There, they're, their

"over there"
They are
"it's their house"

>>53449260
Are you serious ? It's your own language, how can you struggle with these things ?

>>53449393
Immigrant, bro

To or too?

File: pépé.jpg (57KB, 500x392px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x392px

>>53449451
Still, that's not the most complicated thing with english imo.
>th sound

>>53449260
>The faggot lives there
>They're faggots
>That's their faggot

>>53449509
>Are you going to the faggot?
>You're a faggot too

Come on, it's not that bad people

>>53449260
english is the easiest language in the world and americans can't even properly speak it right. top kek

>>53449260
your a retard

>>53449509
"I sent the letter to him"
"one too many letters"
"two birds stoned at once"

>>53449260
>"the knight knows how to knife a knee"
>pronounced as "the night now how to nife a nee"
>not prnounced as "the cnight cnows how to cnife a cnee"

there refers to specifying a location be it physical or metaphorical

"There we can see the true meaning of his statements."
Or
"My coat is over there, on the couch."

They're is a contraction of they are so you'd use it in the exact same way.

"They're having dinner."

"We here, but they're still on the way."

Their is used in reference to ownership

"It's their home."

"Their cause was just, but their means were not."

>>53449634
the kuh nih gut, kuh naos how to kuh n-eye-fee, a kuh nih

File: [screams externally].jpg (24KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 512x512px

>"could of"
>"should of"

what's with black people and using "could of" instead of "could've"?

>>53449260
Their implies ownership.
There implies location.

Even if you're not a native speaker you should get they're is obviously a contraction. So you only need to memorize two.

>>53449713
Fuck, meant to write "We're here" in the 4th example

>>53449260
all easy
I had english from my 4th grade to my 12th grade.
Nigger.

>>53449753
They don't tend to value education as much as other races tbqh.

>>53449260
It's not that hard, Tyrone.

these are so fun that in canada we like to make up even more similar rules to remember

>practice vs. practise
>mould vs. mold
etc. yes, they have different meanings

Who /cantdomathhere/

Literally can't understand algebra
I need to use my fingers to do basic addition and minuses

>>53449753
usually its used as koud'v by blacks

>>53449844
>practice vs. practise
>they have different meanings

4 U !!!

>>53449875
thats not really a language problem thats just u being stupid

>>53449875
That's not good mang
Seek help

>>53449875
>>53449875
I can't even do long division. Good thing we have calculators.

>>53450065
dude thats like 4th grade level of education

>>53449875
I can't even count

Good thing I don't have to

>>53449634
French should not be talking about stupid phonics rules.

>>53449875
Break the numbers in your head into managrable chunks like base 10 or 5. You can make some rules that work for you too.

Say 57+68

I know 5+6 (or 5+5 =10+1=11) is 11 so 50+60=110
7+7=14+1=15
So 110+15=125 or 110+10+5

>>53450256
Based Mexico

And to think 20 seconds ago I wanted a wall to separate us

>>53450256
>mexico teaching algorithms

This board is like magic

>>53449944
>>53449968
Eh I'm pretty sure I'm retarded but I'm not diagnosed or anything

I'm content with my life working at subway for the rest of my life

>>53449260
Make sure not to throw through that hoop otherwise I'll end in the trough.

Just compare heart, beard, and heard,
Dies and diet, lord and word,
Sword and sward, retain and Britain.
(Mind the latter, how it’s written.)
Now I surely will not plague you
With such words as plaque and ague.
But be careful how you speak:
Say break and steak, but bleak and streak;
Cloven, oven, how and low,
Script, receipt, show, poem, and toe.

What amazes me is when I see anglos using them incorrectly (mostly in forums).

>>53449393
I think it's fascinating how some people struggle with concepts like there/they're/their or its/it's yet are still fluent and able speak normally despite having no understanding of the language's core concepts.

>>53450556
It shouldn't. Language is pretty malleable. In some varieties of American Southern, and Ebonic English ( if you consider that a thing) the word "they're" isn't used at all, replaced with they

>>53450256
common core pls go

>>53450556
Actually, it's mostly anglos who do mistakes like that.

File: 1337711458572.jpg (143KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1280x720px

>>53450405
>I'm content with my life working at subway for the rest of my life

bruh...

File: extremely smug.jpg (25KB, 377x364px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 377x364px

>tfw purposefully chuckling whenever foreigners can't pronounce the lovely Anglo-Saxon noise "th" voiced or unvoiced
>putting on a smug face while exaggerating the sounds
>I THink THe Thing went over THere
>mfw observing the poor shitskin's face of anguish as he feels he's failing miserably at my noble Teutonic language

>>53450713
That's pretty fine. My point is stuff like:

"over they're"
Their are
"it's there house"

>>53450556
That's because they're poorly educated and not taught the difference between different homophones. For example: you, as a foreign learner, are taught that "its" is a possessive pronoun while "it's" is a contraction of "it is", but many native speakers have no concept of this and just assume they're the same word.

>>53450938
I see. Thanks for the explanation.
Maybe this is a pattern in many countries... somtimes, even good-schooled Brazilians do make a lot of Portuguese mistakes.

>>53449260
While I fuck you are mother over there, my friends will fuck your gf and sister, and they're going to like it, because their little tight cunts will be dominated and penetrated hard.

>>53449517
>ZE

File: dearest creature.jpg (302KB, 736x2700px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 736x2700px

<pop>