does one rob somebody else without initiating violence? Do people in Australia literally just empty their pockets when someone who's unarmed tells them to?
Crime in my city dropped significantly after they passed a law in the 80s requiring every homeowner to own a gun and ammunition.
>>53653180
>There are human beings who would rather wait around for a nine minute Polive dispatch over defending ones self in a few seconds
America doesn't have a gun problem. It has a black problem.
>>53654349
Yes.
>>53654349
Yes.
>>53654376
Yes. They're all a bunch of pussies.
Everything that can kill a man is fascinating, guns, electric chairs, paracetemol, lead piping.
>>53654349
Yep
>>53654349
No, but I'll be attempting to stop the guy from taking off with my shit and then shoot him if he resists.
>>53654349
My Avengers Hot Toys figurine collection is 100% irreplaceable.
If you don't live in a pussyfied country, yes.
>>53654376
Breaking into someones home assuming the homeowners aren't home obviously
>>53654219
If someone points a weapon at you, you should assume that they are going to use it. If I have a choice then I will not put my life in the hands of a violent criminal.
>>53654349
its meant to be a deterrent. if you rob someone you are risking your life. is that worth a few bucks? the violent crime and robbery rates in the vast majority of areas here are pretty damn low. yeah we have a higher murder rate than most countries, but we also have a massive gang (black urban culture) problem and it would be much more widespread if it weren't for our great self defense laws.
>>53654406
>>53654421
>>53654454
And are any of you anti-abortion?
>>53654559
I'm not
>>53654495
wow. meanwhile in texas...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irNlyAGJh3Q
>>53654534
Adequate police and jail time is a much better deterrent
>>53654559
Unborn babies aren't subhuman criminals.
>>53654629
>mothers should be forced to raise rape babies because life is precious
>but not as precious as the $50 in my wallet
>>53654495
That is so fucking dangerous.
The FBI and friends have conducted studies and tests for many decades showing that under 21 feet a guy with a knife can fuck your shit up. While I am sure 99% of /int/ would cheer on how great it is the cops didn't waste him like it would have happened in America, what they did is 100% methodically wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_KJ1R2PCMM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75RTkGbiJpk
>>53654705
Rape babies are completely justified in aborting. However the majority of abortions are used as a form of birth control.
>>53654559
Personally I disapprove of abortion, but I don't believe it should be illegal.
It's better to abort than to birth a child into poverty or abuse, but it's much better than both to not get pregnant at all in those circumstances. Let public shaming and ostracization prevent frivolous use.
>>53654615
This cuck does not represent my nation. If someone is in my home I have no clear knowledge of his intentions. I have a large khukri next to my bed and will happily lodge it in his neck. Let's remember he won't be alive to state fact from fiction.
>>53654559
Nope
>>53654600
Nice.
>>53654719
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CXqta_zX20
Yeah i know, but i'm pretty sure 2 cops would be able to grab him down and hold him. That was just pure autism.
>>53654559
I'm not!
>>53653581
>mfw Americans are so frail one punch is enough to nearly kill them
man you glassjaw cunts really do need those guns lol
>>53654792
*unsheathes shurikens*
Heh, not today kid.
it is
>>53653180
Once you surrender control of the situation, you have no power to decide what happens next, just saying.
If I were to get attacked here I would do whatever I could to make the attacker completely unable to act in any way.
>>53654792
Just buy a scattergun m8. A good old pump action and you can deter someone with just racking the shotgun.
>>53654859
You've never heard of one punch kills? You must be sheltered
>>53653303
>remove nonwhites
>no homicides ever
>>53653180
Hell yes it is. Especially if you are poor imo, you have the right to defend your property with lethal force.
How... emasculating.
>prison island
>don't want people to use deadly force against criminals
Seriously though, it should never be the victim's responsibility to identify what the assailant's intentions are, under circumstances where a split second decision has to be made. Under such circumstances one should assume that the assailant mean to inflict bodily harm or death, and appropriate levels of force should be applied to defeat it.
What kind of sick degenerate society would put the victim in a situation where they have to pick between getting into trouble for "excessive" force or being at the mercy of whatever criminal scum attack them? Oh, wait..it's Sweden isn't it..
That being said, I do recognize the value of de-escalating potentially violent situations and that should be one's first line of defense.
Just my 2¢ :^)
>>53654917
You're not from a place with lots of migrants or bogans are you?
>projecting rationality onto criminals
Pros case and hit houses when no one's home.
People with iq's flirting with 70 break in houses or businesses when the fuck ever armed. You can't expect them to act in any logical way. They're barely even people.
>>53653180
of course it is nigger
>>53653180
>"it's a dog eat dog world. if someone wishes to take my property, I let them, because this show of strength proves he deserves it more than me. should someone attempt to do the same to my wife or girlfriend I would also refrain from acting, as breaking into my house is an impressive act, and they would probably enjoy it more than intercourse with me either way. bottom line is, degenerate weaponry is for weak, overcompensating weaklings, and those trying to conquer nature, rather than let it run it's course. it's disgusting, and frankly, I despise everyone who does not want to remove all weapons from the world. societies should not be allowed to do as they wish, as this would not fit into my socialist agenda. last but not least I implore all of you civilized folks left in the world to join me, and that the rest take my words into consideration."
T. Australibait
Trying to stop somebody from robbing you is rude, guise.
>>53655679
This is what you sound like OP...
It's justifiable to rape your rapist back if he rapes you!
>>53653550
Nice
>>53654269
>Other weapon
>22%
This is why I always keep a lug wrench taped to my side.
>>53654600
Kek that thumbs up
>>53653180
Well, I live in a white neighborhood and own guns cause they're fun to shoot and go hunting with. I don't have to worry about self-defense because I don't bother to put myself in those situations
That said, hell yeah I'd shoot a nig if he tried to rob me, are you some pussy bitch faggot whose just going to bend over and take it in the ass?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkWgp2abM2w
>>53655247
This is a good post
>>53653775
Is this bait?
>>53653494
I live in one of the highest crime rate towns in Australia and I've never been mugged
>americucks can't into first world
>>53654559
nope.
>>53653920
>FACT: Attempting to kill them makes you more likely to die
but how can a dead man hurt me?
>>53654955
It is illegal in Australia to use a firearm for self-defence.
>>53656734
No, it's illegal to get caught after having done so
>>53654559
Only after there's a detectable heartbeat.
>>53654971
Well, they get kicked by sheep everyday, so i kinda understand them lol
>>53656734
Really? Even if someone shoots you with their own gun?
>>53653180
They shouldn't be robbing people. I hope more robbers get shot.
>>53654559
im a midwestern baptist, even from a non-religious standpoint i dont like it; if some chick was dumb enough to get knocked up she should have to live with that as well as the father
however, thats their fucking business along with whichever doctor to whom they go to get it done, not mine, not the government's, not anyone elses
and all people have the fundamental right to self-protection
>>53656946
Yes.
In order to get a gun, you need to give a few reasons why you need one, putting down self-defence will render your application null.
>>53657151
That's why you get the gun through some excuse and try your hardest to not get caught if you have to use it. And even if you do get caught, it's still better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.
>>53653180
EL OH EL
>>53657325
Fair enough but good luck getting the ammunition and firearm out of the separate safes quick enough when someone is breaking in.
>>53657388
Who's gonna know where you keep your rifles?
>>53656769
You do know that the heart will beat even without a brain, right?
sure is
cry more
>>53653180
Not here, but women is allowed to kill rapist, men isn't.
>>53653180
No problem. I shot a mugger a few years ago and my grandfather back in his day shot dead a mugger and two armed robbers.
>>53654559
Not at all.
>>53653398
True, but in my cunt there are lots of cases of thieves who killed their targets after robbing them.
>>53653180
>who is ONLY robbing you
>>53656441
Shoplifting isn't much of a crime.
>>53656745
The answer is right here.
Yeah asshole, it's called muh freedom. If some guy tries to rob a bank while I'm cashing my paycheck for buger-bux, I have the right to pull out my glock and wildly shoot at him. If I kill 15 innocent bystanders in my attempt to be a hero, oh well, it's all in the name of freedom.
>>53657404
The police when they periodically inspect.
>>53657872
Do they announce when they're coming?
The person who is "robbing" you made a decision to do so... (break da law) I feel like i'm well within my right under laws that govern me to protect myself and if i kill that person at the same time, so fucking what? The "robber" said to himself.. "Fuck other people, imma git mine" So i'll give it i think
>>53654971
Underage kids don't subscribe to reality
>>53657886
Not really. They're allowed to do so when they please but not too regularly.
>>53658054
Can they enter your home without you present?
If you rob someone you deserve to die
At that point you are scum. I especially hate people that break into other peoples' houses. I hate that it's against the law to shoot someone in the back if they're running away; I want that fucker dead.
Shoplifting from stores is not a death-worthy offense however but you are still scum
>>53658072
>I hate that it's against the law to shoot someone in the back if they're running away
wait, seriously?
so someone could just unload an entire clip at you then turn their back and start running, and you wouldn't be allowed to shoot them?
are we still stuck in the 2nd grade playground mentality??
>>53658140
you cannot shoot them once they are deemed not to be a threat to you. Which means if they take off you can only chase them to either the front door or yard. (Depends where you are at) However, as long as they are facing you and you "feel" in danger, it's pretty much fair game.
Depends on the type of robbery
Armed robbery, muggings, absolutely
you're a cretin if you think that's acceptable
>>53658062
I don't think so but I'm not sure how far their powers extend in that regards.
>>53658213
>chase them off your property
>they make it back to their car, where they have the rest of their ammunition waiting for round 2
this is why good old-fashioned neighborhood watches are still good to have
I'll fucking drop them.
It's justice. They will only live to do it to everyone else they find.
>>53658250
>I'm sorry officer, I was right in the middle of cleaning my guns when you arrived unannounced
OR
>They don't get in because you're not home
Problem solved.
>>53657886
Ir doesn't matter.
Never come to my dor unknown or unnonounced. Sell your fucking girlscout cookies in hell.
I've already pledged my money to charities that aren't yours.
>>53658348
That's nice, dear.
>>53658360
Any excess I have is already sent to children's hospitals. I don't buy any fucking cookies or awful tasting popcorn. Go away.
>>53658400
Really nice, dear. Now finish your vegetables or you're not getting any dessert.
>>53658416
Eugh...
Those Finnish assholes.
Same shit as always.
>>53658441
So what do you carry? Don't tell me you're some unimaginative twat who has a Klok 19.
>>53658270
Please, if you are trying to rob someone and they start blasting and you run, once you get to the car it's time to haul ass as the cops are going to be there quick.
>>53658463
Fuck it, i'm enjoying this
>>53658463
Carry?
Are you talking about a gun?
I usually don't. If I every do it's a heavy sidearm when I guide hiking trips. Like a raging bull. Don't ever knock carrying for them until you see how massive they are, or how terrifying they are when you see them. The animals here are enormous, and even the prey makes you see how fucking tiny you are as a human. Real talk, m8.
>>53658524
Well we have beavers. Are your animals bigger than those?
>>53658546
Yeah, a bit bigger :)
>>53658564
Bigger than an alpaca? I saw an alpaca once in a zoo.
>>53658586
Relative to my dick, they're very small. Yet these animals are massive.
Australia, we get it, your government took away your guns and you love shitposting.
Go get mugged by some abbos and let me know how you feel about not having a firearm to defend yourself with to keep them away or from defending your life. Knowing your luck you'd just be thrown into prison like a bitch because your nation no longer respects your right to life, liberty, or property. You've literally thrown away the most basic make up of liberal society.
>>53658612
Do you keep your dick rolled up like a butterfly's tongue or do you wrap it around your leg? I imagine it would be very uncomfortable if you accidentally stepped on your dick while walking.
>>53658477
you're assuming an urban setting.
I am considering a rural setting, where the cops will take a good 20+ minutes to even reach the periphery of your property
>>53658648
I just reach over to Flnland and slap people with it. It gets very cold on the way.
>>53658682
I bet every time you reach over some fucknugget in Britain tries to ban it.
>>53653180
>not defending your property from invaders
Are you suggesting we should just let home invaders steal stuff and leave?
>>53658698
My dick has the status of ambassador cock. Every time somebody thinks of something they did in their life that was humiliating it was just me slapping them with my cock.
>>53653180
faggot cuck
>>53658788
I guess that makes sense. The Brits are many things, but they sure can take a cock.
>>53658811
I wouldn;t knock the angloids.
They get pretty scary when they're pissed off.
>>53658891
You bring up a good point, and they do have a lot of muzzies they could throw at you. And we all know how well you burgers deal with muzzies.
>>53658700
Tell them to fuck off and call the police. Here the police will arrive fast if it's still in progress
>>53658914
Honestly?
We're full woolen killers and it's not a good idea to mess with us. We're not nice at all. We;re actually the epitome of paid mercenaries.
>>53654559
>if you support the right to shoot a nigga you must be a conservatard republican biblethumper
lmao
>>53659061
>We're full woolen killers and it's not a good idea to mess with us.
Well they kinda did succeed in knocking down a couple of towers. And ruin your economy in the ensuing war.
>We;re actually the epitome of paid mercenaries.
Now you're just taking the piss m8, nobody would ever pay Americans to do anything when you can hire Mexicans for cheaper.
Now I want to see what cartel vs. towelhead conflict would look like.
>>53653550
if you look at it you'll see that the robber is bringing a fake gun
>>53659184
Our special forces are unequaled, but they're not for sale. So are our medics. It's freakish how we stand against other forces.
We are the worst thing you could ever face in a conventional war, but we havent dealt with that for decades.
>>53655901
>he doesn't use a bowling ball
>>53659289
>Our special forces are unequaled
Eh, the Green Berets never seemed that tough to me. Sure they know their languages and can train sandniggers, but strict operating? Meh, I'd rather take a full battallion of army Special Forces than a single squad of Spetsnaz Alfa.
>So are our medics
What are they going to do, heal the enemy to death?
>>53659367
I heavily respect Spetnaz, however they have no chance against SEALS. They went into it because they were either batshit insane, or there wasn't anything else they were good for. Comparing them to the berets is useless.
Also, it's very important to have a team medic. We don't just cover up boo-boos.
>>53653180
>a person steals $100
>death
>person steals millions
>might not even get arrested or see court. no one really cares.
USA is fucked.
>>53659454
>I heavily respect Spetnaz, however they have no chance against SEALS
In a contest of which group can attract more media attention? Make books and lie about their achievements? Or fling shit on facebook like edgy teenagers? Yeah, the SEALs have the slavs handily beat in that fight.
If you want actual professional Burgers, you need to look at the SFOD-D. They were modeled after the SAS and act the part too.
>>53659524
Nothing they did was a lie.
They can drop right on top of you like a hammer.
I'm fully aware of that legacy. The SAS does not however have the legacy that SEALS earned in Vietnam. We invented the rebreather.
Don't stand near the shore.
>>53658985
>rural area
>police arriving fast
Maybe in cities, but out in the country the sheriff's department can be up to a half hour or more away.
>>53659617
>Nothing they did was a lie.
http://beforeitsnews.com/strange/2015/02/american-liar-chris-kyles-five-big-lies-2459738.html
Oooooh, poster boys.
>They can drop right on top of you like a hammer.
More like a Blackhawk. In Somalia. Or was that the Rangers? Same difference.
>Living in a city where people get robbed
Sorry I'm not poor.
>>53659682
Semantics.
We weren't allowed to engage back then.
It was however, an overwhelming force with no air-support. It was actually an act of treason from the executive branch but weeew.
>>53659774
>It was however, an overwhelming force with no air-support
You mean like a normal engagement? It's like you're saying your armed forces is completely incompetent unless backed up with the sledgehammer that is the USAF. I'm not sure I'd be proud of that desu ladm8.
>>53659821
Our engagements are defined by air supperiorty or else we don't do it.
Why are you continuing to argue?
>>53659876
So they're incompetent. Glad we solved that!
>>53659643
minimum of 30 min here depending on the time. sad thing is the volunteer fire fighters will show up in like 5 min at 4am to put out your camp fire
>>53659900
>only fighting when you have the advantage
>incompetent
I'm 100% done with you.
There are personal masturbation sessions that should take more time.
>>53659982
No, not fighting when you don't have the advantage is not incompetent. Pushing the problem to some other branch because you can't fix it is.
The Frogs, the Bongs, even the damn Poles have competent infantries. Know why? Because they get the job done even without having massive superiority in personnel and ordnance.
The burgers, though? They hit the deck and whine for CAS until someone drops enough bombs on the problem to flatten an entire mountain range.
>>53660090
I read nothing.
That cum on your face must feel great.
>>53660159
You still haven't finished your veggies, mister. No TV for today if you don't.
>>53656734
No one in Australia would recognize a gunshot.
>>53660716
I'd just assume it was a car backfiring
so your car just stops in the middle of nowhere and you look for help
you can't just knock on somebody's door because they will shoot you for hurr trespassing
nice law, murka
>>53657872
Licensed shooter here, the checks are generated randomly and the system, and they sometimes do announce when they will perform an inspection.
Gun must be stored in safe, with ammo separate. Laws might be different in your state.
>>53661199
yeah it doesn't make sense. why do americans even have front doors and doorbells if they just shoot everybody on their property.
You'll never know what he's going to do. If he's armed with a knife or something fucking kill him. Why gamble?
>>53653180
don't see the problem
>>53657383
...no.
Also, that 'lake' doesn't really exist.
>BUT MUH RIGHT TO DELIVER CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
Stay jelly, niggers.
>>53659643
>burglary in a rural area
yeah i'm sure that's a very relevant example
>>53662710
enjoy getting beheaded by refugees then
>>53662848
How can a refugee behead someone, if all their meagre possessions get confiscated to pay for their food and board?
>>53662960
>trolling this hard
:^)
>>53653180
>he'd rather give some criminal scum the benefit of the doubt that he won't attack and brutalize or kill him
How cucked can one person be?
>>53654399
>There are human beings who would rather wait around for a nine minute Polive dispatch over defending ones self in a few seconds
Probably not to face jail.
>>53665048
>entire legal system is based on innocent until proven guilty
c u c k s
u
c
k
s
>>53653362
Fucking legend.
>>53662960
>How can a refugee behead someone
Let me guess. That will never happen in Europe. Oh wait a minute ...
>>53659289
>the worst thing you could face in a conventional war
>what are ANZACs
>>53653781
he's right
unless it's organised crime coming to your house (in which case you dun goof'd), they aren't gonna have a gun
in which case the largest knife in the kitchen or even a cricket bat is more than adequate for self defense
not that i agree with our ridiculous gun laws but there is definitely a difference that dinguses like you fail to see
>>53653180
Anybody who consciously disregards the law should stand outside it's protection while doing so.
>>53667701
In Dutchieland we say: "It's the risk of the job"
It's the risk you take when you take on the job as burglar.
>>53667701
Aaaaaaaand this is the exact problem with the justice system - this does not happen.
>>53667886
At least, according the minister of justice in charge of the prosecutors.
>>53653303
Europe is a tiny chunk of land that is split into a million countries because white people couldn't stop killing each other for nearly their entire existence.
>>53653180
Sounds normal too me
>rob someone, don't expect do get your shit kicked it
My uncle went in prison for that.
The bastard died of blood loss by the time he was brought to hospital.
>>53667701
This is pretty much my view on the subject.
As I see it, someone who threatens or violates the rights of others forfeits those rights themselves. If you threaten another's life, you forfeit your right to live. If you violate another's right to ownership of property, your property in turn will be taken (in the form of court-ordered recompense).
Once you threaten someone with death or injury, you have no right to complain if they inflict death or injury on you in turn. If they elect not to do so, that is their prerogative, and it should be recognized as the deliberate act of mercy it is.
So aussies are clearly weakspined cuckolds.
Who's up for robbing a continent lads?
>work for something
>letting someone just have what is yours
How's the abbo cum out of your gf taste?
>>53653258
no one would waste a bullet on your worthless nigger ass.
>>53654349
Yes.
>>53654559
No.
>>53668494
and if you come home early and find one in your house that hasn't threatened you at all? Do you still shoot him?
Most robberies are not armed robberies
>>53668810
If you're in my house uninvited, you already ARE threatening my safety. One's home is supposed to be secure and within one's control. Trespassing destroys the sanctity of a dwelling.
Furthermore, "most" means jack shit. If there is ANY chance that they may be armed, I have every right to assume they are. I have no way to know what their intentions are, only that they've broken into my house, violated my rights and damaged my property, and I'd much rather risk a criminal's life than mine or my family's.
If I have the option, I'd ideally be able to simply yell that I'm armed and order them to get on the ground, then keep them there until the police arrive, but the ideal case doesn't always happen.
>>53653180
>someone who is only robbing you
>>53653398
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07slay.html?referer=&_r=0
Always assume the worse in these situations.
>>53667616
Good luck fending multipul pepple off with a bat or knife or if your a women.
>>53671675
Dont forget, raped then burned alive.
D-do foreignbros really feel this way? They care more about the criminal's wellbeing than their own and their family's?
>>53671675
The man you see in this image sat by and did nothing while all the girls in this picture were raped before his own eyes.
t. progress
>>53674970
No he got beaten with baseball bats until they though he was dead.
>>53676178
He is a Libtard so you could argue he was already dead inside.
>>53668810
The very fact that he is in your home proves that he is a threat. Feel free to cut loose on his ass.
>>53653398
tell that to my cousin
may he sit in peace
>>53653180
>You should not be allowed to protect yourself against criminals
Really Ausfailia?
>>53655247
Well said.
I never studied law or morality or such things, I study chemistry, but my feeling for it tells me its just to retaliate in a greater amount then the aggressor.
I dont mean you should whip out a minigun if someone accidently bumped into you while walking, I realize it is counter productive to over retaliate, but I think that if someone invades your private property or if someone tries to do you heavy body harm, you should be allowed to kill the aggressor in self defense.
I am so sad my country has retarded law, for example if you shot an armed aggressor, YOU would end up in jail for like 2 years or something. Its only natural to defend yourself damn it. What are you supposed to do? Call the cops while someone is breaking your leg or shooting at you or robbing you??
It should be legal to kill aggressors that show intent to kill you.
>>53653180
If he is robbing you you can always assume he can do worse.
>>53653303
>you
Whites have knocked themselves off world domination all by them selves.
>ww1
>ww2
>brits putting boers in concentration camps
The eternal anglo is the death of whites.
>>53655247
We live in a time where there are strong overtones of a criminal rights movement.