ITT meme armies

>>53134723
India is the definite evidence that democracy cant work in a disorganized multi-ethnic 3rd world shithole.
As long as there isnt an indian dictator to unify everything by force and build up a functioning and loyal bureaucracy, India will be a literal shithole forever.

Is that gun an AK 74 ripoff?

>>53135220
no, looks like indian fn fal

>>53135220
Galil ripoff

>>53135220
INSAS.
It's a joke. G-36-tier.

>>53135014
Oh yeah because that's working great in the middle east...

Fuck off kraut

>>53135637
It worked great. But then, Amerfats had to support certain 'moderate rebels' to overturn these dictatorships.

At the moment, only Egypt is working kinda well again, due to their new military dictator BTFO'ing the muslim brotherhood.

>>53135713
No it didn't work great, and that's the reason why eventually the tensions accumulated in decades exploded into a civil war

>>53135637
Are you literally retarded? Genuine question here.

Look at any country before and after the arab spring. Where they doing better with a secular dictatorship or in a democracy?

Look at Irak, where they doing better under Sadam or now?

File: brits colonialism india.jpg (89KB, 604x424px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 604x424px

>>53135820
tensions existed since the greation of these states since colonial powers (yes, you) went there to fuck shit up and draw arbitrary lines in the sand to create unsustainable countries with internal ethnic and religious divie (divide et impera etc.). Coincidentially, this is also what the brits did in India as well, with reinforcing and institutionalizing the caste-system, even though the indians themselves nearly got rid of that by the time the brits went in.

>>53135014
India is the evidence that if the government is full of liberals and conservatives, they would let their people live in shit only to increase their own wealth.

>>53136330
It is basically evidence of the effects of democratic detachment; meaning that the democratically elected parliament, who bought their votes by literally handing out sausages to the poor (figuratively speaking), merely continue to rule over the heads of the people with utter arrogance.

It is pretty telling that the Gandhi-clan (not "That" Gandhi), are basically considering whole of india their own property.
What use does free media and 'checks and balances' have, if the entire country became the property of a few big and wealthy clans?

>>53136523
By the way, Ghandi is overrated.
Trade-union activists, commie and nationalist groups did more for the cause of indian independence than any Congress member.

File: democracy vs communism.jpg (459KB, 1392x1087px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 1392x1087px

>>53136681
Yeah, and Ghandi is also a hypocrite.

>>53136802
More like "western writers and movie makers are hypocrites"

>>53136802
ghandi was pretty based desu, he was a socialist too

I agree democracy a shit

>>53137016
He wasn't. Nehru was a socialist until the 1950s, Ghandi was quite conservative and would be satisfied with the status of dominion

>>53137016
Yes, the representative democracy is shit. Direct democracy is better.