what do y'all think of this article? >http://glasst

>>2374435
You would think Artwork/Critique would be more engaged than Random, do you really want to get shown up, glasstire is a national publication.

Anonymous 2016-01-30 21:53:50 Post No.2374472
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-30 21:53:50 Post No.2374472 [Report]

File: 1366718942517.jpg (39KB, 307x329px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 307x329px

>>2374454
youre talking to people that are mainly focused on improving their art as a skill and take the technical aspects of it seriously

this is a place that is biased towards that so when you show modern art like that its not taken seriously unless it brings something to the table which these unfortunately did not

better luck next time kid

Anonymous 2016-01-30 22:14:59 Post No.2374501
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-30 22:14:59 Post No.2374501 [Report]

>>2374364
I for once actually proud of you idiots, not only did you fucking spot the obvious bait that:
>I get the feeling i'm being watched
post but you fucking straight up called out all that pretentious bullshit for what it was

You did Da Vinci, Robert Florczak, Loomis, Kim Jong Gi, etc. proud and I love you

Godspeed in your artistic dreams you magnificent bastards

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/