>muricans btfo

>>53644111
Did it take you 3 whole days to post this picture?

File: image.jpg (130KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1136x640px

>>53644111
"Finest soldiers in the world"
Barack Obama

File: 1400585714417.png (3MB, 1920x1920px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1920px

>>53644260
REKT

File: 1423346468215.jpg (49KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 330x319px

>Aussie upload speeds

>btfo by chinks wearing pajamas
>btfo by Afghans wearing pajamas
>btfo by Arabs wearing pajamas
>btfo by Persians wearing pajamas

kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_MpO1LQE_I

File: bradlaugh.webm (266KB, 494x260px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 494x260px

>>53644260

[This message has not yet downloaded to Australia[

File: 1450889462002.jpg (6KB, 239x238px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 239x238px

Why is it always other anglos making fun of this?
If America started carpet bombing Tehran over it, you'd be bleeding your assholes in overdrive here.

>>53644260
Nicely done

>>53644426
Because in case you haven't noticed the rest of the anglo countries are infested with muds.

File: bad.png (634KB, 631x459px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 631x459px

>>53644260
>tfw we didn't inherit banter from the english OR the french

>>53644426
>Like 'murrica would bomb anything capable to fight back

>>53644585
>iran
>capable of fighting back

>>53644338
This is funnier than the OP.

>>53644635
ok, that is maybe true. but, why is Iran not liberated? they don't need democracy and freedom or thay don't have enough oil for that?

>>53644585
I'm not a fan of vitamine B-52, but if Israel could bomb Iran, America should manage somehow.

>>53644712
Because why bother?

Iraq wasn't freed for oil, we have a shit ton of it, it was freed because Bush is a literal retard and he was still asshurt Saddam tried to kill his daddy. No one actually cares about Iran, outside of them not getting nukes and blowing shit up in other people's countries, except Israel and Israel has attacked them like five times with no consequences.

>>53644717
In 1981? Or you are talking about something else?

>>53644717
We'd probably use B-2s, F-22s, F-35s and Growlers at the beginning if we were going to. Iran does still have a moderately functional air defense network at the moment.

Buffs would go in a week later when all of that was kill.

In fact the Israeli strikes were pretty ballsy given the two sides capabilities. Credit to the commanders planning that the missions went so well.

File: 1449771018540.jpg (427KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 1920x1080px

>>53644260
France bringing the bantz kek

>>53644848
Tbf Iran's military was about 10 times more effective in 1981 than it is today.

>>53644111
>Saudi Arabia having problems with Iran
>Israel wants to attack Iran
>American sailors conveniently lose control of their equipment and drift into Iranian waters

Seems like a false flag to me

>>53644306
these are sailors though

>>53645220
Well that would be nonsensical as the Commander in Chief has spent the last year and a half trying to reach a detente with Iran.

File: 1452369167051.jpg (120KB, 800x457px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 800x457px

>>53645220
A false flag for what? The whole American boat thing was so insignificant that I can't imagine it's anything but coincidence.

>>53644111
>sailors fight back
>completely outgunned with one crippled boat
>eeveryone fucking dies for no reason
>international incident

Face it, if they had fought back and all died, everyone on /int/ would be laughing at them for being so stupid. You're gonna make fun of us no matter what the U.S. does m8.


>>53644260
Thank you greatest ally

>>53645297
About as nonsensical as having Navy equipment fail/run out of fuel and drift into Iranian waters

There is a thing in the military known as Quality Checks

The only thing the picture signifies is the Iranian propensity to attempt humiliation of a significantly more powerful country for domestic PR.

If anything, it reflects petty desperation.

File: 2016-01-16_10-17-22.jpg (47KB, 667x84px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 667x84px

>>53644509
sure thing

>>53645510
>mechanical objects never break
Are you a woman by chance? You sound like my gf did when she didn't put oil in her car for 8000 miles and the cylinder cracked when it was -30 out.

File: NorthwoodsMemorandum.jpg (383KB, 1206x1636px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 1206x1636px

>>53645433
Saudi Arabia beheads a bunch of Shia muslims
Iran says they will retaliate

Israel wants to destroy Iranian nuclear sites but needs a reason to do so

Do you know about Operation Northwoods?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

>>53645510
The US has had a million reasons to start shit with Iran, and has chosen the peaceful road in virtually all of them, most recently in refusing to sanction their ICBM tests despite pledging earlier to do so.
We've invited them to Syria's talks, given them more or less everything in the JPOA deal, trashed our regional relationships, and Obama has all but said in interviews he sees Iran playing a more significant role in the ME in the future.
Your entire argument is a /pol/-tier cui bono without evidence, and the country supposed to be benefiting (the US) doesn't.
>Quality-checks
Murphy's Law, you mental midget.
You have a mountain to climb to prove your point. As of now, you have a thought-terminating cliche. Good luck.

File: Screenshot_2016-01-15-18-22-40.png (228KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1080x1920px

>>53645638
You just going to make shit up and think no one is going to notice?

File: 1451962135720.jpg (38KB, 301x343px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 301x343px

>>53644396
Do we really need to go over Poland's instances of getting BTFO?
Because it's definitely going to be more than the 2,000 character limit

>>53644260
Kek nice one France.

File: tag out.jpg (90KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 638x479px

>>53645699
>Military doesn't do Quality Check before running things

Confirmed idiot
If the equipment fails the quality check it isn't used
Have you heard of equipment lock-out/ tag out?

http://navyadvancement.tpub.com/14504/css/14504_103.htm

File: preserve_baguette_HK417.jpg (182KB, 1247x797px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1247x797px

>>53644260
https://youtu.be/PIQSEq6tEVs?t=40s

>>53645770
Yes, I'm familiar. I'm stupid for not putting 1 and 1 together earlier.

Considering Iran's response, that would mean that Iran is either
A) Too smart to take the bait
and/or
B) Genuinely interested in creating a better relationship with the US

>>53645953
Are you suggesting that US military equipment never mechanically fails in the field despite these checks?

Are you retarded?

File: 1452781955172.jpg (8KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x250px

>>53644260
AUSSIES ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>53645783
>Muh question begging epithet
>Muh Argumentum ad lapidem

You have no argument other than your emotions
You present no counter evidence and resort to personal attacks because you are being proved wrong.

Why is my post wrong?
>because I said so hurr

>Murphy's Law
That explains everything
First their equipment broke
Then their radio
Then they drifted into Iranian waters
What a nice coincidence to conveniently happen all at once

Do you have any argument?
Seems to me your whole position is muh feelings

>>53646118
>Are you suggesting that US military equipment never mechanically fails in the field despite these checks?

What is reading comprehension?
Like I said before equipment is run it goes through a quality check. If it fails it is tagged out

Unless you can provide proof of this otherwise, retard

>>53646352
But anon..stay with me here
Just
Stay with me..

If it fails AFTER the check, like when it's in the field, there won't be a tag to warn the people operating it that it's going to fail.

I think you seem to be confused on the finer workings of the 4th dimension, specifically the part of it moving in only one direction under normal circumstance.

>>53646200
Your post is a monument to stupidity.

Not that that's a big deal, since the onus is still on you to prove your case, and you have nothing besides a cui bono. It's not even a good cui bono, as mentioned.

Again, good luck.

File: 1344942640001.gif (2MB, 330x278px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 330x278px

>>53644260
>Aussies will have to wait till next year to download this gif

File: 1344990131706.jpg (12KB, 212x185px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 212x185px

>>53644111
Those ''Americans'' look awfully brown......

File: 4303-baby-hurrrr.jpg (50KB, 404x267px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 404x267px

>>53646512
>Your post is a monument to stupidity.
>But I can't explain why, goodbye

>>53646687
You continue to fail to offer evidence anon.

Occam's Razor says it was a malfunction on the boat. Your theory is an elaborate false-flag-something-something. The burden of proof is on you.

File: burger surrender.webm (2MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x480px

>>53646458
Anon..pay attention here
Are you listening?
Hey listen!

If the Equipment fails or does not meet the requirements for the check it is not used

But i'm sure you think
The equipment failing (on two boats)
The radio failing (on two boats)
And them drifting into Iranian waters
makes sense to you

>>53646844
see>>53646870

How did two separate boats equipment fail and their radios fail?

You have no counter evidence but believe your feeling prove you right

>>53646936
Unless you have information the rest of us are not privy to, it seems there was a navigation error involved, along with a breakdown on only 1 of the ships.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/14/politics/navy-boats-iran-waters/

A single breakdown. Either one or two navigation errors, it's unclear at this point. Either way, quite possible, and more likely than the scheme you have mentally laid out, whatever it is.

>>53646844
What's the matter?
Are you speechless?
How does that crow taste?

>>53646870
You realize by your logic no piece of us equipment would ever mechanically fail in the field. Ever.

Any idea how many F-16s have had engine failures?

File: 4A8078449E794DFB8CC33ADD00A6F1AF.jpg (46KB, 675x360px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 675x360px

JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJA

>>53647103
>1 ship breaks down
>the other doesn't
>both don't radio for help
How convenient

Grasping at straws huh?

Im sure your article beats my webm from the Iranian navy though

Kinda like how the US Navy Claimed that Iranian ships were charging a US Destroyer but dropped that when the Iranians showed video of them keeping their distance.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/report-iranian-navy-chases-after-u-s-warships/

Do you remember that?

File: 1413875799283.png (13KB, 528x404px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 528x404px

>>53644260

>>53647179
You realize by your logic the US Military is a bunch of buffoons that doesn't know how to check their equipment

see>>53647265
So much for spending more on the Military

File: Amerifat surrender.png (28KB, 450x603px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 450x603px

Is not the first time.

>>53647347
>both don't radio for help
Why would they?
They didn't know they were off course until the Iranians showed up.
Exactly how long they had between them realizing and being taken into custody? Unknown. I wasn't there, and neither were you.

Again, a navigation error, and a breakdown. That's all there is to see.
Your belief that this indicates conspiracy is weak in isolation, and even weaker given that less nefarious circumstances are more likely.

File: 1448743968467.jpg (329KB, 960x768px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 960x768px

>>53645770
>needs a reason to do so
just like we needed in operation opera , nah if we choose to destroy their stuff (which we already did multiple times and killed some of their officers in syria) iranians will take it like a bitch because there's nothing they can do .

>>53645822
It says right there that he's right u idiot

>>53647412
>You realize by your logic the US Military is a bunch of buffoons that doesn't know how to check their equipment
....so you are retarded.

>>53644260
greatest ally always got our back

>>53647861
>....so you are retarded.
>pot calling the kettle black

Oh, the Irony!

File: Burn.jpg (217KB, 1920x838px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1920x838px

>>53644260
Kek

File: image.jpg (59KB, 342x380px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 342x380px

>>53644260
ABSOLUTELY REKT

>>53647640
>Why would they?
>Equipment fails stranded out in the sea
>hurr let's just drift around with our thumbs up our ass

Im sure that make perfect sense to you

>>53647640
>Again, a navigation error, and a breakdown. That's all there is to see.

Yeah, two separate ships just happen to break and drift into Iranian waters

>Your belief that this indicates conspiracy is weak in isolation
So far other than your feelings you've yet to prove me wrong
But you are a bootlicker so it is to be expected

>>53648037
Have you made one for the Spanish-American war too?

File: Spaniard and Indian.png (19KB, 450x603px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 450x603px

>>53648357
>Have you made one for the Spanish-American war too?

No but I have this.

>>53644260
DEVASTATING BLOW

havent read news in who knows how long wtf is happening here?

US cucks get captured by iranian cucks?

did they let them go? why not put up a fight? wtf cucks

>>53650093
One of our boats broke down in the persian gulf and drifted into Iranian waters. The sailors were detained by the Iranian coast guard and released 16 hours later.

tl;dr nothing happened

>>53650267
Well our female got

BURQA'D